Oregon Capybaras - west vs Edmonton Beauties - West

OCHomeOregon Capybaras - west

5–13Final

EBAwayEdmonton Beauties - West

Jun 8, 2022 · West Division · Moda Center

MVP [DUD] fueeqo · 9.3 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Oregon Capybaras - westvsEdmonton Beauties - West

10Shots1727

14Saves95

8Faceoffs won412

20Takeaways1232

32Turnovers↓1319

8Blocks71

56Passes1874

1:28Possession1:212:49

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Oregon Capybaras - west

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
[BAD] Wiki	3	1	4	4	0	4	4	5	10	1	24	0:25	75	6.31	4.55
[OCA] Curt	2	0	2	5	6	4	4	4	10	4	17	0:24	124	4.32	7.02
[OCA] Laggz	0	1	1	1	8	0	4	11	12	3	15	0:39	116	3.82	8.04

Edmonton Beauties - West

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
[BEUT] Rabbi Mekhail	5	2	7	9	1	2	3	4	8	0	31	0:53	115	5.95	4.76
[DUD] fueeqo	6	5	11	11	2	4	3	18	8	0	21	1:20	172	7.96	6.48
[LVS] DeeZy	2	4	6	7	2	6	2	10	3	1	22	0:36	130	7.55	6.73

Wiki Oregon Capybaras - west

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.4

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	2.39	1.85	0.23	0.328	0.075
Assists	1	1.81	1.46	0.19	-0.553	-0.105
Shots	4	4.97	3.13	0.09	-0.309	-0.028
Passes	24	17.47	6.84	0.08	0.954	0.076
Saves	0	2.56	2.8	0.19	-0.914	-0.174
Blocks	1	0.83	0.94	0.11	0.183	0.02
Takeaways	5	7.15	4.67	0.11	-0.46	-0.051

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.185 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.63, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 goals against → 5.4

Pucker+75

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4	4.057	0.986	0.32	0.315
Shots	4	4.967	0.805	0.08	0.064
Saves	0	2.555	0	0.15	0
Blocks	1	0.828	1.208	0.07	0.085
Takeaways	5	7.148	0.699	0.12	0.084
Passes	24	17.474	1.373	0.08	0.11
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.499	1.002	0.03	0.03

Σ 0.688 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.81 − 0.06 turnover penalty = 0.75 → ×100 = 75 → 75

Offensive6.31

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.16	0.105	0.4	3.165
Shooting %	0.75	0.482	0.2	1.605
Assists per pass	0.042	0.104	0.4	1.544

Σ contribution = 6.313

Defensive4.55

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.555	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	1	0.828	6.821	0.2	1.364
Takeaways	5	7.148	4.833	0.25	1.208
Goals conceded	13	7.359	4.366	0.25	1.091

Σ contribution = 4.549

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Curt Oregon Capybaras - west

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.8

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	2.39	1.85	0.23	-0.212	-0.049
Assists	0	1.81	1.46	0.19	-1.237	-0.235
Shots	5	4.97	3.13	0.09	0.011	0.001
Passes	17	17.47	6.84	0.08	-0.069	-0.006
Saves	6	2.56	2.8	0.19	1.232	0.234
Blocks	4	0.83	0.94	0.11	3.375	0.371
Takeaways	4	7.15	4.67	0.11	-0.674	-0.074

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.243 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.486, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting, −0.2 goals against → 5.8

Pucker+124

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2	4.057	0.493	0.32	0.158
Shots	5	4.967	1.007	0.08	0.081
Saves	6	2.555	2.348	0.15	0.352
Blocks	4	0.828	4.832	0.07	0.338
Takeaways	4	7.148	0.56	0.12	0.067
Passes	17	17.474	0.973	0.08	0.078
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.499	1.002	0.03	0.03

Σ 1.104 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.299 − 0.06 turnover penalty = 1.239 → ×100 = 123.88 → 124

Offensive4.32

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.083	0.105	0.4	2.072
Shooting %	0.4	0.482	0.2	1.066
Assists per pass	0	0.104	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 4.319

Defensive7.02

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	6	2.555	9.495	0.3	2.848
Blocks	4	0.828	9.996	0.2	1.999
Takeaways	4	7.148	4.344	0.25	1.086
Goals conceded	13	7.359	4.366	0.25	1.091

Σ contribution = 7.024

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Laggz Oregon Capybaras - west

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.0

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	0	2.39	1.85	0.23	-1.291	-0.297
Assists	1	1.81	1.46	0.19	-0.553	-0.105
Shots	1	4.97	3.13	0.09	-1.266	-0.114
Passes	15	17.47	6.84	0.08	-0.362	-0.029
Saves	8	2.56	2.8	0.19	1.948	0.37
Blocks	3	0.83	0.94	0.11	2.311	0.254
Takeaways	11	7.15	4.67	0.11	0.825	0.091

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.17 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.34, then +0.35 saves, −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting, −0.2 goals against → 6.0

Pucker+116

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	1	4.057	0.246	0.32	0.079
Shots	1	4.967	0.201	0.08	0.016
Saves	8	2.555	3.131	0.15	0.47
Blocks	3	0.828	3.624	0.07	0.254
Takeaways	11	7.148	1.539	0.12	0.185
Passes	15	17.474	0.858	0.08	0.069
Faceoff win rate	0	0.499	0	0.03	0

Σ 1.072 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.261 − 0.102 turnover penalty = 1.159 → ×100 = 115.9 → 116

Offensive3.82

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.026	0.105	0.4	1.378
Shooting %	0	0.482	0.2	0.591
Assists per pass	0.067	0.104	0.4	1.853

Σ contribution = 3.822

Defensive8.04

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	8	2.555	9.889	0.3	2.967
Blocks	3	0.828	9.958	0.2	1.992
Takeaways	11	7.148	7.968	0.25	1.992
Goals conceded	13	7.359	4.366	0.25	1.091

Σ contribution = 8.042

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Rabbi Mekhail Edmonton Beauties - West

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.4

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	5	2.39	1.85	0.23	1.408	0.324
Assists	2	1.81	1.46	0.19	0.131	0.025
Shots	9	4.97	3.13	0.09	1.288	0.116
Passes	31	17.47	6.84	0.08	1.978	0.158
Saves	1	2.56	2.8	0.19	-0.556	-0.106
Blocks	0	0.83	0.94	0.11	-0.881	-0.097
Takeaways	4	7.15	4.67	0.11	-0.674	-0.074

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.346 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.692, then −0.3 turnovers → 6.4

Pucker+115

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	7	4.057	1.725	0.32	0.552
Shots	9	4.967	1.812	0.08	0.145
Saves	1	2.555	0.391	0.15	0.059
Blocks	0	0.828	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	4	7.148	0.56	0.12	0.067
Passes	31	17.474	1.774	0.08	0.142
Faceoff win rate	0.4	0.499	0.801	0.03	0.024

Σ 0.989 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.163 − 0.018 turnover penalty = 1.145 → ×100 = 114.55 → 115

Offensive5.95

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.132	0.105	0.4	2.799
Shooting %	0.556	0.482	0.2	1.322
Assists per pass	0.065	0.104	0.4	1.824

Σ contribution = 5.945

Defensive4.76

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.555	3.827	0.3	1.148
Blocks	0	0.828	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	4	7.148	4.344	0.25	1.086
Goals conceded	5	7.359	7.759	0.25	1.94

Σ contribution = 4.765

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

fueeqo Edmonton Beauties - West

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR9.3

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	6	2.39	1.85	0.23	1.947	0.448
Assists	5	1.81	1.46	0.19	2.183	0.415
Shots	11	4.97	3.13	0.09	1.926	0.173
Passes	21	17.47	6.84	0.08	0.516	0.041
Saves	2	2.56	2.8	0.19	-0.199	-0.038
Blocks	0	0.83	0.94	0.11	-0.881	-0.097
Takeaways	18	7.15	4.67	0.11	2.324	0.256

6.0 + clip(Σ 1.198 × 2, −3 to 3) = 8.397, then +0.5 hat trick, +0.4 playmaker, +0.3 takeaways, −0.3 turnovers → 9.3

Pucker+172

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	9.5	4.057	2.341	0.32	0.749
Shots	11	4.967	2.215	0.08	0.177
Saves	2	2.555	0.783	0.15	0.117
Blocks	0	0.828	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	18	7.148	2.518	0.12	0.302
Passes	21	17.474	1.202	0.08	0.096
Faceoff win rate	0.571	0.499	1.145	0.03	0.034

Σ 1.477 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.737 − 0.018 turnover penalty = 1.719 → ×100 = 171.92 → 172

Offensive7.96

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.138	0.105	0.4	2.876
Shooting %	0.545	0.482	0.2	1.305
Assists per pass	0.238	0.104	0.4	3.779

Σ contribution = 7.96

Defensive6.48

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	2.555	5.145	0.3	1.543
Blocks	0	0.828	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	18	7.148	9.633	0.25	2.408
Goals conceded	5	7.359	7.759	0.25	1.94

Σ contribution = 6.482

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

DeeZy Edmonton Beauties - West

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.6

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	2.39	1.85	0.23	-0.212	-0.049
Assists	4	1.81	1.46	0.19	1.499	0.285
Shots	7	4.97	3.13	0.09	0.649	0.058
Passes	22	17.47	6.84	0.08	0.662	0.053
Saves	2	2.56	2.8	0.19	-0.199	-0.038
Blocks	1	0.83	0.94	0.11	0.183	0.02
Takeaways	10	7.15	4.67	0.11	0.611	0.067

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.397 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.794, then −0.2 cold shooting → 6.6

Pucker+130

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	6	4.057	1.479	0.32	0.473
Shots	7	4.967	1.409	0.08	0.113
Saves	2	2.555	0.783	0.15	0.117
Blocks	1	0.828	1.208	0.07	0.085
Takeaways	10	7.148	1.399	0.12	0.168
Passes	22	17.474	1.259	0.08	0.101
Faceoff win rate	0.75	0.499	1.503	0.03	0.045

Σ 1.102 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.296 → ×100 = 129.6 → 130

Offensive7.55

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.167	0.105	0.4	3.241
Shooting %	0.286	0.482	0.2	0.891
Assists per pass	0.182	0.104	0.4	3.422

Σ contribution = 7.554

Defensive6.73

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	2.555	5.145	0.3	1.543
Blocks	1	0.828	6.821	0.2	1.364
Takeaways	10	7.148	7.516	0.25	1.879
Goals conceded	5	7.359	7.759	0.25	1.94

Σ contribution = 6.726

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.