Texas Templars vs Champaign Champagne

TTHomeTexas Templars

7–8Final

Away · CHAChampaign Champagne

Feb 20, 2024 · Open Division · The Holy Land

MVP Acidic · 8.1 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Texas TemplarsvsChampaign Champagne

15Shots1227

19Saves118

9Faceoffs won9

12Takeaways111

11Turnovers↓112

4Blocks40

39Passes544

1:56Possession0:111:45

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Texas Templars

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Acidic	1	3	4	5	15	4	6	4	1	1	8	0:33	214	7.51	7.45
Peebis	2	2	4	4	3	2	1	7	2	2	14	1:02	153	6.37	7.74
cham seas	4	0	4	6	1	3	2	1	8	1	17	0:21	78	6.28	4.73

Champaign Champagne

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Richard Tantrum	0	1	1	6	7	2	3	5	6	16	0:42	105	3.88	6.99
Square	6	0	6	11	1	5	2	1	1	12	0:28	129	6.24	4.04
woah	2	1	3	10	0	2	4	5	5	16	0:35	89	4.88	4.90

Acidic Texas Templars

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR8.1

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	1.82	1.95	0.23	-0.42	-0.097
Assists	3	1.2	1.3	0.19	1.38	0.262
Shots	5	4.04	3.81	0.09	0.251	0.023
Passes	8	13.29	7.21	0.08	-0.734	-0.059
Saves	15	2.21	2.79	0.19	4.578	0.87
Blocks	1	0.81	1.07	0.11	0.177	0.02
Takeaways	4	2.94	2.57	0.11	0.412	0.045

6.0 + clip(Σ 1.064 × 2, −3 to 3) = 8.128, then +0.35 saves, −0.2 cold shooting, −0.2 goals against → 8.1

Pucker+214

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3.5	2.939	1.191	0.32	0.381
Shots	5	4.042	1.237	0.08	0.099
Saves	15	2.214	6.775	0.15	1.016
Blocks	1	0.811	1.233	0.07	0.086
Takeaways	4	2.943	1.359	0.12	0.163
Passes	8	13.294	0.602	0.08	0.048
Faceoff win rate	0.4	0.501	0.798	0.03	0.024

Σ 1.818 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 2.139 → ×100 = 213.86 → 214

Offensive7.51

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.121	0.101	0.4	2.72
Shooting %	0.2	0.45	0.2	0.796
Assists per pass	0.375	0.091	0.4	3.994

Σ contribution = 7.511

Defensive7.45

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	15	2.214	10	0.3	3
Blocks	1	0.811	6.916	0.2	1.383
Takeaways	4	2.943	7.378	0.25	1.845
Goals conceded	8	5.751	4.904	0.25	1.226

Σ contribution = 7.454

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Peebis Texas Templars

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.8

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	1.82	1.95	0.23	0.093	0.021
Assists	2	1.2	1.3	0.19	0.612	0.116
Shots	4	4.04	3.81	0.09	-0.011	-0.001
Passes	14	13.29	7.21	0.08	0.098	0.008
Saves	3	2.21	2.79	0.19	0.281	0.053
Blocks	2	0.81	1.07	0.11	1.115	0.123
Takeaways	7	2.94	2.57	0.11	1.581	0.174

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.495 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.989, then −0.2 goals against → 6.8

Pucker+153

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4	2.939	1.361	0.32	0.436
Shots	4	4.042	0.99	0.08	0.079
Saves	3	2.214	1.355	0.15	0.203
Blocks	2	0.811	2.466	0.07	0.173
Takeaways	7	2.943	2.379	0.12	0.285
Passes	14	13.294	1.053	0.08	0.084
Faceoff win rate	0.667	0.501	1.329	0.03	0.04

Σ 1.3 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.53 → ×100 = 152.96 → 153

Offensive6.37

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.065	0.101	0.4	1.848
Shooting %	0.5	0.45	0.2	1.289
Assists per pass	0.143	0.091	0.4	3.233

Σ contribution = 6.37

Defensive7.74

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	3	2.214	7.363	0.3	2.209
Blocks	2	0.811	9.595	0.2	1.919
Takeaways	7	2.943	9.523	0.25	2.381
Goals conceded	8	5.751	4.904	0.25	1.226

Σ contribution = 7.735

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

cham seas Texas Templars

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.8

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	4	1.82	1.95	0.23	1.119	0.257
Assists	0	1.2	1.3	0.19	-0.925	-0.176
Shots	6	4.04	3.81	0.09	0.514	0.046
Passes	17	13.29	7.21	0.08	0.514	0.041
Saves	1	2.21	2.79	0.19	-0.435	-0.083
Blocks	1	0.81	1.07	0.11	0.177	0.02
Takeaways	1	2.94	2.57	0.11	-0.757	-0.083

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.023 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.045, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 goals against → 5.8

Pucker+78

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4	2.939	1.361	0.32	0.436
Shots	6	4.042	1.484	0.08	0.119
Saves	1	2.214	0.452	0.15	0.068
Blocks	1	0.811	1.233	0.07	0.086
Takeaways	1	2.943	0.34	0.12	0.041
Passes	17	13.294	1.279	0.08	0.102
Faceoff win rate	0.6	0.501	1.197	0.03	0.036

Σ 0.887 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.044 − 0.26 turnover penalty = 0.784 → ×100 = 78.44 → 78

Offensive6.28

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.19	0.101	0.4	3.538
Shooting %	0.667	0.45	0.2	1.558
Assists per pass	0	0.091	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 6.278

Defensive4.73

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.214	4.003	0.3	1.201
Blocks	1	0.811	6.916	0.2	1.383
Takeaways	1	2.943	3.686	0.25	0.922
Goals conceded	8	5.751	4.904	0.25	1.226

Σ contribution = 4.732

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Richard Tantrum Champaign Champagne

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.2

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	1.82	1.95	0.23	-0.933	-0.215
Assists	1	1.2	1.3	0.19	-0.157	-0.03
Shots	6	4.04	3.81	0.09	0.514	0.046
Passes	16	13.29	7.21	0.08	0.376	0.03
Saves	7	2.21	2.79	0.19	1.714	0.326
Blocks	0	0.81	1.07	0.11	-0.761	-0.084
Takeaways	5	2.94	2.57	0.11	0.802	0.088

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.162 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.324, then +0.35 saves, −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting → 6.2

Pucker+105

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1	2.939	0.34	0.32	0.109
Shots	6	4.042	1.484	0.08	0.119
Saves	7	2.214	3.162	0.15	0.474
Blocks	0	0.811	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	5	2.943	1.699	0.12	0.204
Passes	16	13.294	1.204	0.08	0.096
Faceoff win rate	0.4	0.501	0.798	0.03	0.024

Σ 1.026 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.207 − 0.157 turnover penalty = 1.05 → ×100 = 104.99 → 105

Offensive3.88

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.024	0.101	0.4	1.371
Shooting %	0	0.45	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.062	0.091	0.4	1.919

Σ contribution = 3.881

Defensive6.99

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	7	2.214	9.895	0.3	2.969
Blocks	0	0.811	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	5	2.943	8.415	0.25	2.104
Goals conceded	7	5.751	5.294	0.25	1.323

Σ contribution = 6.987

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Square Champaign Champagne

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.9

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	6	1.82	1.95	0.23	2.145	0.493
Assists	0	1.2	1.3	0.19	-0.925	-0.176
Shots	11	4.04	3.81	0.09	1.825	0.164
Passes	12	13.29	7.21	0.08	-0.179	-0.014
Saves	1	2.21	2.79	0.19	-0.435	-0.083
Blocks	0	0.81	1.07	0.11	-0.761	-0.084
Takeaways	1	2.94	2.57	0.11	-0.757	-0.083

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.218 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.436, then +0.5 hat trick → 6.9

Pucker+129

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	6	2.939	2.041	0.32	0.653
Shots	11	4.042	2.721	0.08	0.218
Saves	1	2.214	0.452	0.15	0.068
Blocks	0	0.811	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	1	2.943	0.34	0.12	0.041
Passes	12	13.294	0.903	0.08	0.072
Faceoff win rate	0.714	0.501	1.424	0.03	0.043

Σ 1.094 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.288 → ×100 = 128.76 → 129

Offensive6.24

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.214	0.101	0.4	3.696
Shooting %	0.545	0.45	0.2	1.367
Assists per pass	0	0.091	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 6.245

Defensive4.04

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.214	4.003	0.3	1.201
Blocks	0	0.811	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	1	2.943	3.686	0.25	0.922
Goals conceded	7	5.751	5.294	0.25	1.323

Σ contribution = 4.037

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

woah Champaign Champagne

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.8

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	1.82	1.95	0.23	0.093	0.021
Assists	1	1.2	1.3	0.19	-0.157	-0.03
Shots	10	4.04	3.81	0.09	1.563	0.141
Passes	16	13.29	7.21	0.08	0.376	0.03
Saves	0	2.21	2.79	0.19	-0.793	-0.151
Blocks	0	0.81	1.07	0.11	-0.761	-0.084
Takeaways	5	2.94	2.57	0.11	0.802	0.088

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.016 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.033, then −0.2 cold shooting → 5.8

Pucker+89

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3	2.939	1.021	0.32	0.327
Shots	10	4.042	2.474	0.08	0.198
Saves	0	2.214	0	0.15	0
Blocks	0	0.811	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	5	2.943	1.699	0.12	0.204
Passes	16	13.294	1.204	0.08	0.096
Faceoff win rate	0.333	0.501	0.665	0.03	0.02

Σ 0.845 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.994 − 0.106 turnover penalty = 0.888 → ×100 = 88.78 → 89

Offensive4.88

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.086	0.101	0.4	2.163
Shooting %	0.2	0.45	0.2	0.796
Assists per pass	0.062	0.091	0.4	1.919

Σ contribution = 4.878

Defensive4.90

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.214	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	0	0.811	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	5	2.943	8.415	0.25	2.104
Goals conceded	7	5.751	5.294	0.25	1.323

Σ contribution = 4.904

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.