Nashville Niconics vs Port Charlotte Pedestrians

NNHomeNashville Niconics

11–6Final

PCAwayPort Charlotte Pedestrians

May 12, 2022 · Open Division - Dusters · Slapstadium Rink E

MVP [] StarFax · 8.8 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Nashville NiconicsvsPort Charlotte Pedestrians

18Shots108

2Saves57

14Faceoffs won86

27Takeaways1710

10Turnovers↓1727

0Blocks66

103Passes7528

3:27Possession2:330:54

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Nashville Niconics

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Passes	GWG	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
[MM] Barkov	7	2	9	9	0	6	3	9	4	32	1	1:22	169	5.62	5.36
[MW] Love	2	3	5	2	2	4	3	2	4	25	0	0:34	95	7.19	4.96
[] StarFax	2	7	9	7	0	4	0	16	2	46	1	1:31	186	6.11	5.62

Port Charlotte Pedestrians

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	GWG	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
[PCP] ICanSmellYou	2	1	3	2	0	2	5	3	7	1	11	1	0:14	58	7.43	4.59
[PCP] Shifti	2	1	3	4	4	2	4	4	5	4	5	0	0:26	132	7.09	7.14
[PNDA] Goku	2	0	2	2	3	2	5	3	15	1	12	0	0:14	47	5.59	5.96

Barkov Nashville Niconics

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR8.3

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	7	2.15	2.02	0.23	2.403	0.553
Assists	2	1.45	1.47	0.19	0.372	0.071
Shots	9	4.28	3.54	0.09	1.334	0.12
Passes	32	14.66	7.84	0.08	2.213	0.177
Saves	0	2.13	2.45	0.19	-0.869	-0.165
Blocks	0	0.8	1.03	0.11	-0.772	-0.085
Takeaways	9	4.7	4.17	0.11	1.03	0.113

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.784 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.567, then +0.5 hat trick, +0.25 hot shooting → 8.3

Pucker+169

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	9	3.505	2.568	0.32	0.822
Shots	9	4.281	2.102	0.08	0.168
Saves	0	2.132	0	0.15	0
Blocks	0	0.797	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	9	4.701	1.914	0.12	0.23
Passes	32	14.663	2.182	0.08	0.175
Faceoff win rate	0.667	0.499	1.336	0.03	0.04

Σ 1.434 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.687 → ×100 = 168.73 → 169

Offensive5.62

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.11	0.127	0.4	2.187
Shooting %	0.778	0.502	0.2	1.6
Assists per pass	0.062	0.099	0.4	1.835

Σ contribution = 5.622

Defensive5.36

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.132	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	0	0.797	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	9	4.701	8.893	0.25	2.223
Goals conceded	6	6.962	6.636	0.25	1.659

Σ contribution = 5.359

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Love Nashville Niconics

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.4

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	2.15	2.02	0.23	-0.074	-0.017
Assists	3	1.45	1.47	0.19	1.052	0.2
Shots	2	4.28	3.54	0.09	-0.645	-0.058
Passes	25	14.66	7.84	0.08	1.319	0.106
Saves	2	2.13	2.45	0.19	-0.054	-0.01
Blocks	0	0.8	1.03	0.11	-0.772	-0.085
Takeaways	2	4.7	4.17	0.11	-0.648	-0.071

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.064 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.128, then +0.25 hot shooting → 6.4

Pucker+95

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4.5	3.505	1.284	0.32	0.411
Shots	2	4.281	0.467	0.08	0.037
Saves	2	2.132	0.938	0.15	0.141
Blocks	0	0.797	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	2	4.701	0.425	0.12	0.051
Passes	25	14.663	1.705	0.08	0.136
Faceoff win rate	0.571	0.499	1.145	0.03	0.034

Σ 0.811 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.954 → ×100 = 95.37 → 95

Offensive7.19

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.147	0.127	0.4	2.654
Shooting %	1	0.502	0.2	1.807
Assists per pass	0.12	0.099	0.4	2.734

Σ contribution = 7.195

Defensive4.96

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	2.132	5.752	0.3	1.726
Blocks	0	0.797	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	2	4.701	3.925	0.25	0.981
Goals conceded	6	6.962	6.636	0.25	1.659

Σ contribution = 4.957

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

[] StarFax Nashville Niconics

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR8.8

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	2.15	2.02	0.23	-0.074	-0.017
Assists	7	1.45	1.47	0.19	3.769	0.716
Shots	7	4.28	3.54	0.09	0.768	0.069
Passes	46	14.66	7.84	0.08	3.999	0.32
Saves	0	2.13	2.45	0.19	-0.869	-0.165
Blocks	0	0.8	1.03	0.11	-0.772	-0.085
Takeaways	16	4.7	4.17	0.11	2.708	0.298

6.0 + clip(Σ 1.136 × 2, −3 to 3) = 8.272, then +0.4 playmaker, +0.3 takeaways, −0.2 cold shooting → 8.8

Pucker+186

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	8	3.505	2.282	0.32	0.73
Shots	7	4.281	1.635	0.08	0.131
Saves	0	2.132	0	0.15	0
Blocks	0	0.797	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	16	4.701	3.403	0.12	0.408
Passes	46	14.663	3.137	0.08	0.251
Faceoff win rate	1	0.499	2.004	0.03	0.06

Σ 1.581 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.86 → ×100 = 185.95 → 186

Offensive6.11

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.099	0.127	0.4	2.054
Shooting %	0.286	0.502	0.2	0.875
Assists per pass	0.152	0.099	0.4	3.185

Σ contribution = 6.114

Defensive5.62

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.132	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	0	0.797	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	16	4.701	9.935	0.25	2.484
Goals conceded	6	6.962	6.636	0.25	1.659

Σ contribution = 5.62

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

ICanSmellYou Port Charlotte Pedestrians

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.0

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	2.15	2.02	0.23	-0.074	-0.017
Assists	1	1.45	1.47	0.19	-0.307	-0.058
Shots	2	4.28	3.54	0.09	-0.645	-0.058
Passes	11	14.66	7.84	0.08	-0.468	-0.037
Saves	0	2.13	2.45	0.19	-0.869	-0.165
Blocks	1	0.8	1.03	0.11	0.196	0.022
Takeaways	3	4.7	4.17	0.11	-0.408	-0.045

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.359 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.282, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 goals against → 5.0

Pucker+58

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3	3.505	0.856	0.32	0.274
Shots	2	4.281	0.467	0.08	0.037
Saves	0	2.132	0	0.15	0
Blocks	1	0.797	1.254	0.07	0.088
Takeaways	3	4.701	0.638	0.12	0.077
Passes	11	14.663	0.75	0.08	0.06
Faceoff win rate	0.286	0.499	0.573	0.03	0.017

Σ 0.553 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.65 − 0.074 turnover penalty = 0.576 → ×100 = 57.62 → 58

Offensive7.43

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.214	0.127	0.4	3.357
Shooting %	1	0.502	0.2	1.807
Assists per pass	0.091	0.099	0.4	2.269

Σ contribution = 7.433

Defensive4.59

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.132	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	1	0.797	6.995	0.2	1.399
Takeaways	3	4.701	4.612	0.25	1.153
Goals conceded	11	6.962	4.594	0.25	1.149

Σ contribution = 4.587

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Shifti Port Charlotte Pedestrians

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.4

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	2.15	2.02	0.23	-0.074	-0.017
Assists	1	1.45	1.47	0.19	-0.307	-0.058
Shots	4	4.28	3.54	0.09	-0.08	-0.007
Passes	5	14.66	7.84	0.08	-1.233	-0.099
Saves	4	2.13	2.45	0.19	0.761	0.145
Blocks	4	0.8	1.03	0.11	3.099	0.341
Takeaways	4	4.7	4.17	0.11	-0.168	-0.018

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.286 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.572, then −0.2 goals against → 6.4

Pucker+132

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3	3.505	0.856	0.32	0.274
Shots	4	4.281	0.934	0.08	0.075
Saves	4	2.132	1.876	0.15	0.281
Blocks	4	0.797	5.016	0.07	0.351
Takeaways	4	4.701	0.851	0.12	0.102
Passes	5	14.663	0.341	0.08	0.027
Faceoff win rate	0.333	0.499	0.668	0.03	0.02

Σ 1.131 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.33 − 0.01 turnover penalty = 1.32 → ×100 = 132 → 132

Offensive7.09

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.115	0.127	0.4	2.257
Shooting %	0.5	0.502	0.2	1.197
Assists per pass	0.2	0.099	0.4	3.632

Σ contribution = 7.085

Defensive7.14

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	4	2.132	8.818	0.3	2.645
Blocks	4	0.797	9.997	0.2	1.999
Takeaways	4	4.701	5.408	0.25	1.352
Goals conceded	11	6.962	4.594	0.25	1.149

Σ contribution = 7.145

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Goku Port Charlotte Pedestrians

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.3

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	2.15	2.02	0.23	-0.074	-0.017
Assists	0	1.45	1.47	0.19	-0.986	-0.187
Shots	2	4.28	3.54	0.09	-0.645	-0.058
Passes	12	14.66	7.84	0.08	-0.34	-0.027
Saves	3	2.13	2.45	0.19	0.354	0.067
Blocks	1	0.8	1.03	0.11	0.196	0.022
Takeaways	3	4.7	4.17	0.11	-0.408	-0.045

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.246 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.509, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 goals against → 5.3

Pucker+47

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2	3.505	0.571	0.32	0.183
Shots	2	4.281	0.467	0.08	0.037
Saves	3	2.132	1.407	0.15	0.211
Blocks	1	0.797	1.254	0.07	0.088
Takeaways	3	4.701	0.638	0.12	0.077
Passes	12	14.663	0.818	0.08	0.065
Faceoff win rate	0.286	0.499	0.573	0.03	0.017

Σ 0.678 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.798 − 0.33 turnover penalty = 0.468 → ×100 = 46.73 → 47

Offensive5.59

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.143	0.127	0.4	2.602
Shooting %	1	0.502	0.2	1.807
Assists per pass	0	0.099	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 5.59

Defensive5.96

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	3	2.132	7.544	0.3	2.263
Blocks	1	0.797	6.995	0.2	1.399
Takeaways	3	4.701	4.612	0.25	1.153
Goals conceded	11	6.962	4.594	0.25	1.149

Σ contribution = 5.964

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.