Hamilton Huskies vs Ottawa Valley Tater Tots

HHHomeHamilton Huskies

13–4Final

OVAwayOttawa Valley Tater Tots

May 26, 2024 · Prospect Cross-Play · Tim Hortons Arena

MVP Luke the Duke · 9.6 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Hamilton HuskiesvsOttawa Valley Tater Tots

22Shots157

3Saves69

9Faceoffs won18

14Takeaways721

21Turnovers↓714

2Blocks2

69Passes2049

1:44Possession1:142:58

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Hamilton Huskies

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Luke the Duke	6	6	12	9	1	4	4	5	10	2	25	0:37	187	9.28	7.37
LYB	5	3	8	10	1	1	3	2	5	0	19	0:29	129	8.36	5.08
MadanSmash	2	4	6	3	1	4	1	7	6	0	25	0:38	101	7.84	6.27

Ottawa Valley Tater Tots

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
brandon hagel	0	2	2	1	4	1	4	8	3	1	16	1:21	111	4.78	7.60
max	1	1	2	3	1	4	5	8	7	1	15	0:38	77	4.50	6.20
conpeylil	3	0	3	3	4	3	0	5	4	0	18	0:59	107	4.63	6.36

Luke the Duke Hamilton Huskies

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR9.6

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	6	2.01	1.83	0.23	2.185	0.502
Assists	6	1.59	1.57	0.19	2.813	0.535
Shots	9	4.27	3.36	0.09	1.41	0.127
Passes	25	16.22	8.32	0.08	1.056	0.084
Saves	1	2.21	2.69	0.19	-0.45	-0.086
Blocks	2	0.71	0.98	0.11	1.32	0.145
Takeaways	5	2.93	2.55	0.11	0.813	0.089

6.0 + clip(Σ 1.397 × 2, −3 to 3) = 8.795, then +0.5 hat trick, +0.4 playmaker, +0.25 hot shooting, −0.3 turnovers → 9.6

Pucker+187

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	12	3.461	3.467	0.32	1.109
Shots	9	4.267	2.109	0.08	0.169
Saves	1	2.211	0.452	0.15	0.068
Blocks	2	0.712	2.808	0.07	0.197
Takeaways	5	2.93	1.707	0.12	0.205
Passes	25	16.221	1.541	0.08	0.123
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.503	0.994	0.03	0.03

Σ 1.9 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 2.236 − 0.368 turnover penalty = 1.868 → ×100 = 186.83 → 187

Offensive9.28

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.324	0.112	0.4	3.93
Shooting %	0.667	0.471	0.2	1.514
Assists per pass	0.24	0.098	0.4	3.835

Σ contribution = 9.279

Defensive7.37

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.211	4.005	0.3	1.202
Blocks	2	0.712	9.79	0.2	1.958
Takeaways	5	2.93	8.434	0.25	2.109
Goals conceded	4	6.747	8.384	0.25	2.096

Σ contribution = 7.365

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

LYB Hamilton Huskies

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR7.0

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	5	2.01	1.83	0.23	1.637	0.377
Assists	3	1.59	1.57	0.19	0.901	0.171
Shots	10	4.27	3.36	0.09	1.708	0.154
Passes	19	16.22	8.32	0.08	0.334	0.027
Saves	1	2.21	2.69	0.19	-0.45	-0.086
Blocks	0	0.71	0.98	0.11	-0.73	-0.08
Takeaways	2	2.93	2.55	0.11	-0.365	-0.04

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.522 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.044, nothing hit the bonus or penalty thresholds → 7.0

Pucker+129

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	8	3.461	2.311	0.32	0.74
Shots	10	4.267	2.344	0.08	0.188
Saves	1	2.211	0.452	0.15	0.068
Blocks	0	0.712	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	2	2.93	0.683	0.12	0.082
Passes	19	16.221	1.171	0.08	0.094
Faceoff win rate	0.25	0.503	0.497	0.03	0.015

Σ 1.185 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.395 − 0.109 turnover penalty = 1.286 → ×100 = 128.59 → 129

Offensive8.36

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.276	0.112	0.4	3.839
Shooting %	0.5	0.471	0.2	1.249
Assists per pass	0.158	0.098	0.4	3.276

Σ contribution = 8.364

Defensive5.08

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.211	4.005	0.3	1.202
Blocks	0	0.712	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	2	2.93	4.772	0.25	1.193
Goals conceded	4	6.747	8.384	0.25	2.096

Σ contribution = 5.082

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

MadanSmash Hamilton Huskies

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.7

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	2.01	1.83	0.23	-0.006	-0.001
Assists	4	1.59	1.57	0.19	1.539	0.292
Shots	3	4.27	3.36	0.09	-0.377	-0.034
Passes	25	16.22	8.32	0.08	1.056	0.084
Saves	1	2.21	2.69	0.19	-0.45	-0.086
Blocks	0	0.71	0.98	0.11	-0.73	-0.08
Takeaways	7	2.93	2.55	0.11	1.599	0.176

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.351 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.703, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.3 turnovers → 6.7

Pucker+101

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4.5	3.461	1.3	0.32	0.416
Shots	3	4.267	0.703	0.08	0.056
Saves	1	2.211	0.452	0.15	0.068
Blocks	0	0.712	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	7	2.93	2.389	0.12	0.287
Passes	25	16.221	1.541	0.08	0.123
Faceoff win rate	0.8	0.503	1.59	0.03	0.048

Σ 0.998 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.174 − 0.161 turnover penalty = 1.013 → ×100 = 101.34 → 101

Offensive7.84

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.158	0.112	0.4	3.026
Shooting %	0.667	0.471	0.2	1.514
Assists per pass	0.16	0.098	0.4	3.3

Σ contribution = 7.84

Defensive6.27

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.211	4.005	0.3	1.202
Blocks	0	0.712	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	7	2.93	9.532	0.25	2.383
Goals conceded	4	6.747	8.384	0.25	2.096

Σ contribution = 6.272

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

brandon hagel Ottawa Valley Tater Tots

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.8

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	2.01	1.83	0.23	-1.101	-0.253
Assists	2	1.59	1.57	0.19	0.264	0.05
Shots	1	4.27	3.36	0.09	-0.973	-0.088
Passes	16	16.22	8.32	0.08	-0.027	-0.002
Saves	4	2.21	2.69	0.19	0.666	0.127
Blocks	1	0.71	0.98	0.11	0.295	0.032
Takeaways	8	2.93	2.55	0.11	1.992	0.219

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.085 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.17, then −0.2 cold shooting, −0.2 goals against → 5.8

Pucker+111

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1.5	3.461	0.433	0.32	0.139
Shots	1	4.267	0.234	0.08	0.019
Saves	4	2.211	1.81	0.15	0.271
Blocks	1	0.712	1.404	0.07	0.098
Takeaways	8	2.93	2.731	0.12	0.328
Passes	16	16.221	0.986	0.08	0.079
Faceoff win rate	0.2	0.503	0.398	0.03	0.012

Σ 0.946 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.113 − 0.005 turnover penalty = 1.108 → ×100 = 110.72 → 111

Offensive4.78

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.025	0.112	0.4	1.357
Shooting %	0	0.471	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.125	0.098	0.4	2.834

Σ contribution = 4.782

Defensive7.60

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	4	2.211	8.677	0.3	2.603
Blocks	1	0.712	7.533	0.2	1.507
Takeaways	8	2.93	9.756	0.25	2.439
Goals conceded	13	6.747	4.212	0.25	1.053

Σ contribution = 7.602

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

max Ottawa Valley Tater Tots

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.1

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	2.01	1.83	0.23	-0.553	-0.127
Assists	1	1.59	1.57	0.19	-0.373	-0.071
Shots	3	4.27	3.36	0.09	-0.377	-0.034
Passes	15	16.22	8.32	0.08	-0.147	-0.012
Saves	1	2.21	2.69	0.19	-0.45	-0.086
Blocks	1	0.71	0.98	0.11	0.295	0.032
Takeaways	8	2.93	2.55	0.11	1.992	0.219

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.078 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.844, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting, −0.2 goals against → 5.1

Pucker+77

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2	3.461	0.578	0.32	0.185
Shots	3	4.267	0.703	0.08	0.056
Saves	1	2.211	0.452	0.15	0.068
Blocks	1	0.712	1.404	0.07	0.098
Takeaways	8	2.93	2.731	0.12	0.328
Passes	15	16.221	0.925	0.08	0.074
Faceoff win rate	0.444	0.503	0.883	0.03	0.027

Σ 0.835 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.983 − 0.212 turnover penalty = 0.771 → ×100 = 77.06 → 77

Offensive4.50

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.053	0.112	0.4	1.625
Shooting %	0.333	0.471	0.2	0.972
Assists per pass	0.067	0.098	0.4	1.907

Σ contribution = 4.505

Defensive6.20

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.211	4.005	0.3	1.202
Blocks	1	0.712	7.533	0.2	1.507
Takeaways	8	2.93	9.756	0.25	2.439
Goals conceded	13	6.747	4.212	0.25	1.053

Σ contribution = 6.201

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

conpeylil Ottawa Valley Tater Tots

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.2

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	2.01	1.83	0.23	0.542	0.125
Assists	0	1.59	1.57	0.19	-1.011	-0.192
Shots	3	4.27	3.36	0.09	-0.377	-0.034
Passes	18	16.22	8.32	0.08	0.214	0.017
Saves	4	2.21	2.69	0.19	0.666	0.127
Blocks	0	0.71	0.98	0.11	-0.73	-0.08
Takeaways	5	2.93	2.55	0.11	0.813	0.089

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.051 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.103, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.2 goals against → 6.2

Pucker+107

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3	3.461	0.867	0.32	0.277
Shots	3	4.267	0.703	0.08	0.056
Saves	4	2.211	1.81	0.15	0.271
Blocks	0	0.712	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	5	2.93	1.707	0.12	0.205
Passes	18	16.221	1.11	0.08	0.089
Faceoff win rate	1	0.503	1.988	0.03	0.06

Σ 0.958 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.127 − 0.057 turnover penalty = 1.07 → ×100 = 107.03 → 107

Offensive4.63

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.051	0.112	0.4	1.605
Shooting %	1	0.471	0.2	1.847
Assists per pass	0	0.098	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 4.633

Defensive6.36

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	4	2.211	8.677	0.3	2.603
Blocks	0	0.712	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	5	2.93	8.434	0.25	2.109
Goals conceded	13	6.747	4.212	0.25	1.053

Σ contribution = 6.356

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.