Orange County low taper fades vs Minnesota Moles

OCHomeOrange County low taper fades

3–1Final

Away · MMMinnesota Moles

Apr 29, 2025 · Central B · Ninjas room

MVP Gold · 7.4 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Orange County low taper fadesvsMinnesota Moles

6Shots814

13Saves103

4Faceoffs won13

15Takeaways312

12Turnovers↓315

24Blocks816

45Passes3479

2:17Possession1:063:23

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Orange County low taper fades

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Gold	2	1	3	4	6	3	2	11	5	13	14	1:17	167	4.48	9.64
Hydroid.	1	2	3	1	5	1	1	2	3	7	17	0:33	111	6.32	7.78
NUTSACK6	0	0	0	1	2	0	0	2	4	4	14	0:27	41	2.95	6.29

Minnesota Moles

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Stryker	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	10	0:09	5	2.95	4.48
Troy Bolton	0	0	0	1	0	1	0	0	2	0	8	0:04	14	2.95	4.48
Chaser	0	1	1	8	0	1	0	1	6	8	32	0:32	57	3.41	5.64
noodlefingers2	1	0	1	4	3	1	2	11	7	6	24	2:26	102	3.21	8.52
kale	0	0	0	1	0	0	1	0	0	2	5	0:12	8	2.95	4.65

Gold Orange County low taper fades

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR7.4

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	2.2	2	0.23	-0.102	-0.024
Assists	1	1.87	1.66	0.19	-0.522	-0.099
Shots	4	4.07	3.2	0.09	-0.022	-0.002
Passes	14	17.37	7.76	0.08	-0.434	-0.035
Saves	6	1.87	2.07	0.19	1.998	0.38
Blocks	13	5.17	3.83	0.11	2.047	0.225
Takeaways	11	3.32	3.38	0.11	2.269	0.25

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.695 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.39, nothing hit the bonus or penalty thresholds → 7.4

Pucker+167

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3	3.88	0.773	0.32	0.247
Shots	4	4.07	0.983	0.08	0.079
Saves	6	1.865	3.216	0.15	0.482
Blocks	13	5.17	2.515	0.07	0.176
Takeaways	11	3.322	3.312	0.12	0.397
Passes	14	17.368	0.806	0.08	0.064
Faceoff win rate	0.6	0.5	1.2	0.03	0.036

Σ 1.482 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.744 − 0.077 turnover penalty = 1.667 → ×100 = 166.66 → 167

Offensive4.48

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.039	0.121	0.4	1.456
Shooting %	0.5	0.542	0.2	1.139
Assists per pass	0.071	0.107	0.4	1.883

Σ contribution = 4.478

Defensive9.64

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	6	1.865	9.906	0.3	2.972
Blocks	13	5.17	9.631	0.2	1.926
Takeaways	11	3.322	9.922	0.25	2.481
Goals conceded	1	7.561	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 9.641

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Hydroid. Orange County low taper fades

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.4

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	2.2	2	0.23	-0.602	-0.138
Assists	2	1.87	1.66	0.19	0.081	0.015
Shots	1	4.07	3.2	0.09	-0.958	-0.086
Passes	17	17.37	7.76	0.08	-0.047	-0.004
Saves	5	1.87	2.07	0.19	1.515	0.288
Blocks	7	5.17	3.83	0.11	0.478	0.053
Takeaways	2	3.32	3.38	0.11	-0.39	-0.043

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.084 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.169, then +0.25 hot shooting → 6.4

Pucker+111

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3	3.88	0.773	0.32	0.247
Shots	1	4.07	0.246	0.08	0.02
Saves	5	1.865	2.68	0.15	0.402
Blocks	7	5.17	1.354	0.07	0.095
Takeaways	2	3.322	0.602	0.12	0.072
Passes	17	17.368	0.979	0.08	0.078
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.5	1	0.03	0.03

Σ 0.944 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.111 → ×100 = 111.11 → 111

Offensive6.32

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.091	0.121	0.4	2.013
Shooting %	1	0.542	0.2	1.751
Assists per pass	0.118	0.107	0.4	2.552

Σ contribution = 6.316

Defensive7.78

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	5	1.865	9.732	0.3	2.919
Blocks	7	5.17	7.36	0.2	1.472
Takeaways	2	3.322	4.487	0.25	1.122
Goals conceded	1	7.561	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 7.775

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

NUTSACK6 Orange County low taper fades

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.5

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	2.2	2	0.23	-1.101	-0.253
Assists	0	1.87	1.66	0.19	-1.124	-0.214
Shots	1	4.07	3.2	0.09	-0.958	-0.086
Passes	14	17.37	7.76	0.08	-0.434	-0.035
Saves	2	1.87	2.07	0.19	0.065	0.012
Blocks	4	5.17	3.83	0.11	-0.306	-0.034
Takeaways	2	3.32	3.38	0.11	-0.39	-0.043

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.652 × 2, −3 to 3) = 4.696, then −0.2 cold shooting → 4.5

Pucker+41

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	0	3.88	0	0.32	0
Shots	1	4.07	0.246	0.08	0.02
Saves	2	1.865	1.072	0.15	0.161
Blocks	4	5.17	0.774	0.07	0.054
Takeaways	2	3.322	0.602	0.12	0.072
Passes	14	17.368	0.806	0.08	0.064
Faceoff win rate	0	0.5	0	0.03	0

Σ 0.371 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.437 − 0.032 turnover penalty = 0.405 → ×100 = 40.5 → 41

Offensive2.95

Rate	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.121	0.4	1.181
Shooting %	0.542	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.107	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 2.954

Defensive6.29

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	1.865	6.288	0.3	1.886
Blocks	4	5.17	5.11	0.2	1.022
Takeaways	2	3.322	4.487	0.25	1.122
Goals conceded	1	7.561	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 6.292

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Stryker Minnesota Moles

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR3.8

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	2.2	2	0.23	-1.101	-0.253
Assists	0	1.87	1.66	0.19	-1.124	-0.214
Shots	0	4.07	3.2	0.09	-1.27	-0.114
Passes	10	17.37	7.76	0.08	-0.95	-0.076
Saves	0	1.87	2.07	0.19	-0.902	-0.171
Blocks	0	5.17	3.83	0.11	-1.351	-0.149
Takeaways	0	3.32	3.38	0.11	-0.981	-0.108

6.0 + clip(Σ −1.085 × 2, −3 to 3) = 3.83, nothing hit the bonus or penalty thresholds → 3.8

Pucker+5

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	0	3.88	0	0.32	0
Shots	0	4.07	0	0.08	0
Saves	0	1.865	0	0.15	0
Blocks	0	5.17	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	0	3.322	0	0.12	0
Passes	10	17.368	0.576	0.08	0.046
Faceoff win rate	0	0.5	0	0.03	0

Σ 0.046 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.054 → ×100 = 5.42 → 5

Offensive2.95

Rate	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.121	0.4	1.181
Shooting %	0.542	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.107	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 2.954

Defensive4.48

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	1.865	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	0	5.17	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	0	3.322	2.954	0.25	0.738
Goals conceded	3	7.561	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 4.477

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Troy Bolton Minnesota Moles

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR3.6

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	2.2	2	0.23	-1.101	-0.253
Assists	0	1.87	1.66	0.19	-1.124	-0.214
Shots	1	4.07	3.2	0.09	-0.958	-0.086
Passes	8	17.37	7.76	0.08	-1.208	-0.097
Saves	0	1.87	2.07	0.19	-0.902	-0.171
Blocks	0	5.17	3.83	0.11	-1.351	-0.149
Takeaways	0	3.32	3.38	0.11	-0.981	-0.108

6.0 + clip(Σ −1.078 × 2, −3 to 3) = 3.845, then −0.2 cold shooting → 3.6

Pucker+14

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	0	3.88	0	0.32	0
Shots	1	4.07	0.246	0.08	0.02
Saves	0	1.865	0	0.15	0
Blocks	0	5.17	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	0	3.322	0	0.12	0
Passes	8	17.368	0.461	0.08	0.037
Faceoff win rate	1	0.5	2	0.03	0.06

Σ 0.117 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.137 → ×100 = 13.71 → 14

Offensive2.95

Rate	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.121	0.4	1.181
Shooting %	0.542	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.107	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 2.954

Defensive4.48

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	1.865	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	0	5.17	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	0	3.322	2.954	0.25	0.738
Goals conceded	3	7.561	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 4.477

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Chaser Minnesota Moles

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.0

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	2.2	2	0.23	-1.101	-0.253
Assists	1	1.87	1.66	0.19	-0.522	-0.099
Shots	8	4.07	3.2	0.09	1.227	0.11
Passes	32	17.37	7.76	0.08	1.886	0.151
Saves	0	1.87	2.07	0.19	-0.902	-0.171
Blocks	8	5.17	3.83	0.11	0.74	0.081
Takeaways	1	3.32	3.38	0.11	-0.686	-0.075

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.256 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.487, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting → 5.0

Pucker+57

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1	3.88	0.258	0.32	0.082
Shots	8	4.07	1.966	0.08	0.157
Saves	0	1.865	0	0.15	0
Blocks	8	5.17	1.548	0.07	0.108
Takeaways	1	3.322	0.301	0.12	0.036
Passes	32	17.368	1.842	0.08	0.147
Faceoff win rate	1	0.5	2	0.03	0.06

Σ 0.592 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.696 − 0.123 turnover penalty = 0.573 → ×100 = 57.31 → 57

Offensive3.41

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.031	0.121	0.4	1.392
Shooting %	0	0.542	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.031	0.107	0.4	1.424

Σ contribution = 3.407

Defensive5.64

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	1.865	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	8	5.17	7.995	0.2	1.599
Takeaways	1	3.322	3.585	0.25	0.896
Goals conceded	3	7.561	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 5.643

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

noodlefingers2 Minnesota Moles

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.7

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	2.2	2	0.23	-0.602	-0.138
Assists	0	1.87	1.66	0.19	-1.124	-0.214
Shots	4	4.07	3.2	0.09	-0.022	-0.002
Passes	24	17.37	7.76	0.08	0.855	0.068
Saves	3	1.87	2.07	0.19	0.548	0.104
Blocks	6	5.17	3.83	0.11	0.217	0.024
Takeaways	11	3.32	3.38	0.11	2.269	0.25

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.092 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.184, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting → 5.7

Pucker+102

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1	3.88	0.258	0.32	0.082
Shots	4	4.07	0.983	0.08	0.079
Saves	3	1.865	1.608	0.15	0.241
Blocks	6	5.17	1.161	0.07	0.081
Takeaways	11	3.322	3.312	0.12	0.397
Passes	24	17.368	1.382	0.08	0.111
Faceoff win rate	0.333	0.5	0.667	0.03	0.02

Σ 1.011 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.19 − 0.168 turnover penalty = 1.022 → ×100 = 102.16 → 102

Offensive3.21

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.007	0.121	0.4	1.221
Shooting %	0.25	0.542	0.2	0.806
Assists per pass	0	0.107	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 3.209

Defensive8.52

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	3	1.865	8.171	0.3	2.451
Blocks	6	5.17	6.637	0.2	1.327
Takeaways	11	3.322	9.922	0.25	2.481
Goals conceded	3	7.561	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 8.521

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

kale Minnesota Moles

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR3.7

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	2.2	2	0.23	-1.101	-0.253
Assists	0	1.87	1.66	0.19	-1.124	-0.214
Shots	1	4.07	3.2	0.09	-0.958	-0.086
Passes	5	17.37	7.76	0.08	-1.595	-0.128
Saves	0	1.87	2.07	0.19	-0.902	-0.171
Blocks	2	5.17	3.83	0.11	-0.829	-0.091
Takeaways	0	3.32	3.38	0.11	-0.981	-0.108

6.0 + clip(Σ −1.051 × 2, −3 to 3) = 3.898, then −0.2 cold shooting → 3.7

Pucker+8

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	0	3.88	0	0.32	0
Shots	1	4.07	0.246	0.08	0.02
Saves	0	1.865	0	0.15	0
Blocks	2	5.17	0.387	0.07	0.027
Takeaways	0	3.322	0	0.12	0
Passes	5	17.368	0.288	0.08	0.023
Faceoff win rate	0	0.5	0	0.03	0

Σ 0.07 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.082 → ×100 = 8.21 → 8

Offensive2.95

Rate	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.121	0.4	1.181
Shooting %	0.542	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.107	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 2.954

Defensive4.65

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	1.865	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	2	5.17	3.815	0.2	0.763
Takeaways	0	3.322	2.954	0.25	0.738
Goals conceded	3	7.561	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 4.649

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.