Okinawa Generations vs Michigan Mallards

Home · OKGOkinawa Generations

5–2Final

MMAwayMichigan Mallards

Jun 6, 2022 · Intermediate Division · Slapstadium Rink G

MVP Pip Starlather · 6.8 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Okinawa GenerationsvsMichigan Mallards

7Shots16

4Saves22

4Faceoffs won26

19Takeaways221

21Turnovers↓219

3Blocks21

42Passes3577

1:56Possession0:512:47

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Okinawa Generations

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
LessThanDennis	2	1	3	3	2	2	2	4	4	1	19	0:42	100	5.16	6.98
Papa Shieldz	0	2	2	0	1	2	1	7	7	0	6	0:52	50	6.09	5.79
Pip Starlather	3	2	5	4	1	0	3	8	10	2	17	0:22	125	8.18	7.34

Michigan Mallards

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Chicken Noodle Soup	0	1	1	1	0	4	3	8	8	1	21	0:48	58	3.62	6.03
Johnboi	1	0	1	2	1	2	1	5	5	0	29	0:45	60	3.74	4.93
Blades	1	0	1	3	1	0	0	8	6	0	27	1:14	64	3.41	5.41

LessThanDennis Okinawa Generations

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.2

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	1.8	1.66	0.23	0.122	0.028
Assists	1	1.47	1.42	0.19	-0.327	-0.062
Shots	3	3.61	2.76	0.09	-0.22	-0.02
Passes	19	16.09	7.86	0.08	0.37	0.03
Saves	2	1.81	1.89	0.19	0.1	0.019
Blocks	1	0.63	0.87	0.11	0.43	0.047
Takeaways	4	6.11	4.41	0.11	-0.478	-0.053

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.011 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.979, then +0.25 hot shooting → 6.2

Pucker+100

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3	3.146	0.954	0.32	0.305
Shots	3	3.606	0.832	0.08	0.067
Saves	2	1.812	1.104	0.15	0.166
Blocks	1	0.628	1.593	0.07	0.112
Takeaways	4	6.108	0.655	0.12	0.079
Passes	19	16.093	1.181	0.08	0.094
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.5	1	0.03	0.03

Σ 0.852 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.002 → ×100 = 100.22 → 100

Offensive5.16

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.071	0.101	0.4	1.941
Shooting %	0.667	0.498	0.2	1.461
Assists per pass	0.053	0.091	0.4	1.762

Σ contribution = 5.164

Defensive6.98

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	1.812	6.414	0.3	1.924
Blocks	1	0.628	8.128	0.2	1.626
Takeaways	4	6.108	4.672	0.25	1.168
Goals conceded	2	6.13	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 6.98

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Papa Shieldz Okinawa Generations

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.6

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	1.8	1.66	0.23	-1.081	-0.249
Assists	2	1.47	1.42	0.19	0.376	0.071
Shots	0	3.61	2.76	0.09	-1.308	-0.118
Passes	6	16.09	7.86	0.08	-1.284	-0.103
Saves	1	1.81	1.89	0.19	-0.43	-0.082
Blocks	0	0.63	0.87	0.11	-0.725	-0.08
Takeaways	7	6.11	4.41	0.11	0.202	0.022

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.537 × 2, −3 to 3) = 4.926, then −0.3 turnovers → 4.6

Pucker+50

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1.5	3.146	0.477	0.32	0.153
Shots	0	3.606	0	0.08	0
Saves	1	1.812	0.552	0.15	0.083
Blocks	0	0.628	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	7	6.108	1.146	0.12	0.138
Passes	6	16.093	0.373	0.08	0.03
Faceoff win rate	0.667	0.5	1.333	0.03	0.04

Σ 0.443 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.521 − 0.022 turnover penalty = 0.499 → ×100 = 49.86 → 50

Offensive6.09

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.038	0.101	0.4	1.518
Shooting %	0	0.498	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.333	0.091	0.4	3.984

Σ contribution = 6.093

Defensive5.79

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	1.812	4.319	0.3	1.296
Blocks	0	0.628	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	7	6.108	6.58	0.25	1.645
Goals conceded	2	6.13	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 5.794

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Pip Starlather Okinawa Generations

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.8

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	1.8	1.66	0.23	0.724	0.167
Assists	2	1.47	1.42	0.19	0.376	0.071
Shots	4	3.61	2.76	0.09	0.143	0.013
Passes	17	16.09	7.86	0.08	0.115	0.009
Saves	1	1.81	1.89	0.19	-0.43	-0.082
Blocks	2	0.63	0.87	0.11	1.584	0.174
Takeaways	8	6.11	4.41	0.11	0.429	0.047

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.4 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.8, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.3 turnovers → 6.8

Pucker+125

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	5	3.146	1.589	0.32	0.509
Shots	4	3.606	1.109	0.08	0.089
Saves	1	1.812	0.552	0.15	0.083
Blocks	2	0.628	3.186	0.07	0.223
Takeaways	8	6.108	1.31	0.12	0.157
Passes	17	16.093	1.056	0.08	0.085
Faceoff win rate	0	0.5	0	0.03	0

Σ 1.145 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.347 − 0.096 turnover penalty = 1.251 → ×100 = 125.07 → 125

Offensive8.18

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.227	0.101	0.4	3.754
Shooting %	0.75	0.498	0.2	1.573
Assists per pass	0.118	0.091	0.4	2.854

Σ contribution = 8.181

Defensive7.34

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	1.812	4.319	0.3	1.296
Blocks	2	0.628	9.9	0.2	1.98
Takeaways	8	6.108	7.201	0.25	1.8
Goals conceded	2	6.13	9.046	0.25	2.262

Σ contribution = 7.338

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Chicken Noodle Soup Michigan Mallards

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.6

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	1.8	1.66	0.23	-1.081	-0.249
Assists	1	1.47	1.42	0.19	-0.327	-0.062
Shots	1	3.61	2.76	0.09	-0.945	-0.085
Passes	21	16.09	7.86	0.08	0.624	0.05
Saves	0	1.81	1.89	0.19	-0.96	-0.182
Blocks	1	0.63	0.87	0.11	0.43	0.047
Takeaways	8	6.11	4.41	0.11	0.429	0.047

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.434 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.132, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting → 4.6

Pucker+58

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1	3.146	0.318	0.32	0.102
Shots	1	3.606	0.277	0.08	0.022
Saves	0	1.812	0	0.15	0
Blocks	1	0.628	1.593	0.07	0.112
Takeaways	8	6.108	1.31	0.12	0.157
Passes	21	16.093	1.305	0.08	0.104
Faceoff win rate	0.571	0.5	1.143	0.03	0.034

Σ 0.531 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.625 − 0.047 turnover penalty = 0.578 → ×100 = 57.81 → 58

Offensive3.62

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.021	0.101	0.4	1.343
Shooting %	0	0.498	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.048	0.091	0.4	1.69

Σ contribution = 3.623

Defensive6.03

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	1.812	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	1	0.628	8.128	0.2	1.626
Takeaways	8	6.108	7.201	0.25	1.8
Goals conceded	5	6.13	6.889	0.25	1.722

Σ contribution = 6.034

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Johnboi Michigan Mallards

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.2

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	1.8	1.66	0.23	-0.479	-0.11
Assists	0	1.47	1.42	0.19	-1.03	-0.196
Shots	2	3.61	2.76	0.09	-0.583	-0.052
Passes	29	16.09	7.86	0.08	1.642	0.131
Saves	1	1.81	1.89	0.19	-0.43	-0.082
Blocks	0	0.63	0.87	0.11	-0.725	-0.08
Takeaways	5	6.11	4.41	0.11	-0.251	-0.028

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.416 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.168, nothing hit the bonus or penalty thresholds → 5.2

Pucker+60

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1	3.146	0.318	0.32	0.102
Shots	2	3.606	0.555	0.08	0.044
Saves	1	1.812	0.552	0.15	0.083
Blocks	0	0.628	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	5	6.108	0.819	0.12	0.098
Passes	29	16.093	1.802	0.08	0.144
Faceoff win rate	0.667	0.5	1.333	0.03	0.04

Σ 0.511 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.601 → ×100 = 60.15 → 60

Offensive3.74

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.022	0.101	0.4	1.355
Shooting %	0.5	0.498	0.2	1.203
Assists per pass	0	0.091	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 3.739

Defensive4.93

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	1.812	4.319	0.3	1.296
Blocks	0	0.628	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	5	6.108	5.282	0.25	1.321
Goals conceded	5	6.13	6.889	0.25	1.722

Σ contribution = 4.93

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Blades Michigan Mallards

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.8

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	1.8	1.66	0.23	-0.479	-0.11
Assists	0	1.47	1.42	0.19	-1.03	-0.196
Shots	3	3.61	2.76	0.09	-0.22	-0.02
Passes	27	16.09	7.86	0.08	1.387	0.111
Saves	1	1.81	1.89	0.19	-0.43	-0.082
Blocks	0	0.63	0.87	0.11	-0.725	-0.08
Takeaways	8	6.11	4.41	0.11	0.429	0.047

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.329 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.342, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting → 4.8

Pucker+64

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1	3.146	0.318	0.32	0.102
Shots	3	3.606	0.832	0.08	0.067
Saves	1	1.812	0.552	0.15	0.083
Blocks	0	0.628	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	8	6.108	1.31	0.12	0.157
Passes	27	16.093	1.678	0.08	0.134
Faceoff win rate	0	0.5	0	0.03	0

Σ 0.542 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.638 → ×100 = 63.82 → 64

Offensive3.41

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.014	0.101	0.4	1.28
Shooting %	0.333	0.498	0.2	0.945
Assists per pass	0	0.091	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 3.406

Defensive5.41

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	1.812	4.319	0.3	1.296
Blocks	0	0.628	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	8	6.108	7.201	0.25	1.8
Goals conceded	5	6.13	6.889	0.25	1.722

Σ contribution = 5.409

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.