Chicago Sky Scrapers vs Kentucky Fried Chickens

Home · CSSChicago Sky Scrapers

7–2Final

KFAwayKentucky Fried Chickens

May 8, 2025 · Open Division · The Rookery Arena

MVP Im Terrible · 7.0 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Chicago Sky ScrapersvsKentucky Fried Chickens

17Shots107

5Saves510

6Faceoffs won6

11Takeaways29

9Turnovers↓110

20Blocks929

64Passes2242

1:37Possession0:031:40

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Chicago Sky Scrapers

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Rage Quitter	3	1	4	6	2	3	1	5	1	9	15	0:32	132	5.97	7.97
andrewdewar104	0	2	2	1	0	0	2	2	2	1	14	0:18	48	6.38	5.03
danimal1059	1	2	3	3	0	1	1	2	3	3	22	0:22	75	6.29	5.21
dead2soon	0	1	1	0	1	2	0	0	0	3	0	0:03	34	5.74	5.14
zukeRulez	3	0	3	7	2	0	2	2	3	4	13	0:22	98	5.24	6.40

Kentucky Fried Chickens

Player	G	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
DylanS	0	0	3	3	2	3	1	6	11	12	0:17	51	2.95	6.54
Im Terrible	2	2	4	6	3	0	5	1	12	16	1:03	155	3.83	8.29
Prizz	0	0	0	1	1	3	3	3	6	14	0:20	43	2.95	5.43

Rage Quitter Chicago Sky Scrapers

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.8

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	1.78	1.8	0.23	0.678	0.156
Assists	1	1.37	1.43	0.19	-0.259	-0.049
Shots	6	3.56	2.91	0.09	0.839	0.075
Passes	15	14.88	6.87	0.08	0.018	0.001
Saves	2	1.76	2.14	0.19	0.112	0.021
Blocks	9	5.98	3.97	0.11	0.762	0.084
Takeaways	5	2.76	2.73	0.11	0.82	0.09

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.379 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.758, nothing hit the bonus or penalty thresholds → 6.8

Pucker+132

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3.5	3.055	1.146	0.32	0.367
Shots	6	3.563	1.684	0.08	0.135
Saves	2	1.761	1.136	0.15	0.17
Blocks	9	5.975	1.506	0.07	0.105
Takeaways	5	2.764	1.809	0.12	0.217
Passes	15	14.877	1.008	0.08	0.081
Faceoff win rate	0.75	0.5	1.501	0.03	0.045

Σ 1.12 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.318 → ×100 = 131.75 → 132

Offensive5.97

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.125	0.099	0.4	2.805
Shooting %	0.5	0.5	0.2	1.2
Assists per pass	0.067	0.092	0.4	1.968

Σ contribution = 5.973

Defensive7.97

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	1.761	6.539	0.3	1.962
Blocks	9	5.975	7.868	0.2	1.574
Takeaways	5	2.764	8.676	0.25	2.169
Goals conceded	2	5.805	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 7.967

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

andrewdewar104 Chicago Sky Scrapers

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.7

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	1.78	1.8	0.23	-0.992	-0.228
Assists	2	1.37	1.43	0.19	0.438	0.083
Shots	1	3.56	2.91	0.09	-0.882	-0.079
Passes	14	14.88	6.87	0.08	-0.128	-0.01
Saves	0	1.76	2.14	0.19	-0.823	-0.156
Blocks	1	5.98	3.97	0.11	-1.254	-0.138
Takeaways	2	2.76	2.73	0.11	-0.28	-0.031

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.56 × 2, −3 to 3) = 4.88, then −0.2 cold shooting → 4.7

Pucker+48

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2	3.055	0.655	0.32	0.21
Shots	1	3.563	0.281	0.08	0.022
Saves	0	1.761	0	0.15	0
Blocks	1	5.975	0.167	0.07	0.012
Takeaways	2	2.764	0.724	0.12	0.087
Passes	14	14.877	0.941	0.08	0.075
Faceoff win rate	0	0.5	0	0.03	0

Σ 0.406 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.477 → ×100 = 47.74 → 48

Offensive6.38

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.111	0.099	0.4	2.59
Shooting %	0	0.5	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.143	0.092	0.4	3.2

Σ contribution = 6.381

Defensive5.03

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	1.761	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	1	5.975	3.272	0.2	0.654
Takeaways	2	2.764	4.921	0.25	1.23
Goals conceded	2	5.805	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 5.032

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

danimal1059 Chicago Sky Scrapers

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.4

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	1.78	1.8	0.23	-0.436	-0.1
Assists	2	1.37	1.43	0.19	0.438	0.083
Shots	3	3.56	2.91	0.09	-0.194	-0.017
Passes	22	14.88	6.87	0.08	1.037	0.083
Saves	0	1.76	2.14	0.19	-0.823	-0.156
Blocks	3	5.98	3.97	0.11	-0.75	-0.083
Takeaways	2	2.76	2.73	0.11	-0.28	-0.031

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.221 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.558, then −0.2 cold shooting → 5.4

Pucker+75

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3	3.055	0.982	0.32	0.314
Shots	3	3.563	0.842	0.08	0.067
Saves	0	1.761	0	0.15	0
Blocks	3	5.975	0.502	0.07	0.035
Takeaways	2	2.764	0.724	0.12	0.087
Passes	22	14.877	1.479	0.08	0.118
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.5	1.001	0.03	0.03

Σ 0.652 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.767 − 0.013 turnover penalty = 0.754 → ×100 = 75.4 → 75

Offensive6.29

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.136	0.099	0.4	2.971
Shooting %	0.333	0.5	0.2	0.943
Assists per pass	0.091	0.092	0.4	2.378

Σ contribution = 6.292

Defensive5.21

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	1.761	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	3	5.975	4.158	0.2	0.832
Takeaways	2	2.764	4.921	0.25	1.23
Goals conceded	2	5.805	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 5.21

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

dead2soon Chicago Sky Scrapers

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.4

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	1.78	1.8	0.23	-0.992	-0.228
Assists	1	1.37	1.43	0.19	-0.259	-0.049
Shots	0	3.56	2.91	0.09	-1.226	-0.11
Passes	0	14.88	6.87	0.08	-2.166	-0.173
Saves	1	1.76	2.14	0.19	-0.356	-0.068
Blocks	3	5.98	3.97	0.11	-0.75	-0.083
Takeaways	0	2.76	2.73	0.11	-1.014	-0.112

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.823 × 2, −3 to 3) = 4.355, nothing hit the bonus or penalty thresholds → 4.4

Pucker+34

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1	3.055	0.327	0.32	0.105
Shots	0	3.563	0	0.08	0
Saves	1	1.761	0.568	0.15	0.085
Blocks	3	5.975	0.502	0.07	0.035
Takeaways	0	2.764	0	0.12	0
Passes	0	14.877	0	0.08	0
Faceoff win rate	1	0.5	2.002	0.03	0.06

Σ 0.285 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.335 → ×100 = 33.54 → 34

Offensive5.74

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.333	0.099	0.4	3.972
Shooting %	0	0.5	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0	0.092	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 5.744

Defensive5.14

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	1.761	4.372	0.3	1.311
Blocks	3	5.975	4.158	0.2	0.832
Takeaways	0	2.764	2.954	0.25	0.738
Goals conceded	2	5.805	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 5.143

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

zukeRulez Chicago Sky Scrapers

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.0

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	1.78	1.8	0.23	0.678	0.156
Assists	0	1.37	1.43	0.19	-0.956	-0.182
Shots	7	3.56	2.91	0.09	1.183	0.106
Passes	13	14.88	6.87	0.08	-0.273	-0.022
Saves	2	1.76	2.14	0.19	0.112	0.021
Blocks	4	5.98	3.97	0.11	-0.498	-0.055
Takeaways	2	2.76	2.73	0.11	-0.28	-0.031

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.006 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.989, nothing hit the bonus or penalty thresholds → 6.0

Pucker+98

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3	3.055	0.982	0.32	0.314
Shots	7	3.563	1.965	0.08	0.157
Saves	2	1.761	1.136	0.15	0.17
Blocks	4	5.975	0.669	0.07	0.047
Takeaways	2	2.764	0.724	0.12	0.087
Passes	13	14.877	0.874	0.08	0.07
Faceoff win rate	0	0.5	0	0.03	0

Σ 0.845 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.995 − 0.013 turnover penalty = 0.982 → ×100 = 98.16 → 98

Offensive5.24

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.136	0.099	0.4	2.971
Shooting %	0.429	0.5	0.2	1.086
Assists per pass	0	0.092	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 5.239

Defensive6.40

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	1.761	6.539	0.3	1.962
Blocks	4	5.975	4.724	0.2	0.945
Takeaways	2	2.764	4.921	0.25	1.23
Goals conceded	2	5.805	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 6.399

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

DylanS Kentucky Fried Chickens

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.9

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	1.78	1.8	0.23	-0.992	-0.228
Assists	0	1.37	1.43	0.19	-0.956	-0.182
Shots	3	3.56	2.91	0.09	-0.194	-0.017
Passes	12	14.88	6.87	0.08	-0.419	-0.034
Saves	3	1.76	2.14	0.19	0.579	0.11
Blocks	11	5.98	3.97	0.11	1.267	0.139
Takeaways	1	2.76	2.73	0.11	-0.647	-0.071

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.283 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.435, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting → 4.9

Pucker+51

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	0	3.055	0	0.32	0
Shots	3	3.563	0.842	0.08	0.067
Saves	3	1.761	1.704	0.15	0.256
Blocks	11	5.975	1.841	0.07	0.129
Takeaways	1	2.764	0.362	0.12	0.043
Passes	12	14.877	0.807	0.08	0.065
Faceoff win rate	0.4	0.5	0.801	0.03	0.024

Σ 0.584 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.687 − 0.176 turnover penalty = 0.511 → ×100 = 51.08 → 51

Offensive2.95

Rate	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.099	0.4	1.181
Shooting %	0.5	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.092	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 2.954

Defensive6.54

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	3	1.761	8.426	0.3	2.528
Blocks	11	5.975	8.745	0.2	1.749
Takeaways	1	2.764	3.745	0.25	0.936
Goals conceded	7	5.805	5.324	0.25	1.331

Σ contribution = 6.544

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Im Terrible Kentucky Fried Chickens

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR7.0

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	1.78	1.8	0.23	0.121	0.028
Assists	0	1.37	1.43	0.19	-0.956	-0.182
Shots	4	3.56	2.91	0.09	0.15	0.014
Passes	16	14.88	6.87	0.08	0.163	0.013
Saves	6	1.76	2.14	0.19	1.981	0.376
Blocks	12	5.98	3.97	0.11	1.519	0.167
Takeaways	5	2.76	2.73	0.11	0.82	0.09

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.506 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.013, nothing hit the bonus or penalty thresholds → 7.0

Pucker+155

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2	3.055	0.655	0.32	0.21
Shots	4	3.563	1.123	0.08	0.09
Saves	6	1.761	3.407	0.15	0.511
Blocks	12	5.975	2.008	0.07	0.141
Takeaways	5	2.764	1.809	0.12	0.217
Passes	16	14.877	1.075	0.08	0.086
Faceoff win rate	1	0.5	2.002	0.03	0.06

Σ 1.314 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.546 → ×100 = 154.6 → 155

Offensive3.83

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.032	0.099	0.4	1.453
Shooting %	0.5	0.5	0.2	1.2
Assists per pass	0	0.092	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 3.834

Defensive8.29

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	6	1.761	9.936	0.3	2.981
Blocks	12	5.975	9.06	0.2	1.812
Takeaways	5	2.764	8.676	0.25	2.169
Goals conceded	7	5.805	5.324	0.25	1.331

Σ contribution = 8.293

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Prizz Kentucky Fried Chickens

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.8

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	1.78	1.8	0.23	-0.992	-0.228
Assists	0	1.37	1.43	0.19	-0.956	-0.182
Shots	0	3.56	2.91	0.09	-1.226	-0.11
Passes	14	14.88	6.87	0.08	-0.128	-0.01
Saves	1	1.76	2.14	0.19	-0.356	-0.068
Blocks	6	5.98	3.97	0.11	0.006	0.001
Takeaways	3	2.76	2.73	0.11	0.086	0.01

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.588 × 2, −3 to 3) = 4.824, nothing hit the bonus or penalty thresholds → 4.8

Pucker+43

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	0	3.055	0	0.32	0
Shots	0	3.563	0	0.08	0
Saves	1	1.761	0.568	0.15	0.085
Blocks	6	5.975	1.004	0.07	0.07
Takeaways	3	2.764	1.085	0.12	0.13
Passes	14	14.877	0.941	0.08	0.075
Faceoff win rate	0.25	0.5	0.5	0.03	0.015

Σ 0.376 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.442 − 0.013 turnover penalty = 0.429 → ×100 = 42.94 → 43

Offensive2.95

Rate	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.099	0.4	1.181
Shooting %	0.5	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.092	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 2.954

Defensive5.43

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	1.761	4.372	0.3	1.311
Blocks	6	5.975	6.016	0.2	1.203
Takeaways	3	2.764	6.34	0.25	1.585
Goals conceded	7	5.805	5.324	0.25	1.331

Σ contribution = 5.43

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.