Columbus Clappers vs Yosemite Grizzlies

CCHomeColumbus Clappers

9–6Final

YGAwayYosemite Grizzlies

Mar 8, 2022 · Pro Division · The Cenacle

MVP Wendy's Cashier · 8.0 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Columbus ClappersvsYosemite Grizzlies

23Shots914

8Saves614

11Faceoffs won47

30Takeaways1317

17Turnovers↓1330

4Blocks4

44Passes852

2:33Possession0:361:57

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Columbus Clappers

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
LemonBond	1	1	2	6	2	6	2	13	7	1	13	0:42	89	4.30	6.62
Panarin	4	1	5	6	6	1	1	13	6	3	14	1:24	163	5.14	8.58
Ridge	4	2	6	11	0	4	4	4	4	0	17	0:27	97	7.26	4.19

Yosemite Grizzlies

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Wendy's Cashier	3	1	4	5	10	1	2	12	12	3	16	1:12	170	4.87	8.24
A Rambome Player	1	2	3	3	4	4	5	0	10	1	18	0:16	80	6.89	5.78
hex	2	1	3	6	0	2	4	5	8	0	18	0:29	60	5.06	3.91

LemonBond Columbus Clappers

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.4

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	2.31	1.76	0.23	-0.745	-0.171
Assists	1	1.91	1.56	0.19	-0.583	-0.111
Shots	6	4.83	2.95	0.09	0.396	0.036
Passes	13	17.45	6.09	0.08	-0.73	-0.058
Saves	2	2.53	2.74	0.19	-0.192	-0.037
Blocks	1	0.86	1.03	0.11	0.136	0.015
Takeaways	13	7.91	4.97	0.11	1.024	0.113

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.214 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.573, then +0.3 takeaways, −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting → 5.4

Pucker+89

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2	4.048	0.494	0.32	0.158
Shots	6	4.833	1.241	0.08	0.099
Saves	2	2.526	0.792	0.15	0.119
Blocks	1	0.86	1.163	0.07	0.081
Takeaways	13	7.909	1.644	0.12	0.197
Passes	13	17.445	0.745	0.08	0.06
Faceoff win rate	0.75	0.498	1.506	0.03	0.045

Σ 0.76 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.894 → ×100 = 89.37 → 89

Offensive4.30

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.048	0.102	0.4	1.619
Shooting %	0.167	0.477	0.2	0.742
Assists per pass	0.077	0.109	0.4	1.94

Σ contribution = 4.3

Defensive6.62

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	2.526	5.178	0.3	1.554
Blocks	1	0.86	6.647	0.2	1.329
Takeaways	13	7.909	8.27	0.25	2.067
Goals conceded	6	7.045	6.69	0.25	1.672

Σ contribution = 6.622

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Panarin Columbus Clappers

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR7.6

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	4	2.31	1.76	0.23	0.965	0.222
Assists	1	1.91	1.56	0.19	-0.583	-0.111
Shots	6	4.83	2.95	0.09	0.396	0.036
Passes	14	17.45	6.09	0.08	-0.566	-0.045
Saves	6	2.53	2.74	0.19	1.268	0.241
Blocks	3	0.86	1.03	0.11	2.073	0.228
Takeaways	13	7.91	4.97	0.11	1.024	0.113

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.683 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.366, then +0.3 takeaways, +0.25 hot shooting, −0.3 turnovers → 7.6

Pucker+163

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	5	4.048	1.235	0.32	0.395
Shots	6	4.833	1.241	0.08	0.099
Saves	6	2.526	2.375	0.15	0.356
Blocks	3	0.86	3.489	0.07	0.244
Takeaways	13	7.909	1.644	0.12	0.197
Passes	14	17.445	0.803	0.08	0.064
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.498	1.004	0.03	0.03

Σ 1.387 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.631 → ×100 = 163.14 → 163

Offensive5.14

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.06	0.102	0.4	1.768
Shooting %	0.667	0.477	0.2	1.502
Assists per pass	0.071	0.109	0.4	1.867

Σ contribution = 5.137

Defensive8.58

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	6	2.526	9.519	0.3	2.856
Blocks	3	0.86	9.945	0.2	1.989
Takeaways	13	7.909	8.27	0.25	2.067
Goals conceded	6	7.045	6.69	0.25	1.672

Σ contribution = 8.584

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Ridge Columbus Clappers

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.9

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	4	2.31	1.76	0.23	0.965	0.222
Assists	2	1.91	1.56	0.19	0.06	0.011
Shots	11	4.83	2.95	0.09	2.093	0.188
Passes	17	17.45	6.09	0.08	-0.073	-0.006
Saves	0	2.53	2.74	0.19	-0.922	-0.175
Blocks	0	0.86	1.03	0.11	-0.833	-0.092
Takeaways	4	7.91	4.97	0.11	-0.786	-0.087

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.062 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.125, then −0.2 cold shooting → 5.9

Pucker+97

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	6	4.048	1.482	0.32	0.474
Shots	11	4.833	2.276	0.08	0.182
Saves	0	2.526	0	0.15	0
Blocks	0	0.86	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	4	7.909	0.506	0.12	0.061
Passes	17	17.445	0.974	0.08	0.078
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.498	1.004	0.03	0.03

Σ 0.825 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.971 → ×100 = 97.08 → 97

Offensive7.26

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.222	0.102	0.4	3.721
Shooting %	0.364	0.477	0.2	1.013
Assists per pass	0.118	0.109	0.4	2.522

Σ contribution = 7.257

Defensive4.19

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.526	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	0	0.86	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	4	7.909	4.17	0.25	1.042
Goals conceded	6	7.045	6.69	0.25	1.672

Σ contribution = 4.191

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Wendy's Cashier Yosemite Grizzlies

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR8.0

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	2.31	1.76	0.23	0.395	0.091
Assists	1	1.91	1.56	0.19	-0.583	-0.111
Shots	5	4.83	2.95	0.09	0.057	0.005
Passes	16	17.45	6.09	0.08	-0.237	-0.019
Saves	10	2.53	2.74	0.19	2.729	0.518
Blocks	3	0.86	1.03	0.11	2.073	0.228
Takeaways	12	7.91	4.97	0.11	0.823	0.091

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.803 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.607, then +0.35 saves, +0.3 takeaways, +0.25 hot shooting, −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 goals against → 8.0

Pucker+170

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4	4.048	0.988	0.32	0.316
Shots	5	4.833	1.034	0.08	0.083
Saves	10	2.526	3.958	0.15	0.594
Blocks	3	0.86	3.489	0.07	0.244
Takeaways	12	7.909	1.517	0.12	0.182
Passes	16	17.445	0.917	0.08	0.073
Faceoff win rate	0.333	0.498	0.669	0.03	0.02

Σ 1.512 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.779 − 0.079 turnover penalty = 1.7 → ×100 = 170.09 → 170

Offensive4.87

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.056	0.102	0.4	1.717
Shooting %	0.6	0.477	0.2	1.401
Assists per pass	0.062	0.109	0.4	1.754

Σ contribution = 4.872

Defensive8.24

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	10	2.526	9.978	0.3	2.994
Blocks	3	0.86	9.945	0.2	1.989
Takeaways	12	7.909	7.903	0.25	1.976
Goals conceded	9	7.045	5.144	0.25	1.286

Σ contribution = 8.245

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

A Rambome Player Yosemite Grizzlies

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.8

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	2.31	1.76	0.23	-0.745	-0.171
Assists	2	1.91	1.56	0.19	0.06	0.011
Shots	3	4.83	2.95	0.09	-0.622	-0.056
Passes	18	17.45	6.09	0.08	0.091	0.007
Saves	4	2.53	2.74	0.19	0.538	0.102
Blocks	1	0.86	1.03	0.11	0.136	0.015
Takeaways	0	7.91	4.97	0.11	-1.591	-0.175

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.266 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.467, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting, −0.2 goals against → 4.8

Pucker+80

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3	4.048	0.741	0.32	0.237
Shots	3	4.833	0.621	0.08	0.05
Saves	4	2.526	1.583	0.15	0.237
Blocks	1	0.86	1.163	0.07	0.081
Takeaways	0	7.909	0	0.12	0
Passes	18	17.445	1.032	0.08	0.083
Faceoff win rate	0.444	0.498	0.892	0.03	0.027

Σ 0.715 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.841 − 0.04 turnover penalty = 0.801 → ×100 = 80.08 → 80

Offensive6.89

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.188	0.102	0.4	3.493
Shooting %	0.333	0.477	0.2	0.966
Assists per pass	0.111	0.109	0.4	2.427

Σ contribution = 6.886

Defensive5.78

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	4	2.526	8.1	0.3	2.43
Blocks	1	0.86	6.647	0.2	1.329
Takeaways	0	7.909	2.954	0.25	0.738
Goals conceded	9	7.045	5.144	0.25	1.286

Σ contribution = 5.783

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

hex Yosemite Grizzlies

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR4.4

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	2.31	1.76	0.23	-0.175	-0.04
Assists	1	1.91	1.56	0.19	-0.583	-0.111
Shots	6	4.83	2.95	0.09	0.396	0.036
Passes	18	17.45	6.09	0.08	0.091	0.007
Saves	0	2.53	2.74	0.19	-0.922	-0.175
Blocks	0	0.86	1.03	0.11	-0.833	-0.092
Takeaways	5	7.91	4.97	0.11	-0.585	-0.064

6.0 + clip(Σ −0.439 × 2, −3 to 3) = 5.121, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting, −0.2 goals against → 4.4

Pucker+60

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3	4.048	0.741	0.32	0.237
Shots	6	4.833	1.241	0.08	0.099
Saves	0	2.526	0	0.15	0
Blocks	0	0.86	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	5	7.909	0.632	0.12	0.076
Passes	18	17.445	1.032	0.08	0.083
Faceoff win rate	0.333	0.498	0.669	0.03	0.02

Σ 0.515 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 0.606 − 0.002 turnover penalty = 0.604 → ×100 = 60.35 → 60

Offensive5.06

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.103	0.102	0.4	2.42
Shooting %	0.333	0.477	0.2	0.966
Assists per pass	0.056	0.109	0.4	1.671

Σ contribution = 5.057

Defensive3.91

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.526	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	0	0.86	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	5	7.909	4.592	0.25	1.148
Goals conceded	9	7.045	5.144	0.25	1.286

Σ contribution = 3.911

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.