Chicago Cuffems vs Orange County Riptides

CCHomeChicago Cuffems

10–7Final

OCAwayOrange County Riptides

Jul 8, 2025 · Challenger Division · The Pen

MVP Gold · 7.6 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Chicago CuffemsvsOrange County Riptides

19Shots613

6Saves39

7Faceoffs won512

10Takeaways414

14Turnovers↓410

16Blocks16

51Passes1970

1:02Possession1:422:44

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Chicago Cuffems

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	GWG	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Gold	6	1	7	7	1	3	3	5	6	5	18	0	0:19	138	7.44	5.79
Hydroid.	2	1	3	3	5	3	7	3	2	8	10	0	0:34	120	6.13	7.29
NUTSACK6	2	1	3	9	0	1	2	2	6	3	23	1	0:09	74	6.37	4.32

Orange County Riptides

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Chadville	3	0	3	7	1	6	2	5	3	6	24	0:19	110	5.51	5.66
YackSlack	1	1	2	2	4	1	4	8	4	8	19	2:04	120	4.23	7.86
dave	3	3	6	4	4	5	1	1	3	2	27	0:21	144	8.14	5.58

Gold Chicago Cuffems

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR7.6

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	6	1.84	1.71	0.23	2.429	0.559
Assists	1	1.58	1.49	0.19	-0.388	-0.074
Shots	7	3.75	3.01	0.09	1.077	0.097
Passes	18	16.23	8.11	0.08	0.219	0.017
Saves	1	1.92	2.17	0.19	-0.422	-0.08
Blocks	5	5.45	3.65	0.11	-0.122	-0.013
Takeaways	5	3.43	3.41	0.11	0.461	0.051

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.556 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.113, then +0.5 hat trick, +0.25 hot shooting, −0.3 turnovers → 7.6

Pucker+138

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	7	3.278	2.136	0.32	0.683
Shots	7	3.755	1.864	0.08	0.149
Saves	1	1.917	0.522	0.15	0.078
Blocks	5	5.447	0.918	0.07	0.064
Takeaways	5	3.427	1.459	0.12	0.175
Passes	18	16.227	1.109	0.08	0.089
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.5	1	0.03	0.03

Σ 1.269 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.493 − 0.113 turnover penalty = 1.38 → ×100 = 137.94 → 138

Offensive7.44

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.368	0.1	0.4	3.985
Shooting %	0.857	0.491	0.2	1.706
Assists per pass	0.056	0.097	0.4	1.753

Σ contribution = 7.444

Defensive5.79

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	1.917	4.22	0.3	1.266
Blocks	5	5.447	5.673	0.2	1.135
Takeaways	5	3.427	7.717	0.25	1.929
Goals conceded	7	6.727	5.844	0.25	1.461

Σ contribution = 5.791

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Hydroid. Chicago Cuffems

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.6

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	1.84	1.71	0.23	0.091	0.021
Assists	1	1.58	1.49	0.19	-0.388	-0.074
Shots	3	3.75	3.01	0.09	-0.251	-0.023
Passes	10	16.23	8.11	0.08	-0.768	-0.061
Saves	5	1.92	2.17	0.19	1.418	0.269
Blocks	8	5.45	3.65	0.11	0.699	0.077
Takeaways	3	3.43	3.41	0.11	-0.125	-0.014

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.196 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.392, then +0.25 hot shooting → 6.6

Pucker+120

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3	3.278	0.915	0.32	0.293
Shots	3	3.755	0.799	0.08	0.064
Saves	5	1.917	2.608	0.15	0.391
Blocks	8	5.447	1.469	0.07	0.103
Takeaways	3	3.427	0.875	0.12	0.105
Passes	10	16.227	0.616	0.08	0.049
Faceoff win rate	0.3	0.5	0.6	0.03	0.018

Σ 1.023 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.204 → ×100 = 120.38 → 120

Offensive6.13

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.088	0.1	0.4	2.212
Shooting %	0.667	0.491	0.2	1.474
Assists per pass	0.1	0.097	0.4	2.444

Σ contribution = 6.131

Defensive7.29

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	5	1.917	9.692	0.3	2.907
Blocks	8	5.447	7.749	0.2	1.55
Takeaways	3	3.427	5.504	0.25	1.376
Goals conceded	7	6.727	5.844	0.25	1.461

Σ contribution = 7.294

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

NUTSACK6 Chicago Cuffems

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.3

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	1.84	1.71	0.23	0.091	0.021
Assists	1	1.58	1.49	0.19	-0.388	-0.074
Shots	9	3.75	3.01	0.09	1.741	0.157
Passes	23	16.23	8.11	0.08	0.835	0.067
Saves	0	1.92	2.17	0.19	-0.882	-0.168
Blocks	3	5.45	3.65	0.11	-0.67	-0.074
Takeaways	2	3.43	3.41	0.11	-0.418	-0.046

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.117 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.767, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting → 5.3

Pucker+74

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3	3.278	0.915	0.32	0.293
Shots	9	3.755	2.397	0.08	0.192
Saves	0	1.917	0	0.15	0
Blocks	3	5.447	0.551	0.07	0.039
Takeaways	2	3.427	0.584	0.12	0.07
Passes	23	16.227	1.417	0.08	0.113
Faceoff win rate	0.333	0.5	0.667	0.03	0.02

Σ 0.727 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.855 − 0.113 turnover penalty = 0.742 → ×100 = 74.15 → 74

Offensive6.37

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.333	0.1	0.4	3.97
Shooting %	0.222	0.491	0.2	0.801
Assists per pass	0.043	0.097	0.4	1.595

Σ contribution = 6.367

Defensive4.32

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	1.917	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	3	5.447	4.315	0.2	0.863
Takeaways	2	3.427	4.425	0.25	1.106
Goals conceded	7	6.727	5.844	0.25	1.461

Σ contribution = 4.316

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Chadville Orange County Riptides

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.0

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	1.84	1.71	0.23	0.676	0.155
Assists	0	1.58	1.49	0.19	-1.059	-0.201
Shots	7	3.75	3.01	0.09	1.077	0.097
Passes	24	16.23	8.11	0.08	0.958	0.077
Saves	1	1.92	2.17	0.19	-0.422	-0.08
Blocks	6	5.45	3.65	0.11	0.152	0.017
Takeaways	5	3.43	3.41	0.11	0.461	0.051

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.115 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.23, then −0.2 goals against → 6.0

Pucker+110

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3	3.278	0.915	0.32	0.293
Shots	7	3.755	1.864	0.08	0.149
Saves	1	1.917	0.522	0.15	0.078
Blocks	6	5.447	1.102	0.07	0.077
Takeaways	5	3.427	1.459	0.12	0.175
Passes	24	16.227	1.479	0.08	0.118
Faceoff win rate	0.75	0.5	1.501	0.03	0.045

Σ 0.936 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.101 → ×100 = 110.1 → 110

Offensive5.51

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.158	0.1	0.4	3.234
Shooting %	0.429	0.491	0.2	1.099
Assists per pass	0	0.097	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 5.514

Defensive5.66

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	1.917	4.22	0.3	1.266
Blocks	6	5.447	6.405	0.2	1.281
Takeaways	5	3.427	7.717	0.25	1.929
Goals conceded	10	6.727	4.736	0.25	1.184

Σ contribution = 5.66

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

YackSlack Orange County Riptides

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.2

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	1.84	1.71	0.23	-0.493	-0.113
Assists	1	1.58	1.49	0.19	-0.388	-0.074
Shots	2	3.75	3.01	0.09	-0.582	-0.052
Passes	19	16.23	8.11	0.08	0.342	0.027
Saves	4	1.92	2.17	0.19	0.958	0.182
Blocks	8	5.45	3.65	0.11	0.699	0.077
Takeaways	8	3.43	3.41	0.11	1.341	0.147

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.194 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.388, then −0.2 goals against → 6.2

Pucker+120

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2	3.278	0.61	0.32	0.195
Shots	2	3.755	0.533	0.08	0.043
Saves	4	1.917	2.087	0.15	0.313
Blocks	8	5.447	1.469	0.07	0.103
Takeaways	8	3.427	2.334	0.12	0.28
Passes	19	16.227	1.171	0.08	0.094
Faceoff win rate	0.2	0.5	0.4	0.03	0.012

Σ 1.039 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.223 − 0.026 turnover penalty = 1.197 → ×100 = 119.73 → 120

Offensive4.23

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.016	0.1	0.4	1.304
Shooting %	0.5	0.491	0.2	1.215
Assists per pass	0.053	0.097	0.4	1.713

Σ contribution = 4.231

Defensive7.86

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	4	1.917	9.183	0.3	2.755
Blocks	8	5.447	7.749	0.2	1.55
Takeaways	8	3.427	9.481	0.25	2.37
Goals conceded	10	6.727	4.736	0.25	1.184

Σ contribution = 7.859

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

dave Orange County Riptides

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR7.0

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	1.84	1.71	0.23	0.676	0.155
Assists	3	1.58	1.49	0.19	0.953	0.181
Shots	4	3.75	3.01	0.09	0.081	0.007
Passes	27	16.23	8.11	0.08	1.328	0.106
Saves	4	1.92	2.17	0.19	0.958	0.182
Blocks	2	5.45	3.65	0.11	-0.944	-0.104
Takeaways	1	3.43	3.41	0.11	-0.712	-0.078

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.45 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.9, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.2 goals against → 7.0

Pucker+144

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	6	3.278	1.831	0.32	0.586
Shots	4	3.755	1.065	0.08	0.085
Saves	4	1.917	2.087	0.15	0.313
Blocks	2	5.447	0.367	0.07	0.026
Takeaways	1	3.427	0.292	0.12	0.035
Passes	27	16.227	1.664	0.08	0.133
Faceoff win rate	0.833	0.5	1.667	0.03	0.05

Σ 1.228 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.445 → ×100 = 144.45 → 144

Offensive8.14

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.286	0.1	0.4	3.924
Shooting %	0.75	0.491	0.2	1.587
Assists per pass	0.111	0.097	0.4	2.625

Σ contribution = 8.136

Defensive5.58

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	4	1.917	9.183	0.3	2.755
Blocks	2	5.447	3.76	0.2	0.752
Takeaways	1	3.427	3.562	0.25	0.89
Goals conceded	10	6.727	4.736	0.25	1.184

Σ contribution = 5.581

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.