Michigan Mallards vs Hot Springs Hot Tamales

MMHomeMichigan Mallards

8–7Final

HSAwayHot Springs Hot Tamales

Aug 23, 2023 · Challenger Division · The Pond

MVP Derek · 7.5 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Michigan MallardsvsHot Springs Hot Tamales

15Shots312

5Saves27

10Faceoffs won28

24Takeaways1014

14Turnovers↓1024

2Blocks11

51Passes2576

1:34Possession0:422:16

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Michigan Mallards

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	GWG	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Derek	5	2	7	8	1	1	3	8	4	1	22	0	0:38	141	7.02	6.53
dave	2	4	6	5	1	4	3	6	6	0	16	0	0:19	101	8.85	5.32
Blades	1	2	3	2	3	5	2	10	4	1	13	1	0:37	116	6.42	7.53

Hot Springs Hot Tamales

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Cheespup	3	3	6	6	1	3	3	1	7	1	27	0:34	96	7.06	4.95
Gubby	2	2	4	2	3	2	4	5	9	0	22	0:51	75	6.04	5.88
Cyoue	2	2	4	4	3	3	3	8	8	0	27	0:51	98	5.18	6.36

Derek Michigan Mallards

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR7.5

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	5	2.13	1.68	0.23	1.712	0.394
Assists	2	1.9	1.56	0.19	0.061	0.012
Shots	8	4.58	2.87	0.09	1.191	0.107
Passes	22	19.19	6.88	0.08	0.409	0.033
Saves	1	2.46	2.51	0.19	-0.58	-0.11
Blocks	1	0.69	0.96	0.11	0.326	0.036
Takeaways	8	3.62	2.84	0.11	1.542	0.17

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.641 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.281, then +0.25 hot shooting → 7.5

Pucker+141

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	6.5	3.864	1.682	0.32	0.538
Shots	8	4.577	1.748	0.08	0.14
Saves	1	2.456	0.407	0.15	0.061
Blocks	1	0.688	1.455	0.07	0.102
Takeaways	8	3.618	2.211	0.12	0.265
Passes	22	19.188	1.147	0.08	0.092
Faceoff win rate	0.25	0.5	0.5	0.03	0.015

Σ 1.213 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.427 − 0.017 turnover penalty = 1.41 → ×100 = 140.98 → 141

Offensive7.02

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.184	0.113	0.4	3.286
Shooting %	0.625	0.465	0.2	1.465
Assists per pass	0.091	0.099	0.4	2.266

Σ contribution = 7.017

Defensive6.53

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.456	3.872	0.3	1.162
Blocks	1	0.688	7.703	0.2	1.541
Takeaways	8	3.618	9.348	0.25	2.337
Goals conceded	7	6.915	5.952	0.25	1.488

Σ contribution = 6.528

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

dave Michigan Mallards

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.7

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	2.13	1.68	0.23	-0.077	-0.018
Assists	4	1.9	1.56	0.19	1.343	0.255
Shots	5	4.58	2.87	0.09	0.147	0.013
Passes	16	19.19	6.88	0.08	-0.463	-0.037
Saves	1	2.46	2.51	0.19	-0.58	-0.11
Blocks	0	0.69	0.96	0.11	-0.718	-0.079
Takeaways	6	3.62	2.84	0.11	0.838	0.092

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.117 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.234, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting → 5.7

Pucker+101

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	6	3.864	1.553	0.32	0.497
Shots	5	4.577	1.092	0.08	0.087
Saves	1	2.456	0.407	0.15	0.061
Blocks	0	0.688	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	6	3.618	1.659	0.12	0.199
Passes	16	19.188	0.834	0.08	0.067
Faceoff win rate	0.571	0.5	1.143	0.03	0.034

Σ 0.945 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.112 − 0.101 turnover penalty = 1.011 → ×100 = 101.11 → 101

Offensive8.85

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.316	0.113	0.4	3.912
Shooting %	0.4	0.465	0.2	1.089
Assists per pass	0.25	0.099	0.4	3.854

Σ contribution = 8.855

Defensive5.32

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.456	3.872	0.3	1.162
Blocks	0	0.688	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	6	3.618	8.31	0.25	2.077
Goals conceded	7	6.915	5.952	0.25	1.488

Σ contribution = 5.318

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Blades Michigan Mallards

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.1

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	2.13	1.68	0.23	-0.673	-0.155
Assists	2	1.9	1.56	0.19	0.061	0.012
Shots	2	4.58	2.87	0.09	-0.897	-0.081
Passes	13	19.19	6.88	0.08	-0.899	-0.072
Saves	3	2.46	2.51	0.19	0.217	0.041
Blocks	1	0.69	0.96	0.11	0.326	0.036
Takeaways	10	3.62	2.84	0.11	2.245	0.247

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.028 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.056, nothing hit the bonus or penalty thresholds → 6.1

Pucker+116

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3	3.864	0.776	0.32	0.248
Shots	2	4.577	0.437	0.08	0.035
Saves	3	2.456	1.222	0.15	0.183
Blocks	1	0.688	1.455	0.07	0.102
Takeaways	10	3.618	2.764	0.12	0.332
Passes	13	19.188	0.678	0.08	0.054
Faceoff win rate	0.714	0.5	1.429	0.03	0.043

Σ 0.997 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.173 − 0.017 turnover penalty = 1.156 → ×100 = 115.58 → 116

Offensive6.42

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.081	0.113	0.4	1.956
Shooting %	0.5	0.465	0.2	1.26
Assists per pass	0.154	0.099	0.4	3.201

Σ contribution = 6.417

Defensive7.53

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	3	2.456	6.872	0.3	2.062
Blocks	1	0.688	7.703	0.2	1.541
Takeaways	10	3.618	9.772	0.25	2.443
Goals conceded	7	6.915	5.952	0.25	1.488

Σ contribution = 7.534

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Cheespup Hot Springs Hot Tamales

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.9

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	2.13	1.68	0.23	0.519	0.119
Assists	3	1.9	1.56	0.19	0.702	0.133
Shots	6	4.58	2.87	0.09	0.495	0.045
Passes	27	19.19	6.88	0.08	1.136	0.091
Saves	1	2.46	2.51	0.19	-0.58	-0.11
Blocks	1	0.69	0.96	0.11	0.326	0.036
Takeaways	1	3.62	2.84	0.11	-0.921	-0.101

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.213 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.425, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 goals against → 5.9

Pucker+96

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	6	3.864	1.553	0.32	0.497
Shots	6	4.577	1.311	0.08	0.105
Saves	1	2.456	0.407	0.15	0.061
Blocks	1	0.688	1.455	0.07	0.102
Takeaways	1	3.618	0.276	0.12	0.033
Passes	27	19.188	1.407	0.08	0.113
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.5	1	0.03	0.03

Σ 0.94 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.106 − 0.143 turnover penalty = 0.963 → ×100 = 96.34 → 96

Offensive7.06

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.176	0.113	0.4	3.208
Shooting %	0.5	0.465	0.2	1.26
Assists per pass	0.111	0.099	0.4	2.59

Σ contribution = 7.058

Defensive4.95

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.456	3.872	0.3	1.162
Blocks	1	0.688	7.703	0.2	1.541
Takeaways	1	3.618	3.524	0.25	0.881
Goals conceded	8	6.915	5.461	0.25	1.365

Σ contribution = 4.949

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Gubby Hot Springs Hot Tamales

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.7

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	2.13	1.68	0.23	-0.077	-0.018
Assists	2	1.9	1.56	0.19	0.061	0.012
Shots	2	4.58	2.87	0.09	-0.897	-0.081
Passes	22	19.19	6.88	0.08	0.409	0.033
Saves	3	2.46	2.51	0.19	0.217	0.041
Blocks	0	0.69	0.96	0.11	-0.718	-0.079
Takeaways	5	3.62	2.84	0.11	0.486	0.053

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.038 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.923, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 goals against → 5.7

Pucker+75

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4	3.864	1.035	0.32	0.331
Shots	2	4.577	0.437	0.08	0.035
Saves	3	2.456	1.222	0.15	0.183
Blocks	0	0.688	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	5	3.618	1.382	0.12	0.166
Passes	22	19.188	1.147	0.08	0.092
Faceoff win rate	0.333	0.5	0.667	0.03	0.02

Σ 0.827 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.973 − 0.227 turnover penalty = 0.746 → ×100 = 74.64 → 75

Offensive6.04

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.078	0.113	0.4	1.921
Shooting %	1	0.465	0.2	1.854
Assists per pass	0.091	0.099	0.4	2.266

Σ contribution = 6.042

Defensive5.88

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	3	2.456	6.872	0.3	2.062
Blocks	0	0.688	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	5	3.618	7.458	0.25	1.865
Goals conceded	8	6.915	5.461	0.25	1.365

Σ contribution = 5.883

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Cyoue Hot Springs Hot Tamales

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.9

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	2.13	1.68	0.23	-0.077	-0.018
Assists	2	1.9	1.56	0.19	0.061	0.012
Shots	4	4.58	2.87	0.09	-0.201	-0.018
Passes	27	19.19	6.88	0.08	1.136	0.091
Saves	3	2.46	2.51	0.19	0.217	0.041
Blocks	0	0.69	0.96	0.11	-0.718	-0.079
Takeaways	8	3.62	2.84	0.11	1.542	0.17

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.199 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.397, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 goals against → 5.9

Pucker+98

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4	3.864	1.035	0.32	0.331
Shots	4	4.577	0.874	0.08	0.07
Saves	3	2.456	1.222	0.15	0.183
Blocks	0	0.688	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	8	3.618	2.211	0.12	0.265
Passes	27	19.188	1.407	0.08	0.113
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.5	1	0.03	0.03

Σ 0.992 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.167 − 0.185 turnover penalty = 0.982 → ×100 = 98.27 → 98

Offensive5.18

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.078	0.113	0.4	1.921
Shooting %	0.5	0.465	0.2	1.26
Assists per pass	0.074	0.099	0.4	2.003

Σ contribution = 5.184

Defensive6.36

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	3	2.456	6.872	0.3	2.062
Blocks	0	0.688	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	8	3.618	9.348	0.25	2.337
Goals conceded	8	6.915	5.461	0.25	1.365

Σ contribution = 6.355

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.