Portillo's Italian Beefs vs Michigan Malus

PSHomePortillo's Italian Beefs

3–2Final

Away · MMichigan Malus

Jun 5, 2026 · Gazz Cup Playoffs · The Dog House

MVP [CHH] Chaos · 7.4 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Portillo's Italian BeefsvsMichigan Malus

13Shots67

5Saves510

4Faceoffs won4

14Takeaways620

20Turnovers↓614

20Blocks911

65Passes772

2:43Possession1:103:53

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Portillo's Italian Beefs

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
[BBB] Beefus	2	0	2	6	0	0	2	0	8	3	25	0:13	38	5.83	4.74
[BOAT] GoldenKnight	1	0	1	5	2	2	2	4	10	4	21	0:42	48	3.43	6.32
[LIL] Blue	0	3	3	2	3	2	0	10	2	13	19	1:48	132	5.73	8.63

Michigan Malus

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
[CHH] Chaos	1	1	2	1	8	0	1	14	1	3	21	3:03	147	4.97	8.57
[MICH] sweatshirt	0	1	1	3	1	1	1	1	7	4	19	0:23	31	4.24	5.26
[YY/LIL] Graves	1	0	1	3	1	3	2	5	6	4	32	0:27	61	3.84	6.14

Beefus Portillo's Italian Beefs

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.6

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	1.86	1.66	0.23	0.082	0.019
Assists	0	1.53	1.33	0.19	-1.153	-0.219
Shots	6	4.21	2.87	0.09	0.623	0.056
Passes	25	19.56	8.23	0.08	0.661	0.053
Saves	0	2.44	3.43	0.19	-0.711	-0.135
Blocks	3	5.64	3.8	0.11	-0.694	-0.076
Takeaways	0	4.02	3.48	0.11	-1.154	-0.127

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.43 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.141, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting → 4.6

Pucker+38

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2	3.212	0.623	0.32	0.199
Shots	6	4.212	1.424	0.08	0.114
Saves	0	2.439	0	0.15	0
Blocks	3	5.636	0.532	0.07	0.037
Takeaways	0	4.015	0	0.12	0
Passes	25	19.561	1.278	0.08	0.102
Faceoff win rate	0	0.5	0	0.03	0

Σ 0.453 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.533 − 0.15 turnover penalty = 0.383 → ×100 = 38.26 → 38

Offensive5.83

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.154	0.076	0.4	3.64
Shooting %	0.333	0.442	0.2	1.007
Assists per pass	0	0.078	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 5.828

Defensive4.74

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.439	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	3	5.636	4.255	0.2	0.851
Takeaways	0	4.015	2.954	0.25	0.738
Goals conceded	2	6.227	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 4.737

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

GoldenKnight Portillo's Italian Beefs

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.8

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	1.86	1.66	0.23	-0.519	-0.119
Assists	0	1.53	1.33	0.19	-1.153	-0.219
Shots	5	4.21	2.87	0.09	0.275	0.025
Passes	21	19.56	8.23	0.08	0.175	0.014
Saves	2	2.44	3.43	0.19	-0.128	-0.024
Blocks	4	5.64	3.8	0.11	-0.43	-0.047
Takeaways	4	4.02	3.48	0.11	-0.004	0

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.372 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.256, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting → 4.8

Pucker+48

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1	3.212	0.311	0.32	0.1
Shots	5	4.212	1.187	0.08	0.095
Saves	2	2.439	0.82	0.15	0.123
Blocks	4	5.636	0.71	0.07	0.05
Takeaways	4	4.015	0.996	0.12	0.12
Passes	21	19.561	1.074	0.08	0.086
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.5	1	0.03	0.03

Σ 0.603 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.709 − 0.225 turnover penalty = 0.484 → ×100 = 48.4 → 48

Offensive3.43

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.024	0.076	0.4	1.448
Shooting %	0.2	0.442	0.2	0.801
Assists per pass	0	0.078	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 3.43

Defensive6.32

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	2.439	5.287	0.3	1.586
Blocks	4	5.636	4.87	0.2	0.974
Takeaways	4	4.015	5.985	0.25	1.496
Goals conceded	2	6.227	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 6.318

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Blue Portillo's Italian Beefs

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.4

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	1.86	1.66	0.23	-1.121	-0.258
Assists	3	1.53	1.33	0.19	1.108	0.21
Shots	2	4.21	2.87	0.09	-0.771	-0.069
Passes	19	19.56	8.23	0.08	-0.068	-0.005
Saves	3	2.44	3.43	0.19	0.163	0.031
Blocks	13	5.64	3.8	0.11	1.937	0.213
Takeaways	10	4.02	3.48	0.11	1.72	0.189

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.311 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.622, then −0.2 cold shooting → 6.4

Pucker+132

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3	3.212	0.934	0.32	0.299
Shots	2	4.212	0.475	0.08	0.038
Saves	3	2.439	1.23	0.15	0.184
Blocks	13	5.636	2.306	0.07	0.161
Takeaways	10	4.015	2.491	0.12	0.299
Passes	19	19.561	0.971	0.08	0.078
Faceoff win rate	1	0.5	2	0.03	0.06

Σ 1.119 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.317 → ×100 = 131.69 → 132

Offensive5.73

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.028	0.076	0.4	1.504
Shooting %	0	0.442	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.158	0.078	0.4	3.631

Σ contribution = 5.725

Defensive8.63

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	3	2.439	6.903	0.3	2.071
Blocks	13	5.636	9.453	0.2	1.891
Takeaways	10	4.015	9.614	0.25	2.403
Goals conceded	2	6.227	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 8.627

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Chaos Michigan Malus

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR7.4

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	1.86	1.66	0.23	-0.519	-0.119
Assists	1	1.53	1.33	0.19	-0.4	-0.076
Shots	1	4.21	2.87	0.09	-1.12	-0.101
Passes	21	19.56	8.23	0.08	0.175	0.014
Saves	8	2.44	3.43	0.19	1.622	0.308
Blocks	3	5.64	3.8	0.11	-0.694	-0.076
Takeaways	14	4.02	3.48	0.11	2.87	0.316

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.265 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.531, then +0.35 saves, +0.3 takeaways, +0.25 hot shooting → 7.4

Pucker+147

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2	3.212	0.623	0.32	0.199
Shots	1	4.212	0.237	0.08	0.019
Saves	8	2.439	3.28	0.15	0.492
Blocks	3	5.636	0.532	0.07	0.037
Takeaways	14	4.015	3.487	0.12	0.418
Passes	21	19.561	1.074	0.08	0.086
Faceoff win rate	0	0.5	0	0.03	0

Σ 1.252 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.473 → ×100 = 147.26 → 147

Offensive4.97

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.011	0.076	0.4	1.29
Shooting %	1	0.442	0.2	1.881
Assists per pass	0.048	0.078	0.4	1.804

Σ contribution = 4.974

Defensive8.57

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	8	2.439	9.917	0.3	2.975
Blocks	3	5.636	4.255	0.2	0.851
Takeaways	14	4.015	9.945	0.25	2.486
Goals conceded	3	6.227	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 8.574

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

sweatshirt Michigan Malus

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.3

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	1.86	1.66	0.23	-1.121	-0.258
Assists	1	1.53	1.33	0.19	-0.4	-0.076
Shots	3	4.21	2.87	0.09	-0.422	-0.038
Passes	19	19.56	8.23	0.08	-0.068	-0.005
Saves	1	2.44	3.43	0.19	-0.42	-0.08
Blocks	4	5.64	3.8	0.11	-0.43	-0.047
Takeaways	1	4.02	3.48	0.11	-0.867	-0.095

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.6 × 2, −3 to 3) = 4.801, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting → 4.3

Pucker+31

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	0.5	3.212	0.156	0.32	0.05
Shots	3	4.212	0.712	0.08	0.057
Saves	1	2.439	0.41	0.15	0.061
Blocks	4	5.636	0.71	0.07	0.05
Takeaways	1	4.015	0.249	0.12	0.03
Passes	19	19.561	0.971	0.08	0.078
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.5	1	0.03	0.03

Σ 0.356 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.418 − 0.112 turnover penalty = 0.306 → ×100 = 30.58 → 31

Offensive4.24

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.043	0.076	0.4	1.758
Shooting %	0	0.442	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.053	0.078	0.4	1.894

Σ contribution = 4.243

Defensive5.26

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.439	3.88	0.3	1.164
Blocks	4	5.636	4.87	0.2	0.974
Takeaways	1	4.015	3.457	0.25	0.864
Goals conceded	3	6.227	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 5.264

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Graves Michigan Malus

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.8

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	1.86	1.66	0.23	-0.519	-0.119
Assists	0	1.53	1.33	0.19	-1.153	-0.219
Shots	3	4.21	2.87	0.09	-0.422	-0.038
Passes	32	19.56	8.23	0.08	1.512	0.121
Saves	1	2.44	3.43	0.19	-0.42	-0.08
Blocks	4	5.64	3.8	0.11	-0.43	-0.047
Takeaways	5	4.02	3.48	0.11	0.283	0.031

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.352 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.297, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting → 4.8

Pucker+61

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1	3.212	0.311	0.32	0.1
Shots	3	4.212	0.712	0.08	0.057
Saves	1	2.439	0.41	0.15	0.061
Blocks	4	5.636	0.71	0.07	0.05
Takeaways	5	4.015	1.245	0.12	0.149
Passes	32	19.561	1.636	0.08	0.131
Faceoff win rate	0.6	0.5	1.2	0.03	0.036

Σ 0.584 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.687 − 0.075 turnover penalty = 0.612 → ×100 = 61.22 → 61

Offensive3.84

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.037	0.076	0.4	1.647
Shooting %	0.333	0.442	0.2	1.007
Assists per pass	0	0.078	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 3.835

Defensive6.14

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.439	3.88	0.3	1.164
Blocks	4	5.636	4.87	0.2	0.974
Takeaways	5	4.015	6.962	0.25	1.74
Goals conceded	3	6.227	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 6.14

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.