Colorado Cobras vs Cedar Rapids Cottonmouths

CCHomeColorado Cobras

6–5Final

CRAwayCedar Rapids Cottonmouths

May 9, 2023 · Pro Division · THE DOME DOME

MVP [GTA] Bolty · 6.9 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Perf is a 0 to 10 Alto rating, 6.0 being league average. Click any Perf number to see the working behind it.

Colorado Cobras

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	GWG	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
[COB] Rokybo	2	2	4	8	1	1	3	3	2	0	29	0	0:35	90	5.50	4.88
[COW] Crusade	1	1	2	4	2	0	3	4	3	1	20	1	0:55	77	4.07	6.36
[FF] Bey	3	1	4	6	0	3	3	3	4	0	23	0	0:17	77	6.69	4.59

Cedar Rapids Cottonmouths

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
[CSC] MVM13	2	1	3	3	0	1	0	3	1	0	17	0:17	62	6.82	4.38
[DUD] fueeqo	1	0	1	3	4	2	3	2	5	1	16	0:19	69	3.86	6.56
[GTA] Bolty	2	1	3	2	8	6	1	4	4	1	10	0:43	128	6.32	7.52

Rokybo Colorado Cobras

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

Performance5.7

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	2.07	1.82	0.23	-0.04	-0.009
Assists	2	1.92	1.79	0.19	0.044	0.008
Shots	8	4.45	3.15	0.09	1.125	0.101
Passes	29	20.67	9.24	0.08	0.902	0.072
Saves	1	2.38	2.7	0.19	-0.51	-0.097
Blocks	0	0.81	1	0.11	-0.815	-0.09
Takeaways	3	3.83	2.87	0.11	-0.289	-0.032

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.046 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.908, then −0.2 cold shooting → 5.7

Pucker+90

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4	3.801	1.052	0.32	0.337
Shots	8	4.454	1.796	0.08	0.144
Saves	1	2.379	0.42	0.15	0.063
Blocks	0	0.815	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	3	3.829	0.784	0.12	0.094
Passes	29	20.668	1.403	0.08	0.112
Faceoff win rate	0.25	0.5	0.5	0.03	0.015

Σ 0.765 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.9 → ×100 = 89.97 → 90

Offensive5.50

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.114	0.099	0.4	2.652
Shooting %	0.25	0.465	0.2	0.854
Assists per pass	0.069	0.093	0.4	1.996

Σ contribution = 5.502

Defensive4.88

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.379	3.91	0.3	1.173
Blocks	0	0.815	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	3	3.829	5.147	0.25	1.287
Goals conceded	5	6.686	7.3	0.25	1.825

Σ contribution = 4.876

League average is 6.0 on Performance, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Crusade Colorado Cobras

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

Performance5.3

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	2.07	1.82	0.23	-0.59	-0.136
Assists	1	1.92	1.79	0.19	-0.516	-0.098
Shots	4	4.45	3.15	0.09	-0.144	-0.013
Passes	20	20.67	9.24	0.08	-0.072	-0.006
Saves	2	2.38	2.7	0.19	-0.14	-0.027
Blocks	1	0.81	1	0.11	0.185	0.02
Takeaways	4	3.83	2.87	0.11	0.06	0.007

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.252 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.496, then −0.2 cold shooting → 5.3

Pucker+77

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2	3.801	0.526	0.32	0.168
Shots	4	4.454	0.898	0.08	0.072
Saves	2	2.379	0.841	0.15	0.126
Blocks	1	0.815	1.227	0.07	0.086
Takeaways	4	3.829	1.045	0.12	0.125
Passes	20	20.668	0.968	0.08	0.077
Faceoff win rate	0	0.5	0	0.03	0

Σ 0.655 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.771 → ×100 = 77.06 → 77

Offensive4.07

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.036	0.099	0.4	1.506
Shooting %	0.25	0.465	0.2	0.854
Assists per pass	0.05	0.093	0.4	1.709

Σ contribution = 4.069

Defensive6.36

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	2.379	5.368	0.3	1.611
Blocks	1	0.815	6.895	0.2	1.379
Takeaways	4	3.829	6.179	0.25	1.545
Goals conceded	5	6.686	7.3	0.25	1.825

Σ contribution = 6.36

League average is 6.0 on Performance, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Bey Colorado Cobras

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

Performance5.6

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	2.07	1.82	0.23	0.509	0.117
Assists	1	1.92	1.79	0.19	-0.516	-0.098
Shots	6	4.45	3.15	0.09	0.49	0.044
Passes	23	20.67	9.24	0.08	0.252	0.02
Saves	0	2.38	2.7	0.19	-0.88	-0.167
Blocks	0	0.81	1	0.11	-0.815	-0.09
Takeaways	3	3.83	2.87	0.11	-0.289	-0.032

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.205 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.59, nothing hit the bonus or penalty thresholds → 5.6

Pucker+77

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4	3.801	1.052	0.32	0.337
Shots	6	4.454	1.347	0.08	0.108
Saves	0	2.379	0	0.15	0
Blocks	0	0.815	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	3	3.829	0.784	0.12	0.094
Passes	23	20.668	1.113	0.08	0.089
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.5	1	0.03	0.03

Σ 0.658 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.774 − 0.007 turnover penalty = 0.767 → ×100 = 76.67 → 77

Offensive6.69

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.235	0.099	0.4	3.811
Shooting %	0.5	0.465	0.2	1.259
Assists per pass	0.043	0.093	0.4	1.621

Σ contribution = 6.691

Defensive4.59

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.379	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	0	0.815	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	3	3.829	5.147	0.25	1.287
Goals conceded	5	6.686	7.3	0.25	1.825

Σ contribution = 4.589

League average is 6.0 on Performance, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

MVM13 Cedar Rapids Cottonmouths

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

Performance5.3

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	2.07	1.82	0.23	-0.04	-0.009
Assists	1	1.92	1.79	0.19	-0.516	-0.098
Shots	3	4.45	3.15	0.09	-0.461	-0.042
Passes	17	20.67	9.24	0.08	-0.397	-0.032
Saves	0	2.38	2.7	0.19	-0.88	-0.167
Blocks	0	0.81	1	0.11	-0.815	-0.09
Takeaways	3	3.83	2.87	0.11	-0.289	-0.032

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.469 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.062, then +0.25 hot shooting → 5.3

Pucker+62

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3	3.801	0.789	0.32	0.253
Shots	3	4.454	0.674	0.08	0.054
Saves	0	2.379	0	0.15	0
Blocks	0	0.815	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	3	3.829	0.784	0.12	0.094
Passes	17	20.668	0.823	0.08	0.066
Faceoff win rate	1	0.5	2	0.03	0.06

Σ 0.526 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.619 → ×100 = 61.91 → 62

Offensive6.82

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.176	0.099	0.4	3.453
Shooting %	0.667	0.465	0.2	1.526
Assists per pass	0.059	0.093	0.4	1.838

Σ contribution = 6.816

Defensive4.38

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.379	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	0	0.815	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	3	3.829	5.147	0.25	1.287
Goals conceded	6	6.686	6.456	0.25	1.614

Σ contribution = 4.378

League average is 6.0 on Performance, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

fueeqo Cedar Rapids Cottonmouths

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

Performance5.1

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	2.07	1.82	0.23	-0.59	-0.136
Assists	0	1.92	1.79	0.19	-1.076	-0.204
Shots	3	4.45	3.15	0.09	-0.461	-0.042
Passes	16	20.67	9.24	0.08	-0.505	-0.04
Saves	4	2.38	2.7	0.19	0.6	0.114
Blocks	1	0.81	1	0.11	0.185	0.02
Takeaways	2	3.83	2.87	0.11	-0.638	-0.07

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.358 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.284, then −0.2 cold shooting → 5.1

Pucker+69

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1	3.801	0.263	0.32	0.084
Shots	3	4.454	0.674	0.08	0.054
Saves	4	2.379	1.682	0.15	0.252
Blocks	1	0.815	1.227	0.07	0.086
Takeaways	2	3.829	0.522	0.12	0.063
Passes	16	20.668	0.774	0.08	0.062
Faceoff win rate	0.4	0.5	0.8	0.03	0.024

Σ 0.625 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.735 − 0.046 turnover penalty = 0.689 → ×100 = 68.9 → 69

Offensive3.86

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.053	0.099	0.4	1.704
Shooting %	0.333	0.465	0.2	0.979
Assists per pass	0	0.093	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 3.864

Defensive6.56

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	4	2.379	8.37	0.3	2.511
Blocks	1	0.815	6.895	0.2	1.379
Takeaways	2	3.829	4.223	0.25	1.056
Goals conceded	6	6.686	6.456	0.25	1.614

Σ contribution = 6.56

League average is 6.0 on Performance, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Bolty Cedar Rapids Cottonmouths

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

Performance6.9

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	2.07	1.82	0.23	-0.04	-0.009
Assists	1	1.92	1.79	0.19	-0.516	-0.098
Shots	2	4.45	3.15	0.09	-0.779	-0.07
Passes	10	20.67	9.24	0.08	-1.155	-0.092
Saves	8	2.38	2.7	0.19	2.08	0.395
Blocks	1	0.81	1	0.11	0.185	0.02
Takeaways	4	3.83	2.87	0.11	0.06	0.007

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.153 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.305, then +0.35 saves, +0.25 hot shooting → 6.9

Pucker+128

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3	3.801	0.789	0.32	0.253
Shots	2	4.454	0.449	0.08	0.036
Saves	8	2.379	3.363	0.15	0.504
Blocks	1	0.815	1.227	0.07	0.086
Takeaways	4	3.829	1.045	0.12	0.125
Passes	10	20.668	0.484	0.08	0.039
Faceoff win rate	0.857	0.5	1.714	0.03	0.051

Σ 1.094 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.287 − 0.007 turnover penalty = 1.28 → ×100 = 128.06 → 128

Offensive6.32

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.07	0.099	0.4	1.945
Shooting %	1	0.465	0.2	1.854
Assists per pass	0.1	0.093	0.4	2.522

Σ contribution = 6.32

Defensive7.52

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	8	2.379	9.93	0.3	2.979
Blocks	1	0.815	6.895	0.2	1.379
Takeaways	4	3.829	6.179	0.25	1.545
Goals conceded	6	6.686	6.456	0.25	1.614

Σ contribution = 7.517

League average is 6.0 on Performance, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.