Coaticook Stars vs New England Harbor

CSHomeCoaticook Stars

8–4Final

NEAwayNew England Harbor

Oct 20, 2024 · Major League · Coaticook Center

MVP SOMEONE · 7.3 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Coaticook StarsvsNew England Harbor

17Shots314

10Saves19

14Faceoffs won131

14Takeaways1024

24Turnovers↓1014

20Blocks614

83Passes2756

2:15Possession1:073:22

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Coaticook Stars

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Charles	2	3	5	5	3	5	0	6	8	10	24	0:46	108	6.69	7.77
Couture	3	1	4	5	5	4	0	7	8	7	32	1:09	121	4.67	8.27
Dylinho	3	2	5	7	2	5	1	1	8	3	27	0:20	78	7.12	5.39

New England Harbor

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
GoldenKnight	1	1	2	5	1	1	8	7	6	3	17	0:38	64	4.38	5.49
IAM FOREHEAD	2	0	2	4	0	0	3	4	3	5	19	0:16	54	5.27	4.78
SOMEONE	1	2	3	5	8	0	3	13	5	6	20	2:28	154	4.73	7.96

Charles Coaticook Stars

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.1

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	2.25	1.8	0.23	-0.14	-0.032
Assists	3	2.08	1.71	0.19	0.537	0.102
Shots	5	4.68	2.71	0.09	0.118	0.011
Passes	24	23.5	9.14	0.08	0.055	0.004
Saves	3	2.43	2.7	0.19	0.212	0.04
Blocks	10	6.55	3.71	0.11	0.93	0.102
Takeaways	6	3.96	2.94	0.11	0.693	0.076

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.304 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.607, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting → 6.1

Pucker+108

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4.5	4.116	1.093	0.32	0.35
Shots	5	4.68	1.068	0.08	0.085
Saves	3	2.428	1.236	0.15	0.185
Blocks	10	6.552	1.526	0.07	0.107
Takeaways	6	3.961	1.515	0.12	0.182
Passes	24	23.5	1.021	0.08	0.082
Faceoff win rate	1	0.5	2	0.03	0.06

Σ 1.051 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.236 − 0.153 turnover penalty = 1.083 → ×100 = 108.32 → 108

Offensive6.69

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.109	0.097	0.4	2.596
Shooting %	0.4	0.481	0.2	1.066
Assists per pass	0.125	0.089	0.4	3.023

Σ contribution = 6.686

Defensive7.77

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	3	2.428	6.925	0.3	2.078
Blocks	10	6.552	7.93	0.2	1.586
Takeaways	6	3.961	7.895	0.25	1.974
Goals conceded	4	6.971	8.523	0.25	2.131

Σ contribution = 7.769

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Couture Coaticook Stars

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.7

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	2.25	1.8	0.23	0.417	0.096
Assists	1	2.08	1.71	0.19	-0.633	-0.12
Shots	5	4.68	2.71	0.09	0.118	0.011
Passes	32	23.5	9.14	0.08	0.93	0.074
Saves	5	2.43	2.7	0.19	0.953	0.181
Blocks	7	6.55	3.71	0.11	0.121	0.013
Takeaways	7	3.96	2.94	0.11	1.032	0.114

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.369 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.737, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.3 turnovers → 6.7

Pucker+121

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4	4.116	0.972	0.32	0.311
Shots	5	4.68	1.068	0.08	0.085
Saves	5	2.428	2.059	0.15	0.309
Blocks	7	6.552	1.068	0.07	0.075
Takeaways	7	3.961	1.767	0.12	0.212
Passes	32	23.5	1.362	0.08	0.109
Faceoff win rate	1	0.5	2	0.03	0.06

Σ 1.161 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.366 − 0.153 turnover penalty = 1.213 → ×100 = 121.28 → 121

Offensive4.67

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.058	0.097	0.4	1.791
Shooting %	0.6	0.481	0.2	1.394
Assists per pass	0.031	0.089	0.4	1.488

Σ contribution = 4.673

Defensive8.27

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	5	2.428	9.141	0.3	2.742
Blocks	7	6.552	6.273	0.2	1.255
Takeaways	7	3.961	8.581	0.25	2.145
Goals conceded	4	6.971	8.523	0.25	2.131

Σ contribution = 8.273

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Dylinho Coaticook Stars

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.6

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	2.25	1.8	0.23	0.417	0.096
Assists	2	2.08	1.71	0.19	-0.048	-0.009
Shots	7	4.68	2.71	0.09	0.855	0.077
Passes	27	23.5	9.14	0.08	0.383	0.031
Saves	2	2.43	2.7	0.19	-0.159	-0.03
Blocks	3	6.55	3.71	0.11	-0.958	-0.105
Takeaways	1	3.96	2.94	0.11	-1.006	-0.111

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.052 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.896, then −0.3 turnovers → 5.6

Pucker+78

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4.5	4.116	1.093	0.32	0.35
Shots	7	4.68	1.496	0.08	0.12
Saves	2	2.428	0.824	0.15	0.124
Blocks	3	6.552	0.458	0.07	0.032
Takeaways	1	3.961	0.252	0.12	0.03
Passes	27	23.5	1.149	0.08	0.092
Faceoff win rate	0.833	0.5	1.667	0.03	0.05

Σ 0.797 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.938 − 0.153 turnover penalty = 0.785 → ×100 = 78.48 → 78

Offensive7.12

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.25	0.097	0.4	3.871
Shooting %	0.429	0.481	0.2	1.113
Assists per pass	0.074	0.089	0.4	2.14

Σ contribution = 7.124

Defensive5.39

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	2.428	5.302	0.3	1.591
Blocks	3	6.552	4.022	0.2	0.804
Takeaways	1	3.961	3.465	0.25	0.866
Goals conceded	4	6.971	8.523	0.25	2.131

Σ contribution = 5.392

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

GoldenKnight New England Harbor

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.5

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	2.25	1.8	0.23	-0.697	-0.16
Assists	1	2.08	1.71	0.19	-0.633	-0.12
Shots	5	4.68	2.71	0.09	0.118	0.011
Passes	17	23.5	9.14	0.08	-0.711	-0.057
Saves	1	2.43	2.7	0.19	-0.529	-0.101
Blocks	3	6.55	3.71	0.11	-0.958	-0.105
Takeaways	7	3.96	2.94	0.11	1.032	0.114

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.419 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.162, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting, −0.2 goals against → 4.5

Pucker+64

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2	4.116	0.486	0.32	0.155
Shots	5	4.68	1.068	0.08	0.085
Saves	1	2.428	0.412	0.15	0.062
Blocks	3	6.552	0.458	0.07	0.032
Takeaways	7	3.961	1.767	0.12	0.212
Passes	17	23.5	0.723	0.08	0.058
Faceoff win rate	0.111	0.5	0.222	0.03	0.007

Σ 0.611 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.719 − 0.077 turnover penalty = 0.642 → ×100 = 64.19 → 64

Offensive4.38

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.053	0.097	0.4	1.717
Shooting %	0.2	0.481	0.2	0.779
Assists per pass	0.059	0.089	0.4	1.882

Σ contribution = 4.378

Defensive5.49

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.428	3.886	0.3	1.166
Blocks	3	6.552	4.022	0.2	0.804
Takeaways	7	3.961	8.581	0.25	2.145
Goals conceded	8	6.971	5.488	0.25	1.372

Σ contribution = 5.487

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

IAM FOREHEAD New England Harbor

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.7

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	2.25	1.8	0.23	-0.14	-0.032
Assists	0	2.08	1.71	0.19	-1.218	-0.231
Shots	4	4.68	2.71	0.09	-0.25	-0.023
Passes	19	23.5	9.14	0.08	-0.492	-0.039
Saves	0	2.43	2.7	0.19	-0.9	-0.171
Blocks	5	6.55	3.71	0.11	-0.419	-0.046
Takeaways	4	3.96	2.94	0.11	0.013	0.001

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.541 × 2, −3 to 3) = 4.918, then −0.2 goals against → 4.7

Pucker+54

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2	4.116	0.486	0.32	0.155
Shots	4	4.68	0.855	0.08	0.068
Saves	0	2.428	0	0.15	0
Blocks	5	6.552	0.763	0.07	0.053
Takeaways	4	3.961	1.01	0.12	0.121
Passes	19	23.5	0.809	0.08	0.065
Faceoff win rate	0	0.5	0	0.03	0

Σ 0.463 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.545 → ×100 = 54.49 → 54

Offensive5.27

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.125	0.097	0.4	2.854
Shooting %	0.5	0.481	0.2	1.231
Assists per pass	0	0.089	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 5.267

Defensive4.78

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.428	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	5	6.552	5.07	0.2	1.014
Takeaways	4	3.961	6.04	0.25	1.51
Goals conceded	8	6.971	5.488	0.25	1.372

Σ contribution = 4.782

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

SOMEONE New England Harbor

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR7.3

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	2.25	1.8	0.23	-0.697	-0.16
Assists	2	2.08	1.71	0.19	-0.048	-0.009
Shots	5	4.68	2.71	0.09	0.118	0.011
Passes	20	23.5	9.14	0.08	-0.383	-0.031
Saves	8	2.43	2.7	0.19	2.065	0.392
Blocks	6	6.55	3.71	0.11	-0.149	-0.016
Takeaways	13	3.96	2.94	0.11	3.07	0.338

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.524 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.049, then +0.35 saves, +0.3 takeaways, −0.2 cold shooting, −0.2 goals against → 7.3

Pucker+154

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3	4.116	0.729	0.32	0.233
Shots	5	4.68	1.068	0.08	0.085
Saves	8	2.428	3.295	0.15	0.494
Blocks	6	6.552	0.916	0.07	0.064
Takeaways	13	3.961	3.282	0.12	0.394
Passes	20	23.5	0.851	0.08	0.068
Faceoff win rate	0	0.5	0	0.03	0

Σ 1.339 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.575 − 0.04 turnover penalty = 1.535 → ×100 = 153.57 → 154

Offensive4.73

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.02	0.097	0.4	1.346
Shooting %	0.2	0.481	0.2	0.779
Assists per pass	0.1	0.089	0.4	2.605

Σ contribution = 4.731

Defensive7.96

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	8	2.428	9.92	0.3	2.976
Blocks	6	6.552	5.664	0.2	1.133
Takeaways	13	3.961	9.918	0.25	2.479
Goals conceded	8	6.971	5.488	0.25	1.372

Σ contribution = 7.96

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.