Michigan Mallards vs Hot Springs Hot Tamales

MMHomeMichigan Mallards

8–7Final

HSAwayHot Springs Hot Tamales

Aug 23, 2023 · Challenger Division · The Pond

MVP Derek · 7.5 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Michigan MallardsvsHot Springs Hot Tamales

15Shots312

5Saves27

10Faceoffs won28

24Takeaways1014

14Turnovers↓1024

2Blocks11

51Passes2576

1:34Possession0:422:16

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Michigan Mallards

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	GWG	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Derek	5	2	7	8	1	1	3	8	4	1	22	0	0:38	141	1.25	1.13
dave	2	4	6	5	1	4	3	6	6	0	16	0	0:19	101	1.71	0.83
Blades	1	2	3	2	3	5	2	10	4	1	13	1	0:37	116	1.10	1.38

Hot Springs Hot Tamales

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Cheespup	3	3	6	6	1	3	3	1	7	1	27	0:34	96	1.26	0.74
Gubby	2	2	4	2	3	2	4	5	9	0	22	0:51	75	1.01	0.97
Cyoue	2	2	4	4	3	3	3	8	8	0	27	0:51	98	0.80	1.09

Derek Michigan Mallards

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR7.5

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	5	2.13	1.68	0.23	1.712	0.394
Assists	2	1.9	1.56	0.19	0.061	0.012
Shots	8	4.58	2.87	0.09	1.191	0.107
Passes	22	19.19	6.88	0.08	0.409	0.033
Saves	1	2.46	2.51	0.19	-0.58	-0.11
Blocks	1	0.69	0.96	0.11	0.326	0.036
Takeaways	8	3.62	2.84	0.11	1.542	0.17

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.641 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.281, then +0.25 hot shooting → 7.5

Pucker+141

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	6.5	3.864	1.682	0.32	0.538
Shots	8	4.577	1.748	0.08	0.14
Saves	1	2.456	0.407	0.15	0.061
Blocks	1	0.688	1.455	0.07	0.102
Takeaways	8	3.618	2.211	0.12	0.265
Passes	22	19.188	1.147	0.08	0.092
Faceoff win rate	0.25	0.5	0.5	0.03	0.015

Σ 1.213 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.427 − 0.017 turnover penalty = 1.41 → ×100 = 140.98 → 141

Offensive1.25

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.184	0.113	0.4	0.622
Shooting %	0.625	0.465	0.2	0.266
Assists per pass	0.091	0.099	0.4	0.366

Σ contribution = 1.254

Defensive1.13

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.456	0.468	0.3	0.14
Blocks	1	0.688	1.426	0.2	0.285
Takeaways	8	3.618	1.837	0.25	0.459
Goals conceded	7	6.915	0.988	0.25	0.247

Σ contribution = 1.131

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

dave Michigan Mallards

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.7

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	2.13	1.68	0.23	-0.077	-0.018
Assists	4	1.9	1.56	0.19	1.343	0.255
Shots	5	4.58	2.87	0.09	0.147	0.013
Passes	16	19.19	6.88	0.08	-0.463	-0.037
Saves	1	2.46	2.51	0.19	-0.58	-0.11
Blocks	0	0.69	0.96	0.11	-0.718	-0.079
Takeaways	6	3.62	2.84	0.11	0.838	0.092

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.117 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.234, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting → 5.7

Pucker+101

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	6	3.864	1.553	0.32	0.497
Shots	5	4.577	1.092	0.08	0.087
Saves	1	2.456	0.407	0.15	0.061
Blocks	0	0.688	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	6	3.618	1.659	0.12	0.199
Passes	16	19.188	0.834	0.08	0.067
Faceoff win rate	0.571	0.5	1.143	0.03	0.034

Σ 0.945 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.112 − 0.101 turnover penalty = 1.011 → ×100 = 101.11 → 101

Offensive1.71

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.316	0.113	0.4	0.778
Shooting %	0.4	0.465	0.2	0.172
Assists per pass	0.25	0.099	0.4	0.763

Σ contribution = 1.714

Defensive0.83

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.456	0.468	0.3	0.14
Blocks	0	0.688	0.238	0.2	0.048
Takeaways	6	3.618	1.577	0.25	0.394
Goals conceded	7	6.915	0.988	0.25	0.247

Σ contribution = 0.829

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Blades Michigan Mallards

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.1

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	2.13	1.68	0.23	-0.673	-0.155
Assists	2	1.9	1.56	0.19	0.061	0.012
Shots	2	4.58	2.87	0.09	-0.897	-0.081
Passes	13	19.19	6.88	0.08	-0.899	-0.072
Saves	3	2.46	2.51	0.19	0.217	0.041
Blocks	1	0.69	0.96	0.11	0.326	0.036
Takeaways	10	3.62	2.84	0.11	2.245	0.247

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.028 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.056, nothing hit the bonus or penalty thresholds → 6.1

Pucker+116

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3	3.864	0.776	0.32	0.248
Shots	2	4.577	0.437	0.08	0.035
Saves	3	2.456	1.222	0.15	0.183
Blocks	1	0.688	1.455	0.07	0.102
Takeaways	10	3.618	2.764	0.12	0.332
Passes	13	19.188	0.678	0.08	0.054
Faceoff win rate	0.714	0.5	1.429	0.03	0.043

Σ 0.997 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.173 − 0.017 turnover penalty = 1.156 → ×100 = 115.58 → 116

Offensive1.10

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.081	0.113	0.4	0.289
Shooting %	0.5	0.465	0.2	0.215
Assists per pass	0.154	0.099	0.4	0.6

Σ contribution = 1.104

Defensive1.38

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	3	2.456	1.218	0.3	0.365
Blocks	1	0.688	1.426	0.2	0.285
Takeaways	10	3.618	1.943	0.25	0.486
Goals conceded	7	6.915	0.988	0.25	0.247

Σ contribution = 1.383

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Cheespup Hot Springs Hot Tamales

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.9

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	2.13	1.68	0.23	0.519	0.119
Assists	3	1.9	1.56	0.19	0.702	0.133
Shots	6	4.58	2.87	0.09	0.495	0.045
Passes	27	19.19	6.88	0.08	1.136	0.091
Saves	1	2.46	2.51	0.19	-0.58	-0.11
Blocks	1	0.69	0.96	0.11	0.326	0.036
Takeaways	1	3.62	2.84	0.11	-0.921	-0.101

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.213 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.425, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 goals against → 5.9

Pucker+96

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	6	3.864	1.553	0.32	0.497
Shots	6	4.577	1.311	0.08	0.105
Saves	1	2.456	0.407	0.15	0.061
Blocks	1	0.688	1.455	0.07	0.102
Takeaways	1	3.618	0.276	0.12	0.033
Passes	27	19.188	1.407	0.08	0.113
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.5	1	0.03	0.03

Σ 0.94 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.106 − 0.143 turnover penalty = 0.963 → ×100 = 96.34 → 96

Offensive1.26

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.176	0.113	0.4	0.602
Shooting %	0.5	0.465	0.2	0.215
Assists per pass	0.111	0.099	0.4	0.448

Σ contribution = 1.264

Defensive0.74

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.456	0.468	0.3	0.14
Blocks	1	0.688	1.426	0.2	0.285
Takeaways	1	3.618	0.381	0.25	0.095
Goals conceded	8	6.915	0.865	0.25	0.216

Σ contribution = 0.736

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Gubby Hot Springs Hot Tamales

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.7

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	2.13	1.68	0.23	-0.077	-0.018
Assists	2	1.9	1.56	0.19	0.061	0.012
Shots	2	4.58	2.87	0.09	-0.897	-0.081
Passes	22	19.19	6.88	0.08	0.409	0.033
Saves	3	2.46	2.51	0.19	0.217	0.041
Blocks	0	0.69	0.96	0.11	-0.718	-0.079
Takeaways	5	3.62	2.84	0.11	0.486	0.053

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.038 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.923, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 goals against → 5.7

Pucker+75

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4	3.864	1.035	0.32	0.331
Shots	2	4.577	0.437	0.08	0.035
Saves	3	2.456	1.222	0.15	0.183
Blocks	0	0.688	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	5	3.618	1.382	0.12	0.166
Passes	22	19.188	1.147	0.08	0.092
Faceoff win rate	0.333	0.5	0.667	0.03	0.02

Σ 0.827 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.973 − 0.227 turnover penalty = 0.746 → ×100 = 74.64 → 75

Offensive1.01

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.078	0.113	0.4	0.28
Shooting %	1	0.465	0.2	0.364
Assists per pass	0.091	0.099	0.4	0.366

Σ contribution = 1.01

Defensive0.97

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	3	2.456	1.218	0.3	0.365
Blocks	0	0.688	0.238	0.2	0.048
Takeaways	5	3.618	1.365	0.25	0.341
Goals conceded	8	6.915	0.865	0.25	0.216

Σ contribution = 0.97

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Cyoue Hot Springs Hot Tamales

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.9

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	2.13	1.68	0.23	-0.077	-0.018
Assists	2	1.9	1.56	0.19	0.061	0.012
Shots	4	4.58	2.87	0.09	-0.201	-0.018
Passes	27	19.19	6.88	0.08	1.136	0.091
Saves	3	2.46	2.51	0.19	0.217	0.041
Blocks	0	0.69	0.96	0.11	-0.718	-0.079
Takeaways	8	3.62	2.84	0.11	1.542	0.17

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.199 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.397, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 goals against → 5.9

Pucker+98

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4	3.864	1.035	0.32	0.331
Shots	4	4.577	0.874	0.08	0.07
Saves	3	2.456	1.222	0.15	0.183
Blocks	0	0.688	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	8	3.618	2.211	0.12	0.265
Passes	27	19.188	1.407	0.08	0.113
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.5	1	0.03	0.03

Σ 0.992 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.167 − 0.185 turnover penalty = 0.982 → ×100 = 98.27 → 98

Offensive0.80

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.078	0.113	0.4	0.28
Shooting %	0.5	0.465	0.2	0.215
Assists per pass	0.074	0.099	0.4	0.301

Σ contribution = 0.796

Defensive1.09

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	3	2.456	1.218	0.3	0.365
Blocks	0	0.688	0.238	0.2	0.048
Takeaways	8	3.618	1.837	0.25	0.459
Goals conceded	8	6.915	0.865	0.25	0.216

Σ contribution = 1.088

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.