Orange County low taper fades vs Long Island Legends

OCHomeOrange County low taper fades

5–9Final

Away · LILLong Island Legends

Jul 9, 2025 · Central A · Ninjas room

MVP Jagr · 7.0 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Orange County low taper fadesvsLong Island Legends

6Shots612

3Saves21

6Faceoffs won511

17Takeaways116

16Turnovers↓117

24Blocks519

38Passes4078

1:17Possession2:143:31

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Orange County low taper fades

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Gold	3	1	4	4	2	3	5	11	6	9	16	0:54	119	5.53	7.00
Hydroid.	0	1	1	0	0	2	2	4	5	5	10	0:16	37	4.93	4.76
NUTSACK6	2	2	4	2	1	1	4	2	5	10	12	0:07	79	9.24	5.24

Long Island Legends

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Jagr	3	4	7	4	0	3	1	4	9	13	30	0:47	111	7.83	6.11
milk	4	2	6	6	1	2	3	4	5	4	27	1:05	113	5.90	5.49
Graves	2	3	5	2	0	6	2	8	3	2	21	1:39	90	6.67	5.71

Gold Orange County low taper fades

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.3

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	2.15	1.81	0.23	0.467	0.107
Assists	1	1.78	1.54	0.19	-0.51	-0.097
Shots	4	4.52	3.14	0.09	-0.166	-0.015
Passes	16	18.6	8.98	0.08	-0.29	-0.023
Saves	2	2.36	3.01	0.19	-0.121	-0.023
Blocks	9	5.19	3.66	0.11	1.041	0.115
Takeaways	11	4.26	3.68	0.11	1.83	0.201

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.265 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.531, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 goals against → 6.3

Pucker+119

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4	3.769	1.061	0.32	0.34
Shots	4	4.522	0.885	0.08	0.071
Saves	2	2.362	0.847	0.15	0.127
Blocks	9	5.188	1.735	0.07	0.121
Takeaways	11	4.256	2.584	0.12	0.31
Passes	16	18.6	0.86	0.08	0.069
Faceoff win rate	0.375	0.501	0.749	0.03	0.022

Σ 1.06 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.247 − 0.062 turnover penalty = 1.185 → ×100 = 118.54 → 119

Offensive5.53

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.074	0.095	0.4	2.053
Shooting %	0.75	0.476	0.2	1.615
Assists per pass	0.062	0.096	0.4	1.864

Σ contribution = 5.532

Defensive7.00

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	2.362	5.391	0.3	1.617
Blocks	9	5.188	8.504	0.2	1.701
Takeaways	11	4.256	9.677	0.25	2.419
Goals conceded	9	6.85	5.062	0.25	1.266

Σ contribution = 7.003

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Hydroid. Orange County low taper fades

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.3

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	2.15	1.81	0.23	-1.188	-0.273
Assists	1	1.78	1.54	0.19	-0.51	-0.097
Shots	0	4.52	3.14	0.09	-1.439	-0.13
Passes	10	18.6	8.98	0.08	-0.958	-0.077
Saves	0	2.36	3.01	0.19	-0.785	-0.149
Blocks	5	5.19	3.66	0.11	-0.051	-0.006
Takeaways	4	4.26	3.68	0.11	-0.07	-0.008

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.739 × 2, −3 to 3) = 4.522, then −0.2 goals against → 4.3

Pucker+37

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1	3.769	0.265	0.32	0.085
Shots	0	4.522	0	0.08	0
Saves	0	2.362	0	0.15	0
Blocks	5	5.188	0.964	0.07	0.067
Takeaways	4	4.256	0.94	0.12	0.113
Passes	10	18.6	0.538	0.08	0.043
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.501	0.998	0.03	0.03

Σ 0.338 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.398 − 0.027 turnover penalty = 0.371 → ×100 = 37.12 → 37

Offensive4.93

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.063	0.095	0.4	1.873
Shooting %	0	0.476	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.1	0.096	0.4	2.468

Σ contribution = 4.931

Defensive4.76

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.362	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	5	5.188	5.855	0.2	1.171
Takeaways	4	4.256	5.759	0.25	1.44
Goals conceded	9	6.85	5.062	0.25	1.266

Σ contribution = 4.763

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

NUTSACK6 Orange County low taper fades

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.8

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	2.15	1.81	0.23	-0.085	-0.019
Assists	2	1.78	1.54	0.19	0.14	0.027
Shots	2	4.52	3.14	0.09	-0.803	-0.072
Passes	12	18.6	8.98	0.08	-0.735	-0.059
Saves	1	2.36	3.01	0.19	-0.453	-0.086
Blocks	10	5.19	3.66	0.11	1.314	0.145
Takeaways	2	4.26	3.68	0.11	-0.612	-0.067

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.133 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.735, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.2 goals against → 5.8

Pucker+79

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4	3.769	1.061	0.32	0.34
Shots	2	4.522	0.442	0.08	0.035
Saves	1	2.362	0.423	0.15	0.063
Blocks	10	5.188	1.928	0.07	0.135
Takeaways	2	4.256	0.47	0.12	0.056
Passes	12	18.6	0.645	0.08	0.052
Faceoff win rate	0.2	0.501	0.399	0.03	0.012

Σ 0.693 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.816 − 0.027 turnover penalty = 0.789 → ×100 = 78.92 → 79

Offensive9.24

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.571	0.095	0.4	4
Shooting %	1	0.476	0.2	1.84
Assists per pass	0.167	0.096	0.4	3.404

Σ contribution = 9.244

Defensive5.24

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.362	3.919	0.3	1.176
Blocks	10	5.188	8.918	0.2	1.784
Takeaways	2	4.256	4.058	0.25	1.015
Goals conceded	9	6.85	5.062	0.25	1.266

Σ contribution = 5.241

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Jagr Long Island Legends

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR7.0

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	2.15	1.81	0.23	0.467	0.107
Assists	4	1.78	1.54	0.19	1.441	0.274
Shots	4	4.52	3.14	0.09	-0.166	-0.015
Passes	30	18.6	8.98	0.08	1.27	0.102
Saves	0	2.36	3.01	0.19	-0.785	-0.149
Blocks	13	5.19	3.66	0.11	2.133	0.235
Takeaways	4	4.26	3.68	0.11	-0.07	-0.008

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.546 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.091, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.3 turnovers → 7.0

Pucker+111

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	6.5	3.769	1.725	0.32	0.552
Shots	4	4.522	0.885	0.08	0.071
Saves	0	2.362	0	0.15	0
Blocks	13	5.188	2.506	0.07	0.175
Takeaways	4	4.256	0.94	0.12	0.113
Passes	30	18.6	1.613	0.08	0.129
Faceoff win rate	0.75	0.501	1.497	0.03	0.045

Σ 1.085 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.276 − 0.168 turnover penalty = 1.108 → ×100 = 110.84 → 111

Offensive7.83

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.149	0.095	0.4	3.221
Shooting %	0.75	0.476	0.2	1.615
Assists per pass	0.133	0.096	0.4	2.994

Σ contribution = 7.831

Defensive6.11

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.362	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	13	5.188	9.625	0.2	1.925
Takeaways	4	4.256	5.759	0.25	1.44
Goals conceded	5	6.85	7.416	0.25	1.854

Σ contribution = 6.105

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

milk Long Island Legends

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.7

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	4	2.15	1.81	0.23	1.019	0.234
Assists	2	1.78	1.54	0.19	0.14	0.027
Shots	6	4.52	3.14	0.09	0.471	0.042
Passes	27	18.6	8.98	0.08	0.935	0.075
Saves	1	2.36	3.01	0.19	-0.453	-0.086
Blocks	4	5.19	3.66	0.11	-0.324	-0.036
Takeaways	4	4.26	3.68	0.11	-0.07	-0.008

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.249 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.498, then +0.25 hot shooting → 6.7

Pucker+113

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	6	3.769	1.592	0.32	0.509
Shots	6	4.522	1.327	0.08	0.106
Saves	1	2.362	0.423	0.15	0.063
Blocks	4	5.188	0.771	0.07	0.054
Takeaways	4	4.256	0.94	0.12	0.113
Passes	27	18.6	1.452	0.08	0.116
Faceoff win rate	0.4	0.501	0.798	0.03	0.024

Σ 0.986 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.16 − 0.027 turnover penalty = 1.133 → ×100 = 113.33 → 113

Offensive5.90

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.092	0.095	0.4	2.354
Shooting %	0.667	0.476	0.2	1.504
Assists per pass	0.074	0.096	0.4	2.042

Σ contribution = 5.9

Defensive5.49

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.362	3.919	0.3	1.176
Blocks	4	5.188	5.1	0.2	1.02
Takeaways	4	4.256	5.759	0.25	1.44
Goals conceded	5	6.85	7.416	0.25	1.854

Σ contribution = 5.49

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Graves Long Island Legends

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.1

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	2.15	1.81	0.23	-0.085	-0.019
Assists	3	1.78	1.54	0.19	0.791	0.15
Shots	2	4.52	3.14	0.09	-0.803	-0.072
Passes	21	18.6	8.98	0.08	0.267	0.021
Saves	0	2.36	3.01	0.19	-0.785	-0.149
Blocks	2	5.19	3.66	0.11	-0.87	-0.096
Takeaways	8	4.26	3.68	0.11	1.016	0.112

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.053 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.893, then +0.25 hot shooting → 6.1

Pucker+90

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4	3.769	1.061	0.32	0.34
Shots	2	4.522	0.442	0.08	0.035
Saves	0	2.362	0	0.15	0
Blocks	2	5.188	0.386	0.07	0.027
Takeaways	8	4.256	1.88	0.12	0.226
Passes	21	18.6	1.129	0.08	0.09
Faceoff win rate	0.75	0.501	1.497	0.03	0.045

Σ 0.763 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.897 → ×100 = 89.74 → 90

Offensive6.67

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.051	0.095	0.4	1.701
Shooting %	1	0.476	0.2	1.84
Assists per pass	0.143	0.096	0.4	3.126

Σ contribution = 6.667

Defensive5.71

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.362	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	2	5.188	3.811	0.2	0.762
Takeaways	8	4.256	8.825	0.25	2.206
Goals conceded	5	6.85	7.416	0.25	1.854

Σ contribution = 5.708

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.