Michigan Mafia vs Richmond Romans

MMHomeMichigan Mafia

10–3Final

RRAwayRichmond Romans

Feb 13, 2024 · Intermediate Cross-Play · Michigan Mansion

MVP Tef · 8.5 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Michigan MafiavsRichmond Romans

22Shots1210

7Saves512

9Faceoffs won27

18Takeaways414

14Turnovers↓418

2Blocks57

62Passes1448

2:24Possession0:162:08

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Michigan Mafia

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Glueshop	3	4	7	7	0	5	1	5	5	0	18	0:26	118	8.70	5.92
Stiff	1	5	6	5	5	2	2	8	7	2	22	1:21	183	6.43	9.53
Tef	6	2	8	10	2	2	4	5	2	0	22	0:37	172	7.26	6.76

Richmond Romans

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Rudd	2	0	2	3	4	2	4	2	6	0	14	0:20	67	4.97	5.63
Cape	0	1	1	4	5	3	3	9	5	1	16	0:47	116	3.73	8.00
domikus	1	2	3	3	3	2	2	3	7	6	18	1:01	144	5.13	7.02

Glueshop Michigan Mafia

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.9

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	1.77	1.78	0.23	0.691	0.159
Assists	4	1.54	1.51	0.19	1.631	0.31
Shots	7	3.9	3.26	0.09	0.95	0.085
Passes	18	15.11	7.05	0.08	0.409	0.033
Saves	0	2.13	2.72	0.19	-0.781	-0.148
Blocks	0	0.7	0.99	0.11	-0.711	-0.078
Takeaways	5	2.73	2.49	0.11	0.912	0.1

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.461 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.921, nothing hit the bonus or penalty thresholds → 6.9

Pucker+118

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	6	3.163	1.897	0.32	0.607
Shots	7	3.901	1.794	0.08	0.144
Saves	0	2.127	0	0.15	0
Blocks	0	0.703	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	5	2.731	1.831	0.12	0.22
Passes	18	15.113	1.191	0.08	0.095
Faceoff win rate	0.833	0.503	1.655	0.03	0.05

Σ 1.115 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.312 − 0.128 turnover penalty = 1.184 → ×100 = 118.41 → 118

Offensive8.70

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.269	0.111	0.4	3.824
Shooting %	0.429	0.455	0.2	1.154
Assists per pass	0.222	0.102	0.4	3.726

Σ contribution = 8.704

Defensive5.92

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.127	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	0	0.703	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	5	2.731	8.723	0.25	2.181
Goals conceded	3	6.415	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 5.92

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Stiff Michigan Mafia

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR7.9

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	1.77	1.78	0.23	-0.436	-0.1
Assists	5	1.54	1.51	0.19	2.294	0.436
Shots	5	3.9	3.26	0.09	0.337	0.03
Passes	22	15.11	7.05	0.08	0.976	0.078
Saves	5	2.13	2.72	0.19	1.055	0.201
Blocks	2	0.7	0.99	0.11	1.312	0.144
Takeaways	8	2.73	2.49	0.11	2.118	0.233

6.0 + clip(Σ 1.022 × 2, −3 to 3) = 8.044, then +0.4 playmaker, −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting → 7.9

Pucker+183

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	6	3.163	1.897	0.32	0.607
Shots	5	3.901	1.282	0.08	0.103
Saves	5	2.127	2.35	0.15	0.353
Blocks	2	0.703	2.846	0.07	0.199
Takeaways	8	2.731	2.929	0.12	0.352
Passes	22	15.113	1.456	0.08	0.116
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.503	0.993	0.03	0.03

Σ 1.759 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 2.07 − 0.239 turnover penalty = 1.831 → ×100 = 183.04 → 183

Offensive6.43

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.074	0.111	0.4	1.885
Shooting %	0.2	0.455	0.2	0.794
Assists per pass	0.227	0.102	0.4	3.75

Σ contribution = 6.428

Defensive9.53

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	5	2.127	9.497	0.3	2.849
Blocks	2	0.703	9.805	0.2	1.961
Takeaways	8	2.731	9.835	0.25	2.459
Goals conceded	3	6.415	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 9.531

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Tef Michigan Mafia

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR8.5

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	6	1.77	1.78	0.23	2.38	0.548
Assists	2	1.54	1.51	0.19	0.306	0.058
Shots	10	3.9	3.26	0.09	1.869	0.168
Passes	22	15.11	7.05	0.08	0.976	0.078
Saves	2	2.13	2.72	0.19	-0.047	-0.009
Blocks	0	0.7	0.99	0.11	-0.711	-0.078
Takeaways	5	2.73	2.49	0.11	0.912	0.1

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.865 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.73, then +0.5 hat trick, +0.25 hot shooting → 8.5

Pucker+172

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	7.5	3.163	2.371	0.32	0.759
Shots	10	3.901	2.563	0.08	0.205
Saves	2	2.127	0.94	0.15	0.141
Blocks	0	0.703	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	5	2.731	1.831	0.12	0.22
Passes	22	15.113	1.456	0.08	0.116
Faceoff win rate	0.333	0.503	0.662	0.03	0.02

Σ 1.461 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.719 → ×100 = 171.88 → 172

Offensive7.26

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.216	0.111	0.4	3.579
Shooting %	0.6	0.455	0.2	1.447
Assists per pass	0.091	0.102	0.4	2.23

Σ contribution = 7.257

Defensive6.76

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	2.127	5.761	0.3	1.728
Blocks	0	0.703	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	5	2.731	8.723	0.25	2.181
Goals conceded	3	6.415	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 6.762

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Rudd Richmond Romans

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.4

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	1.77	1.78	0.23	0.128	0.029
Assists	0	1.54	1.51	0.19	-1.019	-0.194
Shots	3	3.9	3.26	0.09	-0.276	-0.025
Passes	14	15.11	7.05	0.08	-0.158	-0.013
Saves	4	2.13	2.72	0.19	0.688	0.131
Blocks	0	0.7	0.99	0.11	-0.711	-0.078
Takeaways	2	2.73	2.49	0.11	-0.294	-0.032

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.182 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.637, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 goals against → 5.4

Pucker+67

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2	3.163	0.632	0.32	0.202
Shots	3	3.901	0.769	0.08	0.062
Saves	4	2.127	1.88	0.15	0.282
Blocks	0	0.703	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	2	2.731	0.732	0.12	0.088
Passes	14	15.113	0.926	0.08	0.074
Faceoff win rate	0.333	0.503	0.662	0.03	0.02

Σ 0.728 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.856 − 0.184 turnover penalty = 0.672 → ×100 = 67.26 → 67

Offensive4.97

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.1	0.111	0.4	2.239
Shooting %	0.667	0.455	0.2	1.548
Assists per pass	0	0.102	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 4.969

Defensive5.63

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	4	2.127	8.826	0.3	2.648
Blocks	0	0.703	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	2	2.731	4.954	0.25	1.239
Goals conceded	10	6.415	4.624	0.25	1.156

Σ contribution = 5.634

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Cape Richmond Romans

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.1

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	1.77	1.78	0.23	-0.999	-0.23
Assists	1	1.54	1.51	0.19	-0.356	-0.068
Shots	4	3.9	3.26	0.09	0.03	0.003
Passes	16	15.11	7.05	0.08	0.126	0.01
Saves	5	2.13	2.72	0.19	1.055	0.201
Blocks	1	0.7	0.99	0.11	0.301	0.033
Takeaways	9	2.73	2.49	0.11	2.52	0.277

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.226 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.452, then −0.2 cold shooting, −0.2 goals against → 6.1

Pucker+116

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	0.5	3.163	0.158	0.32	0.051
Shots	4	3.901	1.025	0.08	0.082
Saves	5	2.127	2.35	0.15	0.353
Blocks	1	0.703	1.423	0.07	0.1
Takeaways	9	2.731	3.295	0.12	0.395
Passes	16	15.113	1.059	0.08	0.085
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.503	0.993	0.03	0.03

Σ 1.095 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.288 − 0.128 turnover penalty = 1.16 → ×100 = 115.99 → 116

Offensive3.73

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.021	0.111	0.4	1.33
Shooting %	0	0.455	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.062	0.102	0.4	1.812

Σ contribution = 3.732

Defensive8.00

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	5	2.127	9.497	0.3	2.849
Blocks	1	0.703	7.597	0.2	1.519
Takeaways	9	2.731	9.92	0.25	2.48
Goals conceded	10	6.415	4.624	0.25	1.156

Σ contribution = 8.004

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

domikus Richmond Romans

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.6

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	1.77	1.78	0.23	-0.436	-0.1
Assists	2	1.54	1.51	0.19	0.306	0.058
Shots	3	3.9	3.26	0.09	-0.276	-0.025
Passes	18	15.11	7.05	0.08	0.409	0.033
Saves	3	2.13	2.72	0.19	0.321	0.061
Blocks	6	0.7	0.99	0.11	5.357	0.589
Takeaways	3	2.73	2.49	0.11	0.108	0.012

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.628 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.256, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting, −0.2 goals against → 6.6

Pucker+144

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3	3.163	0.949	0.32	0.304
Shots	3	3.901	0.769	0.08	0.062
Saves	3	2.127	1.41	0.15	0.212
Blocks	6	0.703	8.537	0.07	0.598
Takeaways	3	2.731	1.098	0.12	0.132
Passes	18	15.113	1.191	0.08	0.095
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.503	0.993	0.03	0.03

Σ 1.431 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.684 − 0.239 turnover penalty = 1.445 → ×100 = 144.44 → 144

Offensive5.13

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.049	0.111	0.4	1.59
Shooting %	0.333	0.455	0.2	0.992
Assists per pass	0.111	0.102	0.4	2.547

Σ contribution = 5.128

Defensive7.02

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	3	2.127	7.555	0.3	2.266
Blocks	6	0.703	10	0.2	2
Takeaways	3	2.731	6.393	0.25	1.598
Goals conceded	10	6.415	4.624	0.25	1.156

Σ contribution = 7.02

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.