Yosemite Grizzlies vs Tampa Bay Turtles

YGHomeYosemite Grizzlies

7–8Final

TBAwayTampa Bay Turtles

Sep 1, 2021 · Pro Division · Da Woods

MVP Blue · 7.9 performance rating

Writing the recap…

Yosemite GrizzliesvsTampa Bay Turtles

17Shots219

11Saves110

8Faceoffs won19

25Takeaways530

30Turnovers↓525

2Blocks2

57Passes156

2:10Possession0:152:25

APR is the Alto Performance Rating: 0 to 10, with 6.0 league average. Click any APR to see the working.

Yosemite Grizzlies

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Kylar	1	3	4	2	4	2	3	15	3	1	14	1:23	122	6.60	7.58
A Rambome Player	2	3	5	3	6	3	5	2	6	1	17	0:14	120	8.94	6.58
Green	4	0	4	12	1	3	1	8	21	0	26	0:33	76	4.87	4.68

Tampa Bay Turtles

Player	G	A	Pts	Shots	Saves	FOW	FOL	TK	TO	Blk	Passes	GWG	Poss	Pucker+	Off	Def
Blue	1	5	6	5	8	2	3	10	9	2	16	0	1:07	175	6.96	8.23
dave	5	1	6	10	0	1	3	4	7	0	25	0	0:14	101	6.79	4.01
noxu	2	2	4	4	2	6	2	16	9	0	15	1	1:04	97	6.01	5.96

Kylar Yosemite Grizzlies

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.4

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	2.2	1.63	0.23	-0.739	-0.17
Assists	3	1.79	1.54	0.19	0.79	0.15
Shots	2	4.65	2.59	0.09	-1.024	-0.092
Passes	14	18.12	7.88	0.08	-0.523	-0.042
Saves	4	2.45	2.55	0.19	0.609	0.116
Blocks	1	0.73	0.94	0.11	0.289	0.032
Takeaways	15	7.39	4.7	0.11	1.622	0.178

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.172 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.344, then +0.3 takeaways, −0.2 goals against → 6.4

Pucker+122

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4	3.884	1.03	0.32	0.33
Shots	2	4.651	0.43	0.08	0.034
Saves	4	2.448	1.634	0.15	0.245
Blocks	1	0.729	1.371	0.07	0.096
Takeaways	15	7.386	2.031	0.12	0.244
Passes	14	18.121	0.773	0.08	0.062
Faceoff win rate	0.4	0.5	0.8	0.03	0.024

Σ 1.035 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.217 → ×100 = 121.71 → 122

Offensive6.60

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.048	0.101	0.4	1.633
Shooting %	0.5	0.474	0.2	1.244
Assists per pass	0.214	0.099	0.4	3.721

Σ contribution = 6.598

Defensive7.58

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	4	2.448	8.243	0.3	2.473
Blocks	1	0.729	7.419	0.2	1.484
Takeaways	15	7.386	9.097	0.25	2.274
Goals conceded	8	6.739	5.374	0.25	1.344

Σ contribution = 7.575

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

A Rambome Player Yosemite Grizzlies

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.2

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	2.2	1.63	0.23	-0.125	-0.029
Assists	3	1.79	1.54	0.19	0.79	0.15
Shots	3	4.65	2.59	0.09	-0.637	-0.057
Passes	17	18.12	7.88	0.08	-0.142	-0.011
Saves	6	2.45	2.55	0.19	1.395	0.265
Blocks	1	0.73	0.94	0.11	0.289	0.032
Takeaways	2	7.39	4.7	0.11	-1.147	-0.126

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.223 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.446, then +0.25 hot shooting, −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 goals against → 6.2

Pucker+120

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4.5	3.884	1.159	0.32	0.371
Shots	3	4.651	0.645	0.08	0.052
Saves	6	2.448	2.451	0.15	0.368
Blocks	1	0.729	1.371	0.07	0.096
Takeaways	2	7.386	0.271	0.12	0.032
Passes	17	18.121	0.938	0.08	0.075
Faceoff win rate	0.375	0.5	0.75	0.03	0.022

Σ 1.016 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.195 → ×100 = 119.53 → 120

Offensive8.94

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.357	0.101	0.4	3.98
Shooting %	0.667	0.474	0.2	1.509
Assists per pass	0.176	0.099	0.4	3.454

Σ contribution = 8.943

Defensive6.58

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	6	2.448	9.584	0.3	2.875
Blocks	1	0.729	7.419	0.2	1.484
Takeaways	2	7.386	3.51	0.25	0.877
Goals conceded	8	6.739	5.374	0.25	1.344

Σ contribution = 6.58

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Green Yosemite Grizzlies

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR5.7

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	4	2.2	1.63	0.23	1.104	0.254
Assists	0	1.79	1.54	0.19	-1.162	-0.221
Shots	12	4.65	2.59	0.09	2.838	0.255
Passes	26	18.12	7.88	0.08	1	0.08
Saves	1	2.45	2.55	0.19	-0.569	-0.108
Blocks	0	0.73	0.94	0.11	-0.778	-0.086
Takeaways	8	7.39	4.7	0.11	0.131	0.014

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.189 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.379, then −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting, −0.2 goals against → 5.7

Pucker+76

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	4	3.884	1.03	0.32	0.33
Shots	12	4.651	2.58	0.08	0.206
Saves	1	2.448	0.409	0.15	0.061
Blocks	0	0.729	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	8	7.386	1.083	0.12	0.13
Passes	26	18.121	1.435	0.08	0.115
Faceoff win rate	0.75	0.5	1.499	0.03	0.045

Σ 0.887 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.044 − 0.279 turnover penalty = 0.765 → ×100 = 76.46 → 76

Offensive4.87

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.121	0.101	0.4	2.717
Shooting %	0.333	0.474	0.2	0.97
Assists per pass	0	0.099	0.4	1.181

Σ contribution = 4.869

Defensive4.68

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	1	2.448	3.876	0.3	1.163
Blocks	0	0.729	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	8	7.386	6.332	0.25	1.583
Goals conceded	8	6.739	5.374	0.25	1.344

Σ contribution = 4.681

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

Blue Tampa Bay Turtles

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR7.9

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	1	2.2	1.63	0.23	-0.739	-0.17
Assists	5	1.79	1.54	0.19	2.091	0.397
Shots	5	4.65	2.59	0.09	0.135	0.012
Passes	16	18.12	7.88	0.08	-0.269	-0.022
Saves	8	2.45	2.55	0.19	2.18	0.414
Blocks	2	0.73	0.94	0.11	1.355	0.149
Takeaways	10	7.39	4.7	0.11	0.557	0.061

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.842 × 2, −3 to 3) = 7.685, then +0.4 playmaker, +0.35 saves, −0.3 turnovers, −0.2 cold shooting → 7.9

Pucker+175

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	6	3.884	1.545	0.32	0.494
Shots	5	4.651	1.075	0.08	0.086
Saves	8	2.448	3.268	0.15	0.49
Blocks	2	0.729	2.742	0.07	0.192
Takeaways	10	7.386	1.354	0.12	0.162
Passes	16	18.121	0.883	0.08	0.071
Faceoff win rate	0.4	0.5	0.8	0.03	0.024

Σ 1.52 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.788 − 0.034 turnover penalty = 1.754 → ×100 = 175.39 → 175

Offensive6.96

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.09	0.101	0.4	2.22
Shooting %	0.2	0.474	0.2	0.783
Assists per pass	0.312	0.099	0.4	3.959

Σ contribution = 6.963

Defensive8.23

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	8	2.448	9.915	0.3	2.975
Blocks	2	0.729	9.762	0.2	1.952
Takeaways	10	7.386	7.36	0.25	1.84
Goals conceded	7	6.739	5.851	0.25	1.463

Σ contribution = 8.23

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

dave Tampa Bay Turtles

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.1

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	5	2.2	1.63	0.23	1.718	0.395
Assists	1	1.79	1.54	0.19	-0.511	-0.097
Shots	10	4.65	2.59	0.09	2.065	0.186
Passes	25	18.12	7.88	0.08	0.873	0.07
Saves	0	2.45	2.55	0.19	-0.961	-0.183
Blocks	0	0.73	0.94	0.11	-0.778	-0.086
Takeaways	4	7.39	4.7	0.11	-0.721	-0.079

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.206 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.413, then −0.3 turnovers → 6.1

Pucker+101

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	6	3.884	1.545	0.32	0.494
Shots	10	4.651	2.15	0.08	0.172
Saves	0	2.448	0	0.15	0
Blocks	0	0.729	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	4	7.386	0.542	0.12	0.065
Passes	25	18.121	1.38	0.08	0.11
Faceoff win rate	0.25	0.5	0.5	0.03	0.015

Σ 0.857 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.008 → ×100 = 100.79 → 101

Offensive6.79

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.429	0.101	0.4	3.995
Shooting %	0.5	0.474	0.2	1.244
Assists per pass	0.04	0.099	0.4	1.547

Σ contribution = 6.787

Defensive4.01

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	0	2.448	2.954	0.3	0.886
Blocks	0	0.729	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	4	7.386	4.285	0.25	1.071
Goals conceded	7	6.739	5.851	0.25	1.463

Σ contribution = 4.011

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.

noxu Tampa Bay Turtles

rated once over the whole game. Baseline: the player's own division.

APR6.1

Stat	Value	League avg	Std dev	Weight	z	Contribution
Goals	2	2.2	1.63	0.23	-0.125	-0.029
Assists	2	1.79	1.54	0.19	0.139	0.026
Shots	4	4.65	2.59	0.09	-0.251	-0.023
Passes	15	18.12	7.88	0.08	-0.396	-0.032
Saves	2	2.45	2.55	0.19	-0.176	-0.033
Blocks	0	0.73	0.94	0.11	-0.778	-0.086
Takeaways	16	7.39	4.7	0.11	1.834	0.202

6.0 + clip(Σ 0.026 × 2, −3 to 3) = 6.053, then +0.3 takeaways, −0.3 turnovers → 6.1

Pucker+97

Stat	Value	League rate	Ratio	Weight	Contribution
Goal contribution	3.5	3.884	0.901	0.32	0.288
Shots	4	4.651	0.86	0.08	0.069
Saves	2	2.448	0.817	0.15	0.123
Blocks	0	0.729	0	0.07	0
Takeaways	16	7.386	2.166	0.12	0.26
Passes	15	18.121	0.828	0.08	0.066
Faceoff win rate	0.75	0.5	1.499	0.03	0.045

Σ 0.851 ÷ Σ weights 0.85 = 1.001 − 0.034 turnover penalty = 0.967 → ×100 = 96.72 → 97

Offensive6.01

Rate	Value	League	Weight	Contribution
Points per possession-sec	0.063	0.101	0.4	1.819
Shooting %	0.5	0.474	0.2	1.244
Assists per pass	0.133	0.099	0.4	2.942

Σ contribution = 6.005

Defensive5.96

Stat	Value	League rate	d(ratio)	Weight	Contribution
Saves	2	2.448	5.276	0.3	1.583
Blocks	0	0.729	2.954	0.2	0.591
Takeaways	16	7.386	9.292	0.25	2.323
Goals conceded	7	6.739	5.851	0.25	1.463

Σ contribution = 5.96

League average is 6.0 on APR, Offensive and Defensive, and 100 on Pucker+. Every formula.