Brampton Cows vs Michigan Malus

BCHomeBrampton Cows

1–11Final

Away · MMichigan Malus

Apr 13, 2026 · Central A · The Big Barn

MVP [CHH] Chaos · 7.3 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Brampton CowsvsMichigan Malus

2Shots3133

22Saves211

4Faceoffs won59

9Takeaways312

12Turnovers↓39

17Blocks89

29Passes3261

1:07Possession0:391:46

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Brampton Cows

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
[CLUD/HHRS] Tactical Miss	0	1	1	0	3	1	3	1	2	2	7	0:04	44	7.19	4.88
[HHRS] Saucy	0	1	1	1	6	2	3	4	2	8	11	0:20	87	4.30	7.14
[OCP/BRC] lacaaas	1	0	1	1	13	1	3	4	8	7	11	0:43	126	4.37	7.12

Michigan Malus

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
[CHH] Chaos	5	4	9	15	0	4	0	8	4	4	20	0:47	156	7.82	6.44
[MICH] sweatshirt	1	4	5	2	1	1	4	2	2	5	19	0:25	81	8.25	5.64
[SQRT] Tweek	5	4	9	16	0	4	0	2	3	0	22	0:34	146	8.05	4.78

Tactical Miss Brampton Cows

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.4

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	2.12	2.04	0.23	-1.038	-0.239
Assists	1	1.99	1.87	0.19	-0.529	-0.1
Shots	0	4.47	3.66	0.09	-1.223	-0.11
Passes	7	17.95	8.03	0.08	-1.363	-0.109
Saves	3	2.38	2.85	0.19	0.219	0.042
Blocks	2	5.22	3.44	0.11	-0.937	-0.103
Takeaways	1	3.94	3.51	0.11	-0.838	-0.092

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.712 × 2, −3 to 3) = 4.576, then −0.2 goals against → 4.4

Pucker+44

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1	3.905	0.256	0.32	0.082
Shots	0	4.472	0	0.08	0
Saves	3	2.377	1.262	0.15	0.189
Blocks	2	5.221	0.383	0.07	0.027
Takeaways	1	3.944	0.254	0.12	0.03
Passes	7	17.948	0.39	0.08	0.031
Faceoff win rate	0.25	0.5	0.5	0.03	0.015

Σ 0.375 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.441 → ×100 = 44.09 → 44

Offensive7.19

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.25	0.111	0.4	3.755
Shooting %	0	0.473	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.143	0.111	0.4	2.848

Σ contribution = 7.193

Defensive4.88

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	3	2.377	7.026	0.3	2.108
Blocks	2	5.221	3.804	0.2	0.761
Takeaways	1	3.944	3.468	0.25	0.867
Goals conceded	11	6.892	4.572	0.25	1.143

Σ contribution = 4.879

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Saucy Brampton Cows

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.3

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	2.12	2.04	0.23	-1.038	-0.239
Assists	1	1.99	1.87	0.19	-0.529	-0.1
Shots	1	4.47	3.66	0.09	-0.949	-0.085
Passes	11	17.95	8.03	0.08	-0.865	-0.069
Saves	6	2.38	2.85	0.19	1.271	0.241
Blocks	8	5.22	3.44	0.11	0.808	0.089
Takeaways	4	3.94	3.51	0.11	0.016	0.002

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.162 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.676, then −0.2 cold shooting, −0.2 goals against → 5.3

Pucker+87

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	0.5	3.905	0.128	0.32	0.041
Shots	1	4.472	0.224	0.08	0.018
Saves	6	2.377	2.525	0.15	0.379
Blocks	8	5.221	1.532	0.07	0.107
Takeaways	4	3.944	1.014	0.12	0.122
Passes	11	17.948	0.613	0.08	0.049
Faceoff win rate	0.4	0.5	0.799	0.03	0.024

Σ 0.74 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.87 → ×100 = 87 → 87

Offensive4.30

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.05	0.111	0.4	1.598
Shooting %	0	0.473	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.091	0.111	0.4	2.114

Σ contribution = 4.303

Defensive7.14

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	6	2.377	9.638	0.3	2.891
Blocks	8	5.221	7.949	0.2	1.59
Takeaways	4	3.944	6.057	0.25	1.514
Goals conceded	11	6.892	4.572	0.25	1.143

Σ contribution = 7.138

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

lacaaas Brampton Cows

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.7

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	2.12	2.04	0.23	-0.548	-0.126
Assists	0	1.99	1.87	0.19	-1.062	-0.202
Shots	1	4.47	3.66	0.09	-0.949	-0.085
Passes	11	17.95	8.03	0.08	-0.865	-0.069
Saves	13	2.38	2.85	0.19	3.725	0.708
Blocks	7	5.22	3.44	0.11	0.517	0.057
Takeaways	4	3.94	3.51	0.11	0.016	0.002

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.284 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.568, then +0.35 saves, +0.25 hot shooting, −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 goals against → 6.7

Pucker+126

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1	3.905	0.256	0.32	0.082
Shots	1	4.472	0.224	0.08	0.018
Saves	13	2.377	5.47	0.15	0.82
Blocks	7	5.221	1.341	0.07	0.094
Takeaways	4	3.944	1.014	0.12	0.122
Passes	11	17.948	0.613	0.08	0.049
Faceoff win rate	0.25	0.5	0.5	0.03	0.015

Σ 1.2 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.412 − 0.156 turnover penalty = 1.256 → ×100 = 125.6 → 126

Offensive4.37

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.023	0.111	0.4	1.345
Shooting %	1	0.473	0.2	1.844
Assists per pass	0	0.111	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 4.371

Defensive7.12

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	13	2.377	9.999	0.3	3
Blocks	7	5.221	7.313	0.2	1.463
Takeaways	4	3.944	6.057	0.25	1.514
Goals conceded	11	6.892	4.572	0.25	1.143

Σ contribution = 7.12

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Chaos Michigan Malus

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR7.3

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	5	2.12	2.04	0.23	1.414	0.325
Assists	4	1.99	1.87	0.19	1.072	0.204
Shots	15	4.47	3.66	0.09	2.879	0.259
Passes	20	17.95	8.03	0.08	0.255	0.02
Saves	0	2.38	2.85	0.19	-0.833	-0.158
Blocks	4	5.22	3.44	0.11	-0.355	-0.039
Takeaways	8	3.94	3.51	0.11	1.155	0.127

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.738 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.476, then −0.2 cold shooting → 7.3

Pucker+156

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	7.5	3.905	1.921	0.32	0.615
Shots	15	4.472	3.354	0.08	0.268
Saves	0	2.377	0	0.15	0
Blocks	4	5.221	0.766	0.07	0.054
Takeaways	8	3.944	2.029	0.12	0.243
Passes	20	17.948	1.114	0.08	0.089
Faceoff win rate	1	0.5	1.998	0.03	0.06

Σ 1.329 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.564 − 0.003 turnover penalty = 1.561 → ×100 = 156.09 → 156

Offensive7.82

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.191	0.111	0.4	3.386
Shooting %	0.333	0.473	0.2	0.97
Assists per pass	0.2	0.111	0.4	3.465

Σ contribution = 7.821

Defensive6.44

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.377	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	4	5.221	5.081	0.2	1.016
Takeaways	8	3.944	9.093	0.25	2.273
Goals conceded	1	6.892	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 6.437

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

sweatshirt Michigan Malus

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.7

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	2.12	2.04	0.23	-0.548	-0.126
Assists	4	1.99	1.87	0.19	1.072	0.204
Shots	2	4.47	3.66	0.09	-0.676	-0.061
Passes	19	17.95	8.03	0.08	0.131	0.01
Saves	1	2.38	2.85	0.19	-0.483	-0.092
Blocks	5	5.22	3.44	0.11	-0.064	-0.007
Takeaways	2	3.94	3.51	0.11	-0.554	-0.061

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.132 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.735, nothing hit the bonus or penalty thresholds → 5.7

Pucker+81

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4.5	3.905	1.152	0.32	0.369
Shots	2	4.472	0.447	0.08	0.036
Saves	1	2.377	0.421	0.15	0.063
Blocks	5	5.221	0.958	0.07	0.067
Takeaways	2	3.944	0.507	0.12	0.061
Passes	19	17.948	1.059	0.08	0.085
Faceoff win rate	0.2	0.5	0.4	0.03	0.012

Σ 0.692 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.814 → ×100 = 81.44 → 81

Offensive8.25

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.2	0.111	0.4	3.458
Shooting %	0.5	0.473	0.2	1.245
Assists per pass	0.211	0.111	0.4	3.544

Σ contribution = 8.247

Defensive5.64

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.377	3.912	0.3	1.173
Blocks	5	5.221	5.831	0.2	1.166
Takeaways	2	3.944	4.174	0.25	1.044
Goals conceded	1	6.892	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 5.645

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Tweek Michigan Malus

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.7

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	5	2.12	2.04	0.23	1.414	0.325
Assists	4	1.99	1.87	0.19	1.072	0.204
Shots	16	4.47	3.66	0.09	3.153	0.284
Passes	22	17.95	8.03	0.08	0.504	0.04
Saves	0	2.38	2.85	0.19	-0.833	-0.158
Blocks	0	5.22	3.44	0.11	-1.518	-0.167
Takeaways	2	3.94	3.51	0.11	-0.554	-0.061

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.467 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.933, then −0.2 cold shooting → 6.7

Pucker+146

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	9	3.905	2.305	0.32	0.738
Shots	16	4.472	3.578	0.08	0.286
Saves	0	2.377	0	0.15	0
Blocks	0	5.221	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	2	3.944	0.507	0.12	0.061
Passes	22	17.948	1.226	0.08	0.098
Faceoff win rate	1	0.5	1.998	0.03	0.06

Σ 1.243 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.462 → ×100 = 146.19 → 146

Offensive8.05

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.265	0.111	0.4	3.808
Shooting %	0.312	0.473	0.2	0.938
Assists per pass	0.182	0.111	0.4	3.303

Σ contribution = 8.049

Defensive4.78

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.377	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	0	5.221	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	2	3.944	4.174	0.25	1.044
Goals conceded	1	6.892	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 4.783

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.