Ottawa Valley Geriatric Slappers vs Tuxedo Monkeys

Home · OVGSOttawa Valley Geriatric Slappers

8–5Final

TMAwayTuxedo Monkeys

Jan 13, 2026 · Central B - South vs West · Green Grove Retirement Community

MVP Nano · 7.6 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Ottawa Valley Geriatric SlappersvsTuxedo Monkeys

14Shots59

4Saves26

7Faceoffs won18

10Takeaways717

17Turnovers↓710

32Blocks1616

47Passes3481

1:15Possession0:492:04

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Ottawa Valley Geriatric Slappers

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Noob_Weapons	3	3	6	5	1	2	5	3	3	14	8	0:14	120	9.34	6.52
LessThanDennis	1	0	1	2	0	1	1	1	2	4	4	0:11	32	4.62	4.59
GiraffeKiller	4	2	6	7	0	1	1	1	4	1	18	0:03	95	8.03	4.30
Dionysus	0	2	2	0	3	3	1	5	8	13	17	0:47	73	4.99	8.16

Tuxedo Monkeys

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
maiaa^^🐙	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	2	0	6	0:09	13	2.95	4.03
Nayr[QC]	1	0	1	4	0	1	1	3	3	1	17	0:20	49	3.67	4.43
Nano	1	3	4	2	5	2	1	8	5	11	34	0:48	159	5.65	8.42
Rosieyw	3	1	4	3	1	5	5	4	0	4	24	0:47	101	5.56	5.41

Noob_Weapons Ottawa Valley Geriatric Slappers

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR7.3

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	2.07	2.07	0.23	0.446	0.103
Assists	3	1.52	1.28	0.19	1.157	0.22
Shots	5	4.11	3.42	0.09	0.26	0.023
Passes	8	16.52	6.44	0.08	-1.323	-0.106
Saves	1	2.04	2.57	0.19	-0.404	-0.077
Blocks	14	5.89	4.15	0.11	1.953	0.215
Takeaways	3	2.85	2.16	0.11	0.069	0.008

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.386 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.771, then +0.3 blocks, +0.25 hot shooting → 7.3

Pucker+120

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	5.5	3.486	1.578	0.32	0.505
Shots	5	4.112	1.216	0.08	0.097
Saves	1	2.037	0.491	0.15	0.074
Blocks	14	5.888	2.378	0.07	0.166
Takeaways	3	2.85	1.052	0.12	0.126
Passes	8	16.523	0.484	0.08	0.039
Faceoff win rate	0.286	0.5	0.571	0.03	0.017

Σ 1.024 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.205 − 0.008 turnover penalty = 1.197 → ×100 = 119.73 → 120

Offensive9.34

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.429	0.101	0.4	3.995
Shooting %	0.6	0.505	0.2	1.35
Assists per pass	0.375	0.092	0.4	3.993

Σ contribution = 9.338

Defensive6.52

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.037	4.123	0.3	1.237
Blocks	14	5.888	9.522	0.2	1.904
Takeaways	3	2.85	6.21	0.25	1.552
Goals conceded	5	6.692	7.304	0.25	1.826

Σ contribution = 6.519

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

LessThanDennis Ottawa Valley Geriatric Slappers

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.3

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	2.07	2.07	0.23	-0.519	-0.119
Assists	0	1.52	1.28	0.19	-1.193	-0.227
Shots	2	4.11	3.42	0.09	-0.617	-0.056
Passes	4	16.52	6.44	0.08	-1.944	-0.156
Saves	0	2.04	2.57	0.19	-0.793	-0.151
Blocks	4	5.89	4.15	0.11	-0.455	-0.05
Takeaways	1	2.85	2.16	0.11	-0.856	-0.094

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.852 × 2, −3 to 3) = 4.296, nothing hit the bonus or penalty thresholds → 4.3

Pucker+32

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1	3.486	0.287	0.32	0.092
Shots	2	4.112	0.486	0.08	0.039
Saves	0	2.037	0	0.15	0
Blocks	4	5.888	0.679	0.07	0.048
Takeaways	1	2.85	0.351	0.12	0.042
Passes	4	16.523	0.242	0.08	0.019
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.5	1	0.03	0.03

Σ 0.27 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.317 → ×100 = 31.73 → 32

Offensive4.62

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.091	0.101	0.4	2.246
Shooting %	0.5	0.505	0.2	1.193
Assists per pass	0	0.092	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 4.62

Defensive4.59

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.037	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	4	5.888	4.76	0.2	0.952
Takeaways	1	2.85	3.716	0.25	0.929
Goals conceded	5	6.692	7.304	0.25	1.826

Σ contribution = 4.593

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

GiraffeKiller Ottawa Valley Geriatric Slappers

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.0

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	4	2.07	2.07	0.23	0.929	0.214
Assists	2	1.52	1.28	0.19	0.373	0.071
Shots	7	4.11	3.42	0.09	0.844	0.076
Passes	18	16.52	6.44	0.08	0.229	0.018
Saves	0	2.04	2.57	0.19	-0.793	-0.151
Blocks	1	5.89	4.15	0.11	-1.177	-0.129
Takeaways	1	2.85	2.16	0.11	-0.856	-0.094

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.005 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.009, nothing hit the bonus or penalty thresholds → 6.0

Pucker+95

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	6	3.486	1.721	0.32	0.551
Shots	7	4.112	1.702	0.08	0.136
Saves	0	2.037	0	0.15	0
Blocks	1	5.888	0.17	0.07	0.012
Takeaways	1	2.85	0.351	0.12	0.042
Passes	18	16.523	1.089	0.08	0.087
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.5	1	0.03	0.03

Σ 0.858 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.01 − 0.06 turnover penalty = 0.95 → ×100 = 94.9 → 95

Offensive8.03

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	2	0.101	0.4	4
Shooting %	0.571	0.505	0.2	1.305
Assists per pass	0.111	0.092	0.4	2.724

Σ contribution = 8.029

Defensive4.30

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.037	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	1	5.888	3.278	0.2	0.656
Takeaways	1	2.85	3.716	0.25	0.929
Goals conceded	5	6.692	7.304	0.25	1.826

Σ contribution = 4.297

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Dionysus Ottawa Valley Geriatric Slappers

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.9

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	2.07	2.07	0.23	-1.001	-0.23
Assists	2	1.52	1.28	0.19	0.373	0.071
Shots	0	4.11	3.42	0.09	-1.202	-0.108
Passes	17	16.52	6.44	0.08	0.074	0.006
Saves	3	2.04	2.57	0.19	0.375	0.071
Blocks	13	5.89	4.15	0.11	1.712	0.188
Takeaways	5	2.85	2.16	0.11	0.994	0.109

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.107 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.215, then −0.3 turnovers → 5.9

Pucker+73

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1.5	3.486	0.43	0.32	0.138
Shots	0	4.112	0	0.08	0
Saves	3	2.037	1.472	0.15	0.221
Blocks	13	5.888	2.208	0.07	0.155
Takeaways	5	2.85	1.754	0.12	0.21
Passes	17	16.523	1.029	0.08	0.082
Faceoff win rate	0.75	0.5	1.5	0.03	0.045

Σ 0.851 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.001 − 0.271 turnover penalty = 0.73 → ×100 = 73.01 → 73

Offensive4.99

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.043	0.101	0.4	1.567
Shooting %	0	0.505	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.118	0.092	0.4	2.831

Σ contribution = 4.989

Defensive8.16

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	3	2.037	7.761	0.3	2.328
Blocks	13	5.888	9.344	0.2	1.869
Takeaways	5	2.85	8.55	0.25	2.138
Goals conceded	5	6.692	7.304	0.25	1.826

Σ contribution = 8.161

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

maiaa^^🐙 Tuxedo Monkeys

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR3.7

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	2.07	2.07	0.23	-1.001	-0.23
Assists	0	1.52	1.28	0.19	-1.193	-0.227
Shots	0	4.11	3.42	0.09	-1.202	-0.108
Passes	6	16.52	6.44	0.08	-1.634	-0.131
Saves	0	2.04	2.57	0.19	-0.793	-0.151
Blocks	0	5.89	4.15	0.11	-1.418	-0.156
Takeaways	2	2.85	2.16	0.11	-0.393	-0.043

6.0 + clip(Σ −1.046 × 2, −3 to 3) = 3.909, then −0.2 goals against → 3.7

Pucker+13

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	0	3.486	0	0.32	0
Shots	0	4.112	0	0.08	0
Saves	0	2.037	0	0.15	0
Blocks	0	5.888	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	2	2.85	0.702	0.12	0.084
Passes	6	16.523	0.363	0.08	0.029
Faceoff win rate	0	0.5	0	0.03	0

Σ 0.113 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.133 → ×100 = 13.32 → 13

Offensive2.95

Rate	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.101	0.4	1.181
Shooting %	0.505	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.092	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 2.954

Defensive4.03

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.037	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	0	5.888	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	2	2.85	4.841	0.25	1.21
Goals conceded	8	6.692	5.352	0.25	1.338

Σ contribution = 4.025

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Nayr[QC] Tuxedo Monkeys

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.4

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	2.07	2.07	0.23	-0.519	-0.119
Assists	0	1.52	1.28	0.19	-1.193	-0.227
Shots	4	4.11	3.42	0.09	-0.033	-0.003
Passes	17	16.52	6.44	0.08	0.074	0.006
Saves	0	2.04	2.57	0.19	-0.793	-0.151
Blocks	1	5.89	4.15	0.11	-1.177	-0.129
Takeaways	3	2.85	2.16	0.11	0.069	0.008

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.616 × 2, −3 to 3) = 4.769, then −0.2 cold shooting, −0.2 goals against → 4.4

Pucker+49

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1	3.486	0.287	0.32	0.092
Shots	4	4.112	0.973	0.08	0.078
Saves	0	2.037	0	0.15	0
Blocks	1	5.888	0.17	0.07	0.012
Takeaways	3	2.85	1.052	0.12	0.126
Passes	17	16.523	1.029	0.08	0.082
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.5	1	0.03	0.03

Σ 0.42 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.494 − 0.008 turnover penalty = 0.486 → ×100 = 48.64 → 49

Offensive3.67

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.05	0.101	0.4	1.657
Shooting %	0.25	0.505	0.2	0.828
Assists per pass	0	0.092	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 3.666

Defensive4.43

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.037	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	1	5.888	3.278	0.2	0.656
Takeaways	3	2.85	6.21	0.25	1.552
Goals conceded	8	6.692	5.352	0.25	1.338

Σ contribution = 4.432

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Nano Tuxedo Monkeys

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR7.6

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	2.07	2.07	0.23	-0.519	-0.119
Assists	3	1.52	1.28	0.19	1.157	0.22
Shots	2	4.11	3.42	0.09	-0.617	-0.056
Passes	34	16.52	6.44	0.08	2.713	0.217
Saves	5	2.04	2.57	0.19	1.153	0.219
Blocks	11	5.89	4.15	0.11	1.231	0.135
Takeaways	8	2.85	2.16	0.11	2.382	0.262

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.878 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.757, then −0.2 goals against → 7.6

Pucker+159

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4	3.486	1.147	0.32	0.367
Shots	2	4.112	0.486	0.08	0.039
Saves	5	2.037	2.454	0.15	0.368
Blocks	11	5.888	1.868	0.07	0.131
Takeaways	8	2.85	2.807	0.12	0.337
Passes	34	16.523	2.058	0.08	0.165
Faceoff win rate	0.667	0.5	1.333	0.03	0.04

Σ 1.446 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.702 − 0.113 turnover penalty = 1.589 → ×100 = 158.85 → 159

Offensive5.65

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.083	0.101	0.4	2.127
Shooting %	0.5	0.505	0.2	1.193
Assists per pass	0.088	0.092	0.4	2.331

Σ contribution = 5.652

Defensive8.42

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	5	2.037	9.586	0.3	2.876
Blocks	11	5.888	8.802	0.2	1.76
Takeaways	8	2.85	9.79	0.25	2.447
Goals conceded	8	6.692	5.352	0.25	1.338

Σ contribution = 8.421

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Rosieyw Tuxedo Monkeys

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.1

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	2.07	2.07	0.23	0.446	0.103
Assists	1	1.52	1.28	0.19	-0.41	-0.078
Shots	3	4.11	3.42	0.09	-0.325	-0.029
Passes	24	16.52	6.44	0.08	1.161	0.093
Saves	1	2.04	2.57	0.19	-0.404	-0.077
Blocks	4	5.89	4.15	0.11	-0.455	-0.05
Takeaways	4	2.85	2.16	0.11	0.532	0.058

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.02 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.04, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.2 goals against → 6.1

Pucker+101

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4	3.486	1.147	0.32	0.367
Shots	3	4.112	0.73	0.08	0.058
Saves	1	2.037	0.491	0.15	0.074
Blocks	4	5.888	0.679	0.07	0.048
Takeaways	4	2.85	1.403	0.12	0.168
Passes	24	16.523	1.452	0.08	0.116
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.5	1	0.03	0.03

Σ 0.861 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.013 → ×100 = 101.33 → 101

Offensive5.56

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.085	0.101	0.4	2.155
Shooting %	1	0.505	0.2	1.803
Assists per pass	0.042	0.092	0.4	1.601

Σ contribution = 5.559

Defensive5.41

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.037	4.123	0.3	1.237
Blocks	4	5.888	4.76	0.2	0.952
Takeaways	4	2.85	7.531	0.25	1.883
Goals conceded	8	6.692	5.352	0.25	1.338

Σ contribution = 5.41

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.