Ottawa Valley Rubber Duckies vs Chicago Hoodlums

OVHomeOttawa Valley Rubber Duckies

5–6Final

Away · CHChicago Hoodlums

Feb 11, 2025 · Open Division · The Valley Duck Stadium

MVP lilsmalleyes · 6.3 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Ottawa Valley Rubber DuckiesvsChicago Hoodlums

7Shots714

8Saves62

10Faceoffs won73

11Takeaways11

11Turnovers↓11

18Blocks216

54Passes559

1:50Possession0:152:05

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Ottawa Valley Rubber Duckies

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Belevis	2	2	4	2	3	3	1	2	2	5	20	0:45	106	6.33	6.05
Faceguy [ >:) ]	1	2	3	3	2	3	0	6	6	9	13	0:28	92	6.51	7.00
Triscut	2	2	4	2	3	4	2	3	3	4	21	0:37	108	6.55	6.18

Chicago Hoodlums

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	GWG	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
lilsmalleyes	3	2	5	6	1	1	3	1	5	6	23	0	0:11	93	7.34	5.12
noodles	2	2	4	5	1	1	5	7	2	7	17	0	1:24	112	5.26	6.60
Sylvatic	1	3	4	3	0	1	2	3	4	3	19	1	0:30	73	6.95	4.87

Belevis Ottawa Valley Rubber Duckies

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.3

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	1.97	1.75	0.23	0.016	0.004
Assists	2	1.64	1.44	0.19	0.252	0.048
Shots	2	4.05	3	0.09	-0.685	-0.062
Passes	20	15.52	6.73	0.08	0.666	0.053
Saves	3	2.08	2.31	0.19	0.399	0.076
Blocks	5	6.07	3.79	0.11	-0.283	-0.031
Takeaways	2	3.59	3.07	0.11	-0.517	-0.057

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.031 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.062, then +0.25 hot shooting → 6.3

Pucker+106

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4	3.467	1.154	0.32	0.369
Shots	2	4.051	0.494	0.08	0.039
Saves	3	2.08	1.442	0.15	0.216
Blocks	5	6.071	0.824	0.07	0.058
Takeaways	2	3.585	0.558	0.12	0.067
Passes	20	15.523	1.288	0.08	0.103
Faceoff win rate	0.75	0.5	1.5	0.03	0.045

Σ 0.898 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.056 → ×100 = 105.62 → 106

Offensive6.33

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.089	0.103	0.4	2.183
Shooting %	1	0.487	0.2	1.827
Assists per pass	0.1	0.105	0.4	2.318

Σ contribution = 6.328

Defensive6.05

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	3	2.08	7.663	0.3	2.299
Blocks	5	6.071	5.302	0.2	1.06
Takeaways	2	3.585	4.338	0.25	1.085
Goals conceded	6	6.623	6.414	0.25	1.603

Σ contribution = 6.047

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Faceguy [ >:) ] Ottawa Valley Rubber Duckies

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.5

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	1.97	1.75	0.23	-0.554	-0.127
Assists	2	1.64	1.44	0.19	0.252	0.048
Shots	3	4.05	3	0.09	-0.351	-0.032
Passes	13	15.52	6.73	0.08	-0.375	-0.03
Saves	2	2.08	2.31	0.19	-0.035	-0.007
Blocks	9	6.07	3.79	0.11	0.773	0.085
Takeaways	6	3.59	3.07	0.11	0.787	0.087

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.024 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.048, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting → 5.5

Pucker+92

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2.5	3.467	0.721	0.32	0.231
Shots	3	4.051	0.741	0.08	0.059
Saves	2	2.08	0.962	0.15	0.144
Blocks	9	6.071	1.482	0.07	0.104
Takeaways	6	3.585	1.673	0.12	0.201
Passes	13	15.523	0.837	0.08	0.067
Faceoff win rate	1	0.5	2	0.03	0.06

Σ 0.866 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.019 − 0.102 turnover penalty = 0.917 → ×100 = 91.7 → 92

Offensive6.51

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.107	0.103	0.4	2.466
Shooting %	0.333	0.487	0.2	0.956
Assists per pass	0.154	0.105	0.4	3.087

Σ contribution = 6.509

Defensive7.00

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	2.08	5.847	0.3	1.754
Blocks	9	6.071	7.793	0.2	1.559
Takeaways	6	3.585	8.349	0.25	2.087
Goals conceded	6	6.623	6.414	0.25	1.603

Σ contribution = 7.003

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Triscut Ottawa Valley Rubber Duckies

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.3

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	1.97	1.75	0.23	0.016	0.004
Assists	2	1.64	1.44	0.19	0.252	0.048
Shots	2	4.05	3	0.09	-0.685	-0.062
Passes	21	15.52	6.73	0.08	0.814	0.065
Saves	3	2.08	2.31	0.19	0.399	0.076
Blocks	4	6.07	3.79	0.11	-0.547	-0.06
Takeaways	3	3.59	3.07	0.11	-0.191	-0.021

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.05 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.1, then +0.25 hot shooting → 6.3

Pucker+108

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4	3.467	1.154	0.32	0.369
Shots	2	4.051	0.494	0.08	0.039
Saves	3	2.08	1.442	0.15	0.216
Blocks	4	6.071	0.659	0.07	0.046
Takeaways	3	3.585	0.837	0.12	0.1
Passes	21	15.523	1.353	0.08	0.108
Faceoff win rate	0.667	0.5	1.333	0.03	0.04

Σ 0.92 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.082 → ×100 = 108.22 → 108

Offensive6.55

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.108	0.103	0.4	2.48
Shooting %	1	0.487	0.2	1.827
Assists per pass	0.095	0.105	0.4	2.246

Σ contribution = 6.553

Defensive6.18

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	3	2.08	7.663	0.3	2.299
Blocks	4	6.071	4.686	0.2	0.937
Takeaways	3	3.585	5.353	0.25	1.338
Goals conceded	6	6.623	6.414	0.25	1.603

Σ contribution = 6.177

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

lilsmalleyes Chicago Hoodlums

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.3

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	1.97	1.75	0.23	0.587	0.135
Assists	2	1.64	1.44	0.19	0.252	0.048
Shots	6	4.05	3	0.09	0.651	0.059
Passes	23	15.52	6.73	0.08	1.112	0.089
Saves	1	2.08	2.31	0.19	-0.468	-0.089
Blocks	6	6.07	3.79	0.11	-0.019	-0.002
Takeaways	1	3.59	3.07	0.11	-0.842	-0.093

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.147 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.293, nothing hit the bonus or penalty thresholds → 6.3

Pucker+93

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4.5	3.467	1.298	0.32	0.415
Shots	6	4.051	1.481	0.08	0.118
Saves	1	2.08	0.481	0.15	0.072
Blocks	6	6.071	0.988	0.07	0.069
Takeaways	1	3.585	0.279	0.12	0.033
Passes	23	15.523	1.482	0.08	0.119
Faceoff win rate	0.25	0.5	0.5	0.03	0.015

Σ 0.842 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.991 − 0.06 turnover penalty = 0.931 → ×100 = 93.11 → 93

Offensive7.34

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.455	0.103	0.4	3.997
Shooting %	0.5	0.487	0.2	1.222
Assists per pass	0.087	0.105	0.4	2.123

Σ contribution = 7.341

Defensive5.12

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.08	4.092	0.3	1.228
Blocks	6	6.071	5.953	0.2	1.191
Takeaways	1	3.585	3.53	0.25	0.882
Goals conceded	5	6.623	7.255	0.25	1.814

Σ contribution = 5.115

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

noodles Chicago Hoodlums

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.1

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	1.97	1.75	0.23	0.016	0.004
Assists	2	1.64	1.44	0.19	0.252	0.048
Shots	5	4.05	3	0.09	0.317	0.029
Passes	17	15.52	6.73	0.08	0.22	0.018
Saves	1	2.08	2.31	0.19	-0.468	-0.089
Blocks	7	6.07	3.79	0.11	0.245	0.027
Takeaways	7	3.59	3.07	0.11	1.112	0.122

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.158 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.316, then −0.2 cold shooting → 6.1

Pucker+112

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4	3.467	1.154	0.32	0.369
Shots	5	4.051	1.234	0.08	0.099
Saves	1	2.08	0.481	0.15	0.072
Blocks	7	6.071	1.153	0.07	0.081
Takeaways	7	3.585	1.952	0.12	0.234
Passes	17	15.523	1.095	0.08	0.088
Faceoff win rate	0.167	0.5	0.333	0.03	0.01

Σ 0.953 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.121 → ×100 = 112.08 → 112

Offensive5.26

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.048	0.103	0.4	1.614
Shooting %	0.4	0.487	0.2	1.059
Assists per pass	0.118	0.105	0.4	2.585

Σ contribution = 5.258

Defensive6.60

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.08	4.092	0.3	1.228
Blocks	7	6.071	6.607	0.2	1.321
Takeaways	7	3.585	8.963	0.25	2.241
Goals conceded	5	6.623	7.255	0.25	1.814

Σ contribution = 6.604

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Sylvatic Chicago Hoodlums

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.4

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	1.97	1.75	0.23	-0.554	-0.127
Assists	3	1.64	1.44	0.19	0.944	0.179
Shots	3	4.05	3	0.09	-0.351	-0.032
Passes	19	15.52	6.73	0.08	0.517	0.041
Saves	0	2.08	2.31	0.19	-0.901	-0.171
Blocks	3	6.07	3.79	0.11	-0.81	-0.089
Takeaways	3	3.59	3.07	0.11	-0.191	-0.021

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.22 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.561, then −0.2 cold shooting → 5.4

Pucker+73

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3.5	3.467	1.01	0.32	0.323
Shots	3	4.051	0.741	0.08	0.059
Saves	0	2.08	0	0.15	0
Blocks	3	6.071	0.494	0.07	0.035
Takeaways	3	3.585	0.837	0.12	0.1
Passes	19	15.523	1.224	0.08	0.098
Faceoff win rate	0.333	0.5	0.667	0.03	0.02

Σ 0.635 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.747 − 0.018 turnover penalty = 0.729 → ×100 = 72.96 → 73

Offensive6.95

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.133	0.103	0.4	2.859
Shooting %	0.333	0.487	0.2	0.956
Assists per pass	0.158	0.105	0.4	3.137

Σ contribution = 6.952

Defensive4.87

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.08	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	3	6.071	4.133	0.2	0.827
Takeaways	3	3.585	5.353	0.25	1.338
Goals conceded	5	6.623	7.255	0.25	1.814

Σ contribution = 4.865

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.