Tuxedo Monkeys vs Ottawa Valley Ferrari Bazingas

TMHomeTuxedo Monkeys

9–4Final

OVAwayOttawa Valley Ferrari Bazingas

Jul 30, 2025 · Central C · Tailor Place

MVP Looees · 8.0 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Tuxedo MonkeysvsOttawa Valley Ferrari Bazingas

22Shots913

9Saves413

9Faceoffs won45

16Takeaways319

19Turnovers↓316

21Blocks425

77Passes3245

1:56Possession0:401:16

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Tuxedo Monkeys

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Sylvatic	5	0	5	13	0	2	2	8	7	2	26	0:29	123	5.74	6.04
Nano	2	3	5	5	8	3	2	3	7	13	26	0:59	161	6.20	8.28
Rosieyw	2	2	4	4	1	4	1	5	5	6	25	0:28	97	6.67	6.38

Ottawa Valley Ferrari Bazingas

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
4glass	3	0	3	6	2	3	2	6	2	2	13	0:20	102	5.70	5.75
Normalhumanboy	0	1	1	2	1	1	5	4	7	5	18	0:14	42	4.44	5.17
Looees	1	2	3	5	10	1	2	9	7	18	14	0:42	177	6.08	8.63

Sylvatic Tuxedo Monkeys

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.3

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	5	2	1.83	0.23	1.637	0.377
Assists	0	1.46	1.47	0.19	-0.994	-0.189
Shots	13	4.33	3.34	0.09	2.593	0.233
Passes	26	16.44	7.4	0.08	1.293	0.103
Saves	0	2.33	2.75	0.19	-0.85	-0.161
Blocks	2	5.93	3.8	0.11	-1.033	-0.114
Takeaways	8	3.35	3.05	0.11	1.523	0.167

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.417 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.834, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting → 6.3

Pucker+123

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	5	3.356	1.49	0.32	0.477
Shots	13	4.333	3	0.08	0.24
Saves	0	2.333	0	0.15	0
Blocks	2	5.931	0.337	0.07	0.024
Takeaways	8	3.349	2.389	0.12	0.287
Passes	26	16.439	1.582	0.08	0.127
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.5	1	0.03	0.03

Σ 1.184 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.392 − 0.164 turnover penalty = 1.228 → ×100 = 122.8 → 123

Offensive5.74

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.172	0.094	0.4	3.493
Shooting %	0.385	0.462	0.2	1.068
Assists per pass	0	0.089	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 5.742

Defensive6.04

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.333	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	2	5.931	3.679	0.2	0.736
Takeaways	8	3.349	9.531	0.25	2.383
Goals conceded	4	6.418	8.161	0.25	2.04

Σ contribution = 6.045

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Nano Tuxedo Monkeys

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR7.7

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	2	1.83	0.23	0	0
Assists	3	1.46	1.47	0.19	1.045	0.199
Shots	5	4.33	3.34	0.09	0.2	0.018
Passes	26	16.44	7.4	0.08	1.293	0.103
Saves	8	2.33	2.75	0.19	2.064	0.392
Blocks	13	5.93	3.8	0.11	1.858	0.204
Takeaways	3	3.35	3.05	0.11	-0.114	-0.013

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.904 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.808, then +0.35 saves, −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting → 7.7

Pucker+161

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	5	3.356	1.49	0.32	0.477
Shots	5	4.333	1.154	0.08	0.092
Saves	8	2.333	3.43	0.15	0.514
Blocks	13	5.931	2.192	0.07	0.153
Takeaways	3	3.349	0.896	0.12	0.107
Passes	26	16.439	1.582	0.08	0.127
Faceoff win rate	0.6	0.5	1.2	0.03	0.036

Σ 1.507 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.773 − 0.164 turnover penalty = 1.609 → ×100 = 160.85 → 161

Offensive6.20

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.085	0.094	0.4	2.244
Shooting %	0.4	0.462	0.2	1.094
Assists per pass	0.115	0.089	0.4	2.862

Σ contribution = 6.199

Defensive8.28

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	8	2.333	9.938	0.3	2.982
Blocks	13	5.931	9.325	0.2	1.865
Takeaways	3	3.349	5.584	0.25	1.396
Goals conceded	4	6.418	8.161	0.25	2.04

Σ contribution = 8.283

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Rosieyw Tuxedo Monkeys

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.2

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	2	1.83	0.23	0	0
Assists	2	1.46	1.47	0.19	0.365	0.069
Shots	4	4.33	3.34	0.09	-0.1	-0.009
Passes	25	16.44	7.4	0.08	1.157	0.093
Saves	1	2.33	2.75	0.19	-0.485	-0.092
Blocks	6	5.93	3.8	0.11	0.018	0.002
Takeaways	5	3.35	3.05	0.11	0.54	0.059

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.122 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.245, nothing hit the bonus or penalty thresholds → 6.2

Pucker+97

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3.5	3.356	1.043	0.32	0.334
Shots	4	4.333	0.923	0.08	0.074
Saves	1	2.333	0.429	0.15	0.064
Blocks	6	5.931	1.012	0.07	0.071
Takeaways	5	3.349	1.493	0.12	0.179
Passes	25	16.439	1.521	0.08	0.122
Faceoff win rate	0.8	0.5	1.6	0.03	0.048

Σ 0.892 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.049 − 0.075 turnover penalty = 0.974 → ×100 = 97.42 → 97

Offensive6.67

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.143	0.094	0.4	3.165
Shooting %	0.5	0.462	0.2	1.266
Assists per pass	0.08	0.089	0.4	2.24

Σ contribution = 6.671

Defensive6.38

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.333	3.935	0.3	1.18
Blocks	6	5.931	6.047	0.2	1.209
Takeaways	5	3.349	7.826	0.25	1.956
Goals conceded	4	6.418	8.161	0.25	2.04

Σ contribution = 6.385

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

4glass Ottawa Valley Ferrari Bazingas

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.6

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	2	1.83	0.23	0.546	0.126
Assists	0	1.46	1.47	0.19	-0.994	-0.189
Shots	6	4.33	3.34	0.09	0.499	0.045
Passes	13	16.44	7.4	0.08	-0.465	-0.037
Saves	2	2.33	2.75	0.19	-0.121	-0.023
Blocks	2	5.93	3.8	0.11	-1.033	-0.114
Takeaways	6	3.35	3.05	0.11	0.868	0.095

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.097 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.806, then −0.2 goals against → 5.6

Pucker+102

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3	3.356	0.894	0.32	0.286
Shots	6	4.333	1.385	0.08	0.111
Saves	2	2.333	0.857	0.15	0.129
Blocks	2	5.931	0.337	0.07	0.024
Takeaways	6	3.349	1.791	0.12	0.215
Passes	13	16.439	0.791	0.08	0.063
Faceoff win rate	0.6	0.5	1.2	0.03	0.036

Σ 0.863 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.016 → ×100 = 101.57 → 102

Offensive5.70

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.15	0.094	0.4	3.255
Shooting %	0.5	0.462	0.2	1.266
Assists per pass	0	0.089	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 5.703

Defensive5.75

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	2.333	5.433	0.3	1.63
Blocks	2	5.931	3.679	0.2	0.736
Takeaways	6	3.349	8.637	0.25	2.159
Goals conceded	9	6.418	4.883	0.25	1.221

Σ contribution = 5.746

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Normalhumanboy Ottawa Valley Ferrari Bazingas

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.4

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	2	1.83	0.23	-1.091	-0.251
Assists	1	1.46	1.47	0.19	-0.314	-0.06
Shots	2	4.33	3.34	0.09	-0.698	-0.063
Passes	18	16.44	7.4	0.08	0.211	0.017
Saves	1	2.33	2.75	0.19	-0.485	-0.092
Blocks	5	5.93	3.8	0.11	-0.245	-0.027
Takeaways	4	3.35	3.05	0.11	0.213	0.023

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.452 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.095, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting, −0.2 goals against → 4.4

Pucker+42

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1	3.356	0.298	0.32	0.095
Shots	2	4.333	0.462	0.08	0.037
Saves	1	2.333	0.429	0.15	0.064
Blocks	5	5.931	0.843	0.07	0.059
Takeaways	4	3.349	1.194	0.12	0.143
Passes	18	16.439	1.095	0.08	0.088
Faceoff win rate	0.167	0.5	0.333	0.03	0.01

Σ 0.497 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.584 − 0.164 turnover penalty = 0.42 → ×100 = 41.97 → 42

Offensive4.44

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.071	0.094	0.4	2.023
Shooting %	0	0.462	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.056	0.089	0.4	1.826

Σ contribution = 4.44

Defensive5.17

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.333	3.935	0.3	1.18
Blocks	5	5.931	5.377	0.2	1.075
Takeaways	4	3.349	6.767	0.25	1.692
Goals conceded	9	6.418	4.883	0.25	1.221

Σ contribution = 5.168

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Looees Ottawa Valley Ferrari Bazingas

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR8.0

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	2	1.83	0.23	-0.546	-0.126
Assists	2	1.46	1.47	0.19	0.365	0.069
Shots	5	4.33	3.34	0.09	0.2	0.018
Passes	14	16.44	7.4	0.08	-0.33	-0.026
Saves	10	2.33	2.75	0.19	2.792	0.531
Blocks	18	5.93	3.8	0.11	3.173	0.349
Takeaways	9	3.35	3.05	0.11	1.85	0.203

6.0 + clip(Σ 1.019 × 2, −3 to 3) = 8.037, then +0.35 saves, +0.3 blocks, −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting, −0.2 goals against → 8.0

Pucker+177

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3	3.356	0.894	0.32	0.286
Shots	5	4.333	1.154	0.08	0.092
Saves	10	2.333	4.287	0.15	0.643
Blocks	18	5.931	3.035	0.07	0.212
Takeaways	9	3.349	2.687	0.12	0.322
Passes	14	16.439	0.852	0.08	0.068
Faceoff win rate	0.333	0.5	0.667	0.03	0.02

Σ 1.644 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.935 − 0.164 turnover penalty = 1.771 → ×100 = 177.02 → 177

Offensive6.08

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.071	0.094	0.4	2.023
Shooting %	0.2	0.462	0.2	0.79
Assists per pass	0.143	0.089	0.4	3.266

Σ contribution = 6.079

Defensive8.63

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	10	2.333	9.989	0.3	2.997
Blocks	18	5.931	9.866	0.2	1.973
Takeaways	9	3.349	9.735	0.25	2.434
Goals conceded	9	6.418	4.883	0.25	1.221

Σ contribution = 8.625

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.