Michigan Mafia vs Toronto XOS

MMHomeMichigan Mafia

3–7Final

Away · TXToronto XOS

Feb 9, 2026 · Intermediate Division · Michigan Mansion

MVP McDruggie · 7.4 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Michigan MafiavsToronto XOS

12Shots111

4Saves59

8Faceoffs won35

5Takeaways1015

15Turnovers↓105

25Blocks223

77Passes3047

2:18Possession0:232:41

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Michigan Mafia

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Stiff	0	1	1	2	3	3	0	4	3	11	20	1:33	92	3.52	7.20
Tef	3	0	3	8	1	4	2	1	8	9	28	0:23	76	5.01	5.14
PixelSquidy	0	1	1	2	0	1	3	0	4	5	29	0:22	37	3.66	4.13

Toronto XOS

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
McDruggie	2	2	4	3	4	2	3	10	1	12	14	1:32	151	6.16	9.22
Hodie	5	0	5	5	2	2	4	4	1	8	17	0:56	125	5.20	7.22
Hoodie	0	4	4	3	3	1	1	1	3	3	16	0:13	98	8.39	6.29

Stiff Michigan Mafia

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.5

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	1.89	1.66	0.23	-1.136	-0.261
Assists	1	1.64	1.38	0.19	-0.465	-0.088
Shots	2	3.98	2.96	0.09	-0.669	-0.06
Passes	20	16.77	7.4	0.08	0.437	0.035
Saves	3	2.09	2.48	0.19	0.364	0.069
Blocks	11	5.84	3.84	0.11	1.342	0.148
Takeaways	4	3.25	2.88	0.11	0.26	0.029

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.13 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.741, then −0.2 cold shooting → 5.5

Pucker+92

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1	3.363	0.297	0.32	0.095
Shots	2	3.983	0.502	0.08	0.04
Saves	3	2.095	1.432	0.15	0.215
Blocks	11	5.84	1.883	0.07	0.132
Takeaways	4	3.252	1.23	0.12	0.148
Passes	20	16.768	1.193	0.08	0.095
Faceoff win rate	1	0.5	2	0.03	0.06

Σ 0.785 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.924 → ×100 = 92.36 → 92

Offensive3.52

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.011	0.104	0.4	1.256
Shooting %	0	0.474	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.05	0.098	0.4	1.675

Σ contribution = 3.522

Defensive7.20

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	3	2.095	7.628	0.3	2.289
Blocks	11	5.84	8.833	0.2	1.767
Takeaways	4	3.252	6.904	0.25	1.726
Goals conceded	7	6.446	5.684	0.25	1.421

Σ contribution = 7.203

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Tef Michigan Mafia

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.7

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	1.89	1.66	0.23	0.669	0.154
Assists	0	1.64	1.38	0.19	-1.192	-0.226
Shots	8	3.98	2.96	0.09	1.355	0.122
Passes	28	16.77	7.4	0.08	1.519	0.121
Saves	1	2.09	2.48	0.19	-0.441	-0.084
Blocks	9	5.84	3.84	0.11	0.822	0.09
Takeaways	1	3.25	2.88	0.11	-0.783	-0.086

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.092 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.183, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting → 5.7

Pucker+76

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3	3.363	0.892	0.32	0.285
Shots	8	3.983	2.009	0.08	0.161
Saves	1	2.095	0.477	0.15	0.072
Blocks	9	5.84	1.541	0.07	0.108
Takeaways	1	3.252	0.308	0.12	0.037
Passes	28	16.768	1.67	0.08	0.134
Faceoff win rate	0.667	0.5	1.333	0.03	0.04

Σ 0.836 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.984 − 0.221 turnover penalty = 0.763 → ×100 = 76.24 → 76

Offensive5.01

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.13	0.104	0.4	2.793
Shooting %	0.375	0.474	0.2	1.035
Assists per pass	0	0.098	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 5.01

Defensive5.14

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.095	4.081	0.3	1.224
Blocks	9	5.84	7.975	0.2	1.595
Takeaways	1	3.252	3.602	0.25	0.9
Goals conceded	7	6.446	5.684	0.25	1.421

Σ contribution = 5.14

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

PixelSquidy Michigan Mafia

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.6

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	1.89	1.66	0.23	-1.136	-0.261
Assists	1	1.64	1.38	0.19	-0.465	-0.088
Shots	2	3.98	2.96	0.09	-0.669	-0.06
Passes	29	16.77	7.4	0.08	1.654	0.132
Saves	0	2.09	2.48	0.19	-0.843	-0.16
Blocks	5	5.84	3.84	0.11	-0.219	-0.024
Takeaways	0	3.25	2.88	0.11	-1.13	-0.124

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.586 × 2, −3 to 3) = 4.827, then −0.2 cold shooting → 4.6

Pucker+37

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1	3.363	0.297	0.32	0.095
Shots	2	3.983	0.502	0.08	0.04
Saves	0	2.095	0	0.15	0
Blocks	5	5.84	0.856	0.07	0.06
Takeaways	0	3.252	0	0.12	0
Passes	29	16.768	1.729	0.08	0.138
Faceoff win rate	0.25	0.5	0.5	0.03	0.015

Σ 0.349 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.41 − 0.036 turnover penalty = 0.374 → ×100 = 37.45 → 37

Offensive3.66

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.045	0.104	0.4	1.583
Shooting %	0	0.474	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.034	0.098	0.4	1.488

Σ contribution = 3.661

Defensive4.13

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.095	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	5	5.84	5.428	0.2	1.086
Takeaways	0	3.252	2.954	0.25	0.738
Goals conceded	7	6.446	5.684	0.25	1.421

Σ contribution = 4.131

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

McDruggie Toronto XOS

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR7.4

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	1.89	1.66	0.23	0.068	0.016
Assists	2	1.64	1.38	0.19	0.261	0.05
Shots	3	3.98	2.96	0.09	-0.331	-0.03
Passes	14	16.77	7.4	0.08	-0.374	-0.03
Saves	4	2.09	2.48	0.19	0.767	0.146
Blocks	12	5.84	3.84	0.11	1.602	0.176
Takeaways	10	3.25	2.88	0.11	2.345	0.258

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.585 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.171, then +0.25 hot shooting → 7.4

Pucker+151

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3.5	3.363	1.041	0.32	0.333
Shots	3	3.983	0.753	0.08	0.06
Saves	4	2.095	1.91	0.15	0.286
Blocks	12	5.84	2.055	0.07	0.144
Takeaways	10	3.252	3.075	0.12	0.369
Passes	14	16.768	0.835	0.08	0.067
Faceoff win rate	0.4	0.5	0.8	0.03	0.024

Σ 1.283 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.51 → ×100 = 150.99 → 151

Offensive6.16

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.043	0.104	0.4	1.56
Shooting %	0.667	0.474	0.2	1.508
Assists per pass	0.143	0.098	0.4	3.088

Σ contribution = 6.157

Defensive9.22

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	4	2.095	8.884	0.3	2.665
Blocks	12	5.84	9.134	0.2	1.827
Takeaways	10	3.252	9.876	0.25	2.469
Goals conceded	3	6.446	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 9.223

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Hodie Toronto XOS

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.9

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	5	1.89	1.66	0.23	1.873	0.431
Assists	0	1.64	1.38	0.19	-1.192	-0.226
Shots	5	3.98	2.96	0.09	0.343	0.031
Passes	17	16.77	7.4	0.08	0.031	0.003
Saves	2	2.09	2.48	0.19	-0.038	-0.007
Blocks	8	5.84	3.84	0.11	0.562	0.062
Takeaways	4	3.25	2.88	0.11	0.26	0.029

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.321 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.642, then +0.25 hot shooting → 6.9

Pucker+125

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	5	3.363	1.487	0.32	0.476
Shots	5	3.983	1.255	0.08	0.1
Saves	2	2.095	0.955	0.15	0.143
Blocks	8	5.84	1.37	0.07	0.096
Takeaways	4	3.252	1.23	0.12	0.148
Passes	17	16.768	1.014	0.08	0.081
Faceoff win rate	0.333	0.5	0.667	0.03	0.02

Σ 1.064 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.252 → ×100 = 125.18 → 125

Offensive5.20

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.089	0.104	0.4	2.172
Shooting %	1	0.474	0.2	1.843
Assists per pass	0	0.098	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 5.196

Defensive7.22

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	2.095	5.819	0.3	1.746
Blocks	8	5.84	7.415	0.2	1.483
Takeaways	4	3.252	6.904	0.25	1.726
Goals conceded	3	6.446	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 7.217

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Hoodie Toronto XOS

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.7

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	1.89	1.66	0.23	-1.136	-0.261
Assists	4	1.64	1.38	0.19	1.713	0.326
Shots	3	3.98	2.96	0.09	-0.331	-0.03
Passes	16	16.77	7.4	0.08	-0.104	-0.008
Saves	3	2.09	2.48	0.19	0.364	0.069
Blocks	3	5.84	3.84	0.11	-0.739	-0.081
Takeaways	1	3.25	2.88	0.11	-0.783	-0.086

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.072 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.856, then −0.2 cold shooting → 5.7

Pucker+98

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4	3.363	1.189	0.32	0.381
Shots	3	3.983	0.753	0.08	0.06
Saves	3	2.095	1.432	0.15	0.215
Blocks	3	5.84	0.514	0.07	0.036
Takeaways	1	3.252	0.308	0.12	0.037
Passes	16	16.768	0.954	0.08	0.076
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.5	1	0.03	0.03

Σ 0.835 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.982 → ×100 = 98.22 → 98

Offensive8.39

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.308	0.104	0.4	3.937
Shooting %	0	0.474	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.25	0.098	0.4	3.863

Σ contribution = 8.391

Defensive6.29

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	3	2.095	7.628	0.3	2.289
Blocks	3	5.84	4.195	0.2	0.839
Takeaways	1	3.252	3.602	0.25	0.9
Goals conceded	3	6.446	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 6.29

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.