Tuxedo Monkeys vs Michigan Malus

TMHomeTuxedo Monkeys

0–10Final

Away · MMichigan Malus

Apr 22, 2026 · Central A · Tailor Place

MVP sweatshirt · 6.9 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Tuxedo MonkeysvsMichigan Malus

2Shots1921

11Saves92

4Faceoffs won37

6Takeaways511

11Turnovers↓56

17Blocks116

30Passes1949

0:49Possession1:061:55

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Tuxedo Monkeys

Player	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Jenediah	0	2	2	3	4	2	4	9	0:27	43	2.95	5.34
dvyr	0	2	1	4	1	3	5	7	0:01	31	2.95	4.84
Nano	2	7	1	0	1	6	8	14	0:21	79	2.95	6.61

Michigan Malus

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Chaos	3	2	5	5	0	3	1	2	3	3	14	0:31	83	7.33	5.07
sweatshirt	2	6	8	7	2	1	2	5	1	3	16	0:34	130	8.56	6.51
Graves	5	2	7	9	0	3	1	4	2	0	19	0:50	116	6.46	5.25

Jenediah Tuxedo Monkeys

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.4

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	2.12	2.04	0.23	-1.038	-0.239
Assists	0	1.99	1.87	0.19	-1.062	-0.202
Shots	0	4.47	3.66	0.09	-1.223	-0.11
Passes	9	17.95	8.03	0.08	-1.114	-0.089
Saves	2	2.38	2.85	0.19	-0.132	-0.025
Blocks	4	5.22	3.44	0.11	-0.355	-0.039
Takeaways	4	3.94	3.51	0.11	0.016	0.002

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.702 × 2, −3 to 3) = 4.596, then −0.2 goals against → 4.4

Pucker+43

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	0	3.905	0	0.32	0
Shots	0	4.472	0	0.08	0
Saves	2	2.377	0.842	0.15	0.126
Blocks	4	5.221	0.766	0.07	0.054
Takeaways	4	3.944	1.014	0.12	0.122
Passes	9	17.948	0.501	0.08	0.04
Faceoff win rate	0.4	0.5	0.799	0.03	0.024

Σ 0.366 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.43 → ×100 = 43.02 → 43

Offensive2.95

Rate	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.111	0.4	1.181
Shooting %	0.473	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.111	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 2.954

Defensive5.34

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	2.377	5.371	0.3	1.611
Blocks	4	5.221	5.081	0.2	1.016
Takeaways	4	3.944	6.057	0.25	1.514
Goals conceded	10	6.892	4.795	0.25	1.199

Σ contribution = 5.34

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

dvyr Tuxedo Monkeys

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.2

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	2.12	2.04	0.23	-1.038	-0.239
Assists	0	1.99	1.87	0.19	-1.062	-0.202
Shots	0	4.47	3.66	0.09	-1.223	-0.11
Passes	7	17.95	8.03	0.08	-1.363	-0.109
Saves	2	2.38	2.85	0.19	-0.132	-0.025
Blocks	5	5.22	3.44	0.11	-0.064	-0.007
Takeaways	1	3.94	3.51	0.11	-0.838	-0.092

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.784 × 2, −3 to 3) = 4.432, then −0.2 goals against → 4.2

Pucker+31

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	0	3.905	0	0.32	0
Shots	0	4.472	0	0.08	0
Saves	2	2.377	0.842	0.15	0.126
Blocks	5	5.221	0.958	0.07	0.067
Takeaways	1	3.944	0.254	0.12	0.03
Passes	7	17.948	0.39	0.08	0.031
Faceoff win rate	0.2	0.5	0.4	0.03	0.012

Σ 0.267 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.314 → ×100 = 31.4 → 31

Offensive2.95

Rate	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.111	0.4	1.181
Shooting %	0.473	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.111	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 2.954

Defensive4.84

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	2.377	5.371	0.3	1.611
Blocks	5	5.221	5.831	0.2	1.166
Takeaways	1	3.944	3.468	0.25	0.867
Goals conceded	10	6.892	4.795	0.25	1.199

Σ contribution = 4.843

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Nano Tuxedo Monkeys

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.2

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	2.12	2.04	0.23	-1.038	-0.239
Assists	0	1.99	1.87	0.19	-1.062	-0.202
Shots	2	4.47	3.66	0.09	-0.676	-0.061
Passes	14	17.95	8.03	0.08	-0.491	-0.039
Saves	7	2.38	2.85	0.19	1.621	0.308
Blocks	8	5.22	3.44	0.11	0.808	0.089
Takeaways	1	3.94	3.51	0.11	-0.838	-0.092

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.236 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.528, then +0.35 saves, −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting, −0.2 goals against → 5.2

Pucker+79

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	0	3.905	0	0.32	0
Shots	2	4.472	0.447	0.08	0.036
Saves	7	2.377	2.945	0.15	0.442
Blocks	8	5.221	1.532	0.07	0.107
Takeaways	1	3.944	0.254	0.12	0.03
Passes	14	17.948	0.78	0.08	0.062
Faceoff win rate	1	0.5	1.998	0.03	0.06

Σ 0.738 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.868 − 0.079 turnover penalty = 0.789 → ×100 = 78.86 → 79

Offensive2.95

Rate	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.111	0.4	1.181
Shooting %	0.473	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.111	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 2.954

Defensive6.61

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	7	2.377	9.84	0.3	2.952
Blocks	8	5.221	7.949	0.2	1.59
Takeaways	1	3.944	3.468	0.25	0.867
Goals conceded	10	6.892	4.795	0.25	1.199

Σ contribution = 6.608

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Chaos Michigan Malus

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.8

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	2.12	2.04	0.23	0.433	0.1
Assists	2	1.99	1.87	0.19	0.005	0.001
Shots	5	4.47	3.66	0.09	0.144	0.013
Passes	14	17.95	8.03	0.08	-0.491	-0.039
Saves	0	2.38	2.85	0.19	-0.833	-0.158
Blocks	3	5.22	3.44	0.11	-0.646	-0.071
Takeaways	2	3.94	3.51	0.11	-0.554	-0.061

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.216 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.568, then +0.25 hot shooting → 5.8

Pucker+83

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	5	3.905	1.28	0.32	0.41
Shots	5	4.472	1.118	0.08	0.089
Saves	0	2.377	0	0.15	0
Blocks	3	5.221	0.575	0.07	0.04
Takeaways	2	3.944	0.507	0.12	0.061
Passes	14	17.948	0.78	0.08	0.062
Faceoff win rate	0.75	0.5	1.499	0.03	0.045

Σ 0.708 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.833 → ×100 = 83.25 → 83

Offensive7.33

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.161	0.111	0.4	3.072
Shooting %	0.6	0.473	0.2	1.409
Assists per pass	0.143	0.111	0.4	2.848

Σ contribution = 7.329

Defensive5.07

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.377	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	3	5.221	4.394	0.2	0.879
Takeaways	2	3.944	4.174	0.25	1.044
Goals conceded	0	6.892	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 5.071

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

sweatshirt Michigan Malus

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.9

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	2.12	2.04	0.23	-0.057	-0.013
Assists	6	1.99	1.87	0.19	2.139	0.406
Shots	7	4.47	3.66	0.09	0.691	0.062
Passes	16	17.95	8.03	0.08	-0.242	-0.019
Saves	2	2.38	2.85	0.19	-0.132	-0.025
Blocks	3	5.22	3.44	0.11	-0.646	-0.071
Takeaways	5	3.94	3.51	0.11	0.301	0.033

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.373 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.746, then +0.4 playmaker, −0.2 cold shooting → 6.9

Pucker+130

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	7	3.905	1.793	0.32	0.574
Shots	7	4.472	1.565	0.08	0.125
Saves	2	2.377	0.842	0.15	0.126
Blocks	3	5.221	0.575	0.07	0.04
Takeaways	5	3.944	1.268	0.12	0.152
Passes	16	17.948	0.891	0.08	0.071
Faceoff win rate	0.333	0.5	0.666	0.03	0.02

Σ 1.109 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.304 → ×100 = 130.44 → 130

Offensive8.56

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.235	0.111	0.4	3.688
Shooting %	0.286	0.473	0.2	0.898
Assists per pass	0.375	0.111	0.4	3.973

Σ contribution = 8.559

Defensive6.51

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	2.377	5.371	0.3	1.611
Blocks	3	5.221	4.394	0.2	0.879
Takeaways	5	3.944	7.046	0.25	1.762
Goals conceded	0	6.892	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 6.514

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Graves Michigan Malus

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.2

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	5	2.12	2.04	0.23	1.414	0.325
Assists	2	1.99	1.87	0.19	0.005	0.001
Shots	9	4.47	3.66	0.09	1.238	0.111
Passes	19	17.95	8.03	0.08	0.131	0.01
Saves	0	2.38	2.85	0.19	-0.833	-0.158
Blocks	0	5.22	3.44	0.11	-1.518	-0.167
Takeaways	4	3.94	3.51	0.11	0.016	0.002

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.124 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.249, nothing hit the bonus or penalty thresholds → 6.2

Pucker+116

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	7	3.905	1.793	0.32	0.574
Shots	9	4.472	2.013	0.08	0.161
Saves	0	2.377	0	0.15	0
Blocks	0	5.221	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	4	3.944	1.014	0.12	0.122
Passes	19	17.948	1.059	0.08	0.085
Faceoff win rate	0.75	0.5	1.499	0.03	0.045

Σ 0.986 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.16 → ×100 = 116 → 116

Offensive6.46

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.14	0.111	0.4	2.802
Shooting %	0.556	0.473	0.2	1.337
Assists per pass	0.105	0.111	0.4	2.318

Σ contribution = 6.458

Defensive5.25

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.377	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	0	5.221	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	4	3.944	6.057	0.25	1.514
Goals conceded	0	6.892	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 5.253

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.