Kentucky Fried Chickens vs Minnesota Moose

KFHomeKentucky Fried Chickens

6–9Final

MMAwayMinnesota Moose

Oct 21, 2023 · Open Division · Colonel Sanders Kitchen

MVP conpeylil · 9.2 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Kentucky Fried ChickensvsMinnesota Moose

8Shots715

6Saves42

7Faceoffs won411

8Takeaways19

9Turnovers↓18

1Blocks34

25Passes6893

1:07Possession3:014:08

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Kentucky Fried Chickens

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Mr.Malcolm	3	0	3	4	2	1	6	4	3	0	9	0:26	96	0.99	0.82
Im Terrible	2	0	2	3	4	2	3	2	4	1	10	0:27	94	0.77	1.09
Prizz	1	1	2	1	0	4	2	2	2	0	6	0:14	50	1.77	0.45

Minnesota Moose

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Een	2	4	6	3	1	1	1	1	1	1	32	1:06	144	1.39	0.73
kale	1	4	5	3	0	6	2	3	3	0	27	1:30	111	1.14	0.60
conpeylil	6	1	7	9	1	4	4	5	4	3	34	1:32	209	0.87	1.18

Mr.Malcolm Kentucky Fried Chickens

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.9

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	1.61	1.65	0.23	0.84	0.193
Assists	0	1.02	1.23	0.19	-0.833	-0.158
Shots	4	3.77	3.09	0.09	0.076	0.007
Passes	9	13.76	6.77	0.08	-0.703	-0.056
Saves	2	2.15	2.42	0.19	-0.062	-0.012
Blocks	0	0.79	1.01	0.11	-0.782	-0.086
Takeaways	4	2.92	2.79	0.11	0.388	0.043

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.07 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.861, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.2 goals against → 5.9

Pucker+96

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3	2.585	1.16	0.32	0.371
Shots	4	3.765	1.062	0.08	0.085
Saves	2	2.151	0.93	0.15	0.139
Blocks	0	0.791	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	4	2.92	1.37	0.12	0.164
Passes	9	13.759	0.654	0.08	0.052
Faceoff win rate	0.143	0.5	0.286	0.03	0.009

Σ 0.821 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.966 − 0.004 turnover penalty = 0.962 → ×100 = 96.15 → 96

Offensive0.99

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.115	0.08	0.4	0.566
Shooting %	0.75	0.429	0.2	0.327
Assists per pass	0	0.074	0.4	0.095

Σ contribution = 0.988

Defensive0.82

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	2.151	0.93	0.3	0.279
Blocks	0	0.791	0.238	0.2	0.048
Takeaways	4	2.92	1.354	0.25	0.339
Goals conceded	9	5.341	0.614	0.25	0.154

Σ contribution = 0.82

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Im Terrible Kentucky Fried Chickens

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.0

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	1.61	1.65	0.23	0.234	0.054
Assists	0	1.02	1.23	0.19	-0.833	-0.158
Shots	3	3.77	3.09	0.09	-0.248	-0.022
Passes	10	13.76	6.77	0.08	-0.555	-0.044
Saves	4	2.15	2.42	0.19	0.764	0.145
Blocks	1	0.79	1.01	0.11	0.207	0.023
Takeaways	2	2.92	2.79	0.11	-0.33	-0.036

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.04 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.921, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.2 goals against → 6.0

Pucker+94

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2	2.585	0.774	0.32	0.248
Shots	3	3.765	0.797	0.08	0.064
Saves	4	2.151	1.859	0.15	0.279
Blocks	1	0.791	1.264	0.07	0.088
Takeaways	2	2.92	0.685	0.12	0.082
Passes	10	13.759	0.727	0.08	0.058
Faceoff win rate	0.4	0.5	0.8	0.03	0.024

Σ 0.843 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.992 − 0.056 turnover penalty = 0.936 → ×100 = 93.59 → 94

Offensive0.77

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.074	0.08	0.4	0.37
Shooting %	0.667	0.429	0.2	0.301
Assists per pass	0	0.074	0.4	0.095

Σ contribution = 0.766

Defensive1.09

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	4	2.151	1.696	0.3	0.509
Blocks	1	0.791	1.258	0.2	0.252
Takeaways	2	2.92	0.695	0.25	0.174
Goals conceded	9	5.341	0.614	0.25	0.154

Σ contribution = 1.089

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Prizz Kentucky Fried Chickens

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.9

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	1.61	1.65	0.23	-0.372	-0.086
Assists	1	1.02	1.23	0.19	-0.018	-0.003
Shots	1	3.77	3.09	0.09	-0.895	-0.081
Passes	6	13.76	6.77	0.08	-1.146	-0.092
Saves	0	2.15	2.42	0.19	-0.889	-0.169
Blocks	0	0.79	1.01	0.11	-0.782	-0.086
Takeaways	2	2.92	2.79	0.11	-0.33	-0.036

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.552 × 2, −3 to 3) = 4.895, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.2 goals against → 4.9

Pucker+50

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2	2.585	0.774	0.32	0.248
Shots	1	3.765	0.266	0.08	0.021
Saves	0	2.151	0	0.15	0
Blocks	0	0.791	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	2	2.92	0.685	0.12	0.082
Passes	6	13.759	0.436	0.08	0.035
Faceoff win rate	0.667	0.5	1.333	0.03	0.04

Σ 0.426 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.501 → ×100 = 50.11 → 50

Offensive1.77

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.143	0.08	0.4	0.662
Shooting %	1	0.429	0.2	0.374
Assists per pass	0.167	0.074	0.4	0.739

Σ contribution = 1.775

Defensive0.45

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.151	0.238	0.3	0.072
Blocks	0	0.791	0.238	0.2	0.048
Takeaways	2	2.92	0.695	0.25	0.174
Goals conceded	9	5.341	0.614	0.25	0.154

Σ contribution = 0.448

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Een Minnesota Moose

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR7.4

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	1.61	1.65	0.23	0.234	0.054
Assists	4	1.02	1.23	0.19	2.426	0.461
Shots	3	3.77	3.09	0.09	-0.248	-0.022
Passes	32	13.76	6.77	0.08	2.695	0.216
Saves	1	2.15	2.42	0.19	-0.476	-0.09
Blocks	1	0.79	1.01	0.11	0.207	0.023
Takeaways	1	2.92	2.79	0.11	-0.689	-0.076

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.565 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.129, then +0.25 hot shooting → 7.4

Pucker+144

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	6	2.585	2.321	0.32	0.743
Shots	3	3.765	0.797	0.08	0.064
Saves	1	2.151	0.465	0.15	0.07
Blocks	1	0.791	1.264	0.07	0.088
Takeaways	1	2.92	0.343	0.12	0.041
Passes	32	13.759	2.326	0.08	0.186
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.5	1	0.03	0.03

Σ 1.222 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.437 → ×100 = 143.74 → 144

Offensive1.39

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.091	0.08	0.4	0.454
Shooting %	0.667	0.429	0.2	0.301
Assists per pass	0.125	0.074	0.4	0.637

Σ contribution = 1.392

Defensive0.73

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.151	0.511	0.3	0.153
Blocks	1	0.791	1.258	0.2	0.252
Takeaways	1	2.92	0.423	0.25	0.106
Goals conceded	6	5.341	0.891	0.25	0.223

Σ contribution = 0.734

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

kale Minnesota Moose

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.3

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	1.61	1.65	0.23	-0.372	-0.086
Assists	4	1.02	1.23	0.19	2.426	0.461
Shots	3	3.77	3.09	0.09	-0.248	-0.022
Passes	27	13.76	6.77	0.08	1.956	0.157
Saves	0	2.15	2.42	0.19	-0.889	-0.169
Blocks	0	0.79	1.01	0.11	-0.782	-0.086
Takeaways	3	2.92	2.79	0.11	0.029	0.003

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.258 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.516, then −0.2 cold shooting → 6.3

Pucker+111

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4.5	2.585	1.741	0.32	0.557
Shots	3	3.765	0.797	0.08	0.064
Saves	0	2.151	0	0.15	0
Blocks	0	0.791	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	3	2.92	1.028	0.12	0.123
Passes	27	13.759	1.962	0.08	0.157
Faceoff win rate	0.75	0.5	1.5	0.03	0.045

Σ 0.946 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.113 − 0.004 turnover penalty = 1.109 → ×100 = 110.85 → 111

Offensive1.14

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.056	0.08	0.4	0.281
Shooting %	0.333	0.429	0.2	0.156
Assists per pass	0.148	0.074	0.4	0.704

Σ contribution = 1.141

Defensive0.60

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.151	0.238	0.3	0.072
Blocks	0	0.791	0.238	0.2	0.048
Takeaways	3	2.92	1.028	0.25	0.257
Goals conceded	6	5.341	0.891	0.25	0.223

Σ contribution = 0.6

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

conpeylil Minnesota Moose

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR9.2

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	6	1.61	1.65	0.23	2.659	0.611
Assists	1	1.02	1.23	0.19	-0.018	-0.003
Shots	9	3.77	3.09	0.09	1.694	0.152
Passes	34	13.76	6.77	0.08	2.991	0.239
Saves	1	2.15	2.42	0.19	-0.476	-0.09
Blocks	3	0.79	1.01	0.11	2.183	0.24
Takeaways	5	2.92	2.79	0.11	0.747	0.082

6.0 + clip(Σ 1.232 × 2, −3 to 3) = 8.463, then +0.5 hat trick, +0.25 hot shooting → 9.2

Pucker+209

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	7	2.585	2.708	0.32	0.866
Shots	9	3.765	2.39	0.08	0.191
Saves	1	2.151	0.465	0.15	0.07
Blocks	3	0.791	3.793	0.07	0.265
Takeaways	5	2.92	1.713	0.12	0.206
Passes	34	13.759	2.471	0.08	0.198
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.5	1	0.03	0.03

Σ 1.826 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 2.148 − 0.056 turnover penalty = 2.092 → ×100 = 209.24 → 209

Offensive0.87

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.076	0.08	0.4	0.38
Shooting %	0.667	0.429	0.2	0.301
Assists per pass	0.029	0.074	0.4	0.184

Σ contribution = 0.865

Defensive1.18

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.151	0.511	0.3	0.153
Blocks	3	0.791	1.993	0.2	0.399
Takeaways	5	2.92	1.612	0.25	0.403
Goals conceded	6	5.341	0.891	0.25	0.223

Σ contribution = 1.178

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.