Michigan lil Oilers vs Jersey City Grinders

MLHomeMichigan lil Oilers

2–7Final

Away · JCGJersey City Grinders

Feb 19, 2023 · Open Division · Mike Smith's Basement

MVP CatCollector33 · 6.7 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Michigan lil OilersvsJersey City Grinders

10Shots1121

14Saves68

6Faceoffs won15

8Takeaways26

6Turnovers↓28

2Blocks11

28Passes2351

1:04Possession0:061:10

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Michigan lil Oilers

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Arctic Smith	1	1	2	5	7	3	3	0	1	0	10	0:13	96	0.88	0.95
Tornado King	0	1	1	1	2	1	1	1	4	2	9	0:25	51	0.59	1.02
emma raducanu	1	0	1	4	5	2	1	7	1	0	9	0:26	111	0.36	1.34

Jersey City Grinders

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Bobbyboy-3k	3	2	5	9	2	3	2	2	1	1	15	0:20	120	1.26	1.16
CatCollector33	3	2	5	8	5	1	1	4	4	0	21	0:41	136	0.83	1.45
InterJoe95	1	0	1	4	1	1	3	0	3	0	15	0:09	33	0.52	0.70

Arctic Smith Michigan lil Oilers

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.9

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	2.21	2.02	0.23	-0.598	-0.137
Assists	1	1.71	1.64	0.19	-0.434	-0.082
Shots	5	4.44	3.65	0.09	0.152	0.014
Passes	10	14.9	8.54	0.08	-0.574	-0.046
Saves	7	2.24	2.8	0.19	1.703	0.323
Blocks	0	0.85	1.1	0.11	-0.769	-0.085
Takeaways	0	2.3	2.48	0.11	-0.929	-0.102

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.116 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.769, then +0.35 saves, −0.2 cold shooting → 5.9

Pucker+96

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2	3.783	0.529	0.32	0.169
Shots	5	4.445	1.125	0.08	0.09
Saves	7	2.235	3.132	0.15	0.47
Blocks	0	0.85	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	0	2.301	0	0.12	0
Passes	10	14.898	0.671	0.08	0.054
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.5	1	0.03	0.03

Σ 0.813 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.956 → ×100 = 95.6 → 96

Offensive0.88

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.154	0.139	0.4	0.442
Shooting %	0.2	0.497	0.2	0.093
Assists per pass	0.1	0.115	0.4	0.349

Σ contribution = 0.883

Defensive0.95

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	7	2.235	1.972	0.3	0.592
Blocks	0	0.85	0.238	0.2	0.048
Takeaways	0	2.301	0.238	0.25	0.06
Goals conceded	7	7.051	1.007	0.25	0.252

Σ contribution = 0.952

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Tornado King Michigan lil Oilers

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.9

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	2.21	2.02	0.23	-1.092	-0.251
Assists	1	1.71	1.64	0.19	-0.434	-0.082
Shots	1	4.44	3.65	0.09	-0.943	-0.085
Passes	9	14.9	8.54	0.08	-0.691	-0.055
Saves	2	2.24	2.8	0.19	-0.084	-0.016
Blocks	2	0.85	1.1	0.11	1.042	0.115
Takeaways	1	2.3	2.48	0.11	-0.525	-0.058

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.433 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.134, then −0.2 cold shooting → 4.9

Pucker+51

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1	3.783	0.264	0.32	0.085
Shots	1	4.445	0.225	0.08	0.018
Saves	2	2.235	0.895	0.15	0.134
Blocks	2	0.85	2.354	0.07	0.165
Takeaways	1	2.301	0.435	0.12	0.052
Passes	9	14.898	0.604	0.08	0.048
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.5	1	0.03	0.03

Σ 0.532 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.626 − 0.112 turnover penalty = 0.514 → ×100 = 51.38 → 51

Offensive0.59

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.04	0.139	0.4	0.155
Shooting %	0	0.497	0.2	0.048
Assists per pass	0.111	0.115	0.4	0.387

Σ contribution = 0.59

Defensive1.02

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	2.235	0.895	0.3	0.269
Blocks	2	0.85	1.875	0.2	0.375
Takeaways	1	2.301	0.488	0.25	0.122
Goals conceded	7	7.051	1.007	0.25	0.252

Σ contribution = 1.018

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

emma raducanu Michigan lil Oilers

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.6

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	2.21	2.02	0.23	-0.598	-0.137
Assists	0	1.71	1.64	0.19	-1.046	-0.199
Shots	4	4.44	3.65	0.09	-0.122	-0.011
Passes	9	14.9	8.54	0.08	-0.691	-0.055
Saves	5	2.24	2.8	0.19	0.988	0.188
Blocks	0	0.85	1.1	0.11	-0.769	-0.085
Takeaways	7	2.3	2.48	0.11	1.898	0.209

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.091 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.819, then −0.2 cold shooting → 5.6

Pucker+111

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1	3.783	0.264	0.32	0.085
Shots	4	4.445	0.9	0.08	0.072
Saves	5	2.235	2.237	0.15	0.336
Blocks	0	0.85	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	7	2.301	3.042	0.12	0.365
Passes	9	14.898	0.604	0.08	0.048
Faceoff win rate	0.667	0.5	1.333	0.03	0.04

Σ 0.946 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.112 → ×100 = 111.24 → 111

Offensive0.36

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.038	0.139	0.4	0.152
Shooting %	0.25	0.497	0.2	0.108
Assists per pass	0	0.115	0.4	0.095

Σ contribution = 0.356

Defensive1.34

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	5	2.235	1.845	0.3	0.553
Blocks	0	0.85	0.238	0.2	0.048
Takeaways	7	2.301	1.967	0.25	0.492
Goals conceded	7	7.051	1.007	0.25	0.252

Σ contribution = 1.345

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Bobbyboy-3k Jersey City Grinders

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.2

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	2.21	2.02	0.23	0.39	0.09
Assists	2	1.71	1.64	0.19	0.178	0.034
Shots	9	4.44	3.65	0.09	1.247	0.112
Passes	15	14.9	8.54	0.08	0.012	0.001
Saves	2	2.24	2.8	0.19	-0.084	-0.016
Blocks	1	0.85	1.1	0.11	0.136	0.015
Takeaways	2	2.3	2.48	0.11	-0.122	-0.013

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.222 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.445, then −0.2 cold shooting → 6.2

Pucker+120

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	5	3.783	1.322	0.32	0.423
Shots	9	4.445	2.025	0.08	0.162
Saves	2	2.235	0.895	0.15	0.134
Blocks	1	0.85	1.177	0.07	0.082
Takeaways	2	2.301	0.869	0.12	0.104
Passes	15	14.898	1.007	0.08	0.081
Faceoff win rate	0.6	0.5	1.2	0.03	0.036

Σ 1.022 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.203 → ×100 = 120.28 → 120

Offensive1.26

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.25	0.139	0.4	0.664
Shooting %	0.333	0.497	0.2	0.136
Assists per pass	0.133	0.115	0.4	0.464

Σ contribution = 1.265

Defensive1.16

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	2.235	0.895	0.3	0.269
Blocks	1	0.85	1.175	0.2	0.235
Takeaways	2	2.301	0.87	0.25	0.217
Goals conceded	2	7.051	1.762	0.25	0.44

Σ contribution = 1.161

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

CatCollector33 Jersey City Grinders

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.7

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	2.21	2.02	0.23	0.39	0.09
Assists	2	1.71	1.64	0.19	0.178	0.034
Shots	8	4.44	3.65	0.09	0.973	0.088
Passes	21	14.9	8.54	0.08	0.715	0.057
Saves	5	2.24	2.8	0.19	0.988	0.188
Blocks	0	0.85	1.1	0.11	-0.769	-0.085
Takeaways	4	2.3	2.48	0.11	0.686	0.075

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.447 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.894, then −0.2 cold shooting → 6.7

Pucker+136

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	5	3.783	1.322	0.32	0.423
Shots	8	4.445	1.8	0.08	0.144
Saves	5	2.235	2.237	0.15	0.336
Blocks	0	0.85	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	4	2.301	1.738	0.12	0.209
Passes	21	14.898	1.41	0.08	0.113
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.5	1	0.03	0.03

Σ 1.254 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.475 − 0.112 turnover penalty = 1.363 → ×100 = 136.29 → 136

Offensive0.83

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.122	0.139	0.4	0.35
Shooting %	0.375	0.497	0.2	0.152
Assists per pass	0.095	0.115	0.4	0.333

Σ contribution = 0.835

Defensive1.45

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	5	2.235	1.845	0.3	0.553
Blocks	0	0.85	0.238	0.2	0.048
Takeaways	4	2.301	1.628	0.25	0.407
Goals conceded	2	7.051	1.762	0.25	0.44

Σ contribution = 1.448

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

InterJoe95 Jersey City Grinders

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.6

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	2.21	2.02	0.23	-0.598	-0.137
Assists	0	1.71	1.64	0.19	-1.046	-0.199
Shots	4	4.44	3.65	0.09	-0.122	-0.011
Passes	15	14.9	8.54	0.08	0.012	0.001
Saves	1	2.24	2.8	0.19	-0.441	-0.084
Blocks	0	0.85	1.1	0.11	-0.769	-0.085
Takeaways	0	2.3	2.48	0.11	-0.929	-0.102

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.617 × 2, −3 to 3) = 4.766, then −0.2 cold shooting → 4.6

Pucker+33

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1	3.783	0.264	0.32	0.085
Shots	4	4.445	0.9	0.08	0.072
Saves	1	2.235	0.447	0.15	0.067
Blocks	0	0.85	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	0	2.301	0	0.12	0
Passes	15	14.898	1.007	0.08	0.081
Faceoff win rate	0.25	0.5	0.5	0.03	0.015

Σ 0.319 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.376 − 0.047 turnover penalty = 0.329 → ×100 = 32.89 → 33

Offensive0.52

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.111	0.139	0.4	0.32
Shooting %	0.25	0.497	0.2	0.108
Assists per pass	0	0.115	0.4	0.095

Σ contribution = 0.523

Defensive0.70

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.235	0.498	0.3	0.149
Blocks	0	0.85	0.238	0.2	0.048
Takeaways	0	2.301	0.238	0.25	0.06
Goals conceded	2	7.051	1.762	0.25	0.44

Σ contribution = 0.697

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.