Orange County low taper fades vs Minnesota Moles

OCHomeOrange County low taper fades

1–4Final

Away · MMMinnesota Moles

May 30, 2025 · Central B - Playoffs · Ninjas room

MVP kale · 6.8 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Orange County low taper fadesvsMinnesota Moles

14Shots77

3Saves1013

6Faceoffs won42

20Takeaways20

20Turnovers↓20

11Blocks1425

56Passes864

2:01Possession0:532:54

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Orange County low taper fades

Player	G	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Gold	0	0	5	1	1	1	10	7	3	19	1:02	63	2.95	6.46
Hydroid.	1	1	6	1	2	1	4	8	6	18	0:32	60	3.43	5.92
NUTSACK6	0	0	3	1	3	0	6	5	2	19	0:27	54	2.95	5.85

Minnesota Moles

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	GWG	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Troy Bolton	0	0	0	0	8	0	2	4	6	6	18	0	1:17	99	2.95	7.94
Chaser	1	3	4	3	1	2	3	8	8	10	24	1	0:42	108	6.63	7.44
kale	3	0	3	4	4	0	1	8	6	9	22	0	0:55	128	4.65	8.83

Gold Orange County low taper fades

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.8

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	1.8	1.91	0.23	-0.941	-0.216
Assists	0	1.5	1.54	0.19	-0.974	-0.185
Shots	5	3.73	3.1	0.09	0.409	0.037
Passes	19	17.19	6.37	0.08	0.285	0.023
Saves	1	1.93	1.99	0.19	-0.468	-0.089
Blocks	3	5.56	3.64	0.11	-0.704	-0.077
Takeaways	10	4.36	4.23	0.11	1.335	0.147

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.362 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.277, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting → 4.8

Pucker+63

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	0	3.174	0	0.32	0
Shots	5	3.733	1.34	0.08	0.107
Saves	1	1.93	0.518	0.15	0.078
Blocks	3	5.558	0.54	0.07	0.038
Takeaways	10	4.36	2.293	0.12	0.275
Passes	19	17.186	1.106	0.08	0.088
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.5	1	0.03	0.03

Σ 0.616 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.725 − 0.091 turnover penalty = 0.634 → ×100 = 63.36 → 63

Offensive2.95

Rate	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.084	0.4	1.181
Shooting %	0.483	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.087	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 2.954

Defensive6.46

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	1.93	4.209	0.3	1.263
Blocks	3	5.558	4.279	0.2	0.856
Takeaways	10	4.36	9.44	0.25	2.36
Goals conceded	4	6.093	7.921	0.25	1.98

Σ contribution = 6.459

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Hydroid. Orange County low taper fades

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.9

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	1.8	1.91	0.23	-0.419	-0.096
Assists	0	1.5	1.54	0.19	-0.974	-0.185
Shots	6	3.73	3.1	0.09	0.732	0.066
Passes	18	17.19	6.37	0.08	0.128	0.01
Saves	1	1.93	1.99	0.19	-0.468	-0.089
Blocks	6	5.56	3.64	0.11	0.122	0.013
Takeaways	4	4.36	4.23	0.11	-0.085	-0.009

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.29 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.419, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting → 4.9

Pucker+60

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1	3.174	0.315	0.32	0.101
Shots	6	3.733	1.607	0.08	0.129
Saves	1	1.93	0.518	0.15	0.078
Blocks	6	5.558	1.079	0.07	0.076
Takeaways	4	4.36	0.917	0.12	0.11
Passes	18	17.186	1.047	0.08	0.084
Faceoff win rate	0.667	0.5	1.333	0.03	0.04

Σ 0.617 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.725 − 0.126 turnover penalty = 0.599 → ×100 = 59.94 → 60

Offensive3.43

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.031	0.084	0.4	1.512
Shooting %	0.167	0.483	0.2	0.74
Assists per pass	0	0.087	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 3.433

Defensive5.92

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	1.93	4.209	0.3	1.263
Blocks	6	5.558	6.317	0.2	1.263
Takeaways	4	4.36	5.67	0.25	1.418
Goals conceded	4	6.093	7.921	0.25	1.98

Σ contribution = 5.924

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

NUTSACK6 Orange County low taper fades

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.7

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	1.8	1.91	0.23	-0.941	-0.216
Assists	0	1.5	1.54	0.19	-0.974	-0.185
Shots	3	3.73	3.1	0.09	-0.237	-0.021
Passes	19	17.19	6.37	0.08	0.285	0.023
Saves	1	1.93	1.99	0.19	-0.468	-0.089
Blocks	2	5.56	3.64	0.11	-0.979	-0.108
Takeaways	6	4.36	4.23	0.11	0.388	0.043

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.554 × 2, −3 to 3) = 4.892, then −0.2 cold shooting → 4.7

Pucker+54

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	0	3.174	0	0.32	0
Shots	3	3.733	0.804	0.08	0.064
Saves	1	1.93	0.518	0.15	0.078
Blocks	2	5.558	0.36	0.07	0.025
Takeaways	6	4.36	1.376	0.12	0.165
Passes	19	17.186	1.106	0.08	0.088
Faceoff win rate	1	0.5	2	0.03	0.06

Σ 0.481 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.566 − 0.022 turnover penalty = 0.544 → ×100 = 54.31 → 54

Offensive2.95

Rate	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.084	0.4	1.181
Shooting %	0.483	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.087	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 2.954

Defensive5.85

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	1.93	4.209	0.3	1.263
Blocks	2	5.558	3.74	0.2	0.748
Takeaways	6	4.36	7.437	0.25	1.859
Goals conceded	4	6.093	7.921	0.25	1.98

Σ contribution = 5.85

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Troy Bolton Minnesota Moles

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.2

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	1.8	1.91	0.23	-0.941	-0.216
Assists	0	1.5	1.54	0.19	-0.974	-0.185
Shots	0	3.73	3.1	0.09	-1.206	-0.108
Passes	18	17.19	6.37	0.08	0.128	0.01
Saves	8	1.93	1.99	0.19	3.055	0.58
Blocks	6	5.56	3.64	0.11	0.122	0.013
Takeaways	4	4.36	4.23	0.11	-0.085	-0.009

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.085 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.169, then +0.35 saves, −0.3 turnovers → 6.2

Pucker+99

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	0	3.174	0	0.32	0
Shots	0	3.733	0	0.08	0
Saves	8	1.93	4.145	0.15	0.622
Blocks	6	5.558	1.079	0.07	0.076
Takeaways	4	4.36	0.917	0.12	0.11
Passes	18	17.186	1.047	0.08	0.084
Faceoff win rate	0	0.5	0	0.03	0

Σ 0.891 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.048 − 0.057 turnover penalty = 0.991 → ×100 = 99.14 → 99

Offensive2.95

Rate	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.084	0.4	1.181
Shooting %	0.483	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.087	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 2.954

Defensive7.94

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	8	1.93	9.985	0.3	2.996
Blocks	6	5.558	6.317	0.2	1.263
Takeaways	4	4.36	5.67	0.25	1.418
Goals conceded	1	6.093	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 7.939

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Chaser Minnesota Moles

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.1

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	1.8	1.91	0.23	-0.419	-0.096
Assists	3	1.5	1.54	0.19	0.974	0.185
Shots	3	3.73	3.1	0.09	-0.237	-0.021
Passes	24	17.19	6.37	0.08	1.07	0.086
Saves	1	1.93	1.99	0.19	-0.468	-0.089
Blocks	10	5.56	3.64	0.11	1.222	0.134
Takeaways	8	4.36	4.23	0.11	0.861	0.095

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.293 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.587, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting → 6.1

Pucker+108

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4	3.174	1.26	0.32	0.403
Shots	3	3.733	0.804	0.08	0.064
Saves	1	1.93	0.518	0.15	0.078
Blocks	10	5.558	1.799	0.07	0.126
Takeaways	8	4.36	1.835	0.12	0.22
Passes	24	17.186	1.396	0.08	0.112
Faceoff win rate	0.4	0.5	0.8	0.03	0.024

Σ 1.027 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.208 − 0.126 turnover penalty = 1.082 → ×100 = 108.24 → 108

Offensive6.63

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.095	0.084	0.4	2.622
Shooting %	0.333	0.483	0.2	0.96
Assists per pass	0.125	0.087	0.4	3.051

Σ contribution = 6.634

Defensive7.44

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	1.93	4.209	0.3	1.263
Blocks	10	5.558	8.654	0.2	1.731
Takeaways	8	4.36	8.732	0.25	2.183
Goals conceded	1	6.093	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 7.439

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

kale Minnesota Moles

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.8

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	1.8	1.91	0.23	0.625	0.144
Assists	0	1.5	1.54	0.19	-0.974	-0.185
Shots	4	3.73	3.1	0.09	0.086	0.008
Passes	22	17.19	6.37	0.08	0.756	0.06
Saves	4	1.93	1.99	0.19	1.042	0.198
Blocks	9	5.56	3.64	0.11	0.947	0.104
Takeaways	8	4.36	4.23	0.11	0.861	0.095

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.424 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.848, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.3 turnovers → 6.8

Pucker+128

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3	3.174	0.945	0.32	0.302
Shots	4	3.733	1.072	0.08	0.086
Saves	4	1.93	2.072	0.15	0.311
Blocks	9	5.558	1.619	0.07	0.113
Takeaways	8	4.36	1.835	0.12	0.22
Passes	22	17.186	1.28	0.08	0.102
Faceoff win rate	0	0.5	0	0.03	0

Σ 1.135 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.335 − 0.057 turnover penalty = 1.278 → ×100 = 127.82 → 128

Offensive4.65

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.055	0.084	0.4	1.866
Shooting %	0.75	0.483	0.2	1.602
Assists per pass	0	0.087	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 4.65

Defensive8.83

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	4	1.93	9.161	0.3	2.748
Blocks	9	5.558	8.202	0.2	1.64
Takeaways	8	4.36	8.732	0.25	2.183
Goals conceded	1	6.093	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 8.833

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.