Yosemite Bobcats vs Palm Bay Puck Hogs

YBHomeYosemite Bobcats

12–11Final

PBAwayPalm Bay Puck Hogs

May 30, 2022 · West Division · Da Forest

MVP Wendy's Cashier · 6.7 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Yosemite BobcatsvsPalm Bay Puck Hogs

18Shots117

6Saves6

13Faceoffs won112

10Takeaways1121

21Turnovers↓1110

1Blocks12

56Passes749

1:25Possession0:051:30

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Yosemite Bobcats

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	GWG	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Stryker	3	1	4	5	1	4	2	4	9	0	22	0	0:13	74	6.91	4.01
Wendy's Cashier	4	4	8	5	4	4	3	2	8	1	16	0	1:01	131	8.27	5.84
A Rambome Player	5	3	8	8	1	5	7	4	4	0	18	1	0:11	117	8.70	4.01

Palm Bay Puck Hogs

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Jiggy	5	2	7	7	1	5	3	8	3	0	16	0:25	109	8.17	4.49
Moo Dangles	3	4	7	4	2	4	4	5	5	2	12	0:10	126	9.57	5.79
Lil Arnie	3	0	3	6	3	3	6	8	2	0	21	0:55	89	4.10	5.35

Stryker Yosemite Bobcats

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.2

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	2.39	1.85	0.23	0.328	0.075
Assists	1	1.81	1.46	0.19	-0.553	-0.105
Shots	5	4.97	3.13	0.09	0.011	0.001
Passes	22	17.47	6.84	0.08	0.662	0.053
Saves	1	2.56	2.8	0.19	-0.556	-0.106
Blocks	0	0.83	0.94	0.11	-0.881	-0.097
Takeaways	4	7.15	4.67	0.11	-0.674	-0.074

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.252 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.495, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 goals against → 5.2

Pucker+74

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4	4.057	0.986	0.32	0.315
Shots	5	4.967	1.007	0.08	0.081
Saves	1	2.555	0.391	0.15	0.059
Blocks	0	0.828	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	4	7.148	0.56	0.12	0.067
Passes	22	17.474	1.259	0.08	0.101
Faceoff win rate	0.667	0.499	1.336	0.03	0.04

Σ 0.663 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.78 − 0.039 turnover penalty = 0.741 → ×100 = 74.07 → 74

Offensive6.91

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.308	0.105	0.4	3.933
Shooting %	0.6	0.482	0.2	1.393
Assists per pass	0.045	0.104	0.4	1.586

Σ contribution = 6.912

Defensive4.01

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.555	3.827	0.3	1.148
Blocks	0	0.828	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	4	7.148	4.344	0.25	1.086
Goals conceded	11	7.359	4.722	0.25	1.181

Σ contribution = 4.006

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Wendy's Cashier Yosemite Bobcats

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.7

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	4	2.39	1.85	0.23	0.868	0.2
Assists	4	1.81	1.46	0.19	1.499	0.285
Shots	5	4.97	3.13	0.09	0.011	0.001
Passes	16	17.47	6.84	0.08	-0.216	-0.017
Saves	4	2.56	2.8	0.19	0.517	0.098
Blocks	1	0.83	0.94	0.11	0.183	0.02
Takeaways	2	7.15	4.67	0.11	-1.103	-0.121

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.465 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.931, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 goals against → 6.7

Pucker+131

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	7.5	4.057	1.848	0.32	0.592
Shots	5	4.967	1.007	0.08	0.081
Saves	4	2.555	1.566	0.15	0.235
Blocks	1	0.828	1.208	0.07	0.085
Takeaways	2	7.148	0.28	0.12	0.034
Passes	16	17.474	0.916	0.08	0.073
Faceoff win rate	0.571	0.499	1.145	0.03	0.034

Σ 1.133 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.332 − 0.018 turnover penalty = 1.314 → ×100 = 131.46 → 131

Offensive8.27

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.131	0.105	0.4	2.786
Shooting %	0.8	0.482	0.2	1.663
Assists per pass	0.25	0.104	0.4	3.822

Σ contribution = 8.271

Defensive5.84

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	4	2.555	8.048	0.3	2.414
Blocks	1	0.828	6.821	0.2	1.364
Takeaways	2	7.148	3.532	0.25	0.883
Goals conceded	11	7.359	4.722	0.25	1.181

Σ contribution = 5.842

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

A Rambome Player Yosemite Bobcats

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.6

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	5	2.39	1.85	0.23	1.408	0.324
Assists	3	1.81	1.46	0.19	0.815	0.155
Shots	8	4.97	3.13	0.09	0.968	0.087
Passes	18	17.47	6.84	0.08	0.077	0.006
Saves	1	2.56	2.8	0.19	-0.556	-0.106
Blocks	0	0.83	0.94	0.11	-0.881	-0.097
Takeaways	4	7.15	4.67	0.11	-0.674	-0.074

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.295 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.59, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.2 goals against → 6.6

Pucker+117

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	8	4.057	1.972	0.32	0.631
Shots	8	4.967	1.611	0.08	0.129
Saves	1	2.555	0.391	0.15	0.059
Blocks	0	0.828	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	4	7.148	0.56	0.12	0.067
Passes	18	17.474	1.03	0.08	0.082
Faceoff win rate	0.417	0.499	0.835	0.03	0.025

Σ 0.993 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.168 → ×100 = 116.84 → 117

Offensive8.70

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.727	0.105	0.4	4
Shooting %	0.625	0.482	0.2	1.431
Assists per pass	0.167	0.104	0.4	3.271

Σ contribution = 8.702

Defensive4.01

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.555	3.827	0.3	1.148
Blocks	0	0.828	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	4	7.148	4.344	0.25	1.086
Goals conceded	11	7.359	4.722	0.25	1.181

Σ contribution = 4.006

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Jiggy Palm Bay Puck Hogs

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.5

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	5	2.39	1.85	0.23	1.408	0.324
Assists	2	1.81	1.46	0.19	0.131	0.025
Shots	7	4.97	3.13	0.09	0.649	0.058
Passes	16	17.47	6.84	0.08	-0.216	-0.017
Saves	1	2.56	2.8	0.19	-0.556	-0.106
Blocks	0	0.83	0.94	0.11	-0.881	-0.097
Takeaways	8	7.15	4.67	0.11	0.182	0.02

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.207 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.415, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.2 goals against → 6.5

Pucker+109

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	6.5	4.057	1.602	0.32	0.513
Shots	7	4.967	1.409	0.08	0.113
Saves	1	2.555	0.391	0.15	0.059
Blocks	0	0.828	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	8	7.148	1.119	0.12	0.134
Passes	16	17.474	0.916	0.08	0.073
Faceoff win rate	0.625	0.499	1.252	0.03	0.038

Σ 0.929 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.093 → ×100 = 109.32 → 109

Offensive8.17

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.28	0.105	0.4	3.889
Shooting %	0.714	0.482	0.2	1.559
Assists per pass	0.125	0.104	0.4	2.728

Σ contribution = 8.175

Defensive4.49

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.555	3.827	0.3	1.148
Blocks	0	0.828	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	8	7.148	6.474	0.25	1.619
Goals conceded	12	7.359	4.526	0.25	1.131

Σ contribution = 4.489

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Moo Dangles Palm Bay Puck Hogs

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.7

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	2.39	1.85	0.23	0.328	0.075
Assists	4	1.81	1.46	0.19	1.499	0.285
Shots	4	4.97	3.13	0.09	-0.309	-0.028
Passes	12	17.47	6.84	0.08	-0.801	-0.064
Saves	2	2.56	2.8	0.19	-0.199	-0.038
Blocks	2	0.83	0.94	0.11	1.247	0.137
Takeaways	5	7.15	4.67	0.11	-0.46	-0.051

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.317 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.635, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.2 goals against → 6.7

Pucker+126

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	7	4.057	1.725	0.32	0.552
Shots	4	4.967	0.805	0.08	0.064
Saves	2	2.555	0.783	0.15	0.117
Blocks	2	0.828	2.416	0.07	0.169
Takeaways	5	7.148	0.699	0.12	0.084
Passes	12	17.474	0.687	0.08	0.055
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.499	1.002	0.03	0.03

Σ 1.072 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.261 → ×100 = 126.12 → 126

Offensive9.57

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.7	0.105	0.4	4
Shooting %	0.75	0.482	0.2	1.605
Assists per pass	0.333	0.104	0.4	3.963

Σ contribution = 9.567

Defensive5.79

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	2.555	5.145	0.3	1.543
Blocks	2	0.828	9.555	0.2	1.911
Takeaways	5	7.148	4.833	0.25	1.208
Goals conceded	12	7.359	4.526	0.25	1.131

Σ contribution = 5.793

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Lil Arnie Palm Bay Puck Hogs

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.5

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	2.39	1.85	0.23	0.328	0.075
Assists	0	1.81	1.46	0.19	-1.237	-0.235
Shots	6	4.97	3.13	0.09	0.33	0.03
Passes	21	17.47	6.84	0.08	0.516	0.041
Saves	3	2.56	2.8	0.19	0.159	0.03
Blocks	0	0.83	0.94	0.11	-0.881	-0.097
Takeaways	8	7.15	4.67	0.11	0.182	0.02

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.135 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.729, then −0.2 goals against → 5.5

Pucker+89

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3	4.057	0.739	0.32	0.237
Shots	6	4.967	1.208	0.08	0.097
Saves	3	2.555	1.174	0.15	0.176
Blocks	0	0.828	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	8	7.148	1.119	0.12	0.134
Passes	21	17.474	1.202	0.08	0.096
Faceoff win rate	0.333	0.499	0.668	0.03	0.02

Σ 0.76 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.894 → ×100 = 89.39 → 89

Offensive4.10

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.055	0.105	0.4	1.684
Shooting %	0.5	0.482	0.2	1.23
Assists per pass	0	0.104	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 4.096

Defensive5.35

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	3	2.555	6.69	0.3	2.007
Blocks	0	0.828	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	8	7.148	6.474	0.25	1.619
Goals conceded	12	7.359	4.526	0.25	1.131

Σ contribution = 5.348

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.