Ottawa Valley Ferrari Bazingas vs Tuxedo Monkeys

OVHomeOttawa Valley Ferrari Bazingas

6–8Final

TMAwayTuxedo Monkeys

Jul 9, 2025 · Central C · Ferrari dealership

MVP Hill · 8.1 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Ottawa Valley Ferrari BazingasvsTuxedo Monkeys

17Shots512

4Saves711

7Faceoffs won18

26Takeaways188

8Turnovers↓1826

14Blocks113

49Passes1463

2:55Possession0:422:13

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Ottawa Valley Ferrari Bazingas

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
4glass	1	0	1	5	0	2	2	1	2	4	17	0:12	45	4.19	4.03
Belevis	0	2	2	2	3	2	2	6	2	3	15	0:44	91	5.37	6.43
Hill	5	1	6	10	1	3	4	19	4	7	17	1:59	196	4.85	6.33

Tuxedo Monkeys

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	GWG	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Sylvatic	5	1	6	7	0	4	3	8	11	4	20	1	0:25	103	7.20	5.79
Nano	1	2	3	1	10	2	2	0	8	8	22	0	1:08	118	5.92	6.77
Rosieyw	2	2	4	4	1	2	2	0	7	1	21	0	0:40	62	6.28	4.14

4glass Ottawa Valley Ferrari Bazingas

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.4

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	2	1.83	0.23	-0.546	-0.126
Assists	0	1.46	1.47	0.19	-0.994	-0.189
Shots	5	4.33	3.34	0.09	0.2	0.018
Passes	17	16.44	7.4	0.08	0.076	0.006
Saves	0	2.33	2.75	0.19	-0.85	-0.161
Blocks	4	5.93	3.8	0.11	-0.508	-0.056
Takeaways	1	3.35	3.05	0.11	-0.769	-0.085

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.592 × 2, −3 to 3) = 4.816, then −0.2 cold shooting, −0.2 goals against → 4.4

Pucker+45

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1	3.356	0.298	0.32	0.095
Shots	5	4.333	1.154	0.08	0.092
Saves	0	2.333	0	0.15	0
Blocks	4	5.931	0.674	0.07	0.047
Takeaways	1	3.349	0.299	0.12	0.036
Passes	17	16.439	1.034	0.08	0.083
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.5	1	0.03	0.03

Σ 0.383 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.451 → ×100 = 45.11 → 45

Offensive4.19

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.083	0.094	0.4	2.22
Shooting %	0.2	0.462	0.2	0.79
Assists per pass	0	0.089	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 4.191

Defensive4.03

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.333	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	4	5.931	4.742	0.2	0.948
Takeaways	1	3.349	3.579	0.25	0.895
Goals conceded	8	6.418	5.219	0.25	1.305

Σ contribution = 4.034

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Belevis Ottawa Valley Ferrari Bazingas

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.2

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	2	1.83	0.23	-1.091	-0.251
Assists	2	1.46	1.47	0.19	0.365	0.069
Shots	2	4.33	3.34	0.09	-0.698	-0.063
Passes	15	16.44	7.4	0.08	-0.195	-0.016
Saves	3	2.33	2.75	0.19	0.243	0.046
Blocks	3	5.93	3.8	0.11	-0.77	-0.085
Takeaways	6	3.35	3.05	0.11	0.868	0.095

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.203 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.594, then −0.2 cold shooting, −0.2 goals against → 5.2

Pucker+91

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2	3.356	0.596	0.32	0.191
Shots	2	4.333	0.462	0.08	0.037
Saves	3	2.333	1.286	0.15	0.193
Blocks	3	5.931	0.506	0.07	0.035
Takeaways	6	3.349	1.791	0.12	0.215
Passes	15	16.439	0.912	0.08	0.073
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.5	1	0.03	0.03

Σ 0.774 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.911 → ×100 = 91.05 → 91

Offensive5.37

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.045	0.094	0.4	1.64
Shooting %	0	0.462	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.133	0.089	0.4	3.138

Σ contribution = 5.369

Defensive6.43

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	3	2.333	7.114	0.3	2.134
Blocks	3	5.931	4.17	0.2	0.834
Takeaways	6	3.349	8.637	0.25	2.159
Goals conceded	8	6.418	5.219	0.25	1.305

Σ contribution = 6.432

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Hill Ottawa Valley Ferrari Bazingas

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR8.1

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	5	2	1.83	0.23	1.637	0.377
Assists	1	1.46	1.47	0.19	-0.314	-0.06
Shots	10	4.33	3.34	0.09	1.695	0.153
Passes	17	16.44	7.4	0.08	0.076	0.006
Saves	1	2.33	2.75	0.19	-0.485	-0.092
Blocks	7	5.93	3.8	0.11	0.281	0.031
Takeaways	19	3.35	3.05	0.11	5.124	0.564

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.978 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.956, then +0.3 takeaways, −0.2 goals against → 8.1

Pucker+196

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	6	3.356	1.788	0.32	0.572
Shots	10	4.333	2.308	0.08	0.185
Saves	1	2.333	0.429	0.15	0.064
Blocks	7	5.931	1.18	0.07	0.083
Takeaways	19	3.349	5.673	0.12	0.681
Passes	17	16.439	1.034	0.08	0.083
Faceoff win rate	0.429	0.5	0.857	0.03	0.026

Σ 1.693 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.992 − 0.03 turnover penalty = 1.962 → ×100 = 196.2 → 196

Offensive4.85

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.05	0.094	0.4	1.708
Shooting %	0.5	0.462	0.2	1.266
Assists per pass	0.059	0.089	0.4	1.878

Σ contribution = 4.852

Defensive6.33

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.333	3.935	0.3	1.18
Blocks	7	5.931	6.713	0.2	1.343
Takeaways	19	3.349	9.999	0.25	2.5
Goals conceded	8	6.418	5.219	0.25	1.305

Σ contribution = 6.328

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Sylvatic Tuxedo Monkeys

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.7

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	5	2	1.83	0.23	1.637	0.377
Assists	1	1.46	1.47	0.19	-0.314	-0.06
Shots	7	4.33	3.34	0.09	0.798	0.072
Passes	20	16.44	7.4	0.08	0.481	0.039
Saves	0	2.33	2.75	0.19	-0.85	-0.161
Blocks	4	5.93	3.8	0.11	-0.508	-0.056
Takeaways	8	3.35	3.05	0.11	1.523	0.167

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.377 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.755, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.3 turnovers → 6.7

Pucker+103

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	6	3.356	1.788	0.32	0.572
Shots	7	4.333	1.616	0.08	0.129
Saves	0	2.333	0	0.15	0
Blocks	4	5.931	0.674	0.07	0.047
Takeaways	8	3.349	2.389	0.12	0.287
Passes	20	16.439	1.217	0.08	0.097
Faceoff win rate	0.571	0.5	1.143	0.03	0.034

Σ 1.167 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.373 − 0.344 turnover penalty = 1.029 → ×100 = 102.86 → 103

Offensive7.20

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.24	0.094	0.4	3.863
Shooting %	0.714	0.462	0.2	1.599
Assists per pass	0.05	0.089	0.4	1.741

Σ contribution = 7.203

Defensive5.79

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.333	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	4	5.931	4.742	0.2	0.948
Takeaways	8	3.349	9.531	0.25	2.383
Goals conceded	6	6.418	6.278	0.25	1.57

Σ contribution = 5.787

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Nano Tuxedo Monkeys

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR7.1

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	2	1.83	0.23	-0.546	-0.126
Assists	2	1.46	1.47	0.19	0.365	0.069
Shots	1	4.33	3.34	0.09	-0.997	-0.09
Passes	22	16.44	7.4	0.08	0.752	0.06
Saves	10	2.33	2.75	0.19	2.792	0.531
Blocks	8	5.93	3.8	0.11	0.544	0.06
Takeaways	0	3.35	3.05	0.11	-1.097	-0.121

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.384 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.768, then +0.35 saves, +0.25 hot shooting, −0.3 turnovers → 7.1

Pucker+118

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3	3.356	0.894	0.32	0.286
Shots	1	4.333	0.231	0.08	0.018
Saves	10	2.333	4.287	0.15	0.643
Blocks	8	5.931	1.349	0.07	0.094
Takeaways	0	3.349	0	0.12	0
Passes	22	16.439	1.338	0.08	0.107
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.5	1	0.03	0.03

Σ 1.179 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.387 − 0.209 turnover penalty = 1.178 → ×100 = 117.78 → 118

Offensive5.92

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.044	0.094	0.4	1.623
Shooting %	1	0.462	0.2	1.859
Assists per pass	0.091	0.089	0.4	2.435

Σ contribution = 5.917

Defensive6.77

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	10	2.333	9.989	0.3	2.997
Blocks	8	5.931	7.341	0.2	1.468
Takeaways	0	3.349	2.954	0.25	0.738
Goals conceded	6	6.418	6.278	0.25	1.57

Σ contribution = 6.773

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Rosieyw Tuxedo Monkeys

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.2

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	2	1.83	0.23	0	0
Assists	2	1.46	1.47	0.19	0.365	0.069
Shots	4	4.33	3.34	0.09	-0.1	-0.009
Passes	21	16.44	7.4	0.08	0.617	0.049
Saves	1	2.33	2.75	0.19	-0.485	-0.092
Blocks	1	5.93	3.8	0.11	-1.296	-0.143
Takeaways	0	3.35	3.05	0.11	-1.097	-0.121

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.246 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.509, then −0.3 turnovers → 5.2

Pucker+62

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4	3.356	1.192	0.32	0.381
Shots	4	4.333	0.923	0.08	0.074
Saves	1	2.333	0.429	0.15	0.064
Blocks	1	5.931	0.169	0.07	0.012
Takeaways	0	3.349	0	0.12	0
Passes	21	16.439	1.277	0.08	0.102
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.5	1	0.03	0.03

Σ 0.664 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.781 − 0.164 turnover penalty = 0.617 → ×100 = 61.62 → 62

Offensive6.28

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.1	0.094	0.4	2.503
Shooting %	0.5	0.462	0.2	1.266
Assists per pass	0.095	0.089	0.4	2.513

Σ contribution = 6.282

Defensive4.14

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.333	3.935	0.3	1.18
Blocks	1	5.931	3.275	0.2	0.655
Takeaways	0	3.349	2.954	0.25	0.738
Goals conceded	6	6.418	6.278	0.25	1.57

Σ contribution = 4.143

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.