Salem Cats vs Cold Lake Hit Lits

SCHomeSalem Cats

6–7Final

Away · CCold Lake Hit Lits

Jul 14, 2026 · West Division · cat bowl

MVP Hill · 7.9 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Salem CatsvsCold Lake Hit Lits

20Shots317

10Saves414

7Faceoffs won29

23Takeaways1013

13Turnovers↓1023

18Blocks315

45Passes738

2:32Possession0:222:54

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Salem Cats

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Hill	5	0	5	15	4	4	3	17	7	7	23	1:27	188	3.99	8.00
tezz.	0	1	1	2	3	2	6	4	4	7	7	0:29	67	5.06	6.59
Headass	1	1	2	3	3	1	0	2	2	4	15	0:36	72	4.63	5.67

Cold Lake Hit Lits

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	GWG	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
hit	2	0	2	5	4	3	1	0	4	3	7	0	0:06	73	6.26	5.80
Tridoxity	4	2	6	8	3	3	4	11	11	5	18	1	2:05	134	5.46	7.40
LIT	1	1	2	4	7	3	2	2	8	7	13	0	0:43	94	4.51	7.20

Hill Salem Cats

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR7.9

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	5	2.12	1.86	0.23	1.544	0.355
Assists	0	1.68	1.61	0.19	-1.045	-0.199
Shots	15	4.61	3.13	0.09	3.315	0.298
Passes	23	16.09	7.97	0.08	0.868	0.069
Saves	4	2.49	2.58	0.19	0.586	0.111
Blocks	7	4.95	3.65	0.11	0.562	0.062
Takeaways	17	4.04	3.95	0.11	3.281	0.361

6.0 + clip(Σ 1.058 × 2, −3 to 3) = 8.117, then +0.3 takeaways, −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting → 7.9

Pucker+188

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	5	3.673	1.361	0.32	0.436
Shots	15	4.611	3.253	0.08	0.26
Saves	4	2.486	1.609	0.15	0.241
Blocks	7	4.949	1.414	0.07	0.099
Takeaways	17	4.043	4.205	0.12	0.505
Passes	23	16.086	1.43	0.08	0.114
Faceoff win rate	0.571	0.5	1.143	0.03	0.034

Σ 1.689 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.988 − 0.11 turnover penalty = 1.878 → ×100 = 187.76 → 188

Offensive3.99

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.057	0.092	0.4	1.825
Shooting %	0.333	0.461	0.2	0.984
Assists per pass	0	0.104	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 3.991

Defensive8.00

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	4	2.486	8.173	0.3	2.452
Blocks	7	4.949	7.568	0.2	1.514
Takeaways	17	4.043	9.987	0.25	2.497
Goals conceded	7	7.272	6.156	0.25	1.539

Σ contribution = 8.002

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

tezz. Salem Cats

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.0

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	2.12	1.86	0.23	-1.141	-0.262
Assists	1	1.68	1.61	0.19	-0.423	-0.08
Shots	2	4.61	3.13	0.09	-0.833	-0.075
Passes	7	16.09	7.97	0.08	-1.14	-0.091
Saves	3	2.49	2.58	0.19	0.199	0.038
Blocks	7	4.95	3.65	0.11	0.562	0.062
Takeaways	4	4.04	3.95	0.11	-0.011	-0.001

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.411 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.179, then −0.2 cold shooting → 5.0

Pucker+67

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1	3.673	0.272	0.32	0.087
Shots	2	4.611	0.434	0.08	0.035
Saves	3	2.486	1.207	0.15	0.181
Blocks	7	4.949	1.414	0.07	0.099
Takeaways	4	4.043	0.989	0.12	0.119
Passes	7	16.086	0.435	0.08	0.035
Faceoff win rate	0.25	0.5	0.5	0.03	0.015

Σ 0.57 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.671 → ×100 = 67.1 → 67

Offensive5.06

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.034	0.092	0.4	1.512
Shooting %	0	0.461	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.143	0.104	0.4	2.962

Σ contribution = 5.065

Defensive6.59

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	3	2.486	6.815	0.3	2.044
Blocks	7	4.949	7.568	0.2	1.514
Takeaways	4	4.043	5.958	0.25	1.489
Goals conceded	7	7.272	6.156	0.25	1.539

Σ contribution = 6.586

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Headass Salem Cats

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.2

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	2.12	1.86	0.23	-0.604	-0.139
Assists	1	1.68	1.61	0.19	-0.423	-0.08
Shots	3	4.61	3.13	0.09	-0.514	-0.046
Passes	15	16.09	7.97	0.08	-0.136	-0.011
Saves	3	2.49	2.58	0.19	0.199	0.038
Blocks	4	4.95	3.65	0.11	-0.26	-0.029
Takeaways	2	4.04	3.95	0.11	-0.517	-0.057

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.324 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.352, then −0.2 cold shooting → 5.2

Pucker+72

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1.5	3.673	0.408	0.32	0.131
Shots	3	4.611	0.651	0.08	0.052
Saves	3	2.486	1.207	0.15	0.181
Blocks	4	4.949	0.808	0.07	0.057
Takeaways	2	4.043	0.495	0.12	0.059
Passes	15	16.086	0.933	0.08	0.075
Faceoff win rate	1	0.5	2	0.03	0.06

Σ 0.614 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.723 → ×100 = 72.26 → 72

Offensive4.63

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.056	0.092	0.4	1.796
Shooting %	0.333	0.461	0.2	0.984
Assists per pass	0.067	0.104	0.4	1.845

Σ contribution = 4.625

Defensive5.67

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	3	2.486	6.815	0.3	2.044
Blocks	4	4.949	5.242	0.2	1.048
Takeaways	2	4.043	4.135	0.25	1.034
Goals conceded	7	7.272	6.156	0.25	1.539

Σ contribution = 5.665

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

hit Cold Lake Hit Lits

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.1

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	2.12	1.86	0.23	-0.067	-0.015
Assists	0	1.68	1.61	0.19	-1.045	-0.199
Shots	5	4.61	3.13	0.09	0.124	0.011
Passes	7	16.09	7.97	0.08	-1.14	-0.091
Saves	4	2.49	2.58	0.19	0.586	0.111
Blocks	3	4.95	3.65	0.11	-0.534	-0.059
Takeaways	0	4.04	3.95	0.11	-1.024	-0.113

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.354 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.292, then −0.2 cold shooting → 5.1

Pucker+73

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2	3.673	0.544	0.32	0.174
Shots	5	4.611	1.084	0.08	0.087
Saves	4	2.486	1.609	0.15	0.241
Blocks	3	4.949	0.606	0.07	0.042
Takeaways	0	4.043	0	0.12	0
Passes	7	16.086	0.435	0.08	0.035
Faceoff win rate	0.75	0.5	1.5	0.03	0.045

Σ 0.625 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.735 → ×100 = 73.48 → 73

Offensive6.26

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.333	0.092	0.4	3.983
Shooting %	0.4	0.461	0.2	1.095
Assists per pass	0	0.104	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 6.26

Defensive5.80

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	4	2.486	8.173	0.3	2.452
Blocks	3	4.949	4.501	0.2	0.9
Takeaways	0	4.043	2.954	0.25	0.738
Goals conceded	6	7.272	6.836	0.25	1.709

Σ contribution = 5.799

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Tridoxity Cold Lake Hit Lits

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.9

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	4	2.12	1.86	0.23	1.007	0.232
Assists	2	1.68	1.61	0.19	0.198	0.038
Shots	8	4.61	3.13	0.09	1.081	0.097
Passes	18	16.09	7.97	0.08	0.24	0.019
Saves	3	2.49	2.58	0.19	0.199	0.038
Blocks	5	4.95	3.65	0.11	0.014	0.002
Takeaways	11	4.04	3.95	0.11	1.762	0.194

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.619 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.238, then −0.3 turnovers → 6.9

Pucker+134

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	6	3.673	1.633	0.32	0.523
Shots	8	4.611	1.735	0.08	0.139
Saves	3	2.486	1.207	0.15	0.181
Blocks	5	4.949	1.01	0.07	0.071
Takeaways	11	4.043	2.721	0.12	0.327
Passes	18	16.086	1.119	0.08	0.09
Faceoff win rate	0.429	0.5	0.857	0.03	0.026

Σ 1.355 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.594 − 0.259 turnover penalty = 1.335 → ×100 = 133.55 → 134

Offensive5.46

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.048	0.092	0.4	1.687
Shooting %	0.5	0.461	0.2	1.268
Assists per pass	0.111	0.104	0.4	2.501

Σ contribution = 5.457

Defensive7.40

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	3	2.486	6.815	0.3	2.044
Blocks	5	4.949	6.041	0.2	1.208
Takeaways	11	4.043	9.752	0.25	2.438
Goals conceded	6	7.272	6.836	0.25	1.709

Σ contribution = 7.399

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

LIT Cold Lake Hit Lits

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.0

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	2.12	1.86	0.23	-0.604	-0.139
Assists	1	1.68	1.61	0.19	-0.423	-0.08
Shots	4	4.61	3.13	0.09	-0.195	-0.018
Passes	13	16.09	7.97	0.08	-0.387	-0.031
Saves	7	2.49	2.58	0.19	1.747	0.332
Blocks	7	4.95	3.65	0.11	0.562	0.062
Takeaways	2	4.04	3.95	0.11	-0.517	-0.057

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.069 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.138, then +0.35 saves, −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting → 6.0

Pucker+94

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2	3.673	0.544	0.32	0.174
Shots	4	4.611	0.868	0.08	0.069
Saves	7	2.486	2.815	0.15	0.422
Blocks	7	4.949	1.414	0.07	0.099
Takeaways	2	4.043	0.495	0.12	0.059
Passes	13	16.086	0.808	0.08	0.065
Faceoff win rate	0.6	0.5	1.2	0.03	0.036

Σ 0.925 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.088 − 0.147 turnover penalty = 0.941 → ×100 = 94.11 → 94

Offensive4.51

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.047	0.092	0.4	1.667
Shooting %	0.25	0.461	0.2	0.858
Assists per pass	0.077	0.104	0.4	1.987

Σ contribution = 4.512

Defensive7.20

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	7	2.486	9.793	0.3	2.938
Blocks	7	4.949	7.568	0.2	1.514
Takeaways	2	4.043	4.135	0.25	1.034
Goals conceded	6	7.272	6.836	0.25	1.709

Σ contribution = 7.195

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.