Brampton Cows vs Chicago Hoodlums

BCHomeBrampton Cows

10–0Final

Away · CHChicago Hoodlums

Mar 5, 2024 · Open Division · The Big Barn

MVP Tropic · 8.0 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Brampton CowsvsChicago Hoodlums

21Shots183

3Saves811

9Faceoffs won63

12Takeaways113

13Turnovers↓112

5Blocks41

67Passes4819

3:01Possession2:120:49

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Brampton Cows

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Fizzy	3	1	4	5	2	4	0	3	7	1	24	0:49	100	5.17	6.85
Tropic	2	5	7	7	1	2	2	2	3	4	16	0:47	179	8.01	6.65
lacaaas	5	3	8	9	0	3	1	7	3	0	27	1:25	181	6.44	6.12

Chicago Hoodlums

Player	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Brady	2	2	3	2	0	5	0	5	0:04	18	2.95	4.11
madmax200721	0	1	0	1	0	0	0	3	0:02	10	2.95	3.63
MaxZombieJaws	0	0	0	2	2	1	0	2	0:05	11	2.95	3.77
Sylvatic	1	8	0	2	8	6	1	5	0:20	102	2.95	7.91
c.o.l.i.x	0	0	0	2	3	0	0	4	0:18	17	2.95	4.09

Fizzy Brampton Cows

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.5

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	1.82	1.95	0.23	0.606	0.139
Assists	1	1.2	1.3	0.19	-0.157	-0.03
Shots	5	4.04	3.81	0.09	0.251	0.023
Passes	24	13.29	7.21	0.08	1.485	0.119
Saves	2	2.21	2.79	0.19	-0.077	-0.015
Blocks	1	0.81	1.07	0.11	0.177	0.02
Takeaways	3	2.94	2.57	0.11	0.022	0.002

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.258 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.517, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.3 turnovers → 6.5

Pucker+100

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3.5	2.939	1.191	0.32	0.381
Shots	5	4.042	1.237	0.08	0.099
Saves	2	2.214	0.903	0.15	0.136
Blocks	1	0.811	1.233	0.07	0.086
Takeaways	3	2.943	1.019	0.12	0.122
Passes	24	13.294	1.805	0.08	0.144
Faceoff win rate	1	0.501	1.994	0.03	0.06

Σ 1.028 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.21 − 0.208 turnover penalty = 1.002 → ×100 = 100.16 → 100

Offensive5.17

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.082	0.101	0.4	2.1
Shooting %	0.6	0.45	0.2	1.458
Assists per pass	0.042	0.091	0.4	1.611

Σ contribution = 5.168

Defensive6.85

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	2.214	5.615	0.3	1.684
Blocks	1	0.811	6.916	0.2	1.383
Takeaways	3	2.943	6.078	0.25	1.519
Goals conceded	0	5.751	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 6.848

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Tropic Brampton Cows

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR8.0

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	1.82	1.95	0.23	0.093	0.021
Assists	5	1.2	1.3	0.19	2.917	0.554
Shots	7	4.04	3.81	0.09	0.776	0.07
Passes	16	13.29	7.21	0.08	0.376	0.03
Saves	1	2.21	2.79	0.19	-0.435	-0.083
Blocks	4	0.81	1.07	0.11	2.992	0.329
Takeaways	2	2.94	2.57	0.11	-0.367	-0.04

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.882 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.763, then +0.4 playmaker, −0.2 cold shooting → 8.0

Pucker+179

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	7	2.939	2.382	0.32	0.762
Shots	7	4.042	1.732	0.08	0.139
Saves	1	2.214	0.452	0.15	0.068
Blocks	4	0.811	4.933	0.07	0.345
Takeaways	2	2.943	0.68	0.12	0.082
Passes	16	13.294	1.204	0.08	0.096
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.501	0.997	0.03	0.03

Σ 1.521 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.79 − 0.004 turnover penalty = 1.786 → ×100 = 178.64 → 179

Offensive8.01

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.149	0.101	0.4	3.111
Shooting %	0.286	0.45	0.2	0.92
Assists per pass	0.312	0.091	0.4	3.976

Σ contribution = 8.008

Defensive6.65

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.214	4.003	0.3	1.201
Blocks	4	0.811	9.997	0.2	1.999
Takeaways	2	2.943	4.761	0.25	1.19
Goals conceded	0	5.751	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 6.652

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

lacaaas Brampton Cows

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR7.7

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	5	1.82	1.95	0.23	1.632	0.375
Assists	3	1.2	1.3	0.19	1.38	0.262
Shots	9	4.04	3.81	0.09	1.301	0.117
Passes	27	13.29	7.21	0.08	1.902	0.152
Saves	0	2.21	2.79	0.19	-0.793	-0.151
Blocks	0	0.81	1.07	0.11	-0.761	-0.084
Takeaways	7	2.94	2.57	0.11	1.581	0.174

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.846 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.693, nothing hit the bonus or penalty thresholds → 7.7

Pucker+181

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	8	2.939	2.722	0.32	0.871
Shots	9	4.042	2.226	0.08	0.178
Saves	0	2.214	0	0.15	0
Blocks	0	0.811	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	7	2.943	2.379	0.12	0.285
Passes	27	13.294	2.031	0.08	0.162
Faceoff win rate	0.75	0.501	1.496	0.03	0.045

Σ 1.542 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.814 − 0.004 turnover penalty = 1.81 → ×100 = 181.05 → 181

Offensive6.44

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.094	0.101	0.4	2.295
Shooting %	0.556	0.45	0.2	1.385
Assists per pass	0.111	0.091	0.4	2.757

Σ contribution = 6.436

Defensive6.12

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.214	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	0	0.811	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	7	2.943	9.523	0.25	2.381
Goals conceded	0	5.751	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 6.12

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Brady Chicago Hoodlums

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.1

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	1.82	1.95	0.23	-0.933	-0.215
Assists	0	1.2	1.3	0.19	-0.925	-0.176
Shots	2	4.04	3.81	0.09	-0.536	-0.048
Passes	5	13.29	7.21	0.08	-1.151	-0.092
Saves	2	2.21	2.79	0.19	-0.077	-0.015
Blocks	0	0.81	1.07	0.11	-0.761	-0.084
Takeaways	0	2.94	2.57	0.11	-1.147	-0.126

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.755 × 2, −3 to 3) = 4.49, then −0.2 cold shooting, −0.2 goals against → 4.1

Pucker+18

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	0	2.939	0	0.32	0
Shots	2	4.042	0.495	0.08	0.04
Saves	2	2.214	0.903	0.15	0.136
Blocks	0	0.811	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	0	2.943	0	0.12	0
Passes	5	13.294	0.376	0.08	0.03
Faceoff win rate	0.6	0.501	1.197	0.03	0.036

Σ 0.241 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.284 − 0.106 turnover penalty = 0.178 → ×100 = 17.77 → 18

Offensive2.95

Rate	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.101	0.4	1.181
Shooting %	0.45	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.091	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 2.954

Defensive4.11

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	2.214	5.615	0.3	1.684
Blocks	0	0.811	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	0	2.943	2.954	0.25	0.738
Goals conceded	10	5.751	4.396	0.25	1.099

Σ contribution = 4.112

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

madmax200721 Chicago Hoodlums

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.0

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	1.82	1.95	0.23	-0.933	-0.215
Assists	0	1.2	1.3	0.19	-0.925	-0.176
Shots	0	4.04	3.81	0.09	-1.06	-0.095
Passes	3	13.29	7.21	0.08	-1.428	-0.114
Saves	1	2.21	2.79	0.19	-0.435	-0.083
Blocks	0	0.81	1.07	0.11	-0.761	-0.084
Takeaways	0	2.94	2.57	0.11	-1.147	-0.126

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.892 × 2, −3 to 3) = 4.215, then −0.2 goals against → 4.0

Pucker+10

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	0	2.939	0	0.32	0
Shots	0	4.042	0	0.08	0
Saves	1	2.214	0.452	0.15	0.068
Blocks	0	0.811	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	0	2.943	0	0.12	0
Passes	3	13.294	0.226	0.08	0.018
Faceoff win rate	0	0.501	0	0.03	0

Σ 0.086 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.101 → ×100 = 10.09 → 10

Offensive2.95

Rate	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.101	0.4	1.181
Shooting %	0.45	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.091	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 2.954

Defensive3.63

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.214	4.003	0.3	1.201
Blocks	0	0.811	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	0	2.943	2.954	0.25	0.738
Goals conceded	10	5.751	4.396	0.25	1.099

Σ contribution = 3.629

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

MaxZombieJaws Chicago Hoodlums

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.0

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	1.82	1.95	0.23	-0.933	-0.215
Assists	0	1.2	1.3	0.19	-0.925	-0.176
Shots	0	4.04	3.81	0.09	-1.06	-0.095
Passes	2	13.29	7.21	0.08	-1.567	-0.125
Saves	0	2.21	2.79	0.19	-0.793	-0.151
Blocks	0	0.81	1.07	0.11	-0.761	-0.084
Takeaways	2	2.94	2.57	0.11	-0.367	-0.04

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.886 × 2, −3 to 3) = 4.228, then −0.2 goals against → 4.0

Pucker+11

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	0	2.939	0	0.32	0
Shots	0	4.042	0	0.08	0
Saves	0	2.214	0	0.15	0
Blocks	0	0.811	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	2	2.943	0.68	0.12	0.082
Passes	2	13.294	0.15	0.08	0.012
Faceoff win rate	0	0.501	0	0.03	0

Σ 0.094 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.11 → ×100 = 11.01 → 11

Offensive2.95

Rate	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.101	0.4	1.181
Shooting %	0.45	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.091	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 2.954

Defensive3.77

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.214	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	0	0.811	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	2	2.943	4.761	0.25	1.19
Goals conceded	10	5.751	4.396	0.25	1.099

Σ contribution = 3.766

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Sylvatic Chicago Hoodlums

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.8

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	1.82	1.95	0.23	-0.933	-0.215
Assists	0	1.2	1.3	0.19	-0.925	-0.176
Shots	1	4.04	3.81	0.09	-0.798	-0.072
Passes	5	13.29	7.21	0.08	-1.151	-0.092
Saves	8	2.21	2.79	0.19	2.072	0.394
Blocks	1	0.81	1.07	0.11	0.177	0.02
Takeaways	8	2.94	2.57	0.11	1.971	0.217

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.076 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.152, then +0.35 saves, −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting, −0.2 goals against → 5.8

Pucker+102

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	0	2.939	0	0.32	0
Shots	1	4.042	0.247	0.08	0.02
Saves	8	2.214	3.613	0.15	0.542
Blocks	1	0.811	1.233	0.07	0.086
Takeaways	8	2.943	2.719	0.12	0.326
Passes	5	13.294	0.376	0.08	0.03
Faceoff win rate	0	0.501	0	0.03	0

Σ 1.004 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.182 − 0.157 turnover penalty = 1.025 → ×100 = 102.46 → 102

Offensive2.95

Rate	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.101	0.4	1.181
Shooting %	0.45	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.091	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 2.954

Defensive7.91

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	8	2.214	9.957	0.3	2.987
Blocks	1	0.811	6.916	0.2	1.383
Takeaways	8	2.943	9.751	0.25	2.438
Goals conceded	10	5.751	4.396	0.25	1.099

Σ contribution = 7.907

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

c.o.l.i.x Chicago Hoodlums

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.2

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	1.82	1.95	0.23	-0.933	-0.215
Assists	0	1.2	1.3	0.19	-0.925	-0.176
Shots	0	4.04	3.81	0.09	-1.06	-0.095
Passes	4	13.29	7.21	0.08	-1.289	-0.103
Saves	0	2.21	2.79	0.19	-0.793	-0.151
Blocks	0	0.81	1.07	0.11	-0.761	-0.084
Takeaways	3	2.94	2.57	0.11	0.022	0.002

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.821 × 2, −3 to 3) = 4.358, then −0.2 goals against → 4.2

Pucker+17

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	0	2.939	0	0.32	0
Shots	0	4.042	0	0.08	0
Saves	0	2.214	0	0.15	0
Blocks	0	0.811	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	3	2.943	1.019	0.12	0.122
Passes	4	13.294	0.301	0.08	0.024
Faceoff win rate	0	0.501	0	0.03	0

Σ 0.146 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.172 → ×100 = 17.22 → 17

Offensive2.95

Rate	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.101	0.4	1.181
Shooting %	0.45	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.091	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 2.954

Defensive4.09

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.214	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	0	0.811	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	3	2.943	6.078	0.25	1.519
Goals conceded	10	5.751	4.396	0.25	1.099

Σ contribution = 4.095

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.