Chicago Hoodlums vs Ottawa Valley Rubber Duckies

Home · CHChicago Hoodlums

7–5Final

OVAwayOttawa Valley Rubber Duckies

Jan 21, 2025 · Open Division · Chicago Dome

MVP lilsmalleyes · 7.3 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Chicago HoodlumsvsOttawa Valley Rubber Duckies

13Shots112

7Saves16

7Faceoffs won16

14Takeaways68

8Turnovers↓614

14Blocks317

51Passes1364

1:50Possession0:171:33

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Chicago Hoodlums

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
lilsmalleyes	4	1	5	6	4	3	2	3	1	10	19	0:37	138	6.03	7.48
noodles	0	2	2	1	2	3	2	6	6	3	18	0:41	68	4.71	6.48
Sylvatic	3	1	4	6	1	1	2	5	1	1	14	0:32	98	5.86	5.57

Ottawa Valley Rubber Duckies

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
TMNNational	3	1	4	8	0	3	1	5	7	4	29	0:50	96	4.53	5.14
Faceguy [ >:) ]	2	3	5	3	3	2	3	1	4	9	15	0:23	113	8.71	6.19
Triscut	0	1	1	1	3	1	3	2	3	4	20	0:20	66	3.86	5.77

lilsmalleyes Chicago Hoodlums

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR7.3

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	4	1.97	1.75	0.23	1.157	0.266
Assists	1	1.64	1.44	0.19	-0.441	-0.084
Shots	6	4.05	3	0.09	0.651	0.059
Passes	19	15.52	6.73	0.08	0.517	0.041
Saves	4	2.08	2.31	0.19	0.832	0.158
Blocks	10	6.07	3.79	0.11	1.037	0.114
Takeaways	3	3.59	3.07	0.11	-0.191	-0.021

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.534 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.067, then +0.25 hot shooting → 7.3

Pucker+138

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4.5	3.467	1.298	0.32	0.415
Shots	6	4.051	1.481	0.08	0.118
Saves	4	2.08	1.923	0.15	0.288
Blocks	10	6.071	1.647	0.07	0.115
Takeaways	3	3.585	0.837	0.12	0.1
Passes	19	15.523	1.224	0.08	0.098
Faceoff win rate	0.6	0.5	1.2	0.03	0.036

Σ 1.172 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.379 → ×100 = 137.88 → 138

Offensive6.03

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.135	0.103	0.4	2.885
Shooting %	0.667	0.487	0.2	1.483
Assists per pass	0.053	0.105	0.4	1.66

Σ contribution = 6.028

Defensive7.48

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	4	2.08	8.91	0.3	2.673
Blocks	10	6.071	8.279	0.2	1.656
Takeaways	3	3.585	5.353	0.25	1.338
Goals conceded	5	6.623	7.255	0.25	1.814

Σ contribution = 7.481

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

noodles Chicago Hoodlums

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.9

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	1.97	1.75	0.23	-1.125	-0.259
Assists	2	1.64	1.44	0.19	0.252	0.048
Shots	1	4.05	3	0.09	-1.019	-0.092
Passes	18	15.52	6.73	0.08	0.368	0.029
Saves	2	2.08	2.31	0.19	-0.035	-0.007
Blocks	3	6.07	3.79	0.11	-0.81	-0.089
Takeaways	6	3.59	3.07	0.11	0.787	0.087

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.282 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.436, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting → 4.9

Pucker+68

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1.5	3.467	0.433	0.32	0.138
Shots	1	4.051	0.247	0.08	0.02
Saves	2	2.08	0.962	0.15	0.144
Blocks	3	6.071	0.494	0.07	0.035
Takeaways	6	3.585	1.673	0.12	0.201
Passes	18	15.523	1.16	0.08	0.093
Faceoff win rate	0.6	0.5	1.2	0.03	0.036

Σ 0.667 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.784 − 0.102 turnover penalty = 0.682 → ×100 = 68.26 → 68

Offensive4.71

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.049	0.103	0.4	1.628
Shooting %	0	0.487	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.111	0.105	0.4	2.486

Σ contribution = 4.705

Defensive6.48

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	2.08	5.847	0.3	1.754
Blocks	3	6.071	4.133	0.2	0.827
Takeaways	6	3.585	8.349	0.25	2.087
Goals conceded	5	6.623	7.255	0.25	1.814

Σ contribution = 6.482

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Sylvatic Chicago Hoodlums

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.8

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	1.97	1.75	0.23	0.587	0.135
Assists	1	1.64	1.44	0.19	-0.441	-0.084
Shots	6	4.05	3	0.09	0.651	0.059
Passes	14	15.52	6.73	0.08	-0.226	-0.018
Saves	1	2.08	2.31	0.19	-0.468	-0.089
Blocks	1	6.07	3.79	0.11	-1.338	-0.147
Takeaways	5	3.59	3.07	0.11	0.461	0.051

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.094 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.813, nothing hit the bonus or penalty thresholds → 5.8

Pucker+98

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4	3.467	1.154	0.32	0.369
Shots	6	4.051	1.481	0.08	0.118
Saves	1	2.08	0.481	0.15	0.072
Blocks	1	6.071	0.165	0.07	0.012
Takeaways	5	3.585	1.395	0.12	0.167
Passes	14	15.523	0.902	0.08	0.072
Faceoff win rate	0.333	0.5	0.667	0.03	0.02

Σ 0.831 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.977 → ×100 = 97.75 → 98

Offensive5.86

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.125	0.103	0.4	2.738
Shooting %	0.5	0.487	0.2	1.222
Assists per pass	0.071	0.105	0.4	1.901

Σ contribution = 5.861

Defensive5.57

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.08	4.092	0.3	1.228
Blocks	1	6.071	3.267	0.2	0.653
Takeaways	5	3.585	7.501	0.25	1.875
Goals conceded	5	6.623	7.255	0.25	1.814

Σ contribution = 5.57

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

TMNNational Ottawa Valley Rubber Duckies

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.8

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	1.97	1.75	0.23	0.587	0.135
Assists	1	1.64	1.44	0.19	-0.441	-0.084
Shots	8	4.05	3	0.09	1.318	0.119
Passes	29	15.52	6.73	0.08	2.004	0.16
Saves	0	2.08	2.31	0.19	-0.901	-0.171
Blocks	4	6.07	3.79	0.11	-0.547	-0.06
Takeaways	5	3.59	3.07	0.11	0.461	0.051

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.15 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.299, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting → 5.8

Pucker+96

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4	3.467	1.154	0.32	0.369
Shots	8	4.051	1.975	0.08	0.158
Saves	0	2.08	0	0.15	0
Blocks	4	6.071	0.659	0.07	0.046
Takeaways	5	3.585	1.395	0.12	0.167
Passes	29	15.523	1.868	0.08	0.149
Faceoff win rate	0.75	0.5	1.5	0.03	0.045

Σ 0.935 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.1 − 0.144 turnover penalty = 0.956 → ×100 = 95.66 → 96

Offensive4.53

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.08	0.103	0.4	2.049
Shooting %	0.375	0.487	0.2	1.02
Assists per pass	0.034	0.105	0.4	1.461

Σ contribution = 4.53

Defensive5.14

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.08	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	4	6.071	4.686	0.2	0.937
Takeaways	5	3.585	7.501	0.25	1.875
Goals conceded	7	6.623	5.785	0.25	1.446

Σ contribution = 5.144

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Faceguy [ >:) ] Ottawa Valley Rubber Duckies

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.7

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	1.97	1.75	0.23	0.016	0.004
Assists	3	1.64	1.44	0.19	0.944	0.179
Shots	3	4.05	3	0.09	-0.351	-0.032
Passes	15	15.52	6.73	0.08	-0.078	-0.006
Saves	3	2.08	2.31	0.19	0.399	0.076
Blocks	9	6.07	3.79	0.11	0.773	0.085
Takeaways	1	3.59	3.07	0.11	-0.842	-0.093

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.214 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.427, then +0.25 hot shooting → 6.7

Pucker+113

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	5	3.467	1.442	0.32	0.462
Shots	3	4.051	0.741	0.08	0.059
Saves	3	2.08	1.442	0.15	0.216
Blocks	9	6.071	1.482	0.07	0.104
Takeaways	1	3.585	0.279	0.12	0.033
Passes	15	15.523	0.966	0.08	0.077
Faceoff win rate	0.4	0.5	0.8	0.03	0.024

Σ 0.976 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.148 − 0.018 turnover penalty = 1.13 → ×100 = 113.01 → 113

Offensive8.71

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.217	0.103	0.4	3.688
Shooting %	0.667	0.487	0.2	1.483
Assists per pass	0.2	0.105	0.4	3.544

Σ contribution = 8.715

Defensive6.19

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	3	2.08	7.663	0.3	2.299
Blocks	9	6.071	7.793	0.2	1.559
Takeaways	1	3.585	3.53	0.25	0.882
Goals conceded	7	6.623	5.785	0.25	1.446

Σ contribution = 6.186

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Triscut Ottawa Valley Rubber Duckies

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.0

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	1.97	1.75	0.23	-1.125	-0.259
Assists	1	1.64	1.44	0.19	-0.441	-0.084
Shots	1	4.05	3	0.09	-1.019	-0.092
Passes	20	15.52	6.73	0.08	0.666	0.053
Saves	3	2.08	2.31	0.19	0.399	0.076
Blocks	4	6.07	3.79	0.11	-0.547	-0.06
Takeaways	2	3.59	3.07	0.11	-0.517	-0.057

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.422 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.156, then −0.2 cold shooting → 5.0

Pucker+66

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1	3.467	0.288	0.32	0.092
Shots	1	4.051	0.247	0.08	0.02
Saves	3	2.08	1.442	0.15	0.216
Blocks	4	6.071	0.659	0.07	0.046
Takeaways	2	3.585	0.558	0.12	0.067
Passes	20	15.523	1.288	0.08	0.103
Faceoff win rate	0.25	0.5	0.5	0.03	0.015

Σ 0.56 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.658 → ×100 = 65.83 → 66

Offensive3.86

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.05	0.103	0.4	1.643
Shooting %	0	0.487	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.05	0.105	0.4	1.629

Σ contribution = 3.862

Defensive5.77

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	3	2.08	7.663	0.3	2.299
Blocks	4	6.071	4.686	0.2	0.937
Takeaways	2	3.585	4.338	0.25	1.085
Goals conceded	7	6.623	5.785	0.25	1.446

Σ contribution = 5.767

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.