Battle Creek Bandits vs Chicago Hoodlums

BCHomeBattle Creek Bandits

9–5Final

Away · CHChicago Hoodlums

Jul 8, 2024 · Play-ins · Battle Creek Stadium

MVP hellen kellers lunch money · 7.0 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Battle Creek BanditsvsChicago Hoodlums

15Shots213

8Saves26

13Faceoffs won94

7Takeaways411

11Turnovers↓56

21Blocks516

38Passes2462

1:28Possession0:472:15

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Battle Creek Bandits

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
DaisyK	3	0	3	3	5	4	2	1	2	5	9	0:09	113	7.07	6.29
TMNNational	3	0	3	5	0	3	2	6	6	3	13	0:50	86	4.68	5.29
hellen kellers lunch money	3	1	4	7	3	6	0	0	3	13	16	0:29	134	7.13	6.34

Chicago Hoodlums

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Bunda Buster	3	0	3	6	2	1	5	5	4	4	18	1:09	110	4.22	5.52
Lucki	1	1	2	4	4	1	5	3	1	8	19	0:51	106	4.80	6.39
Sylvatic	1	1	2	3	0	2	3	3	1	4	25	0:15	71	6.28	4.20

DaisyK Battle Creek Bandits

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.3

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	1.67	1.49	0.23	0.893	0.205
Assists	0	0.88	0.89	0.19	-0.984	-0.187
Shots	3	3.85	2.36	0.09	-0.36	-0.032
Passes	9	15.42	6.64	0.08	-0.967	-0.077
Saves	5	2.18	2.05	0.19	1.373	0.261
Blocks	5	6.73	3.48	0.11	-0.496	-0.055
Takeaways	1	3.79	3.52	0.11	-0.791	-0.087

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.028 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.056, then +0.25 hot shooting → 6.3

Pucker+113

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3	2.515	1.193	0.32	0.382
Shots	3	3.848	0.78	0.08	0.062
Saves	5	2.182	2.292	0.15	0.344
Blocks	5	6.727	0.743	0.07	0.052
Takeaways	1	3.788	0.264	0.12	0.032
Passes	9	15.424	0.583	0.08	0.047
Faceoff win rate	0.667	0.5	1.333	0.03	0.04

Σ 0.958 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.127 → ×100 = 112.73 → 113

Offensive7.07

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.333	0.08	0.4	3.994
Shooting %	1	0.433	0.2	1.891
Assists per pass	0	0.057	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 7.067

Defensive6.29

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	5	2.182	9.438	0.3	2.831
Blocks	5	6.727	4.995	0.2	0.999
Takeaways	1	3.788	3.493	0.25	0.873
Goals conceded	5	5.424	6.339	0.25	1.585

Σ contribution = 6.288

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

TMNNational Battle Creek Bandits

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.5

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	1.67	1.49	0.23	0.893	0.205
Assists	0	0.88	0.89	0.19	-0.984	-0.187
Shots	5	3.85	2.36	0.09	0.488	0.044
Passes	13	15.42	6.64	0.08	-0.365	-0.029
Saves	0	2.18	2.05	0.19	-1.063	-0.202
Blocks	3	6.73	3.48	0.11	-1.07	-0.118
Takeaways	6	3.79	3.52	0.11	0.628	0.069

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.217 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.565, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.3 turnovers → 5.5

Pucker+86

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3	2.515	1.193	0.32	0.382
Shots	5	3.848	1.299	0.08	0.104
Saves	0	2.182	0	0.15	0
Blocks	3	6.727	0.446	0.07	0.031
Takeaways	6	3.788	1.584	0.12	0.19
Passes	13	15.424	0.843	0.08	0.067
Faceoff win rate	0.6	0.5	1.2	0.03	0.036

Σ 0.81 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.953 − 0.091 turnover penalty = 0.862 → ×100 = 86.19 → 86

Offensive4.68

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.06	0.08	0.4	2.003
Shooting %	0.6	0.433	0.2	1.494
Assists per pass	0	0.057	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 4.678

Defensive5.29

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.182	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	3	6.727	3.986	0.2	0.797
Takeaways	6	3.788	8.102	0.25	2.026
Goals conceded	5	5.424	6.339	0.25	1.585

Σ contribution = 5.294

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

hellen kellers lunch money Battle Creek Bandits

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR7.0

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	1.67	1.49	0.23	0.893	0.205
Assists	1	0.88	0.89	0.19	0.136	0.026
Shots	7	3.85	2.36	0.09	1.335	0.12
Passes	16	15.42	6.64	0.08	0.087	0.007
Saves	3	2.18	2.05	0.19	0.398	0.076
Blocks	13	6.73	3.48	0.11	1.8	0.198
Takeaways	0	3.79	3.52	0.11	-1.075	-0.118

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.514 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.028, nothing hit the bonus or penalty thresholds → 7.0

Pucker+134

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4	2.515	1.59	0.32	0.509
Shots	7	3.848	1.819	0.08	0.146
Saves	3	2.182	1.375	0.15	0.206
Blocks	13	6.727	1.932	0.07	0.135
Takeaways	0	3.788	0	0.12	0
Passes	16	15.424	1.037	0.08	0.083
Faceoff win rate	1	0.5	2	0.03	0.06

Σ 1.139 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.34 → ×100 = 133.99 → 134

Offensive7.13

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.138	0.08	0.4	3.383
Shooting %	0.429	0.433	0.2	1.192
Assists per pass	0.062	0.057	0.4	2.555

Σ contribution = 7.129

Defensive6.34

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	3	2.182	7.433	0.3	2.23
Blocks	13	6.727	8.927	0.2	1.785
Takeaways	0	3.788	2.954	0.25	0.738
Goals conceded	5	5.424	6.339	0.25	1.585

Σ contribution = 6.338

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Bunda Buster Chicago Hoodlums

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.9

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	1.67	1.49	0.23	0.893	0.205
Assists	0	0.88	0.89	0.19	-0.984	-0.187
Shots	6	3.85	2.36	0.09	0.912	0.082
Passes	18	15.42	6.64	0.08	0.388	0.031
Saves	2	2.18	2.05	0.19	-0.089	-0.017
Blocks	4	6.73	3.48	0.11	-0.783	-0.086
Takeaways	5	3.79	3.52	0.11	0.344	0.038

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.066 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.133, then −0.2 goals against → 5.9

Pucker+110

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3	2.515	1.193	0.32	0.382
Shots	6	3.848	1.559	0.08	0.125
Saves	2	2.182	0.917	0.15	0.138
Blocks	4	6.727	0.595	0.07	0.042
Takeaways	5	3.788	1.32	0.12	0.158
Passes	18	15.424	1.167	0.08	0.093
Faceoff win rate	0.167	0.5	0.333	0.03	0.01

Σ 0.947 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.114 − 0.011 turnover penalty = 1.103 → ×100 = 110.35 → 110

Offensive4.22

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.043	0.08	0.4	1.713
Shooting %	0.5	0.433	0.2	1.323
Assists per pass	0	0.057	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 4.217

Defensive5.52

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	2.182	5.667	0.3	1.7
Blocks	4	6.727	4.462	0.2	0.892
Takeaways	5	3.788	7.238	0.25	1.81
Goals conceded	9	5.424	4.489	0.25	1.122

Σ contribution = 5.524

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Lucki Chicago Hoodlums

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.9

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	1.67	1.49	0.23	-0.447	-0.103
Assists	1	0.88	0.89	0.19	0.136	0.026
Shots	4	3.85	2.36	0.09	0.064	0.006
Passes	19	15.42	6.64	0.08	0.538	0.043
Saves	4	2.18	2.05	0.19	0.886	0.168
Blocks	8	6.73	3.48	0.11	0.365	0.04
Takeaways	3	3.79	3.52	0.11	-0.224	-0.025

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.156 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.312, then −0.2 cold shooting, −0.2 goals against → 5.9

Pucker+106

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2	2.515	0.795	0.32	0.254
Shots	4	3.848	1.039	0.08	0.083
Saves	4	2.182	1.833	0.15	0.275
Blocks	8	6.727	1.189	0.07	0.083
Takeaways	3	3.788	0.792	0.12	0.095
Passes	19	15.424	1.232	0.08	0.099
Faceoff win rate	0.167	0.5	0.333	0.03	0.01

Σ 0.899 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.058 → ×100 = 105.82 → 106

Offensive4.80

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.039	0.08	0.4	1.645
Shooting %	0.25	0.433	0.2	0.881
Assists per pass	0.053	0.057	0.4	2.278

Σ contribution = 4.804

Defensive6.39

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	4	2.182	8.729	0.3	2.619
Blocks	8	6.727	6.748	0.2	1.35
Takeaways	3	3.788	5.18	0.25	1.295
Goals conceded	9	5.424	4.489	0.25	1.122

Σ contribution = 6.386

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Sylvatic Chicago Hoodlums

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.0

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	1.67	1.49	0.23	-0.447	-0.103
Assists	1	0.88	0.89	0.19	0.136	0.026
Shots	3	3.85	2.36	0.09	-0.36	-0.032
Passes	25	15.42	6.64	0.08	1.442	0.115
Saves	0	2.18	2.05	0.19	-1.063	-0.202
Blocks	4	6.73	3.48	0.11	-0.783	-0.086
Takeaways	3	3.79	3.52	0.11	-0.224	-0.025

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.307 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.387, then −0.2 cold shooting, −0.2 goals against → 5.0

Pucker+71

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2	2.515	0.795	0.32	0.254
Shots	3	3.848	0.78	0.08	0.062
Saves	0	2.182	0	0.15	0
Blocks	4	6.727	0.595	0.07	0.042
Takeaways	3	3.788	0.792	0.12	0.095
Passes	25	15.424	1.621	0.08	0.13
Faceoff win rate	0.4	0.5	0.8	0.03	0.024

Σ 0.607 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.714 → ×100 = 71.43 → 71

Offensive6.28

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.133	0.08	0.4	3.324
Shooting %	0.333	0.433	0.2	1.019
Assists per pass	0.04	0.057	0.4	1.937

Σ contribution = 6.28

Defensive4.20

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.182	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	4	6.727	4.462	0.2	0.892
Takeaways	3	3.788	5.18	0.25	1.295
Goals conceded	9	5.424	4.489	0.25	1.122

Σ contribution = 4.195

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.