Chicago Thieves vs Naperville Niconics

CTHomeChicago Thieves

16–6Final

NNAwayNaperville Niconics

Apr 17, 2023 · Open Division · United Center

MVP Jakee · 9.9 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Chicago ThievesvsNaperville Niconics

29Shots218

2Saves1113

17Faceoffs won125

3Takeaways21

1Turnovers↓23

0Blocks55

47Passes3710

0:48Possession0:340:14

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Chicago Thieves

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Aves	4	4	8	10	0	1	4	0	0	17	0:05	122	1.70	0.46
Jakee	8	6	14	12	1	11	1	3	0	11	0:38	219	1.85	0.76
ching chong	4	6	10	7	1	5	0	0	1	19	0:05	148	1.81	0.55

Naperville Niconics

Player	G	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Luxuria	1	1	2	11	0	7	0	1	1	2	0:04	130	1.02	1.07
xrayhockeyboss	5	5	5	0	5	7	1	1	1	7	0:09	94	1.24	0.59
Jaws	0	0	1	2	0	3	0	1	3	1	0:01	58	0.24	0.89

Aves Chicago Thieves

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.7

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	4	2.02	1.89	0.23	1.044	0.24
Assists	4	1.4	1.45	0.19	1.794	0.341
Shots	10	3.97	3.19	0.09	1.889	0.17
Passes	17	13.43	6.81	0.08	0.524	0.042
Saves	0	1.94	2.21	0.19	-0.881	-0.167
Blocks	0	0.67	0.95	0.11	-0.709	-0.078
Takeaways	0	2.82	2.75	0.11	-1.024	-0.113

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.435 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.87, then −0.2 cold shooting → 6.7

Pucker+122

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	7.5	3.328	2.254	0.32	0.721
Shots	10	3.975	2.516	0.08	0.201
Saves	0	1.942	0	0.15	0
Blocks	0	0.672	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	0	2.816	0	0.12	0
Passes	17	13.429	1.266	0.08	0.101
Faceoff win rate	0.2	0.501	0.4	0.03	0.012

Σ 1.036 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.218 → ×100 = 121.84 → 122

Offensive1.70

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	1.6	0.114	0.4	0.8
Shooting %	0.4	0.509	0.2	0.158
Assists per pass	0.235	0.105	0.4	0.74

Σ contribution = 1.697

Defensive0.46

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	1.942	0.238	0.3	0.072
Blocks	0	0.672	0.238	0.2	0.048
Takeaways	0	2.816	0.238	0.25	0.06
Goals conceded	6	6.679	1.113	0.25	0.278

Σ contribution = 0.458

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Jakee Chicago Thieves

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR9.9

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	8	2.02	1.89	0.23	3.157	0.726
Assists	6	1.4	1.45	0.19	3.175	0.603
Shots	12	3.97	3.19	0.09	2.516	0.226
Passes	11	13.43	6.81	0.08	-0.357	-0.029
Saves	1	1.94	2.21	0.19	-0.427	-0.081
Blocks	0	0.67	0.95	0.11	-0.709	-0.078
Takeaways	3	2.82	2.75	0.11	0.067	0.007

6.0 + clip(Σ 1.376 × 2, −3 to 3) = 8.751, then +0.5 hat trick, +0.4 playmaker, +0.25 hot shooting → 9.9

Pucker+219

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	13.5	3.328	4.056	0.32	1.298
Shots	12	3.975	3.019	0.08	0.242
Saves	1	1.942	0.515	0.15	0.077
Blocks	0	0.672	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	3	2.816	1.065	0.12	0.128
Passes	11	13.429	0.819	0.08	0.066
Faceoff win rate	0.917	0.501	1.831	0.03	0.055

Σ 1.865 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 2.194 → ×100 = 219.43 → 219

Offensive1.85

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.368	0.114	0.4	0.791
Shooting %	0.667	0.509	0.2	0.26
Assists per pass	0.545	0.105	0.4	0.8

Σ contribution = 1.851

Defensive0.76

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	1.942	0.55	0.3	0.165
Blocks	0	0.672	0.238	0.2	0.048
Takeaways	3	2.816	1.065	0.25	0.266
Goals conceded	6	6.679	1.113	0.25	0.278

Σ contribution = 0.757

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

ching chong Chicago Thieves

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR7.8

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	4	2.02	1.89	0.23	1.044	0.24
Assists	6	1.4	1.45	0.19	3.175	0.603
Shots	7	3.97	3.19	0.09	0.948	0.085
Passes	19	13.43	6.81	0.08	0.818	0.065
Saves	1	1.94	2.21	0.19	-0.427	-0.081
Blocks	0	0.67	0.95	0.11	-0.709	-0.078
Takeaways	0	2.82	2.75	0.11	-1.024	-0.113

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.722 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.445, then +0.4 playmaker → 7.8

Pucker+148

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	9	3.328	2.704	0.32	0.865
Shots	7	3.975	1.761	0.08	0.141
Saves	1	1.942	0.515	0.15	0.077
Blocks	0	0.672	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	0	2.816	0	0.12	0
Passes	19	13.429	1.415	0.08	0.113
Faceoff win rate	1	0.501	1.998	0.03	0.06

Σ 1.257 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.478 → ×100 = 147.84 → 148

Offensive1.81

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	2	0.114	0.4	0.8
Shooting %	0.571	0.509	0.2	0.224
Assists per pass	0.316	0.105	0.4	0.786

Σ contribution = 1.811

Defensive0.55

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	1.942	0.55	0.3	0.165
Blocks	0	0.672	0.238	0.2	0.048
Takeaways	0	2.816	0.238	0.25	0.06
Goals conceded	6	6.679	1.113	0.25	0.278

Σ contribution = 0.551

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Luxuria Naperville Niconics

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.6

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	2.02	1.89	0.23	-0.541	-0.124
Assists	0	1.4	1.45	0.19	-0.97	-0.184
Shots	2	3.97	3.19	0.09	-0.619	-0.056
Passes	2	13.43	6.81	0.08	-1.678	-0.134
Saves	11	1.94	2.21	0.19	4.108	0.78
Blocks	1	0.67	0.95	0.11	0.346	0.038
Takeaways	0	2.82	2.75	0.11	-1.024	-0.113

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.207 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.415, then +0.35 saves, −0.2 goals against → 6.6

Pucker+130

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1	3.328	0.3	0.32	0.096
Shots	2	3.975	0.503	0.08	0.04
Saves	11	1.942	5.665	0.15	0.85
Blocks	1	0.672	1.488	0.07	0.104
Takeaways	0	2.816	0	0.12	0
Passes	2	13.429	0.149	0.08	0.012
Faceoff win rate	0	0.501	0	0.03	0

Σ 1.102 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.297 → ×100 = 129.67 → 130

Offensive1.02

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.25	0.114	0.4	0.732
Shooting %	0.5	0.509	0.2	0.196
Assists per pass	0	0.105	0.4	0.095

Σ contribution = 1.024

Defensive1.07

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	11	1.942	2	0.3	0.6
Blocks	1	0.672	1.453	0.2	0.291
Takeaways	0	2.816	0.238	0.25	0.06
Goals conceded	16	6.679	0.475	0.25	0.119

Σ contribution = 1.07

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

xrayhockeyboss Naperville Niconics

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.9

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	5	2.02	1.89	0.23	1.572	0.362
Assists	0	1.4	1.45	0.19	-0.97	-0.184
Shots	5	3.97	3.19	0.09	0.321	0.029
Passes	7	13.43	6.81	0.08	-0.944	-0.075
Saves	0	1.94	2.21	0.19	-0.881	-0.167
Blocks	1	0.67	0.95	0.11	0.346	0.038
Takeaways	1	2.82	2.75	0.11	-0.661	-0.073

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.071 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.858, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.2 goals against → 5.9

Pucker+94

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	5	3.328	1.502	0.32	0.481
Shots	5	3.975	1.258	0.08	0.101
Saves	0	1.942	0	0.15	0
Blocks	1	0.672	1.488	0.07	0.104
Takeaways	1	2.816	0.355	0.12	0.043
Passes	7	13.429	0.521	0.08	0.042
Faceoff win rate	0.417	0.501	0.832	0.03	0.025

Σ 0.795 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.935 → ×100 = 93.51 → 94

Offensive1.24

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.556	0.114	0.4	0.8
Shooting %	1	0.509	0.2	0.349
Assists per pass	0	0.105	0.4	0.095

Σ contribution = 1.244

Defensive0.59

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	1.942	0.238	0.3	0.072
Blocks	1	0.672	1.453	0.2	0.291
Takeaways	1	2.816	0.432	0.25	0.108
Goals conceded	16	6.679	0.475	0.25	0.119

Σ contribution = 0.59

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Jaws Naperville Niconics

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.6

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	2.02	1.89	0.23	-1.069	-0.246
Assists	0	1.4	1.45	0.19	-0.97	-0.184
Shots	1	3.97	3.19	0.09	-0.933	-0.084
Passes	1	13.43	6.81	0.08	-1.825	-0.146
Saves	2	1.94	2.21	0.19	0.026	0.005
Blocks	3	0.67	0.95	0.11	2.456	0.27
Takeaways	0	2.82	2.75	0.11	-1.024	-0.113

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.498 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.005, then −0.2 cold shooting, −0.2 goals against → 4.6

Pucker+58

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	0	3.328	0	0.32	0
Shots	1	3.975	0.252	0.08	0.02
Saves	2	1.942	1.03	0.15	0.154
Blocks	3	0.672	4.465	0.07	0.313
Takeaways	0	2.816	0	0.12	0
Passes	1	13.429	0.074	0.08	0.006
Faceoff win rate	0	0.501	0	0.03	0

Σ 0.493 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.58 → ×100 = 58.01 → 58

Offensive0.24

Rate	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.114	0.4	0.095
Shooting %	0.509	0.2	0.048
Assists per pass	0.105	0.4	0.095

Σ contribution = 0.238

Defensive0.89

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	1.942	1.03	0.3	0.309
Blocks	3	0.672	1.998	0.2	0.4
Takeaways	0	2.816	0.238	0.25	0.06
Goals conceded	16	6.679	0.475	0.25	0.119

Σ contribution = 0.888

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.