Colorado Cobras vs Pittsburgh Vipers

CCHomeColorado Cobras

7–14Final

PVAwayPittsburgh Vipers

Feb 10, 2022 · Pro Division · The Hog Hole

MVP [PIT] Enry · 8.4 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Perf is a 0 to 10 Alto rating, 6.0 being league average. Click any Perf number to see the working behind it.

Colorado Cobras

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
[COB] Rokybo	2	4	6	3	5	2	10	3	8	0	15	0:19	106	9.28	5.28
[COW] Crusade	4	2	6	9	0	4	4	4	17	1	17	0:15	85	7.66	4.30
[MM/QUE] Doug	1	2	3	1	10	1	3	11	12	0	12	0:53	110	6.74	6.50

Pittsburgh Vipers

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
[LIL] milk	9	0	9	17	0	7	3	4	8	2	31	0:28	165	6.43	5.33
[PIT] Enry	2	8	10	4	5	5	2	16	4	0	12	1:36	176	7.67	7.07
[PLY] ChristianFF	3	2	5	8	1	5	2	18	6	0	28	1:16	121	4.75	5.60

Rokybo Colorado Cobras

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

Performance5.9

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	2.31	1.76	0.23	-0.175	-0.04
Assists	4	1.91	1.56	0.19	1.346	0.256
Shots	3	4.83	2.95	0.09	-0.622	-0.056
Passes	15	17.45	6.09	0.08	-0.402	-0.032
Saves	5	2.53	2.74	0.19	0.903	0.172
Blocks	0	0.86	1.03	0.11	-0.833	-0.092
Takeaways	3	7.91	4.97	0.11	-0.988	-0.109

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.099 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.198, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 goals against → 5.9

Pucker+106

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	5.5	4.048	1.359	0.32	0.435
Shots	3	4.833	0.621	0.08	0.05
Saves	5	2.526	1.979	0.15	0.297
Blocks	0	0.86	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	3	7.909	0.379	0.12	0.046
Passes	15	17.445	0.86	0.08	0.069
Faceoff win rate	0.167	0.498	0.335	0.03	0.01

Σ 0.906 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.065 − 0.002 turnover penalty = 1.063 → ×100 = 106.31 → 106

Offensive9.28

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.316	0.102	0.4	3.952
Shooting %	0.667	0.477	0.2	1.502
Assists per pass	0.267	0.109	0.4	3.83

Σ contribution = 9.284

Defensive5.28

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	5	2.526	9.011	0.3	2.703
Blocks	0	0.86	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	3	7.909	3.794	0.25	0.948
Goals conceded	14	7.045	4.162	0.25	1.04

Σ contribution = 5.282

League average is 6.0 on Performance, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Crusade Colorado Cobras

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

Performance5.7

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	4	2.31	1.76	0.23	0.965	0.222
Assists	2	1.91	1.56	0.19	0.06	0.011
Shots	9	4.83	2.95	0.09	1.414	0.127
Passes	17	17.45	6.09	0.08	-0.073	-0.006
Saves	0	2.53	2.74	0.19	-0.922	-0.175
Blocks	1	0.86	1.03	0.11	0.136	0.015
Takeaways	4	7.91	4.97	0.11	-0.786	-0.087

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.108 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.216, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 goals against → 5.7

Pucker+85

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	6	4.048	1.482	0.32	0.474
Shots	9	4.833	1.862	0.08	0.149
Saves	0	2.526	0	0.15	0
Blocks	1	0.86	1.163	0.07	0.081
Takeaways	4	7.909	0.506	0.12	0.061
Passes	17	17.445	0.974	0.08	0.078
Faceoff win rate	0.5	0.498	1.004	0.03	0.03

Σ 0.873 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.028 − 0.174 turnover penalty = 0.854 → ×100 = 85.39 → 85

Offensive7.66

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.4	0.102	0.4	3.991
Shooting %	0.444	0.477	0.2	1.145
Assists per pass	0.118	0.109	0.4	2.522

Σ contribution = 7.658

Defensive4.30

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.526	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	1	0.86	6.647	0.2	1.329
Takeaways	4	7.909	4.17	0.25	1.042
Goals conceded	14	7.045	4.162	0.25	1.04

Σ contribution = 4.297

League average is 6.0 on Performance, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Doug Colorado Cobras

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

Performance6.4

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	2.31	1.76	0.23	-0.745	-0.171
Assists	2	1.91	1.56	0.19	0.06	0.011
Shots	1	4.83	2.95	0.09	-1.301	-0.117
Passes	12	17.45	6.09	0.08	-0.894	-0.072
Saves	10	2.53	2.74	0.19	2.729	0.518
Blocks	0	0.86	1.03	0.11	-0.833	-0.092
Takeaways	11	7.91	4.97	0.11	0.622	0.068

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.147 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.294, then +0.35 saves, +0.25 hot shooting, −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 goals against → 6.4

Pucker+110

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	2	4.048	0.494	0.32	0.158
Shots	1	4.833	0.207	0.08	0.017
Saves	10	2.526	3.958	0.15	0.594
Blocks	0	0.86	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	11	7.909	1.391	0.12	0.167
Passes	12	17.445	0.688	0.08	0.055
Faceoff win rate	0.25	0.498	0.502	0.03	0.015

Σ 1.005 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.183 − 0.079 turnover penalty = 1.104 → ×100 = 110.43 → 110

Offensive6.74

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.057	0.102	0.4	1.73
Shooting %	1	0.477	0.2	1.839
Assists per pass	0.167	0.109	0.4	3.171

Σ contribution = 6.74

Defensive6.50

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	10	2.526	9.978	0.3	2.994
Blocks	0	0.86	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	11	7.909	7.489	0.25	1.872
Goals conceded	14	7.045	4.162	0.25	1.04

Σ contribution = 6.497

League average is 6.0 on Performance, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

milk Pittsburgh Vipers

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

Performance8.3

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	9	2.31	1.76	0.23	3.813	0.877
Assists	0	1.91	1.56	0.19	-1.226	-0.233
Shots	17	4.83	2.95	0.09	4.129	0.372
Passes	31	17.45	6.09	0.08	2.227	0.178
Saves	0	2.53	2.74	0.19	-0.922	-0.175
Blocks	2	0.86	1.03	0.11	1.104	0.121
Takeaways	4	7.91	4.97	0.11	-0.786	-0.087

6.0 + clip(Σ 1.054 × 2, −3 to 3) = 8.107, then +0.5 hat trick, −0.3 turnovers → 8.3

Pucker+165

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	9	4.048	2.223	0.32	0.712
Shots	17	4.833	3.517	0.08	0.281
Saves	0	2.526	0	0.15	0
Blocks	2	0.86	2.326	0.07	0.163
Takeaways	4	7.909	0.506	0.12	0.061
Passes	31	17.445	1.777	0.08	0.142
Faceoff win rate	0.7	0.498	1.405	0.03	0.042

Σ 1.401 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.648 − 0.002 turnover penalty = 1.646 → ×100 = 164.56 → 165

Offensive6.43

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.321	0.102	0.4	3.957
Shooting %	0.529	0.477	0.2	1.287
Assists per pass	0	0.109	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 6.425

Defensive5.33

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.526	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	2	0.86	9.473	0.2	1.895
Takeaways	4	7.909	4.17	0.25	1.042
Goals conceded	7	7.045	6.026	0.25	1.506

Σ contribution = 5.329

League average is 6.0 on Performance, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Enry Pittsburgh Vipers

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

Performance8.4

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	2.31	1.76	0.23	-0.175	-0.04
Assists	8	1.91	1.56	0.19	3.918	0.744
Shots	4	4.83	2.95	0.09	-0.283	-0.025
Passes	12	17.45	6.09	0.08	-0.894	-0.072
Saves	5	2.53	2.74	0.19	0.903	0.172
Blocks	0	0.86	1.03	0.11	-0.833	-0.092
Takeaways	16	7.91	4.97	0.11	1.628	0.179

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.866 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.733, then +0.4 playmaker, +0.3 takeaways → 8.4

Pucker+176

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	10	4.048	2.47	0.32	0.791
Shots	4	4.833	0.828	0.08	0.066
Saves	5	2.526	1.979	0.15	0.297
Blocks	0	0.86	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	16	7.909	2.023	0.12	0.243
Passes	12	17.445	0.688	0.08	0.055
Faceoff win rate	0.714	0.498	1.434	0.03	0.043

Σ 1.494 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.758 → ×100 = 175.82 → 176

Offensive7.67

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.104	0.102	0.4	2.431
Shooting %	0.5	0.477	0.2	1.238
Assists per pass	0.667	0.109	0.4	4

Σ contribution = 7.669

Defensive7.07

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	5	2.526	9.011	0.3	2.703
Blocks	0	0.86	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	16	7.909	9.085	0.25	2.271
Goals conceded	7	7.045	6.026	0.25	1.506

Σ contribution = 7.071

League average is 6.0 on Performance, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

ChristianFF Pittsburgh Vipers

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

Performance6.5

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	3	2.31	1.76	0.23	0.395	0.091
Assists	2	1.91	1.56	0.19	0.06	0.011
Shots	8	4.83	2.95	0.09	1.075	0.097
Passes	28	17.45	6.09	0.08	1.734	0.139
Saves	1	2.53	2.74	0.19	-0.557	-0.106
Blocks	0	0.86	1.03	0.11	-0.833	-0.092
Takeaways	18	7.91	4.97	0.11	2.031	0.223

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.364 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.727, then +0.3 takeaways, −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting → 6.5

Pucker+121

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	5	4.048	1.235	0.32	0.395
Shots	8	4.833	1.655	0.08	0.132
Saves	1	2.526	0.396	0.15	0.059
Blocks	0	0.86	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	18	7.909	2.276	0.12	0.273
Passes	28	17.445	1.605	0.08	0.128
Faceoff win rate	0.714	0.498	1.434	0.03	0.043

Σ 1.032 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.214 → ×100 = 121.37 → 121

Offensive4.75

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.066	0.102	0.4	1.853
Shooting %	0.375	0.477	0.2	1.031
Assists per pass	0.071	0.109	0.4	1.867

Σ contribution = 4.751

Defensive5.60

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.526	3.84	0.3	1.152
Blocks	0	0.86	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	18	7.909	9.422	0.25	2.355
Goals conceded	7	7.045	6.026	0.25	1.506

Σ contribution = 5.604

League average is 6.0 on Performance, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.