Orange County low taper fades vs Cowtown Dandy Skaters

OCHomeOrange County low taper fades

4–10Final

Away · CDSCowtown Dandy Skaters

Feb 17, 2025 · Central C - Playoffs · Ninjas room

MVP Pip Starlather · 7.9 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Orange County low taper fadesvsCowtown Dandy Skaters

10Shots212

2Saves46

10Faceoffs won46

7Takeaways34

3Turnovers↓47

19Blocks827

66Passes2145

2:01Possession1:220:39

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Orange County low taper fades

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
TMNNational	0	2	2	3	0	3	1	2	1	6	16	0:58	62	0.86	0.57
YackSlack	1	3	4	4	0	3	1	4	1	8	25	0:44	111	1.19	0.80
Cart	3	0	3	3	2	4	4	1	1	5	25	0:19	99	1.19	0.72

Cowtown Dandy Skaters

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
LessThanDennis	3	4	7	5	0	2	2	1	1	5	13	0:05	122	1.88	0.65
jsTronix	3	1	4	3	4	1	3	2	0	13	10	0:19	130	1.65	1.38
Pip Starlather	4	4	8	4	2	3	5	1	6	9	22	0:15	160	1.92	1.01

TMNNational Orange County low taper fades

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.9

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	1.41	1.38	0.23	-1.027	-0.236
Assists	2	1.36	1.15	0.19	0.561	0.107
Shots	3	3.33	2.48	0.09	-0.132	-0.012
Passes	16	17.11	7.44	0.08	-0.149	-0.012
Saves	0	1.91	2.16	0.19	-0.886	-0.168
Blocks	6	6.24	3.47	0.11	-0.069	-0.008
Takeaways	2	2.91	2.48	0.11	-0.369	-0.041

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.37 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.26, then −0.2 cold shooting, −0.2 goals against → 4.9

Pucker+62

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1.5	2.625	0.571	0.32	0.183
Shots	3	3.327	0.902	0.08	0.072
Saves	0	1.913	0	0.15	0
Blocks	6	6.24	0.961	0.07	0.067
Takeaways	2	2.913	0.686	0.12	0.082
Passes	16	17.106	0.935	0.08	0.075
Faceoff win rate	0.75	0.5	1.5	0.03	0.045

Σ 0.525 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.617 → ×100 = 61.71 → 62

Offensive0.86

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.034	0.077	0.4	0.2
Shooting %	0	0.425	0.2	0.048
Assists per pass	0.125	0.079	0.4	0.608

Σ contribution = 0.856

Defensive0.57

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	1.913	0.238	0.3	0.072
Blocks	6	6.24	0.961	0.2	0.192
Takeaways	2	2.913	0.696	0.25	0.174
Goals conceded	10	5.01	0.539	0.25	0.135

Σ contribution = 0.573

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

YackSlack Orange County low taper fades

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.1

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	1.41	1.38	0.23	-0.3	-0.069
Assists	3	1.36	1.15	0.19	1.432	0.272
Shots	4	3.33	2.48	0.09	0.271	0.024
Passes	25	17.11	7.44	0.08	1.062	0.085
Saves	0	1.91	2.16	0.19	-0.886	-0.168
Blocks	8	6.24	3.47	0.11	0.508	0.056
Takeaways	4	2.91	2.48	0.11	0.439	0.048

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.248 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.496, then −0.2 cold shooting, −0.2 goals against → 6.1

Pucker+111

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3.5	2.625	1.333	0.32	0.427
Shots	4	3.327	1.202	0.08	0.096
Saves	0	1.913	0	0.15	0
Blocks	8	6.24	1.282	0.07	0.09
Takeaways	4	2.913	1.373	0.12	0.165
Passes	25	17.106	1.461	0.08	0.117
Faceoff win rate	0.75	0.5	1.5	0.03	0.045

Σ 0.939 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.105 → ×100 = 110.5 → 111

Offensive1.19

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.091	0.077	0.4	0.474
Shooting %	0.25	0.425	0.2	0.122
Assists per pass	0.12	0.079	0.4	0.589

Σ contribution = 1.185

Defensive0.80

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	1.913	0.238	0.3	0.072
Blocks	8	6.24	1.275	0.2	0.255
Takeaways	4	2.913	1.357	0.25	0.339
Goals conceded	10	5.01	0.539	0.25	0.135

Σ contribution = 0.801

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Cart Orange County low taper fades

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.0

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	1.41	1.38	0.23	1.152	0.265
Assists	0	1.36	1.15	0.19	-1.181	-0.224
Shots	3	3.33	2.48	0.09	-0.132	-0.012
Passes	25	17.11	7.44	0.08	1.062	0.085
Saves	2	1.91	2.16	0.19	0.04	0.008
Blocks	5	6.24	3.47	0.11	-0.358	-0.039
Takeaways	1	2.91	2.48	0.11	-0.772	-0.085

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.003 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.994, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.2 goals against → 6.0

Pucker+99

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3	2.625	1.143	0.32	0.366
Shots	3	3.327	0.902	0.08	0.072
Saves	2	1.913	1.045	0.15	0.157
Blocks	5	6.24	0.801	0.07	0.056
Takeaways	1	2.913	0.343	0.12	0.041
Passes	25	17.106	1.461	0.08	0.117
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.5	1	0.03	0.03

Σ 0.839 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.987 → ×100 = 98.69 → 99

Offensive1.19

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.158	0.077	0.4	0.715
Shooting %	1	0.425	0.2	0.375
Assists per pass	0	0.079	0.4	0.095

Σ contribution = 1.185

Defensive0.72

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	1.913	1.045	0.3	0.314
Blocks	5	6.24	0.804	0.2	0.161
Takeaways	1	2.913	0.424	0.25	0.106
Goals conceded	10	5.01	0.539	0.25	0.135

Σ contribution = 0.716

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

LessThanDennis Cowtown Dandy Skaters

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR7.1

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	1.41	1.38	0.23	1.152	0.265
Assists	4	1.36	1.15	0.19	2.303	0.437
Shots	5	3.33	2.48	0.09	0.674	0.061
Passes	13	17.11	7.44	0.08	-0.552	-0.044
Saves	0	1.91	2.16	0.19	-0.886	-0.168
Blocks	5	6.24	3.47	0.11	-0.358	-0.039
Takeaways	1	2.91	2.48	0.11	-0.772	-0.085

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.426 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.853, then +0.25 hot shooting → 7.1

Pucker+122

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	6	2.625	2.286	0.32	0.731
Shots	5	3.327	1.503	0.08	0.12
Saves	0	1.913	0	0.15	0
Blocks	5	6.24	0.801	0.07	0.056
Takeaways	1	2.913	0.343	0.12	0.041
Passes	13	17.106	0.76	0.08	0.061
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.5	1	0.03	0.03

Σ 1.04 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.223 → ×100 = 122.32 → 122

Offensive1.88

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	1.4	0.077	0.4	0.8
Shooting %	0.6	0.425	0.2	0.278
Assists per pass	0.308	0.079	0.4	0.797

Σ contribution = 1.876

Defensive0.65

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	1.913	0.238	0.3	0.072
Blocks	5	6.24	0.804	0.2	0.161
Takeaways	1	2.913	0.424	0.25	0.106
Goals conceded	4	5.01	1.247	0.25	0.312

Σ contribution = 0.651

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

jsTronix Cowtown Dandy Skaters

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR7.2

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	1.41	1.38	0.23	1.152	0.265
Assists	1	1.36	1.15	0.19	-0.31	-0.059
Shots	3	3.33	2.48	0.09	-0.132	-0.012
Passes	10	17.11	7.44	0.08	-0.956	-0.076
Saves	4	1.91	2.16	0.19	0.966	0.184
Blocks	13	6.24	3.47	0.11	1.951	0.215
Takeaways	2	2.91	2.48	0.11	-0.369	-0.041

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.476 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.951, then +0.25 hot shooting → 7.2

Pucker+130

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3.5	2.625	1.333	0.32	0.427
Shots	3	3.327	0.902	0.08	0.072
Saves	4	1.913	2.09	0.15	0.314
Blocks	13	6.24	2.083	0.07	0.146
Takeaways	2	2.913	0.686	0.12	0.082
Passes	10	17.106	0.585	0.08	0.047
Faceoff win rate	0.25	0.5	0.5	0.03	0.015

Σ 1.102 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.297 → ×100 = 129.69 → 130

Offensive1.65

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.211	0.077	0.4	0.777
Shooting %	1	0.425	0.2	0.375
Assists per pass	0.1	0.079	0.4	0.502

Σ contribution = 1.654

Defensive1.38

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	4	1.913	1.797	0.3	0.539
Blocks	13	6.24	1.794	0.2	0.359
Takeaways	2	2.913	0.696	0.25	0.174
Goals conceded	4	5.01	1.247	0.25	0.312

Σ contribution = 1.384

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Pip Starlather Cowtown Dandy Skaters

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR7.9

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	4	1.41	1.38	0.23	1.879	0.432
Assists	4	1.36	1.15	0.19	2.303	0.437
Shots	4	3.33	2.48	0.09	0.271	0.024
Passes	22	17.11	7.44	0.08	0.658	0.053
Saves	2	1.91	2.16	0.19	0.04	0.008
Blocks	9	6.24	3.47	0.11	0.796	0.088
Takeaways	1	2.91	2.48	0.11	-0.772	-0.085

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.957 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.914, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.3 turnovers → 7.9

Pucker+160

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	8	2.625	3.048	0.32	0.975
Shots	4	3.327	1.202	0.08	0.096
Saves	2	1.913	1.045	0.15	0.157
Blocks	9	6.24	1.442	0.07	0.101
Takeaways	1	2.913	0.343	0.12	0.041
Passes	22	17.106	1.286	0.08	0.103
Faceoff win rate	0.375	0.5	0.75	0.03	0.022

Σ 1.496 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.76 − 0.161 turnover penalty = 1.599 → ×100 = 159.87 → 160

Offensive1.92

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.533	0.077	0.4	0.8
Shooting %	1	0.425	0.2	0.375
Assists per pass	0.182	0.079	0.4	0.744

Σ contribution = 1.919

Defensive1.01

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	1.913	1.045	0.3	0.314
Blocks	9	6.24	1.415	0.2	0.283
Takeaways	1	2.913	0.424	0.25	0.106
Goals conceded	4	5.01	1.247	0.25	0.312

Σ contribution = 1.015

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.