Hershey Toots vs Champaign Champagne

Home · HTHershey Toots

6–7Final

Away · CHAChampaign Champagne

Feb 2, 2026 · Challenger Division · Toilet Arena

MVP Richard Tantrum · 6.9 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Hershey TootsvsChampaign Champagne

13Shots112

5Saves27

7Faceoffs won18

18Takeaways711

11Turnovers↓718

11Blocks1021

61Passes465

2:51Possession0:312:20

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Hershey Toots

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Quion Games	2	2	4	5	0	5	2	8	5	1	24	1:01	90	0.74	0.86
NUTSACK6	1	3	4	4	1	1	2	5	4	3	25	0:36	92	0.98	0.88
YackSlack	3	1	4	4	4	1	4	5	2	7	12	1:14	117	0.85	1.35

Champaign Champagne

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	GWG	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
PoppaNut	2	2	4	3	2	3	3	5	6	2	15	0	0:22	83	1.42	1.01
Richard Tantrum	1	4	5	2	4	2	2	3	7	15	23	0	1:16	105	1.11	1.39
Square	4	1	5	7	1	3	2	3	5	4	27	1	0:42	99	0.83	0.81

Quion Games Hershey Toots

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.7

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	2.08	1.84	0.23	-0.044	-0.01
Assists	2	1.93	1.71	0.19	0.04	0.008
Shots	5	4.44	3.29	0.09	0.17	0.015
Passes	24	19.45	8.79	0.08	0.518	0.041
Saves	0	2.36	2.8	0.19	-0.841	-0.16
Blocks	1	5.8	3.73	0.11	-1.288	-0.142
Takeaways	8	3.2	2.66	0.11	1.805	0.199

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.049 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.902, then −0.2 cold shooting → 5.7

Pucker+90

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3.5	3.817	0.917	0.32	0.293
Shots	5	4.441	1.126	0.08	0.09
Saves	0	2.358	0	0.15	0
Blocks	1	5.802	0.172	0.07	0.012
Takeaways	8	3.2	2.5	0.12	0.3
Passes	24	19.448	1.234	0.08	0.099
Faceoff win rate	0.714	0.5	1.429	0.03	0.043

Σ 0.837 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.985 − 0.085 turnover penalty = 0.9 → ×100 = 90 → 90

Offensive0.74

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.066	0.116	0.4	0.237
Shooting %	0.4	0.469	0.2	0.171
Assists per pass	0.083	0.099	0.4	0.336

Σ contribution = 0.744

Defensive0.86

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.358	0.238	0.3	0.072
Blocks	1	5.802	0.321	0.2	0.064
Takeaways	8	3.2	1.905	0.25	0.476
Goals conceded	7	7.031	1.004	0.25	0.251

Σ contribution = 0.863

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

NUTSACK6 Hershey Toots

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.6

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	2.08	1.84	0.23	-0.589	-0.135
Assists	3	1.93	1.71	0.19	0.627	0.119
Shots	4	4.44	3.29	0.09	-0.134	-0.012
Passes	25	19.45	8.79	0.08	0.632	0.051
Saves	1	2.36	2.8	0.19	-0.485	-0.092
Blocks	3	5.8	3.73	0.11	-0.752	-0.083
Takeaways	5	3.2	2.66	0.11	0.677	0.074

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.078 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.844, then −0.2 cold shooting → 5.6

Pucker+92

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4	3.817	1.048	0.32	0.335
Shots	4	4.441	0.901	0.08	0.072
Saves	1	2.358	0.424	0.15	0.064
Blocks	3	5.802	0.517	0.07	0.036
Takeaways	5	3.2	1.563	0.12	0.188
Passes	25	19.448	1.285	0.08	0.103
Faceoff win rate	0.333	0.5	0.667	0.03	0.02

Σ 0.818 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.962 − 0.038 turnover penalty = 0.924 → ×100 = 92.4 → 92

Offensive0.98

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.111	0.116	0.4	0.385
Shooting %	0.25	0.469	0.2	0.113
Assists per pass	0.12	0.099	0.4	0.482

Σ contribution = 0.98

Defensive0.88

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.358	0.48	0.3	0.144
Blocks	3	5.802	0.551	0.2	0.11
Takeaways	5	3.2	1.51	0.25	0.377
Goals conceded	7	7.031	1.004	0.25	0.251

Σ contribution = 0.882

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

YackSlack Hershey Toots

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.6

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	2.08	1.84	0.23	0.501	0.115
Assists	1	1.93	1.71	0.19	-0.546	-0.104
Shots	4	4.44	3.29	0.09	-0.134	-0.012
Passes	12	19.45	8.79	0.08	-0.847	-0.068
Saves	4	2.36	2.8	0.19	0.586	0.111
Blocks	7	5.8	3.73	0.11	0.321	0.035
Takeaways	5	3.2	2.66	0.11	0.677	0.074

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.153 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.305, then +0.25 hot shooting → 6.6

Pucker+117

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4	3.817	1.048	0.32	0.335
Shots	4	4.441	0.901	0.08	0.072
Saves	4	2.358	1.696	0.15	0.254
Blocks	7	5.802	1.206	0.07	0.084
Takeaways	5	3.2	1.563	0.12	0.188
Passes	12	19.448	0.617	0.08	0.049
Faceoff win rate	0.2	0.5	0.4	0.03	0.012

Σ 0.995 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.171 → ×100 = 117.09 → 117

Offensive0.85

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.054	0.116	0.4	0.205
Shooting %	0.75	0.469	0.2	0.307
Assists per pass	0.083	0.099	0.4	0.336

Σ contribution = 0.849

Defensive1.35

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	4	2.358	1.602	0.3	0.481
Blocks	7	5.802	1.204	0.2	0.241
Takeaways	5	3.2	1.51	0.25	0.377
Goals conceded	7	7.031	1.004	0.25	0.251

Σ contribution = 1.35

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

PoppaNut Champaign Champagne

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.7

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	2.08	1.84	0.23	-0.044	-0.01
Assists	2	1.93	1.71	0.19	0.04	0.008
Shots	3	4.44	3.29	0.09	-0.438	-0.039
Passes	15	19.45	8.79	0.08	-0.506	-0.04
Saves	2	2.36	2.8	0.19	-0.128	-0.024
Blocks	2	5.8	3.73	0.11	-1.02	-0.112
Takeaways	5	3.2	2.66	0.11	0.677	0.074

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.144 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.711, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.3 turnovers → 5.7

Pucker+83

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4	3.817	1.048	0.32	0.335
Shots	3	4.441	0.676	0.08	0.054
Saves	2	2.358	0.848	0.15	0.127
Blocks	2	5.802	0.345	0.07	0.024
Takeaways	5	3.2	1.563	0.12	0.188
Passes	15	19.448	0.771	0.08	0.062
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.5	1	0.03	0.03

Σ 0.82 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.965 − 0.132 turnover penalty = 0.833 → ×100 = 83.28 → 83

Offensive1.42

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.182	0.116	0.4	0.607
Shooting %	0.667	0.469	0.2	0.28
Assists per pass	0.133	0.099	0.4	0.532

Σ contribution = 1.419

Defensive1.01

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	2.358	0.849	0.3	0.255
Blocks	2	5.802	0.425	0.2	0.085
Takeaways	5	3.2	1.51	0.25	0.377
Goals conceded	6	7.031	1.17	0.25	0.293

Σ contribution = 1.01

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Richard Tantrum Champaign Champagne

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.9

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	2.08	1.84	0.23	-0.589	-0.135
Assists	4	1.93	1.71	0.19	1.213	0.23
Shots	2	4.44	3.29	0.09	-0.742	-0.067
Passes	23	19.45	8.79	0.08	0.404	0.032
Saves	4	2.36	2.8	0.19	0.586	0.111
Blocks	15	5.8	3.73	0.11	2.467	0.271
Takeaways	3	3.2	2.66	0.11	-0.075	-0.008

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.435 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.87, then +0.3 blocks, −0.3 turnovers → 6.9

Pucker+105

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4	3.817	1.048	0.32	0.335
Shots	2	4.441	0.45	0.08	0.036
Saves	4	2.358	1.696	0.15	0.254
Blocks	15	5.802	2.585	0.07	0.181
Takeaways	3	3.2	0.938	0.12	0.113
Passes	23	19.448	1.183	0.08	0.095
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.5	1	0.03	0.03

Σ 1.044 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.228 − 0.179 turnover penalty = 1.049 → ×100 = 104.93 → 105

Offensive1.11

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.066	0.116	0.4	0.238
Shooting %	0.5	0.469	0.2	0.213
Assists per pass	0.174	0.099	0.4	0.654

Σ contribution = 1.105

Defensive1.39

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	4	2.358	1.602	0.3	0.481
Blocks	15	5.802	1.919	0.2	0.384
Takeaways	3	3.2	0.938	0.25	0.234
Goals conceded	6	7.031	1.17	0.25	0.293

Σ contribution = 1.392

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Square Champaign Champagne

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.2

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	4	2.08	1.84	0.23	1.046	0.241
Assists	1	1.93	1.71	0.19	-0.546	-0.104
Shots	7	4.44	3.29	0.09	0.779	0.07
Passes	27	19.45	8.79	0.08	0.859	0.069
Saves	1	2.36	2.8	0.19	-0.485	-0.092
Blocks	4	5.8	3.73	0.11	-0.483	-0.053
Takeaways	3	3.2	2.66	0.11	-0.075	-0.008

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.122 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.244, nothing hit the bonus or penalty thresholds → 6.2

Pucker+99

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	5	3.817	1.31	0.32	0.419
Shots	7	4.441	1.576	0.08	0.126
Saves	1	2.358	0.424	0.15	0.064
Blocks	4	5.802	0.689	0.07	0.048
Takeaways	3	3.2	0.938	0.12	0.113
Passes	27	19.448	1.388	0.08	0.111
Faceoff win rate	0.6	0.5	1.2	0.03	0.036

Σ 0.917 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.079 − 0.085 turnover penalty = 0.994 → ×100 = 99.36 → 99

Offensive0.83

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.119	0.116	0.4	0.412
Shooting %	0.571	0.469	0.2	0.243
Assists per pass	0.037	0.099	0.4	0.178

Σ contribution = 0.833

Defensive0.81

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.358	0.48	0.3	0.144
Blocks	4	5.802	0.699	0.2	0.14
Takeaways	3	3.2	0.938	0.25	0.234
Goals conceded	6	7.031	1.17	0.25	0.293

Σ contribution = 0.811

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.