Tampa Bay Tadpoles vs Champaign Champagne

TBHomeTampa Bay Tadpoles

11–7Final

Away · CHAChampaign Champagne

Apr 11, 2025 · Challenger Division · Pondwater Centre

MVP Syy · 7.3 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Tampa Bay TadpolesvsChampaign Champagne

20Shots119

2Saves79

10Faceoffs won19

14Takeaways59

9Turnovers↓514

18Blocks119

62Passes755

2:27Possession0:351:52

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Tampa Bay Tadpoles

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Fety	3	3	6	5	0	5	1	4	1	3	17	0:24	104	8.72	4.71
Syy	3	4	7	8	1	2	3	9	5	12	20	1:46	147	6.54	6.81
Jack	5	3	8	7	1	3	5	1	3	3	25	0:17	125	8.35	4.33

Champaign Champagne

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Richard Tantrum	1	2	3	1	3	3	5	1	4	10	13	0:29	75	7.47	5.75
Square	4	2	6	5	3	3	4	2	6	4	19	0:11	109	8.22	5.20
Tridoxity	2	4	6	3	3	3	1	6	4	5	23	1:12	133	7.06	6.27

Fety Tampa Bay Tadpoles

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.3

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	2.06	1.74	0.23	0.543	0.125
Assists	3	1.89	1.51	0.19	0.734	0.14
Shots	5	4.51	3	0.09	0.165	0.015
Passes	17	19.18	7.63	0.08	-0.285	-0.023
Saves	0	2.45	2.76	0.19	-0.887	-0.169
Blocks	3	5.87	3.93	0.11	-0.731	-0.08
Takeaways	4	3.87	3.13	0.11	0.04	0.004

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.012 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.024, then +0.25 hot shooting → 6.3

Pucker+104

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	6	3.755	1.598	0.32	0.511
Shots	5	4.505	1.11	0.08	0.089
Saves	0	2.449	0	0.15	0
Blocks	3	5.874	0.511	0.07	0.036
Takeaways	4	3.874	1.033	0.12	0.124
Passes	17	19.179	0.886	0.08	0.071
Faceoff win rate	0.833	0.5	1.667	0.03	0.05

Σ 0.881 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.036 → ×100 = 103.62 → 104

Offensive8.72

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.25	0.104	0.4	3.821
Shooting %	0.6	0.456	0.2	1.444
Assists per pass	0.176	0.099	0.4	3.453

Σ contribution = 8.717

Defensive4.71

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.449	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	3	5.874	4.186	0.2	0.837
Takeaways	4	3.874	6.13	0.25	1.533
Goals conceded	7	6.688	5.822	0.25	1.455

Σ contribution = 4.711

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Syy Tampa Bay Tadpoles

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR7.3

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	2.06	1.74	0.23	0.543	0.125
Assists	4	1.89	1.51	0.19	1.397	0.265
Shots	8	4.51	3	0.09	1.163	0.105
Passes	20	19.18	7.63	0.08	0.108	0.009
Saves	1	2.45	2.76	0.19	-0.525	-0.1
Blocks	12	5.87	3.93	0.11	1.558	0.171
Takeaways	9	3.87	3.13	0.11	1.635	0.18

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.755 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.51, then −0.2 cold shooting → 7.3

Pucker+147

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	6.5	3.755	1.731	0.32	0.554
Shots	8	4.505	1.776	0.08	0.142
Saves	1	2.449	0.408	0.15	0.061
Blocks	12	5.874	2.043	0.07	0.143
Takeaways	9	3.874	2.323	0.12	0.279
Passes	20	19.179	1.043	0.08	0.083
Faceoff win rate	0.4	0.5	0.8	0.03	0.024

Σ 1.287 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.514 − 0.044 turnover penalty = 1.47 → ×100 = 146.97 → 147

Offensive6.54

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.066	0.104	0.4	1.844
Shooting %	0.375	0.456	0.2	1.059
Assists per pass	0.2	0.099	0.4	3.637

Σ contribution = 6.539

Defensive6.81

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.449	3.875	0.3	1.163
Blocks	12	5.874	9.116	0.2	1.823
Takeaways	9	3.874	9.471	0.25	2.368
Goals conceded	7	6.688	5.822	0.25	1.455

Σ contribution = 6.809

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Jack Tampa Bay Tadpoles

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR7.0

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	5	2.06	1.74	0.23	1.693	0.39
Assists	3	1.89	1.51	0.19	0.734	0.14
Shots	7	4.51	3	0.09	0.83	0.075
Passes	25	19.18	7.63	0.08	0.763	0.061
Saves	1	2.45	2.76	0.19	-0.525	-0.1
Blocks	3	5.87	3.93	0.11	-0.731	-0.08
Takeaways	1	3.87	3.13	0.11	-0.917	-0.101

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.384 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.768, then +0.25 hot shooting → 7.0

Pucker+125

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	8	3.755	2.131	0.32	0.682
Shots	7	4.505	1.554	0.08	0.124
Saves	1	2.449	0.408	0.15	0.061
Blocks	3	5.874	0.511	0.07	0.036
Takeaways	1	3.874	0.258	0.12	0.031
Passes	25	19.179	1.304	0.08	0.104
Faceoff win rate	0.375	0.5	0.75	0.03	0.022

Σ 1.061 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.248 → ×100 = 124.81 → 125

Offensive8.35

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.471	0.104	0.4	3.997
Shooting %	0.714	0.456	0.2	1.609
Assists per pass	0.12	0.099	0.4	2.741

Σ contribution = 8.348

Defensive4.33

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.449	3.875	0.3	1.163
Blocks	3	5.874	4.186	0.2	0.837
Takeaways	1	3.874	3.479	0.25	0.87
Goals conceded	7	6.688	5.822	0.25	1.455

Σ contribution = 4.325

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Richard Tantrum Champaign Champagne

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.6

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	2.06	1.74	0.23	-0.607	-0.14
Assists	2	1.89	1.51	0.19	0.072	0.014
Shots	1	4.51	3	0.09	-1.167	-0.105
Passes	13	19.18	7.63	0.08	-0.809	-0.065
Saves	3	2.45	2.76	0.19	0.199	0.038
Blocks	10	5.87	3.93	0.11	1.049	0.115
Takeaways	1	3.87	3.13	0.11	-0.917	-0.101

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.243 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.513, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.2 goals against → 5.6

Pucker+75

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2.5	3.755	0.666	0.32	0.213
Shots	1	4.505	0.222	0.08	0.018
Saves	3	2.449	1.225	0.15	0.184
Blocks	10	5.874	1.703	0.07	0.119
Takeaways	1	3.874	0.258	0.12	0.031
Passes	13	19.179	0.678	0.08	0.054
Faceoff win rate	0.375	0.5	0.75	0.03	0.022

Σ 0.641 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.755 − 0.005 turnover penalty = 0.75 → ×100 = 74.95 → 75

Offensive7.47

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.103	0.104	0.4	2.397
Shooting %	1	0.456	0.2	1.865
Assists per pass	0.154	0.099	0.4	3.212

Σ contribution = 7.474

Defensive5.75

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	3	2.449	6.884	0.3	2.065
Blocks	10	5.874	8.424	0.2	1.685
Takeaways	1	3.874	3.479	0.25	0.87
Goals conceded	11	6.688	4.508	0.25	1.127

Σ contribution = 5.747

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Square Champaign Champagne

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.2

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	4	2.06	1.74	0.23	1.118	0.257
Assists	2	1.89	1.51	0.19	0.072	0.014
Shots	5	4.51	3	0.09	0.165	0.015
Passes	19	19.18	7.63	0.08	-0.023	-0.002
Saves	3	2.45	2.76	0.19	0.199	0.038
Blocks	4	5.87	3.93	0.11	-0.476	-0.052
Takeaways	2	3.87	3.13	0.11	-0.598	-0.066

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.204 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.407, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 goals against → 6.2

Pucker+109

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	6	3.755	1.598	0.32	0.511
Shots	5	4.505	1.11	0.08	0.089
Saves	3	2.449	1.225	0.15	0.184
Blocks	4	5.874	0.681	0.07	0.048
Takeaways	2	3.874	0.516	0.12	0.062
Passes	19	19.179	0.991	0.08	0.079
Faceoff win rate	0.429	0.5	0.857	0.03	0.026

Σ 0.998 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.175 − 0.083 turnover penalty = 1.092 → ×100 = 109.2 → 109

Offensive8.22

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.545	0.104	0.4	3.999
Shooting %	0.8	0.456	0.2	1.71
Assists per pass	0.105	0.099	0.4	2.507

Σ contribution = 8.216

Defensive5.20

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	3	2.449	6.884	0.3	2.065
Blocks	4	5.874	4.766	0.2	0.953
Takeaways	2	3.874	4.203	0.25	1.051
Goals conceded	11	6.688	4.508	0.25	1.127

Σ contribution = 5.196

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Tridoxity Champaign Champagne

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.7

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	2.06	1.74	0.23	-0.032	-0.007
Assists	4	1.89	1.51	0.19	1.397	0.265
Shots	3	4.51	3	0.09	-0.501	-0.045
Passes	23	19.18	7.63	0.08	0.501	0.04
Saves	3	2.45	2.76	0.19	0.199	0.038
Blocks	5	5.87	3.93	0.11	-0.222	-0.024
Takeaways	6	3.87	3.13	0.11	0.678	0.075

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.341 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.682, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.2 goals against → 6.7

Pucker+133

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	6	3.755	1.598	0.32	0.511
Shots	3	4.505	0.666	0.08	0.053
Saves	3	2.449	1.225	0.15	0.184
Blocks	5	5.874	0.851	0.07	0.06
Takeaways	6	3.874	1.549	0.12	0.186
Passes	23	19.179	1.199	0.08	0.096
Faceoff win rate	0.75	0.5	1.5	0.03	0.045

Σ 1.135 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.335 − 0.005 turnover penalty = 1.33 → ×100 = 132.99 → 133

Offensive7.06

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.083	0.104	0.4	2.09
Shooting %	0.667	0.456	0.2	1.545
Assists per pass	0.174	0.099	0.4	3.429

Σ contribution = 7.064

Defensive6.27

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	3	2.449	6.884	0.3	2.065
Blocks	5	5.874	5.409	0.2	1.082
Takeaways	6	3.874	7.999	0.25	2
Goals conceded	11	6.688	4.508	0.25	1.127

Σ contribution = 6.274

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.