Rosedale Ravens vs Okinawa Generations

RRHomeRosedale Ravens

5–4Final

Away · OKGOkinawa Generations

Sep 7, 2024 · Intermediate Division - Playoffs · The Rangers Watch Tower

MVP LessThanDennis · 6.5 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Rosedale RavensvsOkinawa Generations

13Shots58

4Saves48

7Faceoffs won25

14Takeaways620

20Turnovers↓614

16Blocks117

74Passes2549

2:31Possession0:052:36

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Rosedale Ravens

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	GWG	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
MitchP	1	2	3	3	2	1	1	0	5	4	12	0	0:12	66	1.56	0.86
Nova	3	1	4	8	0	1	1	5	7	5	35	1	0:52	108	0.62	0.97
Squirt	0	2	2	0	2	2	2	5	4	5	12	0	0:59	73	0.87	1.21
Fei Nanduo	1	2	3	2	0	3	1	4	4	2	15	0	0:28	75	1.18	0.82

Okinawa Generations

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Dr_Samurai	0	1	1	0	4	0	2	3	2	2	7	1:19	63	0.75	1.14
LessThanDennis	4	0	4	6	1	3	3	9	6	3	18	0:20	121	1.07	1.05
Papa Shieldz	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	0	0:09	3	0.24	0.50
Pip Starlather	0	3	3	2	3	2	2	8	6	10	24	0:48	125	0.82	1.53

MitchP Rosedale Ravens

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.3

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	1.62	1.75	0.23	-0.355	-0.082
Assists	2	1.48	1.25	0.19	0.415	0.079
Shots	3	3.54	3.06	0.09	-0.177	-0.016
Passes	12	15.61	8.26	0.08	-0.437	-0.035
Saves	2	1.92	2.13	0.19	0.038	0.007
Blocks	4	6.15	3.72	0.11	-0.579	-0.064
Takeaways	0	3.21	2.54	0.11	-1.263	-0.139

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.249 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.502, then −0.2 cold shooting → 5.3

Pucker+66

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2.5	2.931	0.853	0.32	0.273
Shots	3	3.54	0.847	0.08	0.068
Saves	2	1.92	1.042	0.15	0.156
Blocks	4	6.149	0.65	0.07	0.046
Takeaways	0	3.207	0	0.12	0
Passes	12	15.609	0.769	0.08	0.062
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.5	1	0.03	0.03

Σ 0.634 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.746 − 0.085 turnover penalty = 0.661 → ×100 = 66.12 → 66

Offensive1.56

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.25	0.104	0.4	0.754
Shooting %	0.333	0.458	0.2	0.147
Assists per pass	0.167	0.095	0.4	0.655

Σ contribution = 1.556

Defensive0.86

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	1.92	1.042	0.3	0.313
Blocks	4	6.149	0.664	0.2	0.133
Takeaways	0	3.207	0.238	0.25	0.06
Goals conceded	4	5.77	1.416	0.25	0.354

Σ contribution = 0.86

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Nova Rosedale Ravens

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.1

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	1.62	1.75	0.23	0.79	0.182
Assists	1	1.48	1.25	0.19	-0.387	-0.074
Shots	8	3.54	3.06	0.09	1.457	0.131
Passes	35	15.61	8.26	0.08	2.349	0.188
Saves	0	1.92	2.13	0.19	-0.901	-0.171
Blocks	5	6.15	3.72	0.11	-0.309	-0.034
Takeaways	5	3.21	2.54	0.11	0.706	0.078

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.3 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.599, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting → 6.1

Pucker+108

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4	2.931	1.365	0.32	0.437
Shots	8	3.54	2.26	0.08	0.181
Saves	0	1.92	0	0.15	0
Blocks	5	6.149	0.813	0.07	0.057
Takeaways	5	3.207	1.559	0.12	0.187
Passes	35	15.609	2.242	0.08	0.179
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.5	1	0.03	0.03

Σ 1.071 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.26 − 0.179 turnover penalty = 1.081 → ×100 = 108.13 → 108

Offensive0.62

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.077	0.104	0.4	0.298
Shooting %	0.375	0.458	0.2	0.164
Assists per pass	0.029	0.095	0.4	0.158

Σ contribution = 0.62

Defensive0.97

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	1.92	0.238	0.3	0.072
Blocks	5	6.149	0.815	0.2	0.163
Takeaways	5	3.207	1.507	0.25	0.377
Goals conceded	4	5.77	1.416	0.25	0.354

Σ contribution = 0.966

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Squirt Rosedale Ravens

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.6

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	1.62	1.75	0.23	-0.928	-0.213
Assists	2	1.48	1.25	0.19	0.415	0.079
Shots	0	3.54	3.06	0.09	-1.157	-0.104
Passes	12	15.61	8.26	0.08	-0.437	-0.035
Saves	2	1.92	2.13	0.19	0.038	0.007
Blocks	5	6.15	3.72	0.11	-0.309	-0.034
Takeaways	5	3.21	2.54	0.11	0.706	0.078

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.223 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.554, nothing hit the bonus or penalty thresholds → 5.6

Pucker+73

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1.5	2.931	0.512	0.32	0.164
Shots	0	3.54	0	0.08	0
Saves	2	1.92	1.042	0.15	0.156
Blocks	5	6.149	0.813	0.07	0.057
Takeaways	5	3.207	1.559	0.12	0.187
Passes	12	15.609	0.769	0.08	0.062
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.5	1	0.03	0.03

Σ 0.656 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.771 − 0.038 turnover penalty = 0.733 → ×100 = 73.35 → 73

Offensive0.87

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.034	0.104	0.4	0.165
Shooting %	0	0.458	0.2	0.048
Assists per pass	0.167	0.095	0.4	0.655

Σ contribution = 0.868

Defensive1.21

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	1.92	1.042	0.3	0.313
Blocks	5	6.149	0.815	0.2	0.163
Takeaways	5	3.207	1.507	0.25	0.377
Goals conceded	4	5.77	1.416	0.25	0.354

Σ contribution = 1.207

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Fei Nanduo Rosedale Ravens

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.4

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	1.62	1.75	0.23	-0.355	-0.082
Assists	2	1.48	1.25	0.19	0.415	0.079
Shots	2	3.54	3.06	0.09	-0.503	-0.045
Passes	15	15.61	8.26	0.08	-0.074	-0.006
Saves	0	1.92	2.13	0.19	-0.901	-0.171
Blocks	2	6.15	3.72	0.11	-1.117	-0.123
Takeaways	4	3.21	2.54	0.11	0.312	0.034

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.314 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.372, nothing hit the bonus or penalty thresholds → 5.4

Pucker+75

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3	2.931	1.024	0.32	0.328
Shots	2	3.54	0.565	0.08	0.045
Saves	0	1.92	0	0.15	0
Blocks	2	6.149	0.325	0.07	0.023
Takeaways	4	3.207	1.247	0.12	0.15
Passes	15	15.609	0.961	0.08	0.077
Faceoff win rate	0.75	0.5	1.5	0.03	0.045

Σ 0.667 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.785 − 0.038 turnover penalty = 0.747 → ×100 = 74.7 → 75

Offensive1.18

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.107	0.104	0.4	0.411
Shooting %	0.5	0.458	0.2	0.218
Assists per pass	0.133	0.095	0.4	0.553

Σ contribution = 1.183

Defensive0.82

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	1.92	0.238	0.3	0.072
Blocks	2	6.149	0.412	0.2	0.082
Takeaways	4	3.207	1.242	0.25	0.311
Goals conceded	4	5.77	1.416	0.25	0.354

Σ contribution = 0.819

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Dr_Samurai Okinawa Generations

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.2

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	1.62	1.75	0.23	-0.928	-0.213
Assists	1	1.48	1.25	0.19	-0.387	-0.074
Shots	0	3.54	3.06	0.09	-1.157	-0.104
Passes	7	15.61	8.26	0.08	-1.043	-0.083
Saves	4	1.92	2.13	0.19	0.976	0.186
Blocks	2	6.15	3.72	0.11	-1.117	-0.123
Takeaways	3	3.21	2.54	0.11	-0.081	-0.009

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.421 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.159, nothing hit the bonus or penalty thresholds → 5.2

Pucker+63

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	0.5	2.931	0.171	0.32	0.055
Shots	0	3.54	0	0.08	0
Saves	4	1.92	2.084	0.15	0.313
Blocks	2	6.149	0.325	0.07	0.023
Takeaways	3	3.207	0.935	0.12	0.112
Passes	7	15.609	0.448	0.08	0.036
Faceoff win rate	0	0.5	0	0.03	0

Σ 0.538 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.633 → ×100 = 63.3 → 63

Offensive0.75

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.013	0.104	0.4	0.118
Shooting %	0	0.458	0.2	0.048
Assists per pass	0.143	0.095	0.4	0.586

Σ contribution = 0.751

Defensive1.14

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	4	1.92	1.795	0.3	0.538
Blocks	2	6.149	0.412	0.2	0.082
Takeaways	3	3.207	0.936	0.25	0.234
Goals conceded	5	5.77	1.153	0.25	0.288

Σ contribution = 1.142

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

LessThanDennis Okinawa Generations

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.5

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	4	1.62	1.75	0.23	1.362	0.313
Assists	0	1.48	1.25	0.19	-1.189	-0.226
Shots	6	3.54	3.06	0.09	0.804	0.072
Passes	18	15.61	8.26	0.08	0.29	0.023
Saves	1	1.92	2.13	0.19	-0.432	-0.082
Blocks	3	6.15	3.72	0.11	-0.848	-0.093
Takeaways	9	3.21	2.54	0.11	2.282	0.251

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.259 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.517, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.3 turnovers → 6.5

Pucker+121

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4	2.931	1.365	0.32	0.437
Shots	6	3.54	1.695	0.08	0.136
Saves	1	1.92	0.521	0.15	0.078
Blocks	3	6.149	0.488	0.07	0.034
Takeaways	9	3.207	2.806	0.12	0.337
Passes	18	15.609	1.153	0.08	0.092
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.5	1	0.03	0.03

Σ 1.144 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.345 − 0.132 turnover penalty = 1.213 → ×100 = 121.38 → 121

Offensive1.07

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.2	0.104	0.4	0.69
Shooting %	0.667	0.458	0.2	0.285
Assists per pass	0	0.095	0.4	0.095

Σ contribution = 1.071

Defensive1.05

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	1.92	0.555	0.3	0.166
Blocks	3	6.149	0.528	0.2	0.106
Takeaways	9	3.207	1.947	0.25	0.487
Goals conceded	5	5.77	1.153	0.25	0.288

Σ contribution = 1.047

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Papa Shieldz Okinawa Generations

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR3.7

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	1.62	1.75	0.23	-0.928	-0.213
Assists	0	1.48	1.25	0.19	-1.189	-0.226
Shots	0	3.54	3.06	0.09	-1.157	-0.104
Passes	0	15.61	8.26	0.08	-1.891	-0.151
Saves	0	1.92	2.13	0.19	-0.901	-0.171
Blocks	2	6.15	3.72	0.11	-1.117	-0.123
Takeaways	0	3.21	2.54	0.11	-1.263	-0.139

6.0 + clip(Σ −1.128 × 2, −3 to 3) = 3.745, nothing hit the bonus or penalty thresholds → 3.7

Pucker+3

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	0	2.931	0	0.32	0
Shots	0	3.54	0	0.08	0
Saves	0	1.92	0	0.15	0
Blocks	2	6.149	0.325	0.07	0.023
Takeaways	0	3.207	0	0.12	0
Passes	0	15.609	0	0.08	0
Faceoff win rate	0	0.5	0	0.03	0

Σ 0.023 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.027 → ×100 = 2.68 → 3

Offensive0.24

Rate	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.104	0.4	0.095
Shooting %	0.458	0.2	0.048
Assists per pass	0.095	0.4	0.095

Σ contribution = 0.238

Defensive0.50

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	1.92	0.238	0.3	0.072
Blocks	2	6.149	0.412	0.2	0.082
Takeaways	0	3.207	0.238	0.25	0.06
Goals conceded	5	5.77	1.153	0.25	0.288

Σ contribution = 0.502

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Pip Starlather Okinawa Generations

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.4

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	1.62	1.75	0.23	-0.928	-0.213
Assists	3	1.48	1.25	0.19	1.217	0.231
Shots	2	3.54	3.06	0.09	-0.503	-0.045
Passes	24	15.61	8.26	0.08	1.016	0.081
Saves	3	1.92	2.13	0.19	0.507	0.096
Blocks	10	6.15	3.72	0.11	1.036	0.114
Takeaways	8	3.21	2.54	0.11	1.888	0.208

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.472 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.944, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting → 6.4

Pucker+125

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3	2.931	1.024	0.32	0.328
Shots	2	3.54	0.565	0.08	0.045
Saves	3	1.92	1.563	0.15	0.234
Blocks	10	6.149	1.626	0.07	0.114
Takeaways	8	3.207	2.495	0.12	0.299
Passes	24	15.609	1.538	0.08	0.123
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.5	1	0.03	0.03

Σ 1.173 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.38 − 0.132 turnover penalty = 1.248 → ×100 = 124.88 → 125

Offensive0.82

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.063	0.104	0.4	0.248
Shooting %	0	0.458	0.2	0.048
Assists per pass	0.125	0.095	0.4	0.522

Σ contribution = 0.818

Defensive1.53

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	3	1.92	1.51	0.3	0.453
Blocks	10	6.149	1.555	0.2	0.311
Takeaways	8	3.207	1.904	0.25	0.476
Goals conceded	5	5.77	1.153	0.25	0.288

Σ contribution = 1.528

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.