Chicago Rubber Puckies vs Chicago Hoodlums

CRHomeChicago Rubber Puckies

1–11Final

Away · CHChicago Hoodlums

Jan 29, 2025 · Open Division · The Duck Pond

MVP noodles · 9.4 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Chicago Rubber PuckiesvsChicago Hoodlums

4Shots913

2Saves13

4Faceoffs won610

10Takeaways1222

22Turnovers↓1210

18Blocks1028

40Passes1151

1:13Possession1:462:59

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Chicago Rubber Puckies

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Rage Quitter	0	0	0	0	1	3	4	4	9	5	12	0:23	19	2.95	5.03
andrewdewar104	1	0	1	3	1	1	4	1	9	4	16	0:19	24	3.81	4.17
danimal1059	0	1	1	1	0	0	2	5	4	9	12	0:31	51	4.11	5.44

Chicago Hoodlums

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
lilsmalleyes	1	4	5	1	1	5	1	11	3	8	10	1:02	131	7.87	7.41
noodles	6	2	8	7	2	3	2	8	5	16	20	1:32	178	6.19	8.30
Sylvatic	4	3	7	5	0	2	1	3	2	4	21	0:25	122	8.50	5.42

Rage Quitter Chicago Rubber Puckies

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.0

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	1.97	1.75	0.23	-1.125	-0.259
Assists	0	1.64	1.44	0.19	-1.133	-0.215
Shots	0	4.05	3	0.09	-1.352	-0.122
Passes	12	15.52	6.73	0.08	-0.524	-0.042
Saves	1	2.08	2.31	0.19	-0.468	-0.089
Blocks	5	6.07	3.79	0.11	-0.283	-0.031
Takeaways	4	3.59	3.07	0.11	0.135	0.015

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.743 × 2, −3 to 3) = 4.515, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 goals against → 4.0

Pucker+19

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	0	3.467	0	0.32	0
Shots	0	4.051	0	0.08	0
Saves	1	2.08	0.481	0.15	0.072
Blocks	5	6.071	0.824	0.07	0.058
Takeaways	4	3.585	1.116	0.12	0.134
Passes	12	15.523	0.773	0.08	0.062
Faceoff win rate	0.429	0.5	0.857	0.03	0.026

Σ 0.351 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.413 − 0.227 turnover penalty = 0.186 → ×100 = 18.57 → 19

Offensive2.95

Rate	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.103	0.4	1.181
Shooting %	0.487	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.105	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 2.954

Defensive5.03

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.08	4.092	0.3	1.228
Blocks	5	6.071	5.302	0.2	1.06
Takeaways	4	3.585	6.461	0.25	1.615
Goals conceded	11	6.623	4.487	0.25	1.122

Σ contribution = 5.025

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

andrewdewar104 Chicago Rubber Puckies

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.1

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	1.97	1.75	0.23	-0.554	-0.127
Assists	0	1.64	1.44	0.19	-1.133	-0.215
Shots	3	4.05	3	0.09	-0.351	-0.032
Passes	16	15.52	6.73	0.08	0.071	0.006
Saves	1	2.08	2.31	0.19	-0.468	-0.089
Blocks	4	6.07	3.79	0.11	-0.547	-0.06
Takeaways	1	3.59	3.07	0.11	-0.842	-0.093

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.61 × 2, −3 to 3) = 4.779, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting, −0.2 goals against → 4.1

Pucker+24

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1	3.467	0.288	0.32	0.092
Shots	3	4.051	0.741	0.08	0.059
Saves	1	2.08	0.481	0.15	0.072
Blocks	4	6.071	0.659	0.07	0.046
Takeaways	1	3.585	0.279	0.12	0.033
Passes	16	15.523	1.031	0.08	0.082
Faceoff win rate	0.2	0.5	0.4	0.03	0.012

Σ 0.398 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.468 − 0.227 turnover penalty = 0.241 → ×100 = 24.04 → 24

Offensive3.81

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.053	0.103	0.4	1.675
Shooting %	0.333	0.487	0.2	0.956
Assists per pass	0	0.105	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 3.812

Defensive4.17

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.08	4.092	0.3	1.228
Blocks	4	6.071	4.686	0.2	0.937
Takeaways	1	3.585	3.53	0.25	0.882
Goals conceded	11	6.623	4.487	0.25	1.122

Σ contribution = 4.169

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

danimal1059 Chicago Rubber Puckies

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.6

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	1.97	1.75	0.23	-1.125	-0.259
Assists	1	1.64	1.44	0.19	-0.441	-0.084
Shots	1	4.05	3	0.09	-1.019	-0.092
Passes	12	15.52	6.73	0.08	-0.524	-0.042
Saves	0	2.08	2.31	0.19	-0.901	-0.171
Blocks	9	6.07	3.79	0.11	0.773	0.085
Takeaways	5	3.59	3.07	0.11	0.461	0.051

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.511 × 2, −3 to 3) = 4.977, then −0.2 cold shooting, −0.2 goals against → 4.6

Pucker+51

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1	3.467	0.288	0.32	0.092
Shots	1	4.051	0.247	0.08	0.02
Saves	0	2.08	0	0.15	0
Blocks	9	6.071	1.482	0.07	0.104
Takeaways	5	3.585	1.395	0.12	0.167
Passes	12	15.523	0.773	0.08	0.062
Faceoff win rate	0	0.5	0	0.03	0

Σ 0.445 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.524 − 0.018 turnover penalty = 0.506 → ×100 = 50.58 → 51

Offensive4.11

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.032	0.103	0.4	1.447
Shooting %	0	0.487	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.083	0.105	0.4	2.07

Σ contribution = 4.107

Defensive5.44

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.08	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	9	6.071	7.793	0.2	1.559
Takeaways	5	3.585	7.501	0.25	1.875
Goals conceded	11	6.623	4.487	0.25	1.122

Σ contribution = 5.442

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

lilsmalleyes Chicago Hoodlums

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.8

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	1.97	1.75	0.23	-0.554	-0.127
Assists	4	1.64	1.44	0.19	1.637	0.311
Shots	1	4.05	3	0.09	-1.019	-0.092
Passes	10	15.52	6.73	0.08	-0.821	-0.066
Saves	1	2.08	2.31	0.19	-0.468	-0.089
Blocks	8	6.07	3.79	0.11	0.509	0.056
Takeaways	11	3.59	3.07	0.11	2.416	0.266

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.259 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.518, then +0.25 hot shooting → 6.8

Pucker+131

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	5	3.467	1.442	0.32	0.462
Shots	1	4.051	0.247	0.08	0.02
Saves	1	2.08	0.481	0.15	0.072
Blocks	8	6.071	1.318	0.07	0.092
Takeaways	11	3.585	3.068	0.12	0.368
Passes	10	15.523	0.644	0.08	0.052
Faceoff win rate	0.833	0.5	1.667	0.03	0.05

Σ 1.115 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.312 → ×100 = 131.22 → 131

Offensive7.87

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.081	0.103	0.4	2.059
Shooting %	1	0.487	0.2	1.827
Assists per pass	0.4	0.105	0.4	3.988

Σ contribution = 7.874

Defensive7.41

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.08	4.092	0.3	1.228
Blocks	8	6.071	7.23	0.2	1.446
Takeaways	11	3.585	9.874	0.25	2.469
Goals conceded	1	6.623	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 7.405

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

noodles Chicago Hoodlums

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR9.4

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	6	1.97	1.75	0.23	2.298	0.529
Assists	2	1.64	1.44	0.19	0.252	0.048
Shots	7	4.05	3	0.09	0.984	0.089
Passes	20	15.52	6.73	0.08	0.666	0.053
Saves	2	2.08	2.31	0.19	-0.035	-0.007
Blocks	16	6.07	3.79	0.11	2.62	0.288
Takeaways	8	3.59	3.07	0.11	1.438	0.158

6.0 + clip(Σ 1.158 × 2, −3 to 3) = 8.316, then +0.5 hat trick, +0.3 blocks, +0.25 hot shooting → 9.4

Pucker+178

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	7.5	3.467	2.163	0.32	0.692
Shots	7	4.051	1.728	0.08	0.138
Saves	2	2.08	0.962	0.15	0.144
Blocks	16	6.071	2.636	0.07	0.184
Takeaways	8	3.585	2.231	0.12	0.268
Passes	20	15.523	1.288	0.08	0.103
Faceoff win rate	0.6	0.5	1.2	0.03	0.036

Σ 1.566 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.842 − 0.06 turnover penalty = 1.782 → ×100 = 178.28 → 178

Offensive6.19

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.087	0.103	0.4	2.154
Shooting %	0.857	0.487	0.2	1.714
Assists per pass	0.1	0.105	0.4	2.318

Σ contribution = 6.185

Defensive8.30

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	2.08	5.847	0.3	1.754
Blocks	16	6.071	9.707	0.2	1.941
Takeaways	8	3.585	9.372	0.25	2.343
Goals conceded	1	6.623	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 8.3

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Sylvatic Chicago Hoodlums

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.8

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	4	1.97	1.75	0.23	1.157	0.266
Assists	3	1.64	1.44	0.19	0.944	0.179
Shots	5	4.05	3	0.09	0.317	0.029
Passes	21	15.52	6.73	0.08	0.814	0.065
Saves	0	2.08	2.31	0.19	-0.901	-0.171
Blocks	4	6.07	3.79	0.11	-0.547	-0.06
Takeaways	3	3.59	3.07	0.11	-0.191	-0.021

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.287 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.574, then +0.25 hot shooting → 6.8

Pucker+122

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	7	3.467	2.019	0.32	0.646
Shots	5	4.051	1.234	0.08	0.099
Saves	0	2.08	0	0.15	0
Blocks	4	6.071	0.659	0.07	0.046
Takeaways	3	3.585	0.837	0.12	0.1
Passes	21	15.523	1.353	0.08	0.108
Faceoff win rate	0.667	0.5	1.333	0.03	0.04

Σ 1.04 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.223 → ×100 = 122.31 → 122

Offensive8.50

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.28	0.103	0.4	3.901
Shooting %	0.8	0.487	0.2	1.654
Assists per pass	0.143	0.105	0.4	2.946

Σ contribution = 8.5

Defensive5.42

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.08	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	4	6.071	4.686	0.2	0.937
Takeaways	3	3.585	5.353	0.25	1.338
Goals conceded	1	6.623	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 5.423

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.