Utica Uncs vs Michigan Magic

UUHomeUtica Uncs

1–11Final

Away · MICHMichigan Magic

Jul 23, 2025 · Central B · Putt Putt Butt Butt Stadium

MVP YackSlack · 6.8 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Utica UncsvsMichigan Magic

3Shots1114

3Saves12

3Faceoffs won710

12Takeaways113

13Turnovers↓112

12Blocks48

16Passes2945

1:14Possession1:152:29

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Utica Uncs

Player	G	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
BEYBLADE	0	0	0	2	2	4	9	6	8	4	0:49	59	2.95	6.82
Saitama	1	1	2	1	0	3	3	4	4	6	0:13	43	4.53	4.70
Woodchipz	0	0	1	0	1	3	0	3	0	6	0:12	7	2.95	3.34

Michigan Magic

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
sweatshirt	4	1	5	5	2	3	0	0	4	3	14	0:25	99	7.39	5.61
prespectingeh	3	2	5	4	0	3	1	3	1	3	13	0:44	87	7.65	5.37
YackSlack	4	3	7	5	0	4	2	10	7	2	18	1:20	125	7.40	6.35

BEYBLADE Utica Uncs

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.5

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	2.01	1.72	0.23	-1.173	-0.27
Assists	0	1.61	1.45	0.19	-1.114	-0.212
Shots	0	4.07	2.91	0.09	-1.397	-0.126
Passes	4	17.22	7.23	0.08	-1.829	-0.146
Saves	2	2.06	2.34	0.19	-0.025	-0.005
Blocks	8	5.68	3.86	0.11	0.601	0.066
Takeaways	9	3.43	3.39	0.11	1.643	0.181

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.511 × 2, −3 to 3) = 4.978, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 goals against → 4.5

Pucker+59

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	0	3.493	0	0.32	0
Shots	0	4.069	0	0.08	0
Saves	2	2.058	0.972	0.15	0.146
Blocks	8	5.681	1.408	0.07	0.099
Takeaways	9	3.431	2.623	0.12	0.315
Passes	4	17.219	0.232	0.08	0.019
Faceoff win rate	0.333	0.5	0.667	0.03	0.02

Σ 0.598 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.703 − 0.113 turnover penalty = 0.59 → ×100 = 59.04 → 59

Offensive2.95

Rate	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.092	0.4	1.181
Shooting %	0.494	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.094	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 2.954

Defensive6.82

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	2.058	5.887	0.3	1.766
Blocks	8	5.681	7.548	0.2	1.51
Takeaways	9	3.431	9.701	0.25	2.425
Goals conceded	11	6.611	4.484	0.25	1.121

Σ contribution = 6.822

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Saitama Utica Uncs

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.4

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	2.01	1.72	0.23	-0.59	-0.136
Assists	0	1.61	1.45	0.19	-1.114	-0.212
Shots	2	4.07	2.91	0.09	-0.71	-0.064
Passes	6	17.22	7.23	0.08	-1.552	-0.124
Saves	1	2.06	2.34	0.19	-0.453	-0.086
Blocks	4	5.68	3.86	0.11	-0.435	-0.048
Takeaways	3	3.43	3.39	0.11	-0.127	-0.014

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.683 × 2, −3 to 3) = 4.634, then −0.2 goals against → 4.4

Pucker+43

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1	3.493	0.286	0.32	0.092
Shots	2	4.069	0.491	0.08	0.039
Saves	1	2.058	0.486	0.15	0.073
Blocks	4	5.681	0.704	0.07	0.049
Takeaways	3	3.431	0.874	0.12	0.105
Passes	6	17.219	0.348	0.08	0.028
Faceoff win rate	0	0.5	0	0.03	0

Σ 0.386 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.454 − 0.025 turnover penalty = 0.429 → ×100 = 42.88 → 43

Offensive4.53

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.077	0.092	0.4	2.136
Shooting %	0.5	0.494	0.2	1.209
Assists per pass	0	0.094	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 4.527

Defensive4.70

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.058	4.107	0.3	1.232
Blocks	4	5.681	4.85	0.2	0.97
Takeaways	3	3.431	5.501	0.25	1.375
Goals conceded	11	6.611	4.484	0.25	1.121

Σ contribution = 4.698

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Woodchipz Utica Uncs

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR3.3

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	2.01	1.72	0.23	-1.173	-0.27
Assists	0	1.61	1.45	0.19	-1.114	-0.212
Shots	1	4.07	2.91	0.09	-1.054	-0.095
Passes	6	17.22	7.23	0.08	-1.552	-0.124
Saves	0	2.06	2.34	0.19	-0.88	-0.167
Blocks	0	5.68	3.86	0.11	-1.471	-0.162
Takeaways	0	3.43	3.39	0.11	-1.012	-0.111

6.0 + clip(Σ −1.141 × 2, −3 to 3) = 3.719, then −0.2 cold shooting, −0.2 goals against → 3.3

Pucker+7

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	0	3.493	0	0.32	0
Shots	1	4.069	0.246	0.08	0.02
Saves	0	2.058	0	0.15	0
Blocks	0	5.681	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	0	3.431	0	0.12	0
Passes	6	17.219	0.348	0.08	0.028
Faceoff win rate	0.25	0.5	0.5	0.03	0.015

Σ 0.063 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.074 → ×100 = 7.36 → 7

Offensive2.95

Rate	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.092	0.4	1.181
Shooting %	0.494	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.094	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 2.954

Defensive3.34

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.058	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	0	5.681	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	0	3.431	2.954	0.25	0.738
Goals conceded	11	6.611	4.484	0.25	1.121

Σ contribution = 3.336

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

sweatshirt Michigan Magic

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.2

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	4	2.01	1.72	0.23	1.16	0.267
Assists	1	1.61	1.45	0.19	-0.422	-0.08
Shots	5	4.07	2.91	0.09	0.319	0.029
Passes	14	17.22	7.23	0.08	-0.445	-0.036
Saves	2	2.06	2.34	0.19	-0.025	-0.005
Blocks	3	5.68	3.86	0.11	-0.694	-0.076
Takeaways	0	3.43	3.39	0.11	-1.012	-0.111

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.013 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.974, then +0.25 hot shooting → 6.2

Pucker+99

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	5	3.493	1.431	0.32	0.458
Shots	5	4.069	1.229	0.08	0.098
Saves	2	2.058	0.972	0.15	0.146
Blocks	3	5.681	0.528	0.07	0.037
Takeaways	0	3.431	0	0.12	0
Passes	14	17.219	0.813	0.08	0.065
Faceoff win rate	1	0.5	2	0.03	0.06

Σ 0.864 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.017 − 0.025 turnover penalty = 0.992 → ×100 = 99.14 → 99

Offensive7.39

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.2	0.092	0.4	3.718
Shooting %	0.8	0.494	0.2	1.64
Assists per pass	0.071	0.094	0.4	2.028

Σ contribution = 7.386

Defensive5.61

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	2.058	5.887	0.3	1.766
Blocks	3	5.681	4.241	0.2	0.848
Takeaways	0	3.431	2.954	0.25	0.738
Goals conceded	1	6.611	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 5.614

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

prespectingeh Michigan Magic

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.0

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	2.01	1.72	0.23	0.577	0.133
Assists	2	1.61	1.45	0.19	0.269	0.051
Shots	4	4.07	2.91	0.09	-0.024	-0.002
Passes	13	17.22	7.23	0.08	-0.584	-0.047
Saves	0	2.06	2.34	0.19	-0.88	-0.167
Blocks	3	5.68	3.86	0.11	-0.694	-0.076
Takeaways	3	3.43	3.39	0.11	-0.127	-0.014

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.123 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.755, then +0.25 hot shooting → 6.0

Pucker+87

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4.5	3.493	1.288	0.32	0.412
Shots	4	4.069	0.983	0.08	0.079
Saves	0	2.058	0	0.15	0
Blocks	3	5.681	0.528	0.07	0.037
Takeaways	3	3.431	0.874	0.12	0.105
Passes	13	17.219	0.755	0.08	0.06
Faceoff win rate	0.75	0.5	1.5	0.03	0.045

Σ 0.738 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.868 → ×100 = 86.85 → 87

Offensive7.65

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.114	0.092	0.4	2.764
Shooting %	0.75	0.494	0.2	1.581
Assists per pass	0.154	0.094	0.4	3.308

Σ contribution = 7.653

Defensive5.37

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.058	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	3	5.681	4.241	0.2	0.848
Takeaways	3	3.431	5.501	0.25	1.375
Goals conceded	1	6.611	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 5.371

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

YackSlack Michigan Magic

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.8

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	4	2.01	1.72	0.23	1.16	0.267
Assists	3	1.61	1.45	0.19	0.96	0.182
Shots	5	4.07	2.91	0.09	0.319	0.029
Passes	18	17.22	7.23	0.08	0.108	0.009
Saves	0	2.06	2.34	0.19	-0.88	-0.167
Blocks	2	5.68	3.86	0.11	-0.953	-0.105
Takeaways	10	3.43	3.39	0.11	1.938	0.213

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.428 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.855, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.3 turnovers → 6.8

Pucker+125

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	6.5	3.493	1.861	0.32	0.595
Shots	5	4.069	1.229	0.08	0.098
Saves	0	2.058	0	0.15	0
Blocks	2	5.681	0.352	0.07	0.025
Takeaways	10	3.431	2.915	0.12	0.35
Passes	18	17.219	1.045	0.08	0.084
Faceoff win rate	0.667	0.5	1.333	0.03	0.04

Σ 1.192 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.402 − 0.157 turnover penalty = 1.245 → ×100 = 124.56 → 125

Offensive7.40

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.087	0.092	0.4	2.317
Shooting %	0.8	0.494	0.2	1.64
Assists per pass	0.167	0.094	0.4	3.446

Σ contribution = 7.403

Defensive6.35

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.058	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	2	5.681	3.719	0.2	0.744
Takeaways	10	3.431	9.83	0.25	2.458
Goals conceded	1	6.611	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 6.35

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.