Edmonton Beauties vs Copenhagen Cult

Home · EBEdmonton Beauties

13–4Final

CCAwayCopenhagen Cult

Jan 25, 2023 · Challenger Division · Bumping Centre East Rink

MVP fueeqo · 7.5 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Edmonton BeautiesvsCopenhagen Cult

22Shots166

2Saves810

10Faceoffs won28

5Takeaways14

4Turnovers↓15

0Blocks11

70Passes466

2:04Possession0:131:51

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Edmonton Beauties

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Rabbi Mekhail	4	3	7	8	1	5	1	3	0	23	0:40	138	7.76	5.49
fueeqo	5	4	9	7	1	2	3	0	2	28	1:05	142	7.83	4.63
ORO	3	1	4	7	0	3	4	2	2	19	0:19	84	6.59	4.77

Copenhagen Cult

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
NeXuS	3	1	4	3	1	3	5	1	3	0	22	0:11	78	7.48	3.81
Chrislol	0	1	1	1	8	5	3	2	1	1	16	1:27	115	3.78	6.92
Sanguine	1	2	3	2	1	0	2	1	1	0	28	0:13	66	7.10	3.81

Rabbi Mekhail Edmonton Beauties

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.9

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	4	1.93	1.7	0.23	1.216	0.28
Assists	3	1.64	1.51	0.19	0.9	0.171
Shots	8	3.94	3	0.09	1.354	0.122
Passes	23	18.2	7.84	0.08	0.613	0.049
Saves	1	2.01	2.14	0.19	-0.472	-0.09
Blocks	0	0.61	0.86	0.11	-0.707	-0.078
Takeaways	3	2.75	2.49	0.11	0.1	0.011

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.465 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.93, nothing hit the bonus or penalty thresholds → 6.9

Pucker+138

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	7	3.422	2.046	0.32	0.655
Shots	8	3.939	2.031	0.08	0.162
Saves	1	2.01	0.498	0.15	0.075
Blocks	0	0.611	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	3	2.751	1.091	0.12	0.131
Passes	23	18.196	1.264	0.08	0.101
Faceoff win rate	0.833	0.5	1.667	0.03	0.05

Σ 1.174 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.381 → ×100 = 138.09 → 138

Offensive7.76

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.175	0.097	0.4	3.473
Shooting %	0.5	0.49	0.2	1.217
Assists per pass	0.13	0.09	0.4	3.068

Σ contribution = 7.757

Defensive5.49

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.01	4.144	0.3	1.243
Blocks	0	0.611	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	3	2.751	6.362	0.25	1.59
Goals conceded	4	6.55	8.253	0.25	2.063

Σ contribution = 5.487

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

fueeqo Edmonton Beauties

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR7.5

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	5	1.93	1.7	0.23	1.803	0.415
Assists	4	1.64	1.51	0.19	1.563	0.297
Shots	7	3.94	3	0.09	1.02	0.092
Passes	28	18.2	7.84	0.08	1.25	0.1
Saves	1	2.01	2.14	0.19	-0.472	-0.09
Blocks	0	0.61	0.86	0.11	-0.707	-0.078
Takeaways	0	2.75	2.49	0.11	-1.104	-0.121

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.615 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.23, then +0.25 hot shooting → 7.5

Pucker+142

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	9	3.422	2.63	0.32	0.842
Shots	7	3.939	1.777	0.08	0.142
Saves	1	2.01	0.498	0.15	0.075
Blocks	0	0.611	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	0	2.751	0	0.12	0
Passes	28	18.196	1.539	0.08	0.123
Faceoff win rate	0.4	0.5	0.8	0.03	0.024

Σ 1.206 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.418 → ×100 = 141.83 → 142

Offensive7.83

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.138	0.097	0.4	3.053
Shooting %	0.714	0.49	0.2	1.543
Assists per pass	0.143	0.09	0.4	3.239

Σ contribution = 7.835

Defensive4.63

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.01	4.144	0.3	1.243
Blocks	0	0.611	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	0	2.751	2.954	0.25	0.738
Goals conceded	4	6.55	8.253	0.25	2.063

Σ contribution = 4.635

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

ORO Edmonton Beauties

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.7

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	1.93	1.7	0.23	0.629	0.145
Assists	1	1.64	1.51	0.19	-0.426	-0.081
Shots	7	3.94	3	0.09	1.02	0.092
Passes	19	18.2	7.84	0.08	0.103	0.008
Saves	0	2.01	2.14	0.19	-0.939	-0.178
Blocks	0	0.61	0.86	0.11	-0.707	-0.078
Takeaways	2	2.75	2.49	0.11	-0.301	-0.033

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.126 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.749, nothing hit the bonus or penalty thresholds → 5.7

Pucker+84

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4	3.422	1.169	0.32	0.374
Shots	7	3.939	1.777	0.08	0.142
Saves	0	2.01	0	0.15	0
Blocks	0	0.611	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	2	2.751	0.727	0.12	0.087
Passes	19	18.196	1.044	0.08	0.084
Faceoff win rate	0.429	0.5	0.857	0.03	0.026

Σ 0.713 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.839 → ×100 = 83.85 → 84

Offensive6.59

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.211	0.097	0.4	3.724
Shooting %	0.429	0.49	0.2	1.101
Assists per pass	0.053	0.09	0.4	1.769

Σ contribution = 6.593

Defensive4.77

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.01	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	0	0.611	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	2	2.751	4.935	0.25	1.234
Goals conceded	4	6.55	8.253	0.25	2.063

Σ contribution = 4.774

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

NeXuS Copenhagen Cult

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.7

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	1.93	1.7	0.23	0.629	0.145
Assists	1	1.64	1.51	0.19	-0.426	-0.081
Shots	3	3.94	3	0.09	-0.313	-0.028
Passes	22	18.2	7.84	0.08	0.485	0.039
Saves	1	2.01	2.14	0.19	-0.472	-0.09
Blocks	0	0.61	0.86	0.11	-0.707	-0.078
Takeaways	1	2.75	2.49	0.11	-0.702	-0.077

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.17 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.659, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.2 goals against → 5.7

Pucker+78

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4	3.422	1.169	0.32	0.374
Shots	3	3.939	0.762	0.08	0.061
Saves	1	2.01	0.498	0.15	0.075
Blocks	0	0.611	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	1	2.751	0.364	0.12	0.044
Passes	22	18.196	1.209	0.08	0.097
Faceoff win rate	0.375	0.5	0.75	0.03	0.022

Σ 0.672 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.791 − 0.014 turnover penalty = 0.777 → ×100 = 77.71 → 78

Offensive7.48

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.364	0.097	0.4	3.987
Shooting %	1	0.49	0.2	1.823
Assists per pass	0.045	0.09	0.4	1.665

Σ contribution = 7.475

Defensive3.81

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.01	4.144	0.3	1.243
Blocks	0	0.611	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	1	2.751	3.75	0.25	0.938
Goals conceded	13	6.55	4.164	0.25	1.041

Σ contribution = 3.813

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Chrislol Copenhagen Cult

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.1

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	1.93	1.7	0.23	-1.133	-0.261
Assists	1	1.64	1.51	0.19	-0.426	-0.081
Shots	1	3.94	3	0.09	-0.98	-0.088
Passes	16	18.2	7.84	0.08	-0.28	-0.022
Saves	8	2.01	2.14	0.19	2.8	0.532
Blocks	1	0.61	0.86	0.11	0.449	0.049
Takeaways	2	2.75	2.49	0.11	-0.301	-0.033

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.096 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.192, then +0.35 saves, −0.2 cold shooting, −0.2 goals against → 6.1

Pucker+115

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	0.5	3.422	0.146	0.32	0.047
Shots	1	3.939	0.254	0.08	0.02
Saves	8	2.01	3.981	0.15	0.597
Blocks	1	0.611	1.636	0.07	0.115
Takeaways	2	2.751	0.727	0.12	0.087
Passes	16	18.196	0.879	0.08	0.07
Faceoff win rate	0.625	0.5	1.25	0.03	0.037

Σ 0.974 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.146 → ×100 = 114.56 → 115

Offensive3.78

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.011	0.097	0.4	1.269
Shooting %	0	0.49	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.062	0.09	0.4	1.922

Σ contribution = 3.782

Defensive6.92

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	8	2.01	9.979	0.3	2.994
Blocks	1	0.611	8.249	0.2	1.65
Takeaways	2	2.751	4.935	0.25	1.234
Goals conceded	13	6.55	4.164	0.25	1.041

Σ contribution = 6.919

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Sanguine Copenhagen Cult

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.2

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	1.93	1.7	0.23	-0.546	-0.125
Assists	2	1.64	1.51	0.19	0.237	0.045
Shots	2	3.94	3	0.09	-0.646	-0.058
Passes	28	18.2	7.84	0.08	1.25	0.1
Saves	1	2.01	2.14	0.19	-0.472	-0.09
Blocks	0	0.61	0.86	0.11	-0.707	-0.078
Takeaways	1	2.75	2.49	0.11	-0.702	-0.077

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.283 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.433, then −0.2 goals against → 5.2

Pucker+66

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3	3.422	0.877	0.32	0.281
Shots	2	3.939	0.508	0.08	0.041
Saves	1	2.01	0.498	0.15	0.075
Blocks	0	0.611	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	1	2.751	0.364	0.12	0.044
Passes	28	18.196	1.539	0.08	0.123
Faceoff win rate	0	0.5	0	0.03	0

Σ 0.563 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.662 → ×100 = 66.18 → 66

Offensive7.10

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.231	0.097	0.4	3.813
Shooting %	0.5	0.49	0.2	1.217
Assists per pass	0.071	0.09	0.4	2.07

Σ contribution = 7.1

Defensive3.81

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.01	4.144	0.3	1.243
Blocks	0	0.611	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	1	2.751	3.75	0.25	0.938
Goals conceded	13	6.55	4.164	0.25	1.041

Σ contribution = 3.813

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.