Plymouth Plaggers vs Montana Mega Moose

PPHomePlymouth Plaggers

7–1Final

MMAwayMontana Mega Moose

Aug 13, 2023 · 6v6 Major League · East Bethel Garden

MVP [ORL] Mace · 8.0 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Plymouth PlaggersvsMontana Mega Moose

14Shots77

6Saves17

6Faceoffs won24

16Takeaways214

14Turnovers↓216

0Blocks33

114Passes6450

2:41Possession1:241:17

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Plymouth Plaggers

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
[CLP] Panarin	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	9	0:13	14	2.95	4.48
[MIA] Kylar	0	1	1	0	0	2	0	5	2	24	0:37	72	4.20	6.05
[MIA] Rodeo	3	1	4	8	1	0	1	0	2	13	0:13	213	8.31	5.40
[MIA] kyler	1	2	3	2	3	0	2	4	5	27	0:55	195	6.65	7.92
[ORL] Mace	3	1	4	4	0	1	1	4	1	20	0:18	203	8.12	5.85
[PIT] Enry	0	4	4	0	2	2	0	3	4	21	0:25	185	8.41	7.35

Montana Mega Moose

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
[BOAT] Pediatric Patrick	1	0	1	1	0	1	2	2	1	0	6	0:05	59	7.09	3.83
[BPH] Meekrs	0	0	0	3	5	1	1	5	7	2	8	0:39	172	2.95	8.31
[CHA/BOIS] PoppaNut	0	1	1	2	0	0	2	1	1	0	10	0:09	60	7.48	3.46
[OVPD] dave	0	0	0	1	1	1	1	1	4	1	9	0:02	57	2.95	5.78
[OVSS] Jaws	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	1	1	0	8	0:04	19	2.95	3.46
[SEA] AmericanHockeyP1ayer	0	1	1	0	1	0	0	4	2	0	9	0:18	66	6.42	5.51

Panarin Plymouth Plaggers

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.7

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	0.54	0.85	0.23	-0.635	-0.146
Assists	0	0.67	1	0.19	-0.674	-0.128
Shots	0	1.54	1.98	0.09	-0.777	-0.07
Passes	9	12.5	6.34	0.08	-0.552	-0.044
Saves	0	0.99	1.98	0.19	-0.502	-0.095
Blocks	0	0.29	0.66	0.11	-0.45	-0.049
Takeaways	0	2.34	2.25	0.11	-1.042	-0.115

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.648 × 2, −3 to 3) = 4.704, nothing hit the bonus or penalty thresholds → 4.7

Pucker+14

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	0	1.106	0	0.32	0
Shots	0	1.54	0	0.08	0
Saves	0	0.992	0	0.15	0
Blocks	0	0.295	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	0	2.342	0	0.12	0
Passes	9	12.496	0.72	0.08	0.058
Faceoff win rate	1	0.505	1.98	0.03	0.059

Σ 0.117 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.138 → ×100 = 13.77 → 14

Offensive2.95

Rate	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.065	0.4	1.181
Shooting %	0.349	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.054	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 2.954

Defensive4.48

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	0.992	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	0	0.295	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	0	2.342	2.954	0.25	0.738
Goals conceded	1	3.179	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 4.477

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Kylar Plymouth Plaggers

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.0

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	0.54	0.85	0.23	-0.635	-0.146
Assists	1	0.67	1	0.19	0.33	0.063
Shots	0	1.54	1.98	0.09	-0.777	-0.07
Passes	24	12.5	6.34	0.08	1.815	0.145
Saves	0	0.99	1.98	0.19	-0.502	-0.095
Blocks	0	0.29	0.66	0.11	-0.45	-0.049
Takeaways	5	2.34	2.25	0.11	1.183	0.13

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.023 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.954, nothing hit the bonus or penalty thresholds → 6.0

Pucker+72

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	0.5	1.106	0.452	0.32	0.145
Shots	0	1.54	0	0.08	0
Saves	0	0.992	0	0.15	0
Blocks	0	0.295	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	5	2.342	2.135	0.12	0.256
Passes	24	12.496	1.921	0.08	0.154
Faceoff win rate	1	0.505	1.98	0.03	0.059

Σ 0.614 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.722 → ×100 = 72.23 → 72

Offensive4.20

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.027	0.065	0.4	1.557
Shooting %	0	0.349	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.042	0.054	0.4	2.047

Σ contribution = 4.195

Defensive6.05

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	0.992	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	0	0.295	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	5	2.342	9.251	0.25	2.313
Goals conceded	1	3.179	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 6.052

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Rodeo Plymouth Plaggers

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR7.5

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	0.54	0.85	0.23	2.906	0.668
Assists	1	0.67	1	0.19	0.33	0.063
Shots	8	1.54	1.98	0.09	3.259	0.293
Passes	13	12.5	6.34	0.08	0.079	0.006
Saves	1	0.99	1.98	0.19	0.004	0.001
Blocks	0	0.29	0.66	0.11	-0.45	-0.049
Takeaways	0	2.34	2.25	0.11	-1.042	-0.115

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.868 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.735, then −0.2 cold shooting → 7.5

Pucker+213

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4	1.106	3.618	0.32	1.158
Shots	8	1.54	5.195	0.08	0.416
Saves	1	0.992	1.008	0.15	0.151
Blocks	0	0.295	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	0	2.342	0	0.12	0
Passes	13	12.496	1.04	0.08	0.083
Faceoff win rate	0	0.505	0	0.03	0

Σ 1.808 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 2.127 → ×100 = 212.68 → 213

Offensive8.31

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.308	0.065	0.4	3.998
Shooting %	0.375	0.349	0.2	1.259
Assists per pass	0.077	0.054	0.4	3.052

Σ contribution = 8.308

Defensive5.40

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	0.992	6.031	0.3	1.809
Blocks	0	0.295	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	0	2.342	2.954	0.25	0.738
Goals conceded	1	3.179	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 5.4

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

kyler Plymouth Plaggers

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR7.6

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	0.54	0.85	0.23	0.545	0.125
Assists	2	0.67	1	0.19	1.335	0.254
Shots	2	1.54	1.98	0.09	0.232	0.021
Passes	27	12.5	6.34	0.08	2.288	0.183
Saves	3	0.99	1.98	0.19	1.016	0.193
Blocks	0	0.29	0.66	0.11	-0.45	-0.049
Takeaways	4	2.34	2.25	0.11	0.738	0.081

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.808 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.616, nothing hit the bonus or penalty thresholds → 7.6

Pucker+195

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3	1.106	2.714	0.32	0.868
Shots	2	1.54	1.299	0.08	0.104
Saves	3	0.992	3.023	0.15	0.453
Blocks	0	0.295	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	4	2.342	1.708	0.12	0.205
Passes	27	12.496	2.161	0.08	0.173
Faceoff win rate	0	0.505	0	0.03	0

Σ 1.804 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 2.122 − 0.175 turnover penalty = 1.947 → ×100 = 194.71 → 195

Offensive6.65

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.055	0.065	0.4	2.141
Shooting %	0.5	0.349	0.2	1.525
Assists per pass	0.074	0.054	0.4	2.979

Σ contribution = 6.645

Defensive7.92

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	3	0.992	9.862	0.3	2.959
Blocks	0	0.295	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	4	2.342	8.437	0.25	2.109
Goals conceded	1	3.179	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 7.921

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Mace Plymouth Plaggers

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR8.0

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	0.54	0.85	0.23	2.906	0.668
Assists	1	0.67	1	0.19	0.33	0.063
Shots	4	1.54	1.98	0.09	1.241	0.112
Passes	20	12.5	6.34	0.08	1.184	0.095
Saves	0	0.99	1.98	0.19	-0.502	-0.095
Blocks	0	0.29	0.66	0.11	-0.45	-0.049
Takeaways	4	2.34	2.25	0.11	0.738	0.081

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.874 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.748, then +0.25 hot shooting → 8.0

Pucker+203

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4	1.106	3.618	0.32	1.158
Shots	4	1.54	2.598	0.08	0.208
Saves	0	0.992	0	0.15	0
Blocks	0	0.295	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	4	2.342	1.708	0.12	0.205
Passes	20	12.496	1.6	0.08	0.128
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.505	0.99	0.03	0.03

Σ 1.728 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 2.033 → ×100 = 203.33 → 203

Offensive8.12

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.222	0.065	0.4	3.974
Shooting %	0.75	0.349	0.2	1.853
Assists per pass	0.05	0.054	0.4	2.29

Σ contribution = 8.117

Defensive5.85

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	0.992	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	0	0.295	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	4	2.342	8.437	0.25	2.109
Goals conceded	1	3.179	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 5.848

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Enry Plymouth Plaggers

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR7.2

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	0.54	0.85	0.23	-0.635	-0.146
Assists	4	0.67	1	0.19	3.345	0.635
Shots	0	1.54	1.98	0.09	-0.777	-0.07
Passes	21	12.5	6.34	0.08	1.341	0.107
Saves	2	0.99	1.98	0.19	0.51	0.097
Blocks	0	0.29	0.66	0.11	-0.45	-0.049
Takeaways	3	2.34	2.25	0.11	0.293	0.032

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.606 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.213, nothing hit the bonus or penalty thresholds → 7.2

Pucker+185

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3.5	1.106	3.166	0.32	1.013
Shots	0	1.54	0	0.08	0
Saves	2	0.992	2.015	0.15	0.302
Blocks	0	0.295	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	3	2.342	1.281	0.12	0.154
Passes	21	12.496	1.681	0.08	0.134
Faceoff win rate	1	0.505	1.98	0.03	0.059

Σ 1.663 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.956 − 0.11 turnover penalty = 1.846 → ×100 = 184.66 → 185

Offensive8.41

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.16	0.065	0.4	3.834
Shooting %	0	0.349	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.19	0.054	0.4	3.981

Σ contribution = 8.406

Defensive7.35

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	0.992	9.072	0.3	2.722
Blocks	0	0.295	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	3	2.342	7.095	0.25	1.774
Goals conceded	1	3.179	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 7.349

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Pediatric Patrick Montana Mega Moose

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.7

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	0.54	0.85	0.23	0.545	0.125
Assists	0	0.67	1	0.19	-0.674	-0.128
Shots	1	1.54	1.98	0.09	-0.272	-0.025
Passes	6	12.5	6.34	0.08	-1.025	-0.082
Saves	0	0.99	1.98	0.19	-0.502	-0.095
Blocks	0	0.29	0.66	0.11	-0.45	-0.049
Takeaways	2	2.34	2.25	0.11	-0.152	-0.017

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.271 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.458, then +0.25 hot shooting → 5.7

Pucker+59

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1	1.106	0.905	0.32	0.289
Shots	1	1.54	0.649	0.08	0.052
Saves	0	0.992	0	0.15	0
Blocks	0	0.295	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	2	2.342	0.854	0.12	0.102
Passes	6	12.496	0.48	0.08	0.038
Faceoff win rate	0.333	0.505	0.66	0.03	0.02

Σ 0.502 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.591 → ×100 = 59.07 → 59

Offensive7.09

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.2	0.065	0.4	3.95
Shooting %	1	0.349	0.2	1.962
Assists per pass	0	0.054	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 7.093

Defensive3.83

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	0.992	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	0	0.295	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	2	2.342	5.42	0.25	1.355
Goals conceded	7	3.179	4.01	0.25	1.003

Σ contribution = 3.835

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Meekrs Montana Mega Moose

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.6

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	0.54	0.85	0.23	-0.635	-0.146
Assists	0	0.67	1	0.19	-0.674	-0.128
Shots	3	1.54	1.98	0.09	0.737	0.066
Passes	8	12.5	6.34	0.08	-0.709	-0.057
Saves	5	0.99	1.98	0.19	2.029	0.386
Blocks	2	0.29	0.66	0.11	2.603	0.286
Takeaways	5	2.34	2.25	0.11	1.183	0.13

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.537 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.075, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting → 6.6

Pucker+172

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	0	1.106	0	0.32	0
Shots	3	1.54	1.948	0.08	0.156
Saves	5	0.992	5.038	0.15	0.756
Blocks	2	0.295	6.787	0.07	0.475
Takeaways	5	2.342	2.135	0.12	0.256
Passes	8	12.496	0.64	0.08	0.051
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.505	0.99	0.03	0.03

Σ 1.724 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 2.028 − 0.305 turnover penalty = 1.723 → ×100 = 172.34 → 172

Offensive2.95

Rate	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.065	0.4	1.181
Shooting %	0.349	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.054	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 2.954

Defensive8.31

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	5	0.992	9.998	0.3	2.999
Blocks	2	0.295	10	0.2	2
Takeaways	5	2.342	9.251	0.25	2.313
Goals conceded	7	3.179	4.01	0.25	1.003

Σ contribution = 8.315

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

PoppaNut Montana Mega Moose

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.2

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	0.54	0.85	0.23	-0.635	-0.146
Assists	1	0.67	1	0.19	0.33	0.063
Shots	2	1.54	1.98	0.09	0.232	0.021
Passes	10	12.5	6.34	0.08	-0.394	-0.032
Saves	0	0.99	1.98	0.19	-0.502	-0.095
Blocks	0	0.29	0.66	0.11	-0.45	-0.049
Takeaways	1	2.34	2.25	0.11	-0.597	-0.066

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.305 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.391, then −0.2 cold shooting → 5.2

Pucker+60

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1	1.106	0.905	0.32	0.289
Shots	2	1.54	1.299	0.08	0.104
Saves	0	0.992	0	0.15	0
Blocks	0	0.295	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	1	2.342	0.427	0.12	0.051
Passes	10	12.496	0.8	0.08	0.064
Faceoff win rate	0	0.505	0	0.03	0

Σ 0.509 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.598 → ×100 = 59.84 → 60

Offensive7.48

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.111	0.065	0.4	3.371
Shooting %	0	0.349	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.1	0.054	0.4	3.516

Σ contribution = 7.478

Defensive3.46

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	0.992	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	0	0.295	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	1	2.342	3.93	0.25	0.982
Goals conceded	7	3.179	4.01	0.25	1.003

Σ contribution = 3.462

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

dave Montana Mega Moose

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.2

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	0.54	0.85	0.23	-0.635	-0.146
Assists	0	0.67	1	0.19	-0.674	-0.128
Shots	1	1.54	1.98	0.09	-0.272	-0.025
Passes	9	12.5	6.34	0.08	-0.552	-0.044
Saves	1	0.99	1.98	0.19	0.004	0.001
Blocks	1	0.29	0.66	0.11	1.077	0.118
Takeaways	1	2.34	2.25	0.11	-0.597	-0.066

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.289 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.421, then −0.2 cold shooting → 5.2

Pucker+57

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	0	1.106	0	0.32	0
Shots	1	1.54	0.649	0.08	0.052
Saves	1	0.992	1.008	0.15	0.151
Blocks	1	0.295	3.394	0.07	0.238
Takeaways	1	2.342	0.427	0.12	0.051
Passes	9	12.496	0.72	0.08	0.058
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.505	0.99	0.03	0.03

Σ 0.579 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.681 − 0.11 turnover penalty = 0.571 → ×100 = 57.17 → 57

Offensive2.95

Rate	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.065	0.4	1.181
Shooting %	0.349	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.054	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 2.954

Defensive5.78

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	0.992	6.031	0.3	1.809
Blocks	1	0.295	9.934	0.2	1.987
Takeaways	1	2.342	3.93	0.25	0.982
Goals conceded	7	3.179	4.01	0.25	1.003

Σ contribution = 5.781

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Jaws Montana Mega Moose

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.8

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	0.54	0.85	0.23	-0.635	-0.146
Assists	0	0.67	1	0.19	-0.674	-0.128
Shots	0	1.54	1.98	0.09	-0.777	-0.07
Passes	8	12.5	6.34	0.08	-0.709	-0.057
Saves	0	0.99	1.98	0.19	-0.502	-0.095
Blocks	0	0.29	0.66	0.11	-0.45	-0.049
Takeaways	1	2.34	2.25	0.11	-0.597	-0.066

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.612 × 2, −3 to 3) = 4.777, nothing hit the bonus or penalty thresholds → 4.8

Pucker+19

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	0	1.106	0	0.32	0
Shots	0	1.54	0	0.08	0
Saves	0	0.992	0	0.15	0
Blocks	0	0.295	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	1	2.342	0.427	0.12	0.051
Passes	8	12.496	0.64	0.08	0.051
Faceoff win rate	1	0.505	1.98	0.03	0.059

Σ 0.162 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.19 → ×100 = 19.04 → 19

Offensive2.95

Rate	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.065	0.4	1.181
Shooting %	0.349	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.054	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 2.954

Defensive3.46

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	0.992	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	0	0.295	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	1	2.342	3.93	0.25	0.982
Goals conceded	7	3.179	4.01	0.25	1.003

Σ contribution = 3.462

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

AmericanHockeyP1ayer Montana Mega Moose

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.7

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	0.54	0.85	0.23	-0.635	-0.146
Assists	1	0.67	1	0.19	0.33	0.063
Shots	0	1.54	1.98	0.09	-0.777	-0.07
Passes	9	12.5	6.34	0.08	-0.552	-0.044
Saves	1	0.99	1.98	0.19	0.004	0.001
Blocks	0	0.29	0.66	0.11	-0.45	-0.049
Takeaways	4	2.34	2.25	0.11	0.738	0.081

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.165 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.67, nothing hit the bonus or penalty thresholds → 5.7

Pucker+66

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	0.5	1.106	0.452	0.32	0.145
Shots	0	1.54	0	0.08	0
Saves	1	0.992	1.008	0.15	0.151
Blocks	0	0.295	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	4	2.342	1.708	0.12	0.205
Passes	9	12.496	0.72	0.08	0.058
Faceoff win rate	0	0.505	0	0.03	0

Σ 0.558 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.657 → ×100 = 65.7 → 66

Offensive6.42

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.056	0.065	0.4	2.165
Shooting %	0	0.349	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.111	0.054	0.4	3.663

Σ contribution = 6.418

Defensive5.51

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	0.992	6.031	0.3	1.809
Blocks	0	0.295	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	4	2.342	8.437	0.25	2.109
Goals conceded	7	3.179	4.01	0.25	1.003

Σ contribution = 5.512

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.