Vader Saboteurs vs Brampton Cows

Home · VADSVader Saboteurs

6–7Final

BCAwayBrampton Cows

Aug 10, 2026 · B Bowl Playoffs · The Sniper's Nest

MVP [TWFW] cybergoose · 8.1 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Vader SaboteursvsBrampton Cows

11Shots718

11Saves65

10Faceoffs won46

19Takeaways109

9Turnovers↓1019

32Blocks1715

70Passes664

2:06Possession0:221:44

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Vader Saboteurs

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
[OCA] Pl4zma	0	3	3	1	4	3	3	11	3	14	23	1:16	160	5.26	8.49
[TWFW] cybergoose	4	0	4	7	6	5	2	7	4	11	30	0:42	191	5.20	8.52
[VADD] Meenimizer	2	2	4	3	1	2	1	1	2	7	17	0:08	100	8.43	4.99

Brampton Cows

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	GWG	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
[CLUD/HHRS] Tactical Miss	2	4	6	5	0	3	5	2	8	1	33	1	0:30	101	7.83	4.21
[DCU] Skiztastic	5	1	6	11	1	0	3	2	4	3	20	0	0:21	137	6.92	4.78
[OCP/BRC] lacaaas	0	4	4	2	4	3	2	5	7	11	11	0	0:53	105	6.80	8.10

Pl4zma Vader Saboteurs

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR7.6

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	1.61	1.9	0.23	-0.85	-0.196
Assists	3	1.41	1.5	0.19	1.058	0.201
Shots	1	3.65	3.03	0.09	-0.875	-0.079
Passes	23	15.46	6.25	0.08	1.207	0.097
Saves	4	2.04	2.48	0.19	0.792	0.15
Blocks	14	5.06	3.86	0.11	2.317	0.255
Takeaways	11	3.1	2.78	0.11	2.841	0.313

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.741 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.482, then +0.3 blocks, −0.2 cold shooting → 7.6

Pucker+160

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2.5	2.879	0.868	0.32	0.278
Shots	1	3.65	0.274	0.08	0.022
Saves	4	2.039	1.962	0.15	0.294
Blocks	14	5.058	2.768	0.07	0.194
Takeaways	11	3.097	3.552	0.12	0.426
Passes	23	15.456	1.488	0.08	0.119
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.5	1	0.03	0.03

Σ 1.363 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.604 → ×100 = 160.37 → 160

Offensive5.26

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.039	0.085	0.4	1.614
Shooting %	0	0.441	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.13	0.091	0.4	3.051

Σ contribution = 5.256

Defensive8.49

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	4	2.039	8.981	0.3	2.694
Blocks	14	5.058	9.773	0.2	1.955
Takeaways	11	3.097	9.952	0.25	2.488
Goals conceded	7	5.971	5.416	0.25	1.354

Σ contribution = 8.491

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

cybergoose Vader Saboteurs

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR8.1

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	4	1.61	1.9	0.23	1.26	0.29
Assists	0	1.41	1.5	0.19	-0.936	-0.178
Shots	7	3.65	3.03	0.09	1.106	0.1
Passes	30	15.46	6.25	0.08	2.328	0.186
Saves	6	2.04	2.48	0.19	1.599	0.304
Blocks	11	5.06	3.86	0.11	1.539	0.169
Takeaways	7	3.1	2.78	0.11	1.403	0.154

6.0 + clip(Σ 1.025 × 2, −3 to 3) = 8.051, nothing hit the bonus or penalty thresholds → 8.1

Pucker+191

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4	2.879	1.39	0.32	0.445
Shots	7	3.65	1.918	0.08	0.153
Saves	6	2.039	2.943	0.15	0.441
Blocks	11	5.058	2.175	0.07	0.152
Takeaways	7	3.097	2.26	0.12	0.271
Passes	30	15.456	1.941	0.08	0.155
Faceoff win rate	0.714	0.5	1.429	0.03	0.043

Σ 1.661 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.954 − 0.045 turnover penalty = 1.909 → ×100 = 190.92 → 191

Offensive5.20

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.095	0.085	0.4	2.585
Shooting %	0.571	0.441	0.2	1.429
Assists per pass	0	0.091	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 5.195

Defensive8.52

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	6	2.039	9.839	0.3	2.952
Blocks	11	5.058	9.303	0.2	1.861
Takeaways	7	3.097	9.404	0.25	2.351
Goals conceded	7	5.971	5.416	0.25	1.354

Σ contribution = 8.518

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Meenimizer Vader Saboteurs

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.3

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	1.61	1.9	0.23	0.205	0.047
Assists	2	1.41	1.5	0.19	0.394	0.075
Shots	3	3.65	3.03	0.09	-0.215	-0.019
Passes	17	15.46	6.25	0.08	0.247	0.02
Saves	1	2.04	2.48	0.19	-0.419	-0.08
Blocks	7	5.06	3.86	0.11	0.503	0.055
Takeaways	1	3.1	2.78	0.11	-0.754	-0.083

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.015 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.03, then +0.25 hot shooting → 6.3

Pucker+100

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4	2.879	1.39	0.32	0.445
Shots	3	3.65	0.822	0.08	0.066
Saves	1	2.039	0.49	0.15	0.074
Blocks	7	5.058	1.384	0.07	0.097
Takeaways	1	3.097	0.323	0.12	0.039
Passes	17	15.456	1.1	0.08	0.088
Faceoff win rate	0.667	0.5	1.333	0.03	0.04

Σ 0.848 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.997 → ×100 = 99.72 → 100

Offensive8.43

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.5	0.085	0.4	4
Shooting %	0.667	0.441	0.2	1.576
Assists per pass	0.118	0.091	0.4	2.854

Σ contribution = 8.43

Defensive4.99

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.039	4.122	0.3	1.237
Blocks	7	5.058	7.464	0.2	1.493
Takeaways	1	3.097	3.641	0.25	0.91
Goals conceded	7	5.971	5.416	0.25	1.354

Σ contribution = 4.994

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Tactical Miss Brampton Cows

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.1

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	1.61	1.9	0.23	0.205	0.047
Assists	4	1.41	1.5	0.19	1.723	0.327
Shots	5	3.65	3.03	0.09	0.446	0.04
Passes	33	15.46	6.25	0.08	2.808	0.225
Saves	0	2.04	2.48	0.19	-0.823	-0.156
Blocks	1	5.06	3.86	0.11	-1.051	-0.116
Takeaways	2	3.1	2.78	0.11	-0.394	-0.043

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.324 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.648, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting → 6.1

Pucker+101

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	6	2.879	2.084	0.32	0.667
Shots	5	3.65	1.37	0.08	0.11
Saves	0	2.039	0	0.15	0
Blocks	1	5.058	0.198	0.07	0.014
Takeaways	2	3.097	0.646	0.12	0.077
Passes	33	15.456	2.135	0.08	0.171
Faceoff win rate	0.375	0.5	0.75	0.03	0.022

Σ 1.061 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.248 − 0.24 turnover penalty = 1.008 → ×100 = 100.86 → 101

Offensive7.83

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.2	0.085	0.4	3.796
Shooting %	0.4	0.441	0.2	1.125
Assists per pass	0.121	0.091	0.4	2.911

Σ contribution = 7.832

Defensive4.21

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.039	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	1	5.058	3.339	0.2	0.668
Takeaways	2	3.097	4.64	0.25	1.16
Goals conceded	6	5.971	5.981	0.25	1.495

Σ contribution = 4.209

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Skiztastic Brampton Cows

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.9

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	5	1.61	1.9	0.23	1.788	0.411
Assists	1	1.41	1.5	0.19	-0.271	-0.051
Shots	11	3.65	3.03	0.09	2.427	0.218
Passes	20	15.46	6.25	0.08	0.727	0.058
Saves	1	2.04	2.48	0.19	-0.419	-0.08
Blocks	3	5.06	3.86	0.11	-0.533	-0.059
Takeaways	2	3.1	2.78	0.11	-0.394	-0.043

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.455 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.909, nothing hit the bonus or penalty thresholds → 6.9

Pucker+137

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	6	2.879	2.084	0.32	0.667
Shots	11	3.65	3.013	0.08	0.241
Saves	1	2.039	0.49	0.15	0.074
Blocks	3	5.058	0.593	0.07	0.042
Takeaways	2	3.097	0.646	0.12	0.077
Passes	20	15.456	1.294	0.08	0.104
Faceoff win rate	0	0.5	0	0.03	0

Σ 1.204 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.417 − 0.045 turnover penalty = 1.372 → ×100 = 137.17 → 137

Offensive6.92

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.286	0.085	0.4	3.971
Shooting %	0.455	0.441	0.2	1.224
Assists per pass	0.05	0.091	0.4	1.724

Σ contribution = 6.918

Defensive4.78

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.039	4.122	0.3	1.237
Blocks	3	5.058	4.457	0.2	0.891
Takeaways	2	3.097	4.64	0.25	1.16
Goals conceded	6	5.971	5.981	0.25	1.495

Σ contribution = 4.783

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

lacaaas Brampton Cows

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.3

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	1.61	1.9	0.23	-0.85	-0.196
Assists	4	1.41	1.5	0.19	1.723	0.327
Shots	2	3.65	3.03	0.09	-0.545	-0.049
Passes	11	15.46	6.25	0.08	-0.713	-0.057
Saves	4	2.04	2.48	0.19	0.792	0.15
Blocks	11	5.06	3.86	0.11	1.539	0.169
Takeaways	5	3.1	2.78	0.11	0.684	0.075

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.421 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.841, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting → 6.3

Pucker+105

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2.5	2.879	0.868	0.32	0.278
Shots	2	3.65	0.548	0.08	0.044
Saves	4	2.039	1.962	0.15	0.294
Blocks	11	5.058	2.175	0.07	0.152
Takeaways	5	3.097	1.614	0.12	0.194
Passes	11	15.456	0.712	0.08	0.057
Faceoff win rate	0.6	0.5	1.2	0.03	0.036

Σ 1.055 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.241 − 0.191 turnover penalty = 1.05 → ×100 = 104.99 → 105

Offensive6.80

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.075	0.085	0.4	2.216
Shooting %	0	0.441	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.364	0.091	0.4	3.992

Σ contribution = 6.799

Defensive8.10

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	4	2.039	8.981	0.3	2.694
Blocks	11	5.058	9.303	0.2	1.861
Takeaways	5	3.097	8.189	0.25	2.047
Goals conceded	6	5.971	5.981	0.25	1.495

Σ contribution = 8.097

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.