Orange County low taper fades vs Orange County Coyotes

OCHomeOrange County low taper fades

13–6Final

OCAwayOrange County Coyotes

Apr 22, 2025 · Central B · Ninjas room

MVP Gold · 9.4 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Orange County low taper fadesvsOrange County Coyotes

18Shots315

9Saves45

10Faceoffs won212

10Takeaways717

17Turnovers↓89

30Blocks1614

55Passes451

1:03Possession1:272:30

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Orange County low taper fades

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Gold	6	3	9	10	4	5	4	5	7	15	21	0:32	192	7.99	8.46
Hydroid.	2	0	2	2	4	1	3	5	7	9	11	0:23	88	4.90	8.20
NUTSACK6	5	4	9	6	1	4	5	0	3	6	23	0:08	136	8.87	5.10

Orange County Coyotes

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Kili	3	2	5	7	1	5	2	8	2	4	15	1:19	128	5.51	5.79
trippie [C]	2	3	5	5	1	4	4	2	3	3	22	0:20	93	7.48	4.39
YackSlack	1	1	2	3	3	3	4	7	4	7	14	0:51	103	4.25	7.33

Gold Orange County low taper fades

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR9.4

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	6	2.2	2	0.23	1.895	0.436
Assists	3	1.87	1.66	0.19	0.684	0.13
Shots	10	4.07	3.2	0.09	1.851	0.167
Passes	21	17.37	7.76	0.08	0.468	0.037
Saves	4	1.87	2.07	0.19	1.032	0.196
Blocks	15	5.17	3.83	0.11	2.57	0.283
Takeaways	5	3.32	3.38	0.11	0.496	0.055

6.0 + clip(Σ 1.303 × 2, −3 to 3) = 8.606, then +0.5 hat trick, +0.3 blocks, +0.25 hot shooting, −0.3 turnovers → 9.4

Pucker+192

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	9	3.88	2.32	0.32	0.742
Shots	10	4.07	2.457	0.08	0.197
Saves	4	1.865	2.144	0.15	0.322
Blocks	15	5.17	2.902	0.07	0.203
Takeaways	5	3.322	1.505	0.12	0.181
Passes	21	17.368	1.209	0.08	0.097
Faceoff win rate	0.556	0.5	1.111	0.03	0.033

Σ 1.774 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 2.087 − 0.168 turnover penalty = 1.919 → ×100 = 191.9 → 192

Offensive7.99

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.281	0.121	0.4	3.791
Shooting %	0.6	0.542	0.2	1.286
Assists per pass	0.143	0.107	0.4	2.91

Σ contribution = 7.986

Defensive8.46

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	4	1.865	9.263	0.3	2.779
Blocks	15	5.17	9.825	0.2	1.965
Takeaways	5	3.322	7.865	0.25	1.966
Goals conceded	6	7.561	7.018	0.25	1.755

Σ contribution = 8.465

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Hydroid. Orange County low taper fades

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.9

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	2.2	2	0.23	-0.102	-0.024
Assists	0	1.87	1.66	0.19	-1.124	-0.214
Shots	2	4.07	3.2	0.09	-0.646	-0.058
Passes	11	17.37	7.76	0.08	-0.821	-0.066
Saves	4	1.87	2.07	0.19	1.032	0.196
Blocks	9	5.17	3.83	0.11	1.001	0.11
Takeaways	5	3.32	3.38	0.11	0.496	0.055

6.0 + clip(Σ 0 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.999, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.3 turnovers → 5.9

Pucker+88

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2	3.88	0.515	0.32	0.165
Shots	2	4.07	0.491	0.08	0.039
Saves	4	1.865	2.144	0.15	0.322
Blocks	9	5.17	1.741	0.07	0.122
Takeaways	5	3.322	1.505	0.12	0.181
Passes	11	17.368	0.633	0.08	0.051
Faceoff win rate	0.25	0.5	0.5	0.03	0.015

Σ 0.894 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.052 − 0.168 turnover penalty = 0.884 → ×100 = 88.35 → 88

Offensive4.90

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.087	0.121	0.4	1.964
Shooting %	1	0.542	0.2	1.751
Assists per pass	0	0.107	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 4.897

Defensive8.20

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	4	1.865	9.263	0.3	2.779
Blocks	9	5.17	8.519	0.2	1.704
Takeaways	5	3.322	7.865	0.25	1.966
Goals conceded	6	7.561	7.018	0.25	1.755

Σ contribution = 8.204

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

NUTSACK6 Orange County low taper fades

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR7.3

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	5	2.2	2	0.23	1.396	0.321
Assists	4	1.87	1.66	0.19	1.287	0.244
Shots	6	4.07	3.2	0.09	0.602	0.054
Passes	23	17.37	7.76	0.08	0.726	0.058
Saves	1	1.87	2.07	0.19	-0.418	-0.079
Blocks	6	5.17	3.83	0.11	0.217	0.024
Takeaways	0	3.32	3.38	0.11	-0.981	-0.108

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.514 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.028, then +0.25 hot shooting → 7.3

Pucker+136

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	9	3.88	2.32	0.32	0.742
Shots	6	4.07	1.474	0.08	0.118
Saves	1	1.865	0.536	0.15	0.08
Blocks	6	5.17	1.161	0.07	0.081
Takeaways	0	3.322	0	0.12	0
Passes	23	17.368	1.324	0.08	0.106
Faceoff win rate	0.444	0.5	0.889	0.03	0.027

Σ 1.154 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.358 → ×100 = 135.82 → 136

Offensive8.87

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	1.125	0.121	0.4	4
Shooting %	0.833	0.542	0.2	1.593
Assists per pass	0.174	0.107	0.4	3.281

Σ contribution = 8.874

Defensive5.10

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	1.865	4.267	0.3	1.28
Blocks	6	5.17	6.637	0.2	1.327
Takeaways	0	3.322	2.954	0.25	0.738
Goals conceded	6	7.561	7.018	0.25	1.755

Σ contribution = 5.1

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Kili Orange County Coyotes

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.2

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	2.2	2	0.23	0.397	0.091
Assists	2	1.87	1.66	0.19	0.081	0.015
Shots	7	4.07	3.2	0.09	0.914	0.082
Passes	15	17.37	7.76	0.08	-0.305	-0.024
Saves	1	1.87	2.07	0.19	-0.418	-0.079
Blocks	4	5.17	3.83	0.11	-0.306	-0.034
Takeaways	8	3.32	3.38	0.11	1.382	0.152

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.204 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.407, then −0.2 goals against → 6.2

Pucker+128

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	5	3.88	1.289	0.32	0.412
Shots	7	4.07	1.72	0.08	0.138
Saves	1	1.865	0.536	0.15	0.08
Blocks	4	5.17	0.774	0.07	0.054
Takeaways	8	3.322	2.408	0.12	0.289
Passes	15	17.368	0.864	0.08	0.069
Faceoff win rate	0.714	0.5	1.429	0.03	0.043

Σ 1.085 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.277 → ×100 = 127.7 → 128

Offensive5.51

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.063	0.121	0.4	1.692
Shooting %	0.429	0.542	0.2	1.035
Assists per pass	0.133	0.107	0.4	2.779

Σ contribution = 5.506

Defensive5.79

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	1.865	4.267	0.3	1.28
Blocks	4	5.17	5.11	0.2	1.022
Takeaways	8	3.322	9.549	0.25	2.387
Goals conceded	13	7.561	4.418	0.25	1.104

Σ contribution = 5.793

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

trippie [C] Orange County Coyotes

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.6

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	2.2	2	0.23	-0.102	-0.024
Assists	3	1.87	1.66	0.19	0.684	0.13
Shots	5	4.07	3.2	0.09	0.29	0.026
Passes	22	17.37	7.76	0.08	0.597	0.048
Saves	1	1.87	2.07	0.19	-0.418	-0.079
Blocks	3	5.17	3.83	0.11	-0.567	-0.062
Takeaways	2	3.32	3.38	0.11	-0.39	-0.043

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.004 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.991, then −0.2 cold shooting, −0.2 goals against → 5.6

Pucker+93

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4.5	3.88	1.16	0.32	0.371
Shots	5	4.07	1.228	0.08	0.098
Saves	1	1.865	0.536	0.15	0.08
Blocks	3	5.17	0.58	0.07	0.041
Takeaways	2	3.322	0.602	0.12	0.072
Passes	22	17.368	1.267	0.08	0.101
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.5	1	0.03	0.03

Σ 0.794 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.934 → ×100 = 93.41 → 93

Offensive7.48

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.25	0.121	0.4	3.664
Shooting %	0.4	0.542	0.2	0.995
Assists per pass	0.136	0.107	0.4	2.821

Σ contribution = 7.48

Defensive4.39

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	1.865	4.267	0.3	1.28
Blocks	3	5.17	4.413	0.2	0.883
Takeaways	2	3.322	4.487	0.25	1.122
Goals conceded	13	7.561	4.418	0.25	1.104

Σ contribution = 4.389

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

YackSlack Orange County Coyotes

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.5

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	2.2	2	0.23	-0.602	-0.138
Assists	1	1.87	1.66	0.19	-0.522	-0.099
Shots	3	4.07	3.2	0.09	-0.334	-0.03
Passes	14	17.37	7.76	0.08	-0.434	-0.035
Saves	3	1.87	2.07	0.19	0.548	0.104
Blocks	7	5.17	3.83	0.11	0.478	0.053
Takeaways	7	3.32	3.38	0.11	1.087	0.12

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.026 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.948, then −0.2 cold shooting, −0.2 goals against → 5.5

Pucker+103

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2	3.88	0.515	0.32	0.165
Shots	3	4.07	0.737	0.08	0.059
Saves	3	1.865	1.608	0.15	0.241
Blocks	7	5.17	1.354	0.07	0.095
Takeaways	7	3.322	2.107	0.12	0.253
Passes	14	17.368	0.806	0.08	0.064
Faceoff win rate	0.429	0.5	0.857	0.03	0.026

Σ 0.903 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.062 − 0.032 turnover penalty = 1.03 → ×100 = 103.04 → 103

Offensive4.25

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.039	0.121	0.4	1.459
Shooting %	0.333	0.542	0.2	0.907
Assists per pass	0.071	0.107	0.4	1.883

Σ contribution = 4.248

Defensive7.33

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	3	1.865	8.171	0.3	2.451
Blocks	7	5.17	7.36	0.2	1.472
Takeaways	7	3.322	9.213	0.25	2.303
Goals conceded	13	7.561	4.418	0.25	1.104

Σ contribution = 7.33

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.