Richmond Rangers vs Death Valley Tuskan Raiders

RRHomeRichmond Rangers

7–2Final

DVAwayDeath Valley Tuskan Raiders

Nov 2, 2023 · Open Division · The Desert Oaisis

MVP [CHA] Tridoxity · 7.8 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Richmond RangersvsDeath Valley Tuskan Raiders

13Shots310

8Saves26

5Faceoffs won16

22Takeaways166

6Turnovers↓1622

2Blocks11

46Passes739

2:59Possession1:581:01

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Richmond Rangers

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
[BCB] ghostiee	1	5	6	5	3	2	2	2	1	0	24	0:44	147	8.10	6.30
[CHA] Tridoxity	4	1	5	6	0	2	2	15	3	0	14	1:15	173	6.08	6.24
[RM] zNashty	2	1	3	2	5	1	2	5	2	2	8	1:00	143	7.07	9.14

Death Valley Tuskan Raiders

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
[CTH] DarthTaksil	1	1	2	6	2	2	0	3	7	0	17	0:27	73	5.12	5.10
[DVTR] Bham8	0	0	0	1	3	2	3	1	7	0	5	0:16	17	2.95	5.03
[JCG] Orange	1	1	2	3	1	2	2	2	8	1	17	0:18	54	6.09	5.08

ghostiee Richmond Rangers

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR7.5

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	1.61	1.65	0.23	-0.372	-0.086
Assists	5	1.02	1.23	0.19	3.241	0.616
Shots	5	3.77	3.09	0.09	0.399	0.036
Passes	24	13.76	6.77	0.08	1.513	0.121
Saves	3	2.15	2.42	0.19	0.351	0.067
Blocks	0	0.79	1.01	0.11	-0.782	-0.086
Takeaways	2	2.92	2.79	0.11	-0.33	-0.036

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.632 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.263, then +0.4 playmaker, −0.2 cold shooting → 7.5

Pucker+147

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	5.5	2.585	2.127	0.32	0.681
Shots	5	3.765	1.328	0.08	0.106
Saves	3	2.151	1.395	0.15	0.209
Blocks	0	0.791	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	2	2.92	0.685	0.12	0.082
Passes	24	13.759	1.744	0.08	0.14
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.5	1	0.03	0.03

Σ 1.248 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.468 → ×100 = 146.82 → 147

Offensive8.10

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.136	0.08	0.4	3.371
Shooting %	0.2	0.429	0.2	0.81
Assists per pass	0.208	0.074	0.4	3.915

Σ contribution = 8.096

Defensive6.30

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	3	2.151	7.501	0.3	2.25
Blocks	0	0.791	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	2	2.92	4.78	0.25	1.195
Goals conceded	2	5.341	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 6.298

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Tridoxity Richmond Rangers

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR7.8

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	4	1.61	1.65	0.23	1.446	0.333
Assists	1	1.02	1.23	0.19	-0.018	-0.003
Shots	6	3.77	3.09	0.09	0.723	0.065
Passes	14	13.76	6.77	0.08	0.036	0.003
Saves	0	2.15	2.42	0.19	-0.889	-0.169
Blocks	0	0.79	1.01	0.11	-0.782	-0.086
Takeaways	15	2.92	2.79	0.11	4.335	0.477

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.619 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.238, then +0.3 takeaways, +0.25 hot shooting → 7.8

Pucker+173

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	5	2.585	1.934	0.32	0.619
Shots	6	3.765	1.594	0.08	0.127
Saves	0	2.151	0	0.15	0
Blocks	0	0.791	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	15	2.92	5.138	0.12	0.617
Passes	14	13.759	1.018	0.08	0.081
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.5	1	0.03	0.03

Σ 1.474 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.734 − 0.004 turnover penalty = 1.73 → ×100 = 173 → 173

Offensive6.08

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.067	0.08	0.4	2.135
Shooting %	0.667	0.429	0.2	1.603
Assists per pass	0.071	0.074	0.4	2.338

Σ contribution = 6.077

Defensive6.24

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.151	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	0	0.791	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	15	2.92	9.998	0.25	2.499
Goals conceded	2	5.341	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 6.238

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

zNashty Richmond Rangers

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR7.0

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	1.61	1.65	0.23	0.234	0.054
Assists	1	1.02	1.23	0.19	-0.018	-0.003
Shots	2	3.77	3.09	0.09	-0.571	-0.051
Passes	8	13.76	6.77	0.08	-0.851	-0.068
Saves	5	2.15	2.42	0.19	1.177	0.224
Blocks	2	0.79	1.01	0.11	1.195	0.131
Takeaways	5	2.92	2.79	0.11	0.747	0.082

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.368 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.736, then +0.25 hot shooting → 7.0

Pucker+143

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3	2.585	1.16	0.32	0.371
Shots	2	3.765	0.531	0.08	0.042
Saves	5	2.151	2.324	0.15	0.349
Blocks	2	0.791	2.528	0.07	0.177
Takeaways	5	2.92	1.713	0.12	0.206
Passes	8	13.759	0.581	0.08	0.047
Faceoff win rate	0.333	0.5	0.667	0.03	0.02

Σ 1.212 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.425 → ×100 = 142.53 → 143

Offensive7.07

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.05	0.08	0.4	1.826
Shooting %	1	0.429	0.2	1.896
Assists per pass	0.125	0.074	0.4	3.349

Σ contribution = 7.071

Defensive9.14

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	5	2.151	9.471	0.3	2.841
Blocks	2	0.791	9.641	0.2	1.928
Takeaways	5	2.92	8.449	0.25	2.112
Goals conceded	2	5.341	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 9.143

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

DarthTaksil Death Valley Tuskan Raiders

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.3

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	1.61	1.65	0.23	-0.372	-0.086
Assists	1	1.02	1.23	0.19	-0.018	-0.003
Shots	6	3.77	3.09	0.09	0.723	0.065
Passes	17	13.76	6.77	0.08	0.479	0.038
Saves	2	2.15	2.42	0.19	-0.062	-0.012
Blocks	0	0.79	1.01	0.11	-0.782	-0.086
Takeaways	3	2.92	2.79	0.11	0.029	0.003

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.08 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.839, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting → 5.3

Pucker+73

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2	2.585	0.774	0.32	0.248
Shots	6	3.765	1.594	0.08	0.127
Saves	2	2.151	0.93	0.15	0.139
Blocks	0	0.791	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	3	2.92	1.028	0.12	0.123
Passes	17	13.759	1.236	0.08	0.099
Faceoff win rate	1	0.5	2	0.03	0.06

Σ 0.797 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.937 − 0.21 turnover penalty = 0.727 → ×100 = 72.68 → 73

Offensive5.12

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.074	0.08	0.4	2.281
Shooting %	0.167	0.429	0.2	0.764
Assists per pass	0.059	0.074	0.4	2.071

Σ contribution = 5.116

Defensive5.10

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	2.151	5.719	0.3	1.716
Blocks	0	0.791	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	3	2.92	6.11	0.25	1.528
Goals conceded	7	5.341	5.069	0.25	1.267

Σ contribution = 5.102

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Bham8 Death Valley Tuskan Raiders

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.2

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	1.61	1.65	0.23	-0.978	-0.225
Assists	0	1.02	1.23	0.19	-0.833	-0.158
Shots	1	3.77	3.09	0.09	-0.895	-0.081
Passes	5	13.76	6.77	0.08	-1.294	-0.104
Saves	3	2.15	2.42	0.19	0.351	0.067
Blocks	0	0.79	1.01	0.11	-0.782	-0.086
Takeaways	1	2.92	2.79	0.11	-0.689	-0.076

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.663 × 2, −3 to 3) = 4.675, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting → 4.2

Pucker+17

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	0	2.585	0	0.32	0
Shots	1	3.765	0.266	0.08	0.021
Saves	3	2.151	1.395	0.15	0.209
Blocks	0	0.791	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	1	2.92	0.343	0.12	0.041
Passes	5	13.759	0.363	0.08	0.029
Faceoff win rate	0.4	0.5	0.8	0.03	0.024

Σ 0.325 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.382 − 0.21 turnover penalty = 0.172 → ×100 = 17.15 → 17

Offensive2.95

Rate	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.08	0.4	1.181
Shooting %	0.429	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.074	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 2.954

Defensive5.03

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	3	2.151	7.501	0.3	2.25
Blocks	0	0.791	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	1	2.92	3.693	0.25	0.923
Goals conceded	7	5.341	5.069	0.25	1.267

Σ contribution = 5.031

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Orange Death Valley Tuskan Raiders

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.1

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	1.61	1.65	0.23	-0.372	-0.086
Assists	1	1.02	1.23	0.19	-0.018	-0.003
Shots	3	3.77	3.09	0.09	-0.248	-0.022
Passes	17	13.76	6.77	0.08	0.479	0.038
Saves	1	2.15	2.42	0.19	-0.476	-0.09
Blocks	1	0.79	1.01	0.11	0.207	0.023
Takeaways	2	2.92	2.79	0.11	-0.33	-0.036

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.177 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.646, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting → 5.1

Pucker+54

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2	2.585	0.774	0.32	0.248
Shots	3	3.765	0.797	0.08	0.064
Saves	1	2.151	0.465	0.15	0.07
Blocks	1	0.791	1.264	0.07	0.088
Takeaways	2	2.92	0.685	0.12	0.082
Passes	17	13.759	1.236	0.08	0.099
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.5	1	0.03	0.03

Σ 0.681 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.801 − 0.262 turnover penalty = 0.539 → ×100 = 53.88 → 54

Offensive6.09

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.111	0.08	0.4	2.992
Shooting %	0.333	0.429	0.2	1.025
Assists per pass	0.059	0.074	0.4	2.071

Σ contribution = 6.088

Defensive5.08

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.151	4.043	0.3	1.213
Blocks	1	0.791	7.033	0.2	1.407
Takeaways	2	2.92	4.78	0.25	1.195
Goals conceded	7	5.341	5.069	0.25	1.267

Σ contribution = 5.082

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.