Jersey City Grinders vs Massachusetts Manatees

Home · JCGJersey City Grinders

3–13Final

MMAwayMassachusetts Manatees

Feb 8, 2023 · Open Division · The Grinder Dome

MVP Skonchy · 8.4 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Jersey City GrindersvsMassachusetts Manatees

9Shots2332

19Saves136

3Faceoffs won1215

6Takeaways28

8Turnovers↓26

4Blocks22

35Passes1752

1:05Possession1:032:08

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Jersey City Grinders

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Bobbyboy-3k	2	0	2	4	2	1	4	3	4	1	16	0:21	73	4.30	5.88
CatCollector33	0	1	1	3	16	1	6	1	2	1	8	0:29	165	4.51	6.40
Kraaazy	1	1	2	2	1	1	5	2	2	2	11	0:15	72	5.61	5.54

Massachusetts Manatees

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Cosmo Kramer	2	4	6	12	4	5	0	4	4	1	13	1:25	155	6.30	8.32
Post Master	5	3	8	7	0	4	2	2	1	0	20	0:05	119	8.41	5.11
Skonchy	6	4	10	13	2	6	1	2	1	1	19	0:38	183	8.17	6.65

Bobbyboy-3k Jersey City Grinders

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.4

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	2.21	2.02	0.23	-0.104	-0.024
Assists	0	1.71	1.64	0.19	-1.046	-0.199
Shots	4	4.44	3.65	0.09	-0.122	-0.011
Passes	16	14.9	8.54	0.08	0.129	0.01
Saves	2	2.24	2.8	0.19	-0.084	-0.016
Blocks	1	0.85	1.1	0.11	0.136	0.015
Takeaways	3	2.3	2.48	0.11	0.282	0.031

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.193 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.614, then −0.2 goals against → 5.4

Pucker+73

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2	3.783	0.529	0.32	0.169
Shots	4	4.445	0.9	0.08	0.072
Saves	2	2.235	0.895	0.15	0.134
Blocks	1	0.85	1.177	0.07	0.082
Takeaways	3	2.301	1.304	0.12	0.156
Passes	16	14.898	1.074	0.08	0.086
Faceoff win rate	0.2	0.5	0.4	0.03	0.012

Σ 0.712 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.838 − 0.112 turnover penalty = 0.726 → ×100 = 72.56 → 73

Offensive4.30

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.095	0.139	0.4	1.91
Shooting %	0.5	0.497	0.2	1.205
Assists per pass	0	0.115	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 4.296

Defensive5.88

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	2.235	5.581	0.3	1.674
Blocks	1	0.85	6.701	0.2	1.34
Takeaways	3	2.301	7.179	0.25	1.795
Goals conceded	13	7.051	4.287	0.25	1.072

Σ contribution = 5.881

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

CatCollector33 Jersey City Grinders

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.9

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	2.21	2.02	0.23	-1.092	-0.251
Assists	1	1.71	1.64	0.19	-0.434	-0.082
Shots	3	4.44	3.65	0.09	-0.396	-0.036
Passes	8	14.9	8.54	0.08	-0.808	-0.065
Saves	16	2.24	2.8	0.19	4.919	0.935
Blocks	1	0.85	1.1	0.11	0.136	0.015
Takeaways	1	2.3	2.48	0.11	-0.525	-0.058

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.458 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.916, then +0.35 saves, −0.2 cold shooting, −0.2 goals against → 6.9

Pucker+165

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1	3.783	0.264	0.32	0.085
Shots	3	4.445	0.675	0.08	0.054
Saves	16	2.235	7.158	0.15	1.074
Blocks	1	0.85	1.177	0.07	0.082
Takeaways	1	2.301	0.435	0.12	0.052
Passes	8	14.898	0.537	0.08	0.043
Faceoff win rate	0.143	0.5	0.286	0.03	0.009

Σ 1.398 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.645 → ×100 = 164.52 → 165

Offensive4.51

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.034	0.139	0.4	1.381
Shooting %	0	0.497	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.125	0.115	0.4	2.542

Σ contribution = 4.514

Defensive6.40

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	16	2.235	10	0.3	3
Blocks	1	0.85	6.701	0.2	1.34
Takeaways	1	2.301	3.952	0.25	0.988
Goals conceded	13	7.051	4.287	0.25	1.072

Σ contribution = 6.4

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Kraaazy Jersey City Grinders

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.2

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	2.21	2.02	0.23	-0.598	-0.137
Assists	1	1.71	1.64	0.19	-0.434	-0.082
Shots	2	4.44	3.65	0.09	-0.669	-0.06
Passes	11	14.9	8.54	0.08	-0.457	-0.037
Saves	1	2.24	2.8	0.19	-0.441	-0.084
Blocks	2	0.85	1.1	0.11	1.042	0.115
Takeaways	2	2.3	2.48	0.11	-0.122	-0.013

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.299 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.401, then −0.2 goals against → 5.2

Pucker+72

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2	3.783	0.529	0.32	0.169
Shots	2	4.445	0.45	0.08	0.036
Saves	1	2.235	0.447	0.15	0.067
Blocks	2	0.85	2.354	0.07	0.165
Takeaways	2	2.301	0.869	0.12	0.104
Passes	11	14.898	0.738	0.08	0.059
Faceoff win rate	0.167	0.5	0.333	0.03	0.01

Σ 0.61 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.718 → ×100 = 71.82 → 72

Offensive5.61

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.133	0.139	0.4	2.331
Shooting %	0.5	0.497	0.2	1.205
Assists per pass	0.091	0.115	0.4	2.072

Σ contribution = 5.608

Defensive5.54

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.235	3.99	0.3	1.197
Blocks	2	0.85	9.5	0.2	1.9
Takeaways	2	2.301	5.48	0.25	1.37
Goals conceded	13	7.051	4.287	0.25	1.072

Σ contribution = 5.539

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Cosmo Kramer Massachusetts Manatees

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR7.0

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	2.21	2.02	0.23	-0.104	-0.024
Assists	4	1.71	1.64	0.19	1.401	0.266
Shots	12	4.44	3.65	0.09	2.068	0.186
Passes	13	14.9	8.54	0.08	-0.222	-0.018
Saves	4	2.24	2.8	0.19	0.631	0.12
Blocks	1	0.85	1.1	0.11	0.136	0.015
Takeaways	4	2.3	2.48	0.11	0.686	0.075

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.621 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.242, then −0.2 cold shooting → 7.0

Pucker+155

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	6	3.783	1.586	0.32	0.508
Shots	12	4.445	2.7	0.08	0.216
Saves	4	2.235	1.79	0.15	0.268
Blocks	1	0.85	1.177	0.07	0.082
Takeaways	4	2.301	1.738	0.12	0.209
Passes	13	14.898	0.873	0.08	0.07
Faceoff win rate	1	0.5	2	0.03	0.06

Σ 1.413 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.662 − 0.112 turnover penalty = 1.55 → ×100 = 154.99 → 155

Offensive6.30

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.071	0.139	0.4	1.669
Shooting %	0.167	0.497	0.2	0.735
Assists per pass	0.308	0.115	0.4	3.893

Σ contribution = 6.296

Defensive8.32

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	4	2.235	8.633	0.3	2.59
Blocks	1	0.85	6.701	0.2	1.34
Takeaways	4	2.301	8.513	0.25	2.128
Goals conceded	3	7.051	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 8.32

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Post Master Massachusetts Manatees

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.9

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	5	2.21	2.02	0.23	1.378	0.317
Assists	3	1.71	1.64	0.19	0.789	0.15
Shots	7	4.44	3.65	0.09	0.699	0.063
Passes	20	14.9	8.54	0.08	0.598	0.048
Saves	0	2.24	2.8	0.19	-0.799	-0.152
Blocks	0	0.85	1.1	0.11	-0.769	-0.085
Takeaways	2	2.3	2.48	0.11	-0.122	-0.013

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.328 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.656, then +0.25 hot shooting → 6.9

Pucker+119

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	7.5	3.783	1.983	0.32	0.634
Shots	7	4.445	1.575	0.08	0.126
Saves	0	2.235	0	0.15	0
Blocks	0	0.85	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	2	2.301	0.869	0.12	0.104
Passes	20	14.898	1.342	0.08	0.107
Faceoff win rate	0.667	0.5	1.333	0.03	0.04

Σ 1.012 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.191 → ×100 = 119.07 → 119

Offensive8.41

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	1.6	0.139	0.4	4
Shooting %	0.714	0.497	0.2	1.529
Assists per pass	0.15	0.115	0.4	2.876

Σ contribution = 8.405

Defensive5.11

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.235	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	0	0.85	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	2	2.301	5.48	0.25	1.37
Goals conceded	3	7.051	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 5.109

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Skonchy Massachusetts Manatees

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR8.4

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	6	2.21	2.02	0.23	1.872	0.431
Assists	4	1.71	1.64	0.19	1.401	0.266
Shots	13	4.44	3.65	0.09	2.342	0.211
Passes	19	14.9	8.54	0.08	0.48	0.038
Saves	2	2.24	2.8	0.19	-0.084	-0.016
Blocks	1	0.85	1.1	0.11	0.136	0.015
Takeaways	2	2.3	2.48	0.11	-0.122	-0.013

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.932 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.863, then +0.5 hat trick → 8.4

Pucker+183

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	10	3.783	2.644	0.32	0.846
Shots	13	4.445	2.925	0.08	0.234
Saves	2	2.235	0.895	0.15	0.134
Blocks	1	0.85	1.177	0.07	0.082
Takeaways	2	2.301	0.869	0.12	0.104
Passes	19	14.898	1.275	0.08	0.102
Faceoff win rate	0.857	0.5	1.714	0.03	0.051

Σ 1.554 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.829 → ×100 = 182.86 → 183

Offensive8.17

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.263	0.139	0.4	3.537
Shooting %	0.462	0.497	0.2	1.143
Assists per pass	0.211	0.115	0.4	3.493

Σ contribution = 8.172

Defensive6.65

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	2.235	5.581	0.3	1.674
Blocks	1	0.85	6.701	0.2	1.34
Takeaways	2	2.301	5.48	0.25	1.37
Goals conceded	3	7.051	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 6.646

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.