Quebec Flare vs Massachusetts Manatees

Home · QUEQuebec Flare

7–2Final

MMAwayMassachusetts Manatees

Jan 18, 2023 · Open Division · Glueshop Arena

MVP Zesh · 7.5 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Quebec FlarevsMassachusetts Manatees

17Shots710

8Saves210

5Faceoffs won27

9Takeaways54

4Turnovers↓59

2Blocks11

71Passes3239

2:52Possession1:491:03

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Quebec Flare

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Zesh	3	3	6	5	4	2	4	6	1	1	20	2:07	163	5.71	8.62
Mat_Jek	0	3	3	0	4	3	3	2	2	1	21	0:22	95	5.74	7.56
Nayr[QC]	4	1	5	12	0	0	0	1	1	0	30	0:23	95	5.58	4.73

Massachusetts Manatees

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Cosmo Kramer	1	1	2	2	2	5	4	0	1	0	9	0:18	50	5.63	4.51
Post Master	0	0	0	5	3	0	0	0	3	0	20	0:10	42	2.95	5.03
Skonchy	1	0	1	3	5	2	1	4	5	1	10	0:35	83	3.47	7.79

Zesh Quebec Flare

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR7.5

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	2.21	2.02	0.23	0.39	0.09
Assists	3	1.71	1.64	0.19	0.789	0.15
Shots	5	4.44	3.65	0.09	0.152	0.014
Passes	20	14.9	8.54	0.08	0.598	0.048
Saves	4	2.24	2.8	0.19	0.631	0.12
Blocks	1	0.85	1.1	0.11	0.136	0.015
Takeaways	6	2.3	2.48	0.11	1.494	0.164

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.6 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.201, then +0.25 hot shooting → 7.5

Pucker+163

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	6	3.783	1.586	0.32	0.508
Shots	5	4.445	1.125	0.08	0.09
Saves	4	2.235	1.79	0.15	0.268
Blocks	1	0.85	1.177	0.07	0.082
Takeaways	6	2.301	2.608	0.12	0.313
Passes	20	14.898	1.342	0.08	0.107
Faceoff win rate	0.333	0.5	0.667	0.03	0.02

Σ 1.389 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.634 → ×100 = 163.38 → 163

Offensive5.71

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.047	0.139	0.4	1.474
Shooting %	0.6	0.497	0.2	1.363
Assists per pass	0.15	0.115	0.4	2.876

Σ contribution = 5.713

Defensive8.62

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	4	2.235	8.633	0.3	2.59
Blocks	1	0.85	6.701	0.2	1.34
Takeaways	6	2.301	9.691	0.25	2.423
Goals conceded	2	7.051	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 8.615

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Mat_Jek Quebec Flare

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.9

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	2.21	2.02	0.23	-1.092	-0.251
Assists	3	1.71	1.64	0.19	0.789	0.15
Shots	0	4.44	3.65	0.09	-1.217	-0.11
Passes	21	14.9	8.54	0.08	0.715	0.057
Saves	4	2.24	2.8	0.19	0.631	0.12
Blocks	1	0.85	1.1	0.11	0.136	0.015
Takeaways	2	2.3	2.48	0.11	-0.122	-0.013

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.032 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.936, nothing hit the bonus or penalty thresholds → 5.9

Pucker+95

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2.5	3.783	0.661	0.32	0.211
Shots	0	4.445	0	0.08	0
Saves	4	2.235	1.79	0.15	0.268
Blocks	1	0.85	1.177	0.07	0.082
Takeaways	2	2.301	0.869	0.12	0.104
Passes	21	14.898	1.41	0.08	0.113
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.5	1	0.03	0.03

Σ 0.809 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.952 → ×100 = 95.22 → 95

Offensive5.74

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.136	0.139	0.4	2.366
Shooting %	0	0.497	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.143	0.115	0.4	2.784

Σ contribution = 5.74

Defensive7.56

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	4	2.235	8.633	0.3	2.59
Blocks	1	0.85	6.701	0.2	1.34
Takeaways	2	2.301	5.48	0.25	1.37
Goals conceded	2	7.051	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 7.562

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Nayr[QC] Quebec Flare

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.1

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	4	2.21	2.02	0.23	0.884	0.203
Assists	1	1.71	1.64	0.19	-0.434	-0.082
Shots	12	4.44	3.65	0.09	2.068	0.186
Passes	30	14.9	8.54	0.08	1.769	0.142
Saves	0	2.24	2.8	0.19	-0.799	-0.152
Blocks	0	0.85	1.1	0.11	-0.769	-0.085
Takeaways	1	2.3	2.48	0.11	-0.525	-0.058

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.154 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.309, then −0.2 cold shooting → 6.1

Pucker+95

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4.5	3.783	1.19	0.32	0.381
Shots	12	4.445	2.7	0.08	0.216
Saves	0	2.235	0	0.15	0
Blocks	0	0.85	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	1	2.301	0.435	0.12	0.052
Passes	30	14.898	2.014	0.08	0.161
Faceoff win rate	0	0.5	0	0.03	0

Σ 0.81 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.953 → ×100 = 95.28 → 95

Offensive5.58

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.217	0.139	0.4	3.213
Shooting %	0.333	0.497	0.2	0.946
Assists per pass	0.033	0.115	0.4	1.423

Σ contribution = 5.582

Defensive4.73

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.235	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	0	0.85	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	1	2.301	3.952	0.25	0.988
Goals conceded	2	7.051	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 4.727

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Cosmo Kramer Massachusetts Manatees

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.9

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	2.21	2.02	0.23	-0.598	-0.137
Assists	1	1.71	1.64	0.19	-0.434	-0.082
Shots	2	4.44	3.65	0.09	-0.669	-0.06
Passes	9	14.9	8.54	0.08	-0.691	-0.055
Saves	2	2.24	2.8	0.19	-0.084	-0.016
Blocks	0	0.85	1.1	0.11	-0.769	-0.085
Takeaways	0	2.3	2.48	0.11	-0.929	-0.102

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.538 × 2, −3 to 3) = 4.923, nothing hit the bonus or penalty thresholds → 4.9

Pucker+50

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2	3.783	0.529	0.32	0.169
Shots	2	4.445	0.45	0.08	0.036
Saves	2	2.235	0.895	0.15	0.134
Blocks	0	0.85	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	0	2.301	0	0.12	0
Passes	9	14.898	0.604	0.08	0.048
Faceoff win rate	0.556	0.5	1.111	0.03	0.033

Σ 0.421 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.495 → ×100 = 49.54 → 50

Offensive5.63

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.111	0.139	0.4	2.08
Shooting %	0.5	0.497	0.2	1.205
Assists per pass	0.111	0.115	0.4	2.349

Σ contribution = 5.634

Defensive4.51

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	2.235	5.581	0.3	1.674
Blocks	0	0.85	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	0	2.301	2.954	0.25	0.738
Goals conceded	7	7.051	6.029	0.25	1.507

Σ contribution = 4.51

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Post Master Massachusetts Manatees

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.8

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	2.21	2.02	0.23	-1.092	-0.251
Assists	0	1.71	1.64	0.19	-1.046	-0.199
Shots	5	4.44	3.65	0.09	0.152	0.014
Passes	20	14.9	8.54	0.08	0.598	0.048
Saves	3	2.24	2.8	0.19	0.273	0.052
Blocks	0	0.85	1.1	0.11	-0.769	-0.085
Takeaways	0	2.3	2.48	0.11	-0.929	-0.102

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.523 × 2, −3 to 3) = 4.954, then −0.2 cold shooting → 4.8

Pucker+42

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	0	3.783	0	0.32	0
Shots	5	4.445	1.125	0.08	0.09
Saves	3	2.235	1.342	0.15	0.201
Blocks	0	0.85	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	0	2.301	0	0.12	0
Passes	20	14.898	1.342	0.08	0.107
Faceoff win rate	0	0.5	0	0.03	0

Σ 0.399 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.469 − 0.047 turnover penalty = 0.422 → ×100 = 42.24 → 42

Offensive2.95

Rate	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.139	0.4	1.181
Shooting %	0.497	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.115	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 2.954

Defensive5.03

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	3	2.235	7.318	0.3	2.195
Blocks	0	0.85	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	0	2.301	2.954	0.25	0.738
Goals conceded	7	7.051	6.029	0.25	1.507

Σ contribution = 5.031

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Skonchy Massachusetts Manatees

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.5

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	2.21	2.02	0.23	-0.598	-0.137
Assists	0	1.71	1.64	0.19	-1.046	-0.199
Shots	3	4.44	3.65	0.09	-0.396	-0.036
Passes	10	14.9	8.54	0.08	-0.574	-0.046
Saves	5	2.24	2.8	0.19	0.988	0.188
Blocks	1	0.85	1.1	0.11	0.136	0.015
Takeaways	4	2.3	2.48	0.11	0.686	0.075

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.139 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.721, then −0.2 cold shooting → 5.5

Pucker+83

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1	3.783	0.264	0.32	0.085
Shots	3	4.445	0.675	0.08	0.054
Saves	5	2.235	2.237	0.15	0.336
Blocks	1	0.85	1.177	0.07	0.082
Takeaways	4	2.301	1.738	0.12	0.209
Passes	10	14.898	0.671	0.08	0.054
Faceoff win rate	0.667	0.5	1.333	0.03	0.04

Σ 0.859 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.01 − 0.178 turnover penalty = 0.832 → ×100 = 83.26 → 83

Offensive3.47

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.029	0.139	0.4	1.342
Shooting %	0.333	0.497	0.2	0.946
Assists per pass	0	0.115	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 3.469

Defensive7.79

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	5	2.235	9.378	0.3	2.814
Blocks	1	0.85	6.701	0.2	1.34
Takeaways	4	2.301	8.513	0.25	2.128
Goals conceded	7	7.051	6.029	0.25	1.507

Σ contribution = 7.789

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.