Ottawa Drinkers vs Orange County low taper fades

Home · ODOttawa Drinkers

10–4Final

OCAwayOrange County low taper fades

Jan 21, 2025 · Central C · The Slosh Pit

MVP Brewski · 8.2 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Ottawa DrinkersvsOrange County low taper fades

21Shots1011

7Saves411

8Faceoffs won19

13Takeaways58

8Turnovers↓513

20Blocks218

52Passes254

2:00Possession1:153:15

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Ottawa Drinkers

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
kman	4	1	5	8	0	0	1	4	4	8	22	0:29	120	1.11	1.04
Brewski	4	5	9	8	1	3	5	6	0	3	15	0:54	179	1.68	1.07
Cozbee	2	2	4	5	6	5	3	3	4	9	15	0:37	142	1.22	1.50

Orange County low taper fades

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
TMNNational	2	2	4	3	2	2	3	2	4	4	19	0:45	98	1.14	0.76
YackSlack	0	3	3	2	7	4	2	2	6	12	16	2:11	121	0.91	1.28
Carti	2	0	2	6	2	3	3	4	3	2	19	0:19	94	0.69	0.87

kman Ottawa Drinkers

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.9

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	4	1.72	1.63	0.23	1.399	0.322
Assists	1	1.4	1.4	0.19	-0.287	-0.054
Shots	8	3.8	2.77	0.09	1.516	0.136
Passes	22	15.69	7.12	0.08	0.887	0.071
Saves	0	2.07	2.71	0.19	-0.766	-0.145
Blocks	8	5.96	4.14	0.11	0.493	0.054
Takeaways	4	2.92	2.58	0.11	0.418	0.046

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.429 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.859, nothing hit the bonus or penalty thresholds → 6.9

Pucker+120

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	5	3.014	1.659	0.32	0.531
Shots	8	3.798	2.106	0.08	0.169
Saves	0	2.071	0	0.15	0
Blocks	8	5.96	1.342	0.07	0.094
Takeaways	4	2.919	1.37	0.12	0.164
Passes	22	15.686	1.402	0.08	0.112
Faceoff win rate	0	0.499	0	0.03	0

Σ 1.07 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.259 − 0.054 turnover penalty = 1.205 → ×100 = 120.45 → 120

Offensive1.11

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.172	0.094	0.4	0.672
Shooting %	0.5	0.454	0.2	0.22
Assists per pass	0.045	0.089	0.4	0.218

Σ contribution = 1.11

Defensive1.04

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.071	0.238	0.3	0.072
Blocks	8	5.96	1.33	0.2	0.266
Takeaways	4	2.919	1.354	0.25	0.339
Goals conceded	4	5.975	1.457	0.25	0.364

Σ contribution = 1.041

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Brewski Ottawa Drinkers

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR8.2

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	4	1.72	1.63	0.23	1.399	0.322
Assists	5	1.4	1.4	0.19	2.575	0.489
Shots	8	3.8	2.77	0.09	1.516	0.136
Passes	15	15.69	7.12	0.08	-0.096	-0.008
Saves	1	2.07	2.71	0.19	-0.396	-0.075
Blocks	3	5.96	4.14	0.11	-0.714	-0.079
Takeaways	6	2.92	2.58	0.11	1.193	0.131

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.917 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.834, then +0.4 playmaker → 8.2

Pucker+179

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	8.5	3.014	2.82	0.32	0.902
Shots	8	3.798	2.106	0.08	0.169
Saves	1	2.071	0.483	0.15	0.072
Blocks	3	5.96	0.503	0.07	0.035
Takeaways	6	2.919	2.055	0.12	0.247
Passes	15	15.686	0.956	0.08	0.076
Faceoff win rate	0.375	0.499	0.751	0.03	0.023

Σ 1.524 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.793 → ×100 = 179.33 → 179

Offensive1.68

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.167	0.094	0.4	0.658
Shooting %	0.5	0.454	0.2	0.22
Assists per pass	0.333	0.089	0.4	0.797

Σ contribution = 1.675

Defensive1.07

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.071	0.524	0.3	0.157
Blocks	3	5.96	0.541	0.2	0.108
Takeaways	6	2.919	1.784	0.25	0.446
Goals conceded	4	5.975	1.457	0.25	0.364

Σ contribution = 1.075

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Cozbee Ottawa Drinkers

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.8

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	1.72	1.63	0.23	0.17	0.039
Assists	2	1.4	1.4	0.19	0.429	0.081
Shots	5	3.8	2.77	0.09	0.434	0.039
Passes	15	15.69	7.12	0.08	-0.096	-0.008
Saves	6	2.07	2.71	0.19	1.452	0.276
Blocks	9	5.96	4.14	0.11	0.734	0.081
Takeaways	3	2.92	2.58	0.11	0.031	0.003

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.512 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.024, then −0.2 cold shooting → 6.8

Pucker+142

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3.5	3.014	1.161	0.32	0.372
Shots	5	3.798	1.316	0.08	0.105
Saves	6	2.071	2.897	0.15	0.434
Blocks	9	5.96	1.51	0.07	0.106
Takeaways	3	2.919	1.028	0.12	0.123
Passes	15	15.686	0.956	0.08	0.076
Faceoff win rate	0.625	0.499	1.252	0.03	0.038

Σ 1.254 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.476 − 0.054 turnover penalty = 1.422 → ×100 = 142.16 → 142

Offensive1.22

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.108	0.094	0.4	0.458
Shooting %	0.4	0.454	0.2	0.176
Assists per pass	0.133	0.089	0.4	0.583

Σ contribution = 1.217

Defensive1.50

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	6	2.071	1.956	0.3	0.587
Blocks	9	5.96	1.47	0.2	0.294
Takeaways	3	2.919	1.028	0.25	0.257
Goals conceded	4	5.975	1.457	0.25	0.364

Σ contribution = 1.502

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

TMNNational Orange County low taper fades

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.1

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	1.72	1.63	0.23	0.17	0.039
Assists	2	1.4	1.4	0.19	0.429	0.081
Shots	3	3.8	2.77	0.09	-0.288	-0.026
Passes	19	15.69	7.12	0.08	0.465	0.037
Saves	2	2.07	2.71	0.19	-0.026	-0.005
Blocks	4	5.96	4.14	0.11	-0.473	-0.052
Takeaways	2	2.92	2.58	0.11	-0.356	-0.039

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.036 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.071, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.2 goals against → 6.1

Pucker+98

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4	3.014	1.327	0.32	0.425
Shots	3	3.798	0.79	0.08	0.063
Saves	2	2.071	0.966	0.15	0.145
Blocks	4	5.96	0.671	0.07	0.047
Takeaways	2	2.919	0.685	0.12	0.082
Passes	19	15.686	1.211	0.08	0.097
Faceoff win rate	0.4	0.499	0.801	0.03	0.024

Σ 0.883 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.039 − 0.054 turnover penalty = 0.985 → ×100 = 98.44 → 98

Offensive1.14

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.089	0.094	0.4	0.377
Shooting %	0.667	0.454	0.2	0.287
Assists per pass	0.105	0.089	0.4	0.471

Σ contribution = 1.135

Defensive0.76

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	2.071	0.966	0.3	0.29
Blocks	4	5.96	0.683	0.2	0.137
Takeaways	2	2.919	0.695	0.25	0.174
Goals conceded	10	5.975	0.618	0.25	0.154

Σ contribution = 0.755

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

YackSlack Orange County low taper fades

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.4

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	1.72	1.63	0.23	-1.059	-0.244
Assists	3	1.4	1.4	0.19	1.144	0.217
Shots	2	3.8	2.77	0.09	-0.649	-0.058
Passes	16	15.69	7.12	0.08	0.044	0.004
Saves	7	2.07	2.71	0.19	1.822	0.346
Blocks	12	5.96	4.14	0.11	1.458	0.16
Takeaways	2	2.92	2.58	0.11	-0.356	-0.039

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.386 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.773, then +0.35 saves, −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting, −0.2 goals against → 6.4

Pucker+121

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2.5	3.014	0.829	0.32	0.265
Shots	2	3.798	0.527	0.08	0.042
Saves	7	2.071	3.379	0.15	0.507
Blocks	12	5.96	2.014	0.07	0.141
Takeaways	2	2.919	0.685	0.12	0.082
Passes	16	15.686	1.02	0.08	0.082
Faceoff win rate	0.667	0.499	1.335	0.03	0.04

Σ 1.159 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.364 − 0.156 turnover penalty = 1.208 → ×100 = 120.75 → 121

Offensive0.91

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.023	0.094	0.4	0.144
Shooting %	0	0.454	0.2	0.048
Assists per pass	0.188	0.089	0.4	0.72

Σ contribution = 0.912

Defensive1.28

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	7	2.071	1.983	0.3	0.595
Blocks	12	5.96	1.767	0.2	0.353
Takeaways	2	2.919	0.695	0.25	0.174
Goals conceded	10	5.975	0.618	0.25	0.154

Σ contribution = 1.276

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Carti Orange County low taper fades

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.4

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	1.72	1.63	0.23	0.17	0.039
Assists	0	1.4	1.4	0.19	-1.002	-0.19
Shots	6	3.8	2.77	0.09	0.794	0.071
Passes	19	15.69	7.12	0.08	0.465	0.037
Saves	2	2.07	2.71	0.19	-0.026	-0.005
Blocks	2	5.96	4.14	0.11	-0.956	-0.105
Takeaways	4	2.92	2.58	0.11	0.418	0.046

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.107 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.787, then −0.2 cold shooting, −0.2 goals against → 5.4

Pucker+94

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2	3.014	0.664	0.32	0.212
Shots	6	3.798	1.58	0.08	0.126
Saves	2	2.071	0.966	0.15	0.145
Blocks	2	5.96	0.336	0.07	0.023
Takeaways	4	2.919	1.37	0.12	0.164
Passes	19	15.686	1.211	0.08	0.097
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.499	1.002	0.03	0.03

Σ 0.798 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.939 − 0.003 turnover penalty = 0.936 → ×100 = 93.61 → 94

Offensive0.69

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.105	0.094	0.4	0.446
Shooting %	0.333	0.454	0.2	0.148
Assists per pass	0	0.089	0.4	0.095

Σ contribution = 0.69

Defensive0.87

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	2.071	0.966	0.3	0.29
Blocks	2	5.96	0.419	0.2	0.084
Takeaways	4	2.919	1.354	0.25	0.339
Goals conceded	10	5.975	0.618	0.25	0.154

Σ contribution = 0.867

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.