Ottawa Valley Post Dingers vs Chicago Rubber Puckies

Home · OVPDOttawa Valley Post Dingers

9–2Final

CRAwayChicago Rubber Puckies

Aug 29, 2024 · Open Dusters - Playoffs · Nassau Coliseum

MVP YmisScarab · 7.2 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Ottawa Valley Post DingersvsChicago Rubber Puckies

14Shots68

6Saves15

10Faceoffs won64

10Takeaways37

7Turnovers↓310

20Blocks727

44Passes1054

1:50Possession0:291:21

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Ottawa Valley Post Dingers

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
YmisScarab	3	0	3	5	5	3	1	2	3	14	12	0:42	126	4.78	8.02
crinkly	4	2	6	5	0	4	0	6	3	4	20	0:48	132	7.66	6.14
OstrichK	2	4	6	4	1	3	3	2	1	2	12	0:20	111	9.25	5.27

Chicago Rubber Puckies

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Rage Quitter	1	1	2	5	3	2	4	1	3	11	13	0:11	81	6.88	5.93
andrewdewar104	0	1	1	2	2	0	1	4	3	3	19	0:29	63	4.04	5.29
danimal1059	1	0	1	1	0	2	5	2	4	13	22	0:41	51	4.46	4.94

YmisScarab Ottawa Valley Post Dingers

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR7.2

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	1.86	1.45	0.23	0.786	0.181
Assists	0	1.31	1.15	0.19	-1.133	-0.215
Shots	5	4.05	2.57	0.09	0.369	0.033
Passes	12	16.81	6.32	0.08	-0.76	-0.061
Saves	5	2.19	2.49	0.19	1.126	0.214
Blocks	14	6.71	3.59	0.11	2.033	0.224
Takeaways	2	3.55	3.27	0.11	-0.475	-0.052

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.323 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.646, then +0.3 blocks, +0.25 hot shooting → 7.2

Pucker+126

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3	3.079	0.974	0.32	0.312
Shots	5	4.053	1.234	0.08	0.099
Saves	5	2.193	2.28	0.15	0.342
Blocks	14	6.711	2.086	0.07	0.146
Takeaways	2	3.553	0.563	0.12	0.068
Passes	12	16.807	0.714	0.08	0.057
Faceoff win rate	0.75	0.5	1.5	0.03	0.045

Σ 1.068 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.257 → ×100 = 125.67 → 126

Offensive4.78

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.071	0.084	0.4	2.155
Shooting %	0.6	0.459	0.2	1.439
Assists per pass	0	0.078	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 4.775

Defensive8.02

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	5	2.193	9.426	0.3	2.828
Blocks	14	6.711	9.182	0.2	1.836
Takeaways	2	3.553	4.355	0.25	1.089
Goals conceded	2	5.974	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 8.015

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

crinkly Ottawa Valley Post Dingers

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR7.0

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	4	1.86	1.45	0.23	1.476	0.339
Assists	2	1.31	1.15	0.19	0.601	0.114
Shots	5	4.05	2.57	0.09	0.369	0.033
Passes	20	16.81	6.32	0.08	0.505	0.04
Saves	0	2.19	2.49	0.19	-0.88	-0.167
Blocks	4	6.71	3.59	0.11	-0.756	-0.083
Takeaways	6	3.55	3.27	0.11	0.749	0.082

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.359 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.719, then +0.25 hot shooting → 7.0

Pucker+132

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	6	3.079	1.949	0.32	0.624
Shots	5	4.053	1.234	0.08	0.099
Saves	0	2.193	0	0.15	0
Blocks	4	6.711	0.596	0.07	0.042
Takeaways	6	3.553	1.689	0.12	0.203
Passes	20	16.807	1.19	0.08	0.095
Faceoff win rate	1	0.5	2	0.03	0.06

Σ 1.122 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.32 → ×100 = 131.99 → 132

Offensive7.66

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.125	0.084	0.4	3.114
Shooting %	0.8	0.459	0.2	1.705
Assists per pass	0.1	0.078	0.4	2.845

Σ contribution = 7.664

Defensive6.14

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.193	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	4	6.711	4.467	0.2	0.893
Takeaways	6	3.553	8.389	0.25	2.097
Goals conceded	2	5.974	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 6.138

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

OstrichK Ottawa Valley Post Dingers

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.2

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	1.86	1.45	0.23	0.097	0.022
Assists	4	1.31	1.15	0.19	2.335	0.444
Shots	4	4.05	2.57	0.09	-0.021	-0.002
Passes	12	16.81	6.32	0.08	-0.76	-0.061
Saves	1	2.19	2.49	0.19	-0.479	-0.091
Blocks	2	6.71	3.59	0.11	-1.313	-0.144
Takeaways	2	3.55	3.27	0.11	-0.475	-0.052

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.116 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.231, nothing hit the bonus or penalty thresholds → 6.2

Pucker+111

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	6	3.079	1.949	0.32	0.624
Shots	4	4.053	0.987	0.08	0.079
Saves	1	2.193	0.456	0.15	0.068
Blocks	2	6.711	0.298	0.07	0.021
Takeaways	2	3.553	0.563	0.12	0.068
Passes	12	16.807	0.714	0.08	0.057
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.5	1	0.03	0.03

Σ 0.946 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.114 → ×100 = 111.35 → 111

Offensive9.25

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.3	0.084	0.4	3.981
Shooting %	0.5	0.459	0.2	1.272
Assists per pass	0.333	0.078	0.4	3.995

Σ contribution = 9.248

Defensive5.27

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.193	4.016	0.3	1.205
Blocks	2	6.711	3.578	0.2	0.716
Takeaways	2	3.553	4.355	0.25	1.089
Goals conceded	2	5.974	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 5.272

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Rage Quitter Chicago Rubber Puckies

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.4

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	1.86	1.45	0.23	-0.593	-0.136
Assists	1	1.31	1.15	0.19	-0.266	-0.051
Shots	5	4.05	2.57	0.09	0.369	0.033
Passes	13	16.81	6.32	0.08	-0.602	-0.048
Saves	3	2.19	2.49	0.19	0.324	0.062
Blocks	11	6.71	3.59	0.11	1.196	0.132
Takeaways	1	3.55	3.27	0.11	-0.781	-0.086

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.095 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.811, then −0.2 cold shooting, −0.2 goals against → 5.4

Pucker+81

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1.5	3.079	0.487	0.32	0.156
Shots	5	4.053	1.234	0.08	0.099
Saves	3	2.193	1.368	0.15	0.205
Blocks	11	6.711	1.639	0.07	0.115
Takeaways	1	3.553	0.281	0.12	0.034
Passes	13	16.807	0.773	0.08	0.062
Faceoff win rate	0.333	0.5	0.667	0.03	0.02

Σ 0.69 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.812 → ×100 = 81.2 → 81

Offensive6.88

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.182	0.084	0.4	3.71
Shooting %	0.2	0.459	0.2	0.791
Assists per pass	0.077	0.078	0.4	2.383

Σ contribution = 6.884

Defensive5.93

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	3	2.193	7.409	0.3	2.223
Blocks	11	6.711	8.257	0.2	1.651
Takeaways	1	3.553	3.536	0.25	0.884
Goals conceded	9	5.974	4.703	0.25	1.176

Σ contribution = 5.934

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

andrewdewar104 Chicago Rubber Puckies

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.6

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	1.86	1.45	0.23	-1.282	-0.295
Assists	1	1.31	1.15	0.19	-0.266	-0.051
Shots	2	4.05	2.57	0.09	-0.8	-0.072
Passes	19	16.81	6.32	0.08	0.347	0.028
Saves	2	2.19	2.49	0.19	-0.077	-0.015
Blocks	3	6.71	3.59	0.11	-1.035	-0.114
Takeaways	4	3.55	3.27	0.11	0.137	0.015

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.503 × 2, −3 to 3) = 4.994, then −0.2 cold shooting, −0.2 goals against → 4.6

Pucker+63

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1	3.079	0.325	0.32	0.104
Shots	2	4.053	0.494	0.08	0.039
Saves	2	2.193	0.912	0.15	0.137
Blocks	3	6.711	0.447	0.07	0.031
Takeaways	4	3.553	1.126	0.12	0.135
Passes	19	16.807	1.13	0.08	0.09
Faceoff win rate	0	0.5	0	0.03	0

Σ 0.537 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.632 → ×100 = 63.18 → 63

Offensive4.04

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.034	0.084	0.4	1.55
Shooting %	0	0.459	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.053	0.078	0.4	1.9

Σ contribution = 4.041

Defensive5.29

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	2.193	5.649	0.3	1.695
Blocks	3	6.711	3.989	0.2	0.798
Takeaways	4	3.553	6.501	0.25	1.625
Goals conceded	9	5.974	4.703	0.25	1.176

Σ contribution = 5.294

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

danimal1059 Chicago Rubber Puckies

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.2

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	1.86	1.45	0.23	-0.593	-0.136
Assists	0	1.31	1.15	0.19	-1.133	-0.215
Shots	1	4.05	2.57	0.09	-1.19	-0.107
Passes	22	16.81	6.32	0.08	0.821	0.066
Saves	0	2.19	2.49	0.19	-0.88	-0.167
Blocks	13	6.71	3.59	0.11	1.754	0.193
Takeaways	2	3.55	3.27	0.11	-0.475	-0.052

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.42 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.161, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.2 goals against → 5.2

Pucker+51

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1	3.079	0.325	0.32	0.104
Shots	1	4.053	0.247	0.08	0.02
Saves	0	2.193	0	0.15	0
Blocks	13	6.711	1.937	0.07	0.136
Takeaways	2	3.553	0.563	0.12	0.068
Passes	22	16.807	1.309	0.08	0.105
Faceoff win rate	0.286	0.5	0.571	0.03	0.017

Σ 0.449 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.528 − 0.019 turnover penalty = 0.509 → ×100 = 50.9 → 51

Offensive4.46

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.024	0.084	0.4	1.422
Shooting %	1	0.459	0.2	1.862
Assists per pass	0	0.078	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 4.465

Defensive4.94

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.193	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	13	6.711	8.936	0.2	1.787
Takeaways	2	3.553	4.355	0.25	1.089
Goals conceded	9	5.974	4.703	0.25	1.176

Σ contribution = 4.938

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.