Rosedale Ravens vs Seattle Cyclones

RRHomeRosedale Ravens

6–5Final

Away · SEASeattle Cyclones

Apr 30, 2024 · Intermediate Division · The Rangers Watch Tower

MVP [OCA] white women lover · 7.6 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Rosedale RavensvsSeattle Cyclones

15Shots15

10Saves19

7Faceoffs won7

18Takeaways117

17Turnovers↓118

2Blocks11

75Passes1489

2:19Possession0:473:06

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Rosedale Ravens

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	GWG	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
[OCA] white women lover	2	3	5	7	6	4	3	13	8	0	23	0	1:18	170	5.55	7.82
[RAV] Squirt	2	0	2	4	0	2	2	4	4	2	21	1	0:32	80	4.23	6.36
[SEA] Fei Nanduo	2	0	2	4	4	1	2	1	5	0	31	0	0:29	78	4.31	5.90

Seattle Cyclones

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
[SDS] kale	2	1	3	3	2	4	2	7	3	0	26	1:27	101	4.51	6.21
[SEA] Gronk	1	2	3	7	6	2	2	9	7	1	35	1:23	151	3.94	8.32
[SEA] wads	2	0	2	5	1	1	3	1	8	0	28	0:16	40	4.97	4.30

white women lover Rosedale Ravens

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR7.6

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	1.94	1.76	0.23	0.033	0.008
Assists	3	1.69	1.53	0.19	0.857	0.163
Shots	7	4.19	3.02	0.09	0.931	0.084
Passes	23	16.57	7.39	0.08	0.869	0.07
Saves	6	2.23	2.55	0.19	1.477	0.281
Blocks	0	0.85	0.99	0.11	-0.857	-0.094
Takeaways	13	3.15	2.82	0.11	3.49	0.384

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.894 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.788, then +0.3 takeaways, −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting → 7.6

Pucker+170

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	5	3.459	1.446	0.32	0.463
Shots	7	4.193	1.669	0.08	0.134
Saves	6	2.231	2.689	0.15	0.403
Blocks	0	0.847	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	13	3.147	4.131	0.12	0.496
Passes	23	16.571	1.388	0.08	0.111
Faceoff win rate	0.571	0.499	1.145	0.03	0.034

Σ 1.641 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.93 − 0.231 turnover penalty = 1.699 → ×100 = 169.95 → 170

Offensive5.55

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.064	0.105	0.4	1.805
Shooting %	0.286	0.463	0.2	0.908
Assists per pass	0.13	0.102	0.4	2.837

Σ contribution = 5.55

Defensive7.82

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	6	2.231	9.736	0.3	2.921
Blocks	0	0.847	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	13	3.147	9.985	0.25	2.496
Goals conceded	5	6.602	7.239	0.25	1.81

Σ contribution = 7.818

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Squirt Rosedale Ravens

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.7

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	1.94	1.76	0.23	0.033	0.008
Assists	0	1.69	1.53	0.19	-1.103	-0.209
Shots	4	4.19	3.02	0.09	-0.064	-0.006
Passes	21	16.57	7.39	0.08	0.599	0.048
Saves	0	2.23	2.55	0.19	-0.875	-0.166
Blocks	2	0.85	0.99	0.11	1.167	0.128
Takeaways	4	3.15	2.82	0.11	0.302	0.033

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.164 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.671, nothing hit the bonus or penalty thresholds → 5.7

Pucker+80

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2	3.459	0.578	0.32	0.185
Shots	4	4.193	0.954	0.08	0.076
Saves	0	2.231	0	0.15	0
Blocks	2	0.847	2.361	0.07	0.165
Takeaways	4	3.147	1.271	0.12	0.153
Passes	21	16.571	1.267	0.08	0.101
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.499	1.002	0.03	0.03

Σ 0.711 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.836 − 0.04 turnover penalty = 0.796 → ×100 = 79.57 → 80

Offensive4.23

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.063	0.105	0.4	1.784
Shooting %	0.5	0.463	0.2	1.264
Assists per pass	0	0.102	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 4.229

Defensive6.36

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.231	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	2	0.847	9.507	0.2	1.901
Takeaways	4	3.147	7.059	0.25	1.765
Goals conceded	5	6.602	7.239	0.25	1.81

Σ contribution = 6.362

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Fei Nanduo Rosedale Ravens

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.8

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	1.94	1.76	0.23	0.033	0.008
Assists	0	1.69	1.53	0.19	-1.103	-0.209
Shots	4	4.19	3.02	0.09	-0.064	-0.006
Passes	31	16.57	7.39	0.08	1.951	0.156
Saves	4	2.23	2.55	0.19	0.693	0.132
Blocks	0	0.85	0.99	0.11	-0.857	-0.094
Takeaways	1	3.15	2.82	0.11	-0.76	-0.084

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.098 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.804, nothing hit the bonus or penalty thresholds → 5.8

Pucker+78

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2	3.459	0.578	0.32	0.185
Shots	4	4.193	0.954	0.08	0.076
Saves	4	2.231	1.793	0.15	0.269
Blocks	0	0.847	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	1	3.147	0.318	0.12	0.038
Passes	31	16.571	1.871	0.08	0.15
Faceoff win rate	0.333	0.499	0.668	0.03	0.02

Σ 0.738 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.868 − 0.088 turnover penalty = 0.78 → ×100 = 78.04 → 78

Offensive4.31

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.069	0.105	0.4	1.87
Shooting %	0.5	0.463	0.2	1.264
Assists per pass	0	0.102	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 4.315

Defensive5.90

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	4	2.231	8.64	0.3	2.592
Blocks	0	0.847	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	1	3.147	3.628	0.25	0.907
Goals conceded	5	6.602	7.239	0.25	1.81

Σ contribution = 5.9

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

kale Seattle Cyclones

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.3

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	1.94	1.76	0.23	0.033	0.008
Assists	1	1.69	1.53	0.19	-0.449	-0.085
Shots	3	4.19	3.02	0.09	-0.396	-0.036
Passes	26	16.57	7.39	0.08	1.275	0.102
Saves	2	2.23	2.55	0.19	-0.091	-0.017
Blocks	0	0.85	0.99	0.11	-0.857	-0.094
Takeaways	7	3.15	2.82	0.11	1.365	0.15

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.027 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.054, then +0.25 hot shooting → 6.3

Pucker+101

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2.5	3.459	0.723	0.32	0.231
Shots	3	4.193	0.715	0.08	0.057
Saves	2	2.231	0.896	0.15	0.134
Blocks	0	0.847	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	7	3.147	2.224	0.12	0.267
Passes	26	16.571	1.569	0.08	0.126
Faceoff win rate	0.667	0.499	1.336	0.03	0.04

Σ 0.855 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.006 → ×100 = 100.65 → 101

Offensive4.51

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.034	0.105	0.4	1.462
Shooting %	0.667	0.463	0.2	1.531
Assists per pass	0.038	0.102	0.4	1.516

Σ contribution = 4.508

Defensive6.21

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	2.231	5.587	0.3	1.676
Blocks	0	0.847	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	7	3.147	9.364	0.25	2.341
Goals conceded	6	6.602	6.4	0.25	1.6

Σ contribution = 6.208

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Gronk Seattle Cyclones

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.9

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	1.94	1.76	0.23	-0.534	-0.123
Assists	2	1.69	1.53	0.19	0.204	0.039
Shots	7	4.19	3.02	0.09	0.931	0.084
Passes	35	16.57	7.39	0.08	2.492	0.199
Saves	6	2.23	2.55	0.19	1.477	0.281
Blocks	1	0.85	0.99	0.11	0.155	0.017
Takeaways	9	3.15	2.82	0.11	2.073	0.228

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.725 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.449, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting → 6.9

Pucker+151

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3	3.459	0.867	0.32	0.278
Shots	7	4.193	1.669	0.08	0.134
Saves	6	2.231	2.689	0.15	0.403
Blocks	1	0.847	1.181	0.07	0.083
Takeaways	9	3.147	2.86	0.12	0.343
Passes	35	16.571	2.112	0.08	0.169
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.499	1.002	0.03	0.03

Σ 1.439 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.693 − 0.183 turnover penalty = 1.51 → ×100 = 151.03 → 151

Offensive3.94

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.036	0.105	0.4	1.478
Shooting %	0.143	0.463	0.2	0.721
Assists per pass	0.057	0.102	0.4	1.739

Σ contribution = 3.939

Defensive8.32

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	6	2.231	9.736	0.3	2.921
Blocks	1	0.847	6.714	0.2	1.343
Takeaways	9	3.147	9.811	0.25	2.453
Goals conceded	6	6.602	6.4	0.25	1.6

Σ contribution = 8.317

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

wads Seattle Cyclones

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.9

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	1.94	1.76	0.23	0.033	0.008
Assists	0	1.69	1.53	0.19	-1.103	-0.209
Shots	5	4.19	3.02	0.09	0.268	0.024
Passes	28	16.57	7.39	0.08	1.546	0.124
Saves	1	2.23	2.55	0.19	-0.483	-0.092
Blocks	0	0.85	0.99	0.11	-0.857	-0.094
Takeaways	1	3.15	2.82	0.11	-0.76	-0.084

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.324 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.352, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting → 4.9

Pucker+40

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2	3.459	0.578	0.32	0.185
Shots	5	4.193	1.192	0.08	0.095
Saves	1	2.231	0.448	0.15	0.067
Blocks	0	0.847	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	1	3.147	0.318	0.12	0.038
Passes	28	16.571	1.69	0.08	0.135
Faceoff win rate	0.25	0.499	0.501	0.03	0.015

Σ 0.536 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.631 − 0.231 turnover penalty = 0.4 → ×100 = 40 → 40

Offensive4.97

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.125	0.105	0.4	2.697
Shooting %	0.4	0.463	0.2	1.092
Assists per pass	0	0.102	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 4.971

Defensive4.30

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.231	3.992	0.3	1.198
Blocks	0	0.847	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	1	3.147	3.628	0.25	0.907
Goals conceded	6	6.602	6.4	0.25	1.6

Σ contribution = 4.296

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.